Paris, France - The war is making the world more dangerous because no protagonist will achieve any of its goals. Moreover, each might be tempted, at worst, to extend the war or at best to achieve a temporary peace agreement...
» Back to full entry
» Back to full entry


All Comments (4)
abtfzrvu qmou cvnq rfhsjeywb szgwmy qfbzmucxh mvzbiluf
December 30, 2007 3:28 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on December 30, 2007 03:28
honeyedness nonstriated redd apery honeymoonshine ashpit libertinage kaliana
New York Pizza Depot
http://www.pvillepresby.org/
December 16, 2007 12:38 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on December 16, 2007 00:38
I agree. Instead of spending so much money on the Iraq war (340 billion) and the US military (420 billion), Americans should be spending at least some of this on global poverty in order to discourage more terrorism and wars. In reality only .16% of the US federal budget is spent on poverty reduction, the least among wealthy nations.
January 30, 2007 11:35 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on January 30, 2007 11:35
Invitation for perpetual peace
Though it is looking a mad's dream to talk about a global invitation for a perpetual
peace in the climax of conflicts and in worst fall of civilizations but being part of
a global community with a sense of humanity, I believe it is my duty to invite my
fellow human beings for a dailogue on a issue that is the ultimate goal of all human
acheivements, directions and dimensions and that is, "perpetual peace".
Mecheiveli, defined the politics as,"perpetual conflict" but neither he defined the
conflict nor he told the end result of the conflict as he might thought that in
presence of perpetual conflict there would be no perpetual consensus or in other
phrase, "perpetual peace". But I must add that when there are ranges and varieties of
equilibriums in ever spreading universe why there couldn't be ranges and varieties of
"peace" in ever increasing and growing conflicts?
We know that equilibriums are evolving to attain the perpetual equilibrium or
universal equilibrium or simply, "end result of big bang", so why we can't consider
that the conflicts are also evoloving to attain the perpetual peace, that is the end
result of barbarianism" or "excellence of humanity"..........?
I accept that conflicts never end and will always be on work a, "hub of evolution"
but I also believe that, "conflicts are also evolving" and this evolution would
distinguish us from the "perpetual conflicts of beasts". What I mean by peace is not
end of conflicts but evolution of conflicts from beastly competition to human
Competitions. Competitions that ensures "freedoms of human consciousness" which lead
us to huaman excellence". What human consruct are "civilizations" and what human
compete each otherin conflicts is vision of human on,"civilizations". It is inhuman to
destroy a civilization. It is just expression of shallowness in level of evolution or
more clearly,"expression of beastly conflicts".
I accept that conflicts never end and will always be on work as "hub of evolution" but conflicts
are also evoloving. It needs a serious global consideration, debates and consensus to make people
around the globe aware of the mechanism of "evolution of conflicts" that make us more close to the
perpetual peace.
I have a very clear vision of "evolution of conflicts" but I want to hear the global voices of the
deeplydivided world indulged in shallow conflicts. May be they themselves rech to the result. I
am looking forward a shift of mechanism from "profitism" to "humanism".
I know that this topics do not match your policies that are based on profitism and hence all these
would look utopian and impractical in these dark ages.......yes.............oh....yes?????????
But I am just doing my duty.......as I am in debt to humanity that they taught me by their mistakes.
Mistakes that perished lives and perishing lives..........................................
KHUDA DAD AZARA
Quetta
khdddazara@yahoo.com
July 25, 2006 8:59 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on July 25, 2006 08:59