Miriam Leitao at PostGlobal

Miriam Leitao

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Miriam Leitao is a reporter and columnist for O Globo and Radio CBN in Brazil. She is also a commentator on Globo TV Network and runs her own blog, www.miriamleitao.com, hosted at Globo online at www.oglobo.com.br. She was awarded Columbia University’s Maria Moors Cabot Prize in 2005. Close.

Miriam Leitao

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Miriam Leitao is a reporter and columnist for O Globo and Radio CBN in Brazil. more »

Main Page | Miriam Leitao Archives | PostGlobal Archives


« Previous Post | Next Post »

Boycott Plans Naïve and Unrealistic

Yes, countries should tell China that they will boycott Beijing Olympics if China does not pressure Burma to open up! That's the easy choice, but it's also the naïve one. In the first place, China is a dictatorship and faces many of Burma’s same problems: human rights, civil liberties, freedom of the press and internet. Realistically, what kind of help can we expect from China?

Let’s think about the Chinese methods of pressure. Will China use diplomatic or economic methods to pressure Burma? Or will it use force and violence, the conventional methods of an authoritarian regime? If China decides to invade Burma as a form of “pressure”, are we supposed to applaud it? Do we also expect or even trust China to eventually offer protection to refugees? Could China, with its current political structure, support the ideal of freedom in another country? I don’t think so. Most likely, the Communist Party’s strategists will fear that the process could spread dangerous ideas of liberty among their own population.

It’s clear that the international community must do something for Burma’s monks and freedom fighters. During Brazil’s military dictatorship of the 1970s, international pressure from many fronts helped undermine the strength of the military government. But that pressure came from democratic governments and organizations committed to freedom, such as Amnesty International.

That won’t happen in China for one single reason: China is an authoritarian regime, and as such it doesn’t share in other governments’ and organizations’ belief in democratic principles. Pressure to liberate non-democratic countries to liberalize is completely contradictory to the nature of a dictatorship. So we cannot transfer this responsibility onto China.

Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.

Email the Author | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (43)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Categories

PostGlobal is an interactive conversation on global issues moderated by Newsweek International Editor Fareed Zakaria and David Ignatius of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is On Faith, a conversation on religion. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for PostGlobal to Lauren Keane, its editor and producer.