Rodney Wilson - Islamic banking has become a substantial industry over the last four decades. It's central component: the avoidance of interest. Does its emergence segregate Muslims from Western values and norms, creating a financial ghetto?
I contend that as increasing numbers of people in the West become dissatisfied or skeptical about the banking services they receive, and see them as exploitative or even unethical, the emergence of Islamic banking with its own distinctive morality could help project a much more positive face to Islam. Islamic banking and finance can help foster dialog between Westerners and Muslims.
Islamic retail financial institutions, including the Islamic Bank of Britain, the European Islamic Investment Bank and Lariba Bank in California, are now well established in a number of Western countries. Furthermore, the leading international banks, including Citibank, HSBC Amanah, Deutsche Bank and UBS of Switzerland, all offer Islamic deposits and shari'a-compliant financing facilities.
There has been much dialog between the Western bankers working in these institutions and the shari'a scholars who advise what is, and what is not, permissible. This dialog extends to insurance, where Islamic companies have become increasingly active, their distinguishing feature being that they do not hold conventional interest-yielding bonds, and that shareholder funds and premiums paid by policy holders cannot be co-mingled.
As shari'a is about universal, divinely inspired principles rather than national laws, leading international law firms have also become involved in Islamic banking and finance, as contracts need to be drafted under English or American law in a way that is consistent with shari'a. Indeed, the main job of the shari'a committee members who serve on the boards of Islamic banks and conventional banks offering Islamic products is to ensure that new contracts are compatible with shari'a principles and, if they are not, to pursue a dialog with the lawyers concerning amendments and redrafting.
The aspiration of many Islamists is to have divinely inspired shari'a replacing man-made laws, perhaps even the establishment of a universal caliphate under which everyone, Muslim and non-Muslim, should live. Not surprisingly, such an aspiration is unacceptable for most non-Muslims, and indeed for many Muslims, as it denies choice.
Islamic banking and finance can point the way forward: it is about extending choice, not restricting options. As each institution has its own shari'a board, shari'a compliance is effectively privatized, rather than being a matter of national law. Indeed, each shari'a board passes its own fatwas, or religious rulings, which further extends choice in the marketplace for religious ideas. Religion, of course, flourishes under competitive conditions and Islam is no exception, whereas when it is nationalized, its adherents soon become alienated.
The Islamic Republic of Iran can be regarded as an example of how not to encourage the development of Islamic banking and finance. There, all banking has been shari'a- compliant since the Law on Interest Free Banking was passed in 1983. Bank clients have therefore no choice but to use the shari'a system. The banks, however, are state-owned and have little autonomy, even in determining what deposit and financing products to offer. They also do not have shari'a committees, the argument being that this is unnecessary as the law ensures shari'a compliance in any case.
The result has been that banking development has been slow, there is little financial innovation, and most Iranians do not have bank accounts. In contrast, on the Arab side of the Gulf and in Malaysia, where Islamic and conventional banks compete, Islamic banks have attractive products on offer and a growing client base. Al Rajhi Bank of Saudi Arabia has become the world's largest Islamic retail bank, and its range of services and delivery channels compares favorably with the best that Western banks can offer.
Islamic banking is here to stay, is an opportunity rather than a threat, and has an exciting future. Gaps remain -- there is no Islamic bank in Israel for example to serve its Muslim population. But if the Central Bank of Israel licensed such an entity it could create much goodwill. It might also encourage the Jewish population living there to question whether the operations of their own banks are compatible with religious teaching in Leviticus and Deuteronomy.
Ultimately, Islamic banking and finance is about the emergence of a distinctively Islamic form of capitalism that may co-exist and interact with Western, Chinese, Russian or any other capitalism. Such a development should be welcomed and facilitated, and not hindered or suppressed.
Rodney Wilson is Director of Postgraduate Studies at Durham University's Institute for Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies. He is co-editor of The Politics of Islamic Finance and co-author of Islamic Economics: A Short History. This article is part of a series on economics and Muslim-Western relations distributed by the Common Ground News Service (CGNews), and can be accessed at www.commongroundnews.org. Special thanks to Leena El-Ali.
Email This Post | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.


Comments (13)
cheap viagra best price viagra [url=http://lipstick.com/user/Cheap_Viagra_By_Doc/]best price viagra[/url] cheap viagra
November 15, 2007 1:07 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on November 15, 2007 01:07
free downloads t mobile ringtones
http://idisk.mac.com/ringtonesforyou/Public/index.html
May 26, 2007 8:29 PM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on May 26, 2007 20:29
As I understand of Banking, it is mere lending of money to peoples and paid back with interest. Islamic Banks should be lending money to peoples without interest because that is prohibited in Islam. However, the Islamic Bank can thrive. How? In Islam, there is the so-called zakah and sadaqah system (that is, an obligatory and voluntary donation, respectively). In Shia Islam, there is even khums system which is very much the same with zakah and sadaqah but only a bigger amount of money given.
MY point is, the Islamic bank should be lending money to poor or needy people so that they can have the capital to put up business or investments to better their lives - without interest. But in return, after the people have made their lives economically and financially capable, they should be giving back the favor done to them by paying zakah, sadaqah and khums to the banks, which needs funding to finance its expenses and further help other needy people.
This way, there would be more and more poor people uplifted from their plight and consequently capable of giving donations, and lesser and lesser people would be needing help. Then there would be no more needy and everyone would then be giving zakah/sadaqah/khums as a funding for any eventuality.
Hence, the Bank should be a Public/Government-owned or operated and not to be a Private one. Therefore, it should no longer be called a bank anymore but I think it should be called a Treasury.
Banking should be abolished from the vocabulary of humankind because there is no use anymore. It would be remembered only as the institution that has made poor poorer, and made the rich richer.
That is ribah in Islam, a prohibited and detestable system. And this is the Islamic system
March 20, 2007 12:54 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on March 20, 2007 00:54
asjmgipwd opfa zapfnj srzn ioxh bgfvd ifmdzqay [URL]http://www.nqfuwv.qucfyrn.com[/URL] mjte ehdscytv
March 11, 2007 11:00 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on March 11, 2007 11:00
nhre xqufw wnqhcpmly qmzvpoy vdgpcmue zqrokbpm wbjgdq [URL=http://www.swyeba.bukorsf.com]xmpoej enjorsli[/URL]
March 11, 2007 10:59 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on March 11, 2007 10:59
qltspjear adzqtncek zfyvdebk ywgueacs kzqdo pkbl pndlwtkac ecymtp gantks
March 11, 2007 10:59 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on March 11, 2007 10:59
amdi bryntalo bvoje lxzy nawdtehr xltad umerfkw
March 11, 2007 10:58 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on March 11, 2007 10:58
How the bank will exist without charging interest is a valid question. But take one step back and start from the so-called business plan objective of the Bank entities. And now imagine if the Bank plans from the get go to exist business plan that has no plan to collect interest. So, can you simply imagine how many ways a Bank entity can realize “revenue”. Based on your imagination, I would say that is how the Islamic-based Bank entity will prosper assuming the entity executes its plan properly. My father was life long banker with over 40 years of conventional bank experience. In fact he made to the top of the bank seat and when they called him in a Islamic-based Banking as a consultant after he retired, he kept arguing by translating each transaction that the Islamic Bank executes to percentage and rate of equivalent interest. After long sessions and multiple seminars, his words were, the mechanics or semantics of both Banking system were the same, but the syntactic were distinctly different. Now my comment to you is actually, the Islamic-based Banks are more humane than conventional Banks and they are of course more stringent in the process of granting loans etc… and ensuring proper collateral etc… Ok, that is not to say the Islamic-based Banks are bullet proof and they indeed do have drawbacks when compared to conventional banks.
March 4, 2007 1:03 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on March 4, 2007 01:03
Im not sure this can not come to fruition.The old testement for bids jews to charge a fellow jew interest,so im sure islamic law could find the same answers for the same problem.
January 22, 2007 3:51 PM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on January 22, 2007 15:51
Islamic banking, with a particular value system, is one thing. But banks without interest is quite another. How exactly are banks expected to make money?
The interest system allows the borrower to more freely invest the borrowed money how they see fit within the sector for which they borrowed the money in the first place. But if a bank doesn't charge interest, then you can bet that banks will seek out a secure return on their investment by more closely overseeing your investment options.
Does it make sense in a capitalist system of any sort to give banks such a large degree of influence over how people use their borrowed money?
Cultures and religion can be again "usury," and interest all they want, but in the modern day how else is a bank supposed to make a profit?
January 22, 2007 3:27 PM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on January 22, 2007 15:27
Islam forbids Reeba.Interest equals Reeba is Wrong Translation.Lets not forget,at present time we dont use Golden and Silver Coins.
January 22, 2007 11:44 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on January 22, 2007 11:44
Islam forbids Reeba.Interest equals Reeba is Wrong Translation.Lets not forget,at present time we dont use Golden And Silver Coins.
January 22, 2007 11:40 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on January 22, 2007 11:40
Islam forbids Reeba.Interest equals Reeba is Wrong Translation.Lets not forget,at present time we dont use Golden And Silver Coins.
January 22, 2007 11:40 AM | Report Offensive Comment
Posted on January 22, 2007 11:40