All Comments (59)

This commentary from a French journalist that speculates about John McCain taking lessons from the Nicolas Sarkosy campaign seems relevant-- Sarkosy played a game of running against French Arabs/Muslims while tiptoeing around overtly racist rhetoric. McCain seems to be playing the same Islamophobic strategy.

http://www.culturekiosque.com/nouveau/comment/sarkozy_mccain181.html

The Fairness Doctrine (or its ghost) appears again.

What gives with all the posts by "rafamdergem" ?
I can hardly find any actual comments by anyone with all the "rafamdergem" "gems"...

Why not clean up this mess?

i am Liturgy in Turkey, this is a light, while i am around this region, it is rafamdergem. while i am world wide, it is Liturgy in Turkey.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/miletus
Aristotle, Anaximander, Anaxiemenes, Thales

the conflict between Syria and BAghdat is
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Kindi

the conflict between Baghdat and Iran is
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assasination

i was watching on CNN the Candidates and the General Commander, and this ball below came to me from the words of John McCain.

it came to me when He said "El Kaide is in Iraq", this was driving my attention for a few days, the first time was from Williams Bush. they all play baseball. Dick Cheney was also a speaker but we couldnt get up when He woke us up.

if i write a term in Turkish, please refer to tr.wikipedia.com/wiki/the-term-in-turkish and then select the english page to read. for meanings of the term, seslisozluk.com is available for i refer to it too.

i am sorry, i was not connected fully.

the reason why USA Government verbalize (El Kaide is in Iraq) and (there are nuclear weapons in Iraq) is in the language.

in the education centers, especially those in Uzbekistan Azerbeycan Turkmenistan, Buhara and Semerkand, were there science, philosophy, linguistics, astronomy, anthropology, psychology.

one of those who had been in Ozbekistan and Buhara is today in Bursa, grandson of Ahmet prophet, Emirsultan, He is resident in a church.

the reason why El Kaide is in Iraq and there are nuclear weapons in Iraq is in the language. "el kaide" is "nizamiye" too, university of Selcuks and Sunni Islam that have come up to date and those who made war against other prophets.

there are a few more in Iran too, one of them is in Semerkand and also one in Buhara. these are the nuclear weapons for they radiate to others in the education centers to other pupils.

1. in Iraq Baghdad there was a university in 1000 AC,
2. there was education in Baghdad that affected the next 1000 years to 2000 AC.

how can i say? through the valley between two hills?

it was 2004 i am not sure, i was watching a gatherin a group of men and women, they were in silver cloths, a few women had children in their arms, one of the women was my wife and she was with our child. they were in a valley, between two hills. one man, with two other men in each side of him, was in front of the group, his face towrds the gathering. it was as if i had just passed away, i was above the gathering. and the men turned to the land, in front of the group, all shined and the group went to the wide land.

dining. agriculture. on a table. on the land. sleeping. trees. waters. stars.

a pair of animals on an arch is an education.

astronomy, genetics, literature, faith, wisdom, linguistics, anthropology, healing.

this is a flood.

what is this flow, for Heaven's and Apostels' Sake!
who shall have the next St Vitus Oscar?

Kurds, Israel, Said Nursi, Ataturk, England, Turkish Government, Turkish Army. catholic and protestant Armenians gathered around St PAul by France, attacked by Germany, that had been sent to Church of Source in Syria,

who are Germen, are they with St Germain, what is the german philosophy then? what are communism and evolution based on apostels prophets and mythology? Churchill, Nietzsche? what is the similarities between their languages?

Vatican, Lousanne Agreement

Banker Israel, Ataturk, Churchill, religious Inonu, United Nations, Civil War, mobile phones, symbiax and texas instruments, Zyprexa, Lily, Holland, Scotland, Turks, Wolves, Electromagnetics, Challenger, Hydrogen, Israel, Ukrain, Chernobyl, soviets Shuttle on Tupolev, Nibiruan council, 2012 MAya Calendar, Solar MAx, LAdy Diana, World Trade Center and Churchill and Episcopal Church, Earthquakes, Fires, Yom Kippur, Heaven, Anadolu.

why am i not related with South Asia that Prince Andrew is in? i was but there are cases near by around. good we have a step further. allright. we have come from Hungary, Karl Rove and Austria to this point.

does anybody have any news about Armenia and Armenians here in Turkey, that i wrote poems to?

