Hong Kong – Six years on, I still remember vividly that fateful day on which I happened to be in New York. I took my first and only bike-ride in Manhattan, from Upper West Side down to ground zero, and filed one of the earliest reports for a newspaper in Hong Kong . Six years on, the atrocities still shape my worldview and I continue to lend my support to the U.S. in this war against those who strive to destroy the free world. The Bush administration, despite committing numerous mistakes, deserves credit in preventing another 9/11 from happening. It's amazing that life can basically go on as usual amid a war.
Norman Podhoretz, whose new book "World War IV: The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism" (Doubleday) http://www.randomhouse.com/doubleday/catalog/display.pperl?isbn=9780385522212 is published today, provides the best framework in examining what we're facing. The Cold War was World War III and our current struggle is World War IV. If you're too busy to read the book, you may read his article on the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal today. http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110010589
While I have my fair share of disagreement and disappointment with President Bush, I pray that the Bush Doctrine would prevail. Again, Mr. Podhoretz's insight of comparing it with the Truman Doctrine offers me hope. Let me end by quoting his conclusion in "Is the Bush Doctrine Dead?" from the September 2006 issue of Commentary http://www.commentarymagazine.com/cm/main/viewArticle.html?id=10107:
"So far as the implementation of this new strategy goes, it is still early days—roughly comparable to 1952 in the history of the Truman Doctrine. As with the Truman Doctrine then, the Bush Doctrine has thus far acted only in the first few scenes of the first act of a five-act play. Like the Truman Doctrine, too, its performance has received very bad reviews. Yet we now know that the Truman Doctrine, despite being attacked by its Republican opponents as the "College of Cowardly Containment," was adopted by them when they took power behind Dwight D. Eisenhower. We also know now that, after many ups and downs and following a period of retreat in the 1970's, the policy of containment was updated and reinvigorated in the 1980's by Ronald Reagan (albeit without admitting that this was what he was doing). And we now know as well that it was by thus building on the sound foundation laid by the Truman Doctrine that Reagan delivered on its original promise.
"It is my contention that the Bush Doctrine is no more dead today than the Truman Doctrine was cowardly in its own early career. Bolstered by that analogy, I feel safe in predicting that, like the Truman Doctrine in 1952, the Bush Doctrine will prove irreversible by the time its author leaves the White House in 2008. And encouraged by the precedent of Ronald Reagan, I feel almost as confident in predicting that, three or four decades into the future, and after the inevitable missteps and reversals, there will come a President who, like Reagan in relation to Truman in World War III, will bring World War IV to a victorious end by building on the noble doctrine that George W. Bush promulgated when that war first began."
Please e-mail PostGlobal if you'd like to receive an email notification when PostGlobal sends out a new question.

