Masha Lipman at PostGlobal

Masha Lipman

Moscow, Russia

Masha Lipman is the editor of the Pro et Contra journal, published by Carnegie Moscow Center. Lipman is also an expert in the Civil Society Program at the Carnegie Moscow Center. She served as deputy editor of the Russian weekly newsmagazines, Ezhenedel’ny zhurnal from 2001 to 2003, and of Itogi magazine from 1995 to 2001. She has worked as a translator, researcher, and contributor forMoscow bureau of The Washington Post and has had a monthly op-ed column in The Washington Post since 2001. Close.

Masha Lipman

Moscow, Russia

Masha Lipman is the editor of the Pro et Contra journal, published by Carnegie Moscow Center. Lipman is also an expert in the Civil Society Program at the Carnegie Moscow Center. more »

Main Page | Masha Lipman Archives | PostGlobal Archives


« Previous Post | Next Post »

Now is Not the Time

Moscow, Russia -- The suggestion to carry out a strike against North Korea sounds logical, rational and likely even reasonable - but that would have been before the war in Iraq...Or rather, instead of it.

The US apparently has the technology with which to defend itself against a possible attack from the North Korean territory. But according to Ashton Carter and William Perry, it cannot ensure enough security and so it is "risky". Now a strike is risky too, to say the very least.

The problem with North Korea, as with any full-blown totalitarian state, is that it is built on irrational foundations. Such a regime is not about minimizing human loss or avoiding a suicidal course. When dire circumstances and even famine are daily routines, when the imminent threat of an American attack is used as an instrument of national mobilization and to buttress state ideology, the leadership sends its people to death easily. In a totalitarian, closed state, people are easily indoctrinated to a point of mass hysterics (remember the images of weeping nation in the wake of Kim Il Sung's death!). Besides, in such a regime, to give in to US threats or "swallow" a strike is to show weakness that may cost North Korean leaders their positions and likely their lives. It sounds unrealistic that the US can "make clear" to North Korea that "South Korea will play no role in the attack". Since South Korea is close and vulnerable, North Koreans will likely do as much damage as possible to the pro-American neighbor, even if they die in the process.

But all the above would have also been true before the war in Iraq. Today, however, with the US' moral authority largely squandered and America increasingly seen as an aggressive force which attacks whenever and wherever it sees fit, such a strike is likely to become highly destabilizing. It will deepen the fears of those leaders who believe (or persuade their constituencies) that America may deal a strike on them if they misbehave. (In my country, Russia, this idea is fairly common and is sure to convince many more people, should a strike against North Korea be carried out). It will give additional drive to a broad range of anti-American forces, including the most ugly ones prone to use "dirty bombs" and suchlike. It will work to bring regional organizations built on a vaguely anti-American basis closer together, such as Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

If, in the meantime, the US stays on alert, drawing on its formidable power of military technology and its intelligence capacity, it is likely to see the North Korean regime fall apart before too long.

Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.

Email the Author | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (491)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Categories

PostGlobal is an interactive conversation on global issues moderated by Newsweek International Editor Fareed Zakaria and David Ignatius of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is On Faith, a conversation on religion. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for PostGlobal to Lauren Keane, its editor and producer.