Venice? Iran? the whole Asia with Azerbaycan? India?

masonry? democracy? laicism? turkish soviets in the government? jewish community in Turkey? ottomans in Turkey? Turkish Army in NATO? Army supported by Jewish comunity? Greeks in Media, Bank, Social Life? petroleum, boron mineral?

all for all! but the problem is somebody stop the fractional frictional agreements please!

and Vatican is with Presidency and England is with Prime Ministry. Prime Ministry was with Germany and Russia before.

then stop Germany please. they support Turkey for Ottomans! and who are those Germen? those against Israel and British Church? Vatican?

Russia is in United NAtions and Vatican want to go on? but they united in Ephesus with orthodx Church with a paper announced without Turkish! why do they support Turkey then ?

and then here we come to Arabia?

and Condaliza Rice is preparing to be Vice-President for Episcopal John McCain, the man in Second World War and Mediterranean Sea NAvy Commander?

where was International Court of Justice in Iraq? all were in the court of USA then! who is the other part in Middle East? Latter Day Saints? Evangelists? Protestants? NATOand Israel?

is Evil Axis those who were in British Empire?

i canceled the Post office account that i had announced on the internet. United Nations? is United Nations Episcopal? of Churchill and Rose Field Dutch Episcopal Roosevelt?

The term "United Nations" was decided by Franklin D. Roosevelt and Winston Churchill during World War II, to refer to the Allies. Its first formal use was in the 1 January 1942 Declaration by the United Nations, which committed the Allies to the principles of the Atlantic Charter and pledged them not to seek a separate peace with the Axis powers. Thereafter, the Allies used the term "United Nations Fighting Forces" to refer to their alliance.

is NATO against or substitute for Common Wealth and Churchill?

my name is banned here,

this is L.A. 14 May, 1973 (2 August, 1972)
onbirinci.halkan@gmail.com

Bursa

there is not any other email account, but one in turkcell.com, not in hotmail or facebook, not present and not active member on any other website, other than ABC and OnFaith. and i didnt have a golden shot of opium on April 1st, in Alanya.

why dont i talk to Presidency or Prime Ministry of Turkey? are they worth talking to? are they able to talk under Sun and Stars on Earth? They shall come if they may, at least in May, with You, Her MAjesty His Royalness.

and i didnt talk about what i lived in these two years of time, electromagnetically. and i shall go to Church to be baptised in an Episcopal Church in one proper time. My Queen, did You reject Churchill and Common Wealth too? what is the common problems and solutions that Williams Bush in NATO meeting with Putin verbalized? the problems of Churchill and Common Wealth are they?

i am able to read Quran and Bible in English, Her Majesty, in the West of Anadolu with Apostels and Saints, with Mythology of this land from South to West. with coffee of Ahmet prophet and StJohn. flowers are here, education is here. common wealth is here.

the men LAdy Diana married with later after She divorced Prince Charles are tanned in the skin and all are from countries in the Allways Sunny British Empire!

France, Vatican, Germany. LAdy Diana died in France.

and then did all the countries in British Empire attack World Trade Center of Churcill, is this reasonable?

and where is Israel where is USA where is Russia? where is the gold in the basement of WTC TT? where is Turks and this government, My Queen, where is the liturgy of Turkey? where is Tony Blair? why did later General Staff thank to Iraq and Muslims and went back to Britain?

this is to Your Highest MAjesty, My Queen.

My Queen, her MAjesty, life is grand and holy. we are together. life has magic touches anytime, we all understand and grow a little further. all lifes we individuals on Earth have been couriering are gifts to us all, to our own presence.

this is what i heard from LAdy Diana's bodyless Presence, My Queen.

- he is playing with the doughs of others,
- i cant say this, how can i say this?
- i dont have a penny, dear

this reminds me the poem to Recep TAyyip Erdogan, a man had appeared and wanted to pay for the poem but i had thanked for the poem. the voice was like someone who had just resurrected in soul, after a long spell or consciousness, a person who had realized that he was not dead but had left body and has been bodyless but present.

Erdal Inonu, son of Ismet Inonu with Churchill, had come after he had left, and had told me that all was as he had realized and predicted. life goes on, bodyless and as it is in quantum physics. the other night came too. then he left. Robin Williams What Dreams Come True is a reference here.

Prince Charles is married with a woman who looks like similar to Him and within His family and genetics, as far as i see. had the priests before the wedding approve the marriage of Prince Charles and Princess Diana? is she episcopal? does Common Wealth mean that Churchill family was episcopal too?

but My Queen, Her Majesty, a royal and with high-fidelity woman rejects a man, when Her Husband is not a King. am i able to verbalize, Her Majesty?

did Lady Diana flirt another man, Her MAjesty, till We learned that She had suffered first?

i didnt read a language as advanced, public, free, royal, loyal, honouring, cheering, strong, sword-like, mature, hand-some as English in United Kingdom, especially the one in Daily Mail.

this anthropological scientific spiritual language is the main tool, based and developed on values and worths that is the inheritance with love and wisdom, grown with personal labor, in which Earth and Sky are together involving the children and elders.

the light of the sun of Vodafone is not available to tan with. for this reason, till they are 11 AM in the sky, i shall be busy with my daily job.

Lady Diana didnt have a belt. the priests with Vatican (paparazzis) in UK and those in the line of British Paulist Priests (Henry PAul) didnt respond to the Royal verbalizations.

while Israel is kept out of heaven, Israel is keeping being here.

Williams Bush,
i shall ask to be informed again,

1. where is the golden teeth of jews known with your father?
2. where is the gold announced in the basement of World Trade Center Towers?

are You with Israel, Williams Bush, or are You educating Israel? and i see there are two Israel.

and is there "common" problems, Williams Bush? why is British Airways able to fly any point in USA they want to? is Episcopal Church Common Prayers Book what You read, Williams Bush?

"Christ had put the demons on the swines and thrown them down the hills"

demon : seperative speech, teachings, prayers, spells

swine : priest, teacher
down the hill : unemploy the priests

Williams Bush, are You with Israel down there on the east coast of Mediterranean Sea, or are You educating Israel?

till 1940, there were soviets. till 2008, there were Israelians in the government. there are masonry, soviets and religious staff in the government hidden too. i dont read a book in Turkish, translated from other languages.

now in literature, religion, faith, translations, systems, law, there are soviets, americans, vatican, israel and armenia.

why British women are raped in South Anatolia is a matter of catholics, british had raped a catholic french woman, sworded a few feet above the floor hanging on the wooden wall of the house, and a few other men were eating the meal she had prepared. British women go to Kenya nowadays. but there are Israel and Armenia and Vatican here with money.

now i need to know, because we learn as Moses was explained as a Bush in Fire on the Top of the Mountain. and then we see a man in flame flying in USA known under Armenian St Germain vocabulary. is Moses explained to children in USA as Bush in Fire? then if a bush is fired, then is there communication and ascension?

can we say all have been cross-checked and uncovered, explained and presented to all of the people and individuals of this Earth we are on?

there is not anything important other than words and worths. not money, not colour, not house, not job. just worths. peace, unity and freedom are with worths, in light apperant.

were they fish that had come to the surface to listen to in lines relatively to their sizes, or were they people and authorities of that village that had come to listen to the apostel

were they fish that had come to the surface to give pearl and golden coins to the prophets while they were in the boat

how is there a song as "Killing me softly with his words"? when you kill a horse, you can put a seat onto him to ride. when you kill onion, you have a sweet salad.

when you kill meat in wine, you have a better meal. when you kill a mouse, you have a cat. when you kill a donkey, you have a horse.

if Martin Luther King was killed, then it is by someone in the family or nation. but if He was murdered, then it is by his enemies

when you kill a child, you have a mature man. when you kill your personality, you are a master. when you kill your desires, not by suffering but by fullfilling in small amounts to educate and heal, then you wend further.

were Apostels walking on the surface of the water? or were they above the consciousness of the people in the village? to parse is to beg, i look up a word in www.seslisozluk.com

Correct perspective McCain and Bush are wrong on a few things. On the other hand Obama and Hillary are wrong on everything.

Just a reminder. The supernatural being in the burning bush, the one Moses made the deal with is the biggest devil of them all, Lucifer by name. Of course you know that now so your soul is now headed to hell. Lucifer is the father of Jesus you know.

Lucifer just loves it when two or more gather in the name of Jesus and cause trouble with others of great faith like Muslims. That explains all the chaos surrounding faith.

