Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite

President, Chicago Theological Seminary

Rev. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite is president of Chicago Theological Seminary and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. She has been a professor of theology at the seminary for 20 years and director of its graduate degree center for five years. Her area of expertise is contextual theologies of liberation, specializing in issues of violence and violation. An ordained minister of the United Church of Christ since 1974, the “On Faith” panelist is the author or editor of thirteen books and has been a translator for two translations of the Bible. Her works include Casting Stones: Prostitution and Liberation in Asia and the United States (1996) and The New Testament and Psalms: An Inclusive Translation (1995). Since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, Thistlethwaite has been working diligently to promote peace, including a presentation at the U.S. Institute of Peace, which appears in one of their special reports. Most recently she edited and contributed to Adam, Eve and the Genome: Theology in Dialogue with the Human Genome Project (2003). Close.

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite

President, Chicago Theological Seminary

Rev. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite is president of Chicago Theological Seminary and senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. She has been a professor of theology at the seminary for 20 years and director of its graduate degree center for five years. Her area of expertise is contextual theologies of liberation, specializing in issues of violence and violation. more »

Main Page | Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite Archives | On Faith Archives


From John Kerry to the Da Vinci Code: Discrimination Reinvented?

On the one hand, as the difference between the attitudes toward the presidential candidacy of John Kennedy and John Kerry show, the American people, in the case of Kerry, no longer regard Catholicism as potentially “un-American," the question that was raised about Kennedy.

Today Americans in general do not discriminate against a Catholic candidate just for being Catholic. Indeed, the majority of the Supreme Court is now Catholic.

But on the other hand, a new attitude of suspicion of the Catholic Church has arisen among some in the U.S. due to the sexual abuse of children by priests and the apparent cover-up by church authorities.

The astonishing popularity of the grade-B novel by Dan Brown, The Da Vinci Code, is instructive. I was amazed at how many people have asked me (and stilll ask me!) about The Da Vinci Code as though it was some new, hitherto undiscovered, 5th Gospel. It’s a pretty good suspense novel, but then so are the novels of John Grisham and nobody thinks of his work as religious revelation.

The huge response to Brown’s novel, I believe, is due, at least in part, to the fact that he cleverly used the device of a Catholic “secret society” (Opus Dei) to create the dramatic tension in the novel and used the Catholic Church’s actual invention of the falsehood that Mary Magdalene was a prostitute (she wasn’t) to make his fictional projection of secret-keeping onto the Catholic Church more plausible.

Many, many people, both Protestants and Catholics, ask me ‘what other secrets do you think they are hiding?’ This is a remarkable response to an otherwise unremarkable work of fiction.

I think The Da Vinci Code simply tapped into the national revulsion over the fact that some in the hierarchy of the actual (i.e. non-fictional) Catholic Church were knowingly passing sex abusing priests from one unsuspecting church to another and keeping their history secret, thus increasingly the number of victims. This came into vivid relief with the deposition of Cardinal Law in Boston.

I think the net cultural result was an increasingly negative view of the American Catholic Church; at least that has been my unscientific observation.

Has this undercurrent of suspicion translated into discrimination against Catholics per se? Well, not in the case of John Kerry or Samuel Alito, clearly. Discrimination equals prejudice plus power, the ability to enforce your prejudice and create patterns of discrimination in hiring, housing, education and so forth.

While I think this climate of suspicion has had a negative effect on the views of Americans of many religious persuasions about the Catholic Church hierarchy, I do not myself observe a new pattern of discrimination against individual Catholics.

I will be interested to read what my Catholic colleagues write this week.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (52)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.