But the eye to any USAmerican is not what his colours appear to be in the mirror of his Mother and Father but what they are to the Parents' Daughters and Sons. So if Mr Obama is a person of color (African-American) in his case then if he says he is Black then Black is what he is. (The US Census Bureau defines race inclusion of a person with up to 1/16th of any included choice on a census form.
In another vein, this is like being of the Black and White TV days. In Living Color came around a long time ago. In some circles, Black has been popular longer than I've been popular and that's only 56 or 57 years. In other's longer than we've all been around, but who that I am is just not an understatement but an understatemnet because I'm really just no one in particular. So that I am not popular at all makes me a candidate for "In the Future, everyone will be popular for 15 minutes". We all are who we are. So why the discussion of Mr Obama's color? Everyone that's born on US soil can grow up and become President. Unarguably.
Should we discuss how I am or am not part semite, because my birthday Thursday, 07-17-(19)52 NYTimes Vol CI No. 34508 makes me conceived 40 weeks full term / 280 days before, on Yom Kippur 5712H or Tuesday October 9th 1951? Just because the New Moon of Roshashona was Sunday,September 1 1951 doesn't make me a semite. But at least I know where the Moons of my birth are.
Where's ?'s Nose on this one. '"Black is Black" I want my baby back" is a lyric from a popular song from the 1960's. "Paint it Black' is another well know recoding from that era. Still to this day are we going to be discussing "Who's Who in America?" based on Exclusion? What gives? This is the 21st century. Remember another song by the Singer Songwriter, Cat Stevens /Ibrahim Joseph;
'"Oh Very Young" what are you going to leave us this time?' Let's set an expample. Live and let live. Isn't the future now?

Regards
dePaul Consiglio

On this day, Tuesday, November 11 2008AD

http://iconsiglio.blogspot.com
http://www.consiglio.com

Ive got to add on to TJManley here.

I love PostGlobal, because it brings together the view points of people around the world, which is something that is sorely lacking in America, as our media landscape is so huge that hearing other voices above the din is nigh impossible. This is particularly a problem when it comes to making judgments about foreign conflicts, which we too often can only view through American-valued lenses.

At the same time comments like Mr. Bayuni exemplify that Americans aren't the only ones capable of making inane and erroneous judgments based on lack of cultural understanding. Any American from Miami to Wasilla understands that superficially, culturally, and for that matter, legally, Barack Obama is black. Not because of some bastardized identity mythology, but because of the norms and standards of the American people.

He may be right that this is an unfortunate circumstance: I personally hope for the day when we are more color-blind than we are now, and I understand why he brings it up. But he misses the point by implying there is anything disingenuous about Obama's win. Obama's self-identification is his choice. African-Americans vote for Democrats all the time. And the amount of white voters that voted

More importantly, if he thinks that in 2008, this is the first thing Obama should do he is looney tunes. Still saner than Dr Ettefagh though!

If Obama had been walking down Main Street in Selma, Alabama, in the 1950's, is there any doubt how the local sheriff would have viewed him?
Millions of African-Americans have reacted with jubilation because they know that if you look Black in America, you are Black, at least in terms of a public, surface identity.
Commentators who are not African-American are absurdly presumptuous to declare what race or ethnicity Obama should or shouldn't identify himself as.