Lucifer simply loves killings and all the other things religion inspires like 9-11 and more recently uncovered Mormon polygamy camps. Camps? Settlements of some kind like the Puritans aren't they? And they say we have religious freedom.

Where would the world be without faith? The US government is terrified that the three great faiths might disintegrate.

Disintegrate - turn material objects into cosmic dust, what happens to folks at ground zero.

Let's see if I can beat the censors...

"And we all need to pay a LOT more attention to what the so-called conservative “base” is actually advocating."

Here is what the "base" is saying, in their own words: (delete any embedded spaces)

churc hstatewall.typep ad.com/the_church_state_wal l/tyranny_in_their_own_word.html

churchs tatewall.typepa d.com/the_church_state_wa ll/the-current-state-of-reli.html

Why am I being censored?

Ms Brooks, did You call Rod PArsley for what He wanted to say with His words in His speech? did You ask Him for His vocabulary to have a user-interface to comprehend and communicate?

Salman Rushdie, he wants to be "Bus Driver", does he want to de-rive what Moses or Bush in Fire on the Mountain did? does he want to unite the two sides of the seas and of the river, in stead of drying the Euphrates to have the gold? or is it a term for a "school teacher", or priest, driver of a multi-seated car?

We should just dispense with religion altogether and ask a simple question instead. Who will be better for our general well being as a nation - McCain or Obama??

Well, we know that if you liked George W. Bush, you're going to love John McCain, since there's not an ounce of difference between the two. If you love the war in Iraq, you're going to love John McCain, because he's selling the surge on every street corner, and for the next generation to come.

If you like what Bush and Bush Senior before him have done to the national debt and our current economy, you're going to love John McCain, because he wouldn't have it any other way. It's all going for a good cause - the war in Iraq.

As for Obama, just say 'NO' to all of the above.

That should help put things in a better perspective.

President Williams Bush, do You overcome emotional burden by biking on the mountains? are You by King then? is this what You say?

i shall be better in the morning. sometimes it is so heavy. but there is hope, really hope comes as a friend hugs to warm and touches in love.

Robert B. why is it either McCain's or Obama's job to denounce every idiot whether they have followers or not who might potentially vote for them?

Again there is a heck of a difference between sharing a dais with someone you scarcely even know and sitting in a Pastor's pew for 20 years.

There is no reason to believe the McCain and Parsley are attached at the hip or that Parsley will have anything whatever to do with shaping McCain's foreign policy. McCain's got quite a bit of track record. On the other hand Obama has almost none. We really don't know Obama. We are however, quite familiar with John McCain.

Don't you think that church and state were united in an unbreakable hold 9-11-2001, like two gun fighter of old west folklore. They remain joined until one or the other dies. Care must be taken else both will fire at the same time and both die.

Mr Bush sees, at least saw the holy war declared by Islam as a crusade so he set about the task of making himself into King Arthur, kinda stumbly bumbly. The real question is does McCain see it that way too.

The D's are hell bent to wait for the next 9-11 and then do who knows what. The economy is threatening to collapse so they will likely win the majority in congress and the white house too. Take heart. No Republican administration has ever won a war except the Civil War when we fought ourselves, and nearly lost. Maybe the D's will think of something. McCain needs help from anywhere he can get it to win, just like Bush.

WW2 was decided by two things, oil and information. That makes the fight with Islam kinda even except Islam can gain an easy upper hand with better intel on their side.

We are at war with Islam like it or not. Will oil and information decide the outcome? Some truths are too unbearable to be heard. That wouldn't be the kind of information that determines if America becomes an Islamic state or not would it to say nothing of the biggest question, will America survive?

Think of it this way. The day Hitler killed himself there were still people looking for promotions in his government. Let's hope that's not the situation right now. Are we electing a new president for our old bankrupt corporation? Things have become real "sub prime" here lately. Any Islamic help doing that or have we become so righteous we don't need any help?

faith of St Royal? faith of Tailor? who is the St Royal? faith of denmark? is islam faith of England and Scotland so must islam be free of Kingdom of Israel?

is Islam Fall's Faith, faith of "Evenire", of "to happen", of "to come", of "event", of "life", and must Islam be de-kinged, de-royaled? must islam be free of Kingdom of Israel?

my email address is onbirinci.halkan@gmail.com
that is "eleventh circle"@gmail.com

newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/susan_jacoby/2008/04/the_newest_faithbased_tomfoole/all_comments.html

there are twelve apostels, twelve planets, twelve sons of Jacob Israel, twelve authorities in mythology of greek and roman

I think it's less important to me that Parsley's views run contrary to the Constitution--I follow Christ before any political leader--than that it runs completely contrary to the Gospel. The Gospel isn't about an authority that comes from controlling people. It's about an authority that comes from serving others. The Kingdom of God isn't about a top-down government, it's a reality in which "whoever wants to become great among you must be your servant,and whoever wants to be first must be your slave." It's about service and self sacrifice. It's about a love that is not self-serving. I haven't read anything by Parsley (because most of the propaganda that comes from the politicized Christian Right makes me nauseous) but if this is an accurate representation, I think he'd do well to remain silent and seek council from one of your WP's other bloggers, N.T. Wright.

P.S. It's sad to see so many responses that stray from the actual content of the post. This isn't a post on apologetics.

Isaac Asimov;

Religions may have been actively involved in the easing of the human condition, but I am more aware of conversion by the sword (the first case being that of the Edomites by the Jews in Maccabean times) and of burning at the stake and of Inquisitorial suppression of dissent. The benefits are a matter of theory; the harm is clear and present.

I am prejudiced against religion because I know the history of religion, and it is the history of human misery and of black crimes.

I have written on religion and science and have never made any secret of the fact that I am an atheist. My feeling is, quite simply, that if there is a God, he has done such a bad job that He isn't worth discussing.

Isaac Asimov. from "The Letters of Isaac Azimov".pp319

Vatican two days ago invited Israelians to Christianity, but because of opposes, He amended the prayer.

meanwhile we shall go on studying.

Man does not have the capacity to prove the existence of God, much less that a God was the active inspiration of any religion.

Since all we know is filtered through man’s imperfection, apparent errors and inconsistencies in the Bible and other fundamental religious documents are not proof of the non-existence of God, but only of the imperfection of man.

The first point reduces to zero our knowledge of whether there is a God and any claim that religious works are divinely inspired.

The second point adds nothing to the discussion.

The question of whether or not there is a superior being that created us and the universe is clearly appears to have arisen in every culture. It is our link to possible immortality and, for some, a basis for accepting and following a moral code.

We cannot “know” there is a God, but can only believe there is a God, based upon the beliefs others urge upon us, often influenced by our own speculations and hopes.

Practically everything humans do is based upon probability. I would like to see anyone tackle the probability issues surrounding the existence and nature of God and man’s relation to God. For example:

A. What possible reason (or justice or fairness) can there by for a perfect and loving God to play hide and seek with humanity? It is predictable, even to an imperfect human mind, that large numbers of people would go looking in the wrong places. Why would not a God, of the type advanced in most of the major religions, simply address us each, personally, tell us the major moral truths, and judge us based upon whether we follow what we would thus know rather than on our imperfect speculation?

B. Fear and suffering have been a major experience in human life. Is there any conceivable basis upon which an perfect and loving God would subject us to that? If there is a God, does not such suffering and fear indicate that he is not quite the perfect and loving figure that the preachers of faith would have us believe? Some would say that this is the result of the Original Sin of Adam and Eve. Does it make any sense that God would inflict such a curse upon us, who had nothing to do Original Sin? What about the obvious inequality of pain and suffering across the human race? Is that consistent with our image of God? Then, of course there is a major factor seldom mentioned: Animals, of every description, experience much the same pain and suffering that we experience — and probably worse. What could the reason for that be? Does that tend to show that we and animals are simply subjected to a world of chance in which suffering is more or less random?

C. In the debates upon the existence and nature of God, what is the practical difference in the moral imperatives between those who come down on one side or another. The God team seems to think that a failure to believe in God means that morality goes out the window or would at least be very different. Is that true, based upon experience or logic?

why have we watched John McCain with caps on TV and election news? does He have hats too? shall we see Him with a Tam on?

From an Emo Phillips routine...

Two men meet.

"Christian or Jew?" asks the first man.

"Christian" says the second.

"Me too ! Protestant or Catholic?"

"Protestant."

"Me too," crows the first man.

And so the questioning continues, until the two men discover
they are both not only Baptists, but Northern, Conservative,
Fundamentalist Baptists of the the Great Lakes Region.

When the first man finally inquires, "Council of 1879 or Council of 1912?

the reply is "1912."

So he cries "Die Heretic!"

That's religion!!

All religions are false. ALL OF THEM.

could You ask Williams Bush whether He has read Cameron Diaz in GQ magazine? She has steeped on a chair, it is a summer house chair, as far as i see. She hasnt exaggerated as if it were a throne.

is GQ Children of Victory, Queen of Victory? Her legs are thicker than they were during Charlie's Angelness.

Siemens has sold mobile phone company to BenQ, Motorola is about to sell in this year. so British Chinese and High GErman in Texas.

would Tyme Warmer please come with Dynasty of Mythology in TNT channel, more scottish movies on? i love Carol Tunes Network, especially Johnny Bravo, www.tnttv.com.tr/index.php?section=programdetail&id=29

Ms Brooks, there is a far different schedules here. i attend as many as i can according to my syllabus marianum and chrisanthemum.

What an incredibly naive and arrogant post. You have slandered a dedicated servant of God who has not said anything remotely resembling what you claim he has said regarding Islam.

In "Silent No More," which contains possibly the definitive chapter-length description of Islam's tenets in the market today, Rev. Parsley calls for the confrontation of Islam and notes that this nation was founded, in part, on the notion that Islam should be destroyed. The latter point is inarguable to any informed student of American history.

Rev. Parsley also opposes same-sex marriage - as does nearly 70 percent of the populace. He is hardly an anti-gay bigot as you claim.

You owe the man an apology, not an ill-considered harrangue.

To GaryD:

You asked, "Should Obama be required to renounce every hater at the Daily Kos or Huffington Post?"

Last time I checked, "every hater at the Daily Kos or Huffington Post" doesn't have thousands of people hanging on his every word or an organization that he can send out to accomplish a political agenda.

I don't think Senator McCain should be required to denounce anyone. But I am happy that I know who Senator McCain is in bed with (politically, that is :).

I'm sure it'll be seen as a historical irony, one day, but, speaking of the American religious fanatics called 'The base,'

Yaknow what 'Al Qaeda' means in Arabic?

'The base.'

Gods, that creeps me out. :)

TO SUSAN BROOKS THISTLETHWAITE:

First off, I never even heard of Rod Parsley until these postings but I would like to comment on what Chris Hedges describes as "Christian dominion".

He wrote, where “the 10 Commandments form the basis of our legal system, creationism and ‘Christian values’ form the basis of our eductional system,and the media and the government proclaim the Good News to one and all. Labor unions, civil-rights laws and public schools will be abolished. Women will be removed from the workforce to stay home, and all those deemed insufficiently Christian will be denied citizenship.”

Except for, "Proclaiming the Good News to one and all", I think that Jesus would throw up over this.

And as for "Proclaiming the Good News", there are many so-called "Christians" that don't have a clue what the "GOOD NEWS" even is.

The Good News is that God has a Plan and has had His Plan since before creation and that His Plan is for ALL OF HUMANITY to be with Him in the Kingdom [the new heavens and the new earth].

He also wrote, "It is shocking enough that there are American citizens who hold these views. But it must be said, in no uncertain terms, that this is a vision of a repressive, theocratic society so at odds with the American Constitution".

It is not only at odds with the American Constitution but it is also at odds with what Jesus taught.

Jesus forced Himself on no one and He did not ask anyone else to force themselves or Him or the bible on anyone, quite to the contrary, He invited people to "Come follow Me".

The True, Living, Triune, Triumphant God is a searcher of hearts and minds, not of religious affiliations or lack thereof and He also doesn't look at whatever label someone puts on themself.

Calling yourself a "christian" and being a "christian" is not necessarily the same thing especially since some "christians" don't have a clue what being a "christian" is.

It is important what you do and why you do it and what you know.

Christianity is part of God's Plan and His Plan is unfolding before our very eyes and God's Plan will come to Fruition.

Take care, be ready, see you and the rest of humanity in the Kingdom [the new heavens and the new earth].

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Should Obama be required to renounce every hater at the Daily Kos or Huffington Post? McCain is no more joined at the hip to Parsley than Obama is to those nuts.