By Debra DeLee and James Zogby
Washington, DC - We were a little anxious when we decided to jointly poll Jewish and Arab Americans on Middle East peace this year.
Not that we haven’t done it before. Similar surveys that we commissioned three times in the past six years have shown that American Jews and Arabs largely see eye-to-eye on the importance of efforts to achieve peace between Israel and its neighbors and on the vital role that the U.S. must play to promote such efforts.
But this year is different. Israeli and Palestinian morale is at an all-time low. People in the region, despaired by ongoing violence, revenge, fanaticism, corruption and lack of leadership, have almost given up on hope for real peace. With no political horizon in sight, a sense of hopelessness dominates public opinion in the region. And Americans with ties to the region – whether Arabs or Jews – pick up on this sentiment. We were concerned that the grim situation on the ground would reduce support for peace efforts among our respective communities.
As expected, our poll shows that most American Jews (73%) and of Arab Americans (63%) are mostly pessimistic about Middle East peace.
Yet despite the skepticism, most American Jews and Arabs, according to the poll, still want to see our government lead a diplomatic process that would bring peace and security to their brethren in the region.
Moreover, the poll shows that most will take that policy-priority to the voting booth in November 2008. Only 3% said that they are less likely to vote for a presidential candidate who promises to take an active role in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, while a large majority of American Jews (68%) and Arabs (64%) said that they are more likely to vote for such a candidate. Significant majorities in both communities also said that they are more likely to vote for a presidential candidate who promises to support peace negotiations between Israel and Syria.
Our poll sends an unmistakable message to presidential candidates: withdrawing from America’s traditional role as a peace-broker between Israel and its Arab neighbors is not the way to win the Jewish or Arab vote. Neither is downplaying the use of diplomacy in other parts of the Middle East. In other words, a repeat of President Bush’s Mideast policy approach will not attract Jewish or Arab voters. When asked how they rate President Bush’s handling of the Arab-Israeli conflict, 76% of Arab Americans and a whopping 80% of American Jews said it was ineffective. In comparison, 65% of Arab Americans and 76% of American Jews rated President Clinton’s handling of the conflict as effective. Clinton, it should be reminded, invested significant amounts of his time in trying to personally mediate between Israeli and Arab leaders.
Overwhelming majorities in both communities, Jewish and Arab, said they believe that such efforts are vital to American interests. 91% of Arab Americans and 96% of American Jews agreed that trying to achieve peace, security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians is important to U.S. strategic interests. A large majority, 80% in each community, agreed that American efforts to resolve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict will help the U.S. achieve its broader goals in the Middle East.
Further illustrating the strong support in both communities for diplomatic engagement in the Middle East is the high percentage of respondents in both communities who said that America should engage in serious diplomacy with Iran rather than focus on preparations for military action. 79% of Arab Americans and 73% of American Jews preferred focusing on diplomatic action.
While we hope that politicians take note of the poll’s results, we will continue to follow the message this survey sends. An overwhelming majority, some 90% in both communities, said that it is important for Jewish and Arab Americans to work together to promote a Middle East peace in which Israelis and Palestinians live in independent states of their own. This survey reinvigorates us, the head of a Jewish American organization and the head of an Arab American organization, to keep on struggling, jointly, to achieve that goal.
-------------------
Debra DeLee is the president and CEO of Americans for Peace Now, a Jewish organization that advocates security for Israel through peace and supports Israel’s Peace Now movement.
James Zogby is the president of the Arab American Institute, an advocacy organization that focuses on public policy issues that concern Arab Americans and U.S. – Arab relations.
This article is distributed by the Common Ground News Service.
Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.
Comments (4)
keeeeeep ooooooooooooooooooo
December 20, 2007 6:52 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on December 20, 2007 06:52
Thank GOD, You found out something, that this world realy need. http://mike18movies.ifrance.com/
November 3, 2007 10:05 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on November 3, 2007 22:05
Had a billion American Indians inhabited the million square miles of America's Midwest, our settlers would faced the same population density -- one thousand per square mile -- encountered in the West Bank by Israeli settlers -- that is, before Israeli first worlders battered West Bank third worlders back into half the space (affluent moderns needing more room to breath -- and swim).
To fill out the billion Indian ratio: 150 million American settlers would have to have carved out -- extra -- room for themselves.
Israel could adopt the ultimate sane option (practiced by successful first-worlders everywhere): no more "dozerkrieging" next-door neighbors, no-choice returning misappropriated land and homes and no fair waiting until resistance ends before doing both (it works the other way around). A growing Arab consensus can assure Israel that withdrawing the unbearable occupation would do more for her genuine security than embarking on mutually assured destruction.
It does not take a Solomon to calculate that a nation of 5 million who occupies a neighbor of 4 million -- to park a few hundred thousand of her own on half their ancestral land -- will be condemned to exist always half-concentration camp and half-free.
Denis Drew
Chicago
ddrew2u@sbcglobal.net
www.onsamepage.blogspot.com
June 24, 2007 12:00 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on June 24, 2007 12:00
I just saw this survey-a bit late-and somehow very surprised about some of results, namely that people are still under the illusion of setting up a Palestinian state. Don’t American Arabs in particular and Jews too know the most basic facts about on the issue: Israel occupied 78% of historic Palestine in 1947/8 and 22% in 1967(West Bank and Gaza including Jerusalem)-and annexed over 50% of the 22% thus leaving about 10% of all of Historic Arab Palestine for a so called Palestinian state; in addition Israel controls and exploits Palestinian water resources and borders and airports with its Berlin Wall and the state of Apartheid its imposing on the dispossessed Palestinians.
There will never be a viable Palestinian state-ever. The solution is one Secular Democratic Palestine for all the people now living in Palestine-including the return of the Palestinian refugees-to replace the racist apartheid Jewish state-a regime change and not a destruction of the Jews-that guarantees the rights of all Jews and Arabs.
Nothing else will work.
June 22, 2007 6:03 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on June 22, 2007 06:03