THE QUESTION
A London publishing house was firebombed for agreeing to publish 'The Jewel of Medina', a controversial novel about Muhammad's wife, which Random House dropped earlier this year because it feared terrorist threats. In hindsight, was Random House in the right? Does this justify censorship of this kind in the future?
FROM THE PANEL
Publishers Should Not be Cowed
When Random House and other big publishers drop controversial novels, they forget their responsibility to defend our open society.
Posted by David Goodhart Great Britain |Oct 7, 2008 at 9:34 AM
Defending Aisha
Sherry Jones was wrong, but it's high time Muslims stopped being obsessed with such trifling matters and focused on the bigger problems we face.
Posted by Sami Moubayed Damascus, Syria |Oct 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM
The Terror of Publishing
Why do we expect book publishers to be any more courageous than the rest of us?
Posted by Miklos Vamos Budapest, Hungary |Oct 6, 2008 at 12:52 PM
Random House's Solid Business Sense
I fail to see censorship in this matter.
Posted by Ali Ettefagh Tehran, Iran |Oct 6, 2008 at 12:45 PM
Free Speech and Blasphemy
It would have been wiser to resort to legal means, if possible, to prevent the publication of the book.
Posted by Anwer Sher Dubai, UAE |Oct 6, 2008 at 12:42 PM
Recent Discussions
- Should the World Help Iran Protesters?
- Iranian Election Aftermath
- Obama's Cairo Speech
- Has the World Lost Confidence in U.S. Economic Management?
- The Future of Newspapers
- U.S., Israel on a Crash Course Over Iran?
- Threats From An Interlinked World
- Reconciliation for Turkey and Armenia
- All Past Questions


Recent Comments
We also can on...
Another topic of littl...
Here is the thing... w...
In my opinion the Hous...
Though there are much ...
Please note, I'm busy ...
There's plenty to writ...
Yes, in hindsight Rand...