The Jesuit theologian John Courtney Murray was fond of quoting a Dominican named Thomas Gilby who insisted that civilizations rest on citizens "locked in argument."
He may have said "moral argument;" I'm not sure. But I would suggest the modifier "reasoned" to make the point that reasoned argument is essential for the preservation and advancement of both civility and civilization.
Religious persons who really believe that they hold a monopoly on truth might try to state that belief in the form of reasoned argument. The effort will move them in the direction of new ground that could become commmon ground if others respond from a different faith perspective with reasoned arguments of their own.
The point of departure for the conversation will be neither revelation nor authority, just a reasoned conviction related to a specific truth. The benefits of this kind of converation are first an increase in the supply of civility in our world, and then an enlargement of understanding on both sides. Difficulties might arise in the form of dilution of commitment to the truth thus articulated, but this need never be the case. Only those who are "often in error but never in doubt" have anything to fear on that front.
Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.
Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook


