Sulayman Nyang

Sulayman S. Nyang

Scholar of African and Muslim affairs

"On Faith" panelist Sulayman S. Nyang teaches in the Department of African Studies at Howard University in Washington, D.C. A scholar of African and Muslim affairs, Nyang, who is a native of the Republic of the Gambia, also served as his homeland's deputy ambassador to seven Middle Eastern and North African countries from 1975-78. Except for those three years, Nyang has taught at Howard since 1972, serving as acting director of the African Studies Program from 1973-75 and from 1986-1993, as chairman of the Department of African Studies. In 1993, he became senior consultant on the African Voices Project of the Museum of Natural History of the Smithsonian Institution..In 1997, Nyang became the first scholar to be named the Henry Luce Professor for Abrahamic Religions at the University of Hartford and Hartford Seminary. From 1999 to 2002 Professor Nyang served as a principal investigator and co-director of the Muslims in the American Public Square (MAPS) project sponsored by the Pew Charitable Trust and housed at Georgetown University's Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding. Now a U.S. citizen, Nyang has written extensively on African, Islamic and Middle Eastern affairs .His most widely-known book is Islam, Christianity and African Identity. He has also authored or co-edited Religious Plurality in Africa, with Jacob Olupona; A Line in the Sand: Saudi Arabia's Role in the Gulf War, with Evans Heindricks; and Islam:Its Relevance Today, co-edited with Henry Thompson. Nyang also wrote Islam in the United States of America (1999). His latest work is Muslims' Place in the American Public Square. Hopes, Fears, and Aspirations (2004), jointly edited with Zahid Bukhari and John Esposito of Georgetown University, and Mumtaz Ahmad of Hampton University). Nyang, who holds a doctorate in government from the University of Virginia, also serves on the advisory boards of several national African and Muslim organizations and was the first American Muslim president of the Interfaith Conference of Metropolitan Washington, D.C. Close.

Sulayman S. Nyang

Scholar of African and Muslim affairs

"On Faith" panelist Sulayman S. Nyang teaches in the Department of African Studies at Howard University in Washington, D.C. A scholar of African and Muslim affairs, Nyang, who is a native of the Republic of the Gambia, also served as his homeland's deputy ambassador to seven Middle Eastern and North African countries from 1975-78. more »

Main Page | Sulayman S. Nyang Archives | On Faith Archives


« Previous Post | Next Post »

True Faith is not a Science Project

Human beings since the 19th century have come to grapple with three categories of knowledge. They are namely, mythology, metaphysics and science. This three compartments of human understanding and appreciation of self and the world around us have been the source of satisfaction or grief for humankind.

Up to the time when when rational human beings who have mastered their languages and were in a better position to probe deeper into their languages and the contents left behind by their ancestors, mythologies command the attention of most if not all men. Searching for the meaning of life and very unsure and uncomfortable with life and death in their existential challenges, human beings found a great deal of support and satisfaction in their mythologies.

With the discovery of metaphysical means of address sing the ontological, teleological and other aspects of the body of knowledge known to the Greeks as Philosophy, human beings found in religion the supreme power of explanation. Breaking firmly away from mythologies and metaphysics as known to the Greeks, the ancient Egyptians, the Babylonians and other centers of civilizations, the Hebrew people who came out of Egyptian hegemony put forth the most radical and transforming legacy to humankind.

This Hebrew formulation of the human condition made it categorically clear that we humans are not marooned here below the sublunary world and that there is a destiny beyond the grave and our ancestors came to this world from a higher place where the real Creator of all things lived. This radical departure from the gods of the ancient world has been identified and celebrated by many historians.

An alien graduate student visiting this planet from another galaxy would be struck by the similarities of views about human origins and the destiny of Man in the universe.
Central to these peoples now known to American and other Western media as the Abraham's is the belief by Jews, Christians and Muslims that Adam and Eve were the common progeny of all of us.

Their unanimity is certainly not embraced by Buddhists, Hindus and peoples of the ancient world. Even the traditional Africans and Native peoples of the world did not share this myth of origins. Of course the Abraham's do not see this position as a mythical notion. Rather, to them this is a Divine fact revealed to the grand patriarchs and prophets of old immortalized in their respective scriptures. The centrality of sin and its consequences in both the death of the human being and his or her resurrection are critical in these belief systems.

Due to this effective chain of beliefs that define who we are and where we are going after this life, Christians found in Jesus the most critical being that ever walked this earth. Revolving around the nature of Christ and his role in the salvation of humankind, it is dangerous and unwise for any Christian or non-Christians to confuse and counter pose the mythological and the metaphysical knowledge of Christians with the scientific demands of their daily life.

Suggesting such a question raises a number of issues that are critical to the meaning in life of a Christian. By affirming the scientific claims of a Jesus DNA, a non-Christian examiner is most likely conflating science and metaphysics. If Jesus according to Christian claim was God himself in human flesh through incarnation, then his DNA cannot be registered scientifically. What is reported as his human remains are inconclusive based on insufficient evidence. Such is a likely response from a devoted Christians.

Writing from an Islamic perspective, one is limited by the Quranic text. Though Muslims believe in the miraculous birth of Jesus, and though Muslims also share with Christians the belief that Jesus was lifted from this earth at the time of the crucifixion as readers of the Hebrew Bible learned about Elijah's heavenly flight, the Muslims do part company with their Christian neighbors when it comes to the question of his resurrection from Crucifixion.

As far of the Quran is concerned, someone who resembled Jesus was put to the cross. This radical departure from the dominant Christian position as immortalized by the Council of Nicea and the Council of Chalcidon has separated Muslims from Christians from the very beginning of Islam in Arabia. It is indeed on this account that John of Damascus in his treatise against Islam that he saw this religion as the 101st heresy of Christianity.

Anyone who suggests to modern-day Christian believers that DNA has positively identified the remains of Jesus would be engaged in what most if not all Christians would call the greatest subversion of all heresies in the name of science. By affirming this, one goes to the warning of Paul. Without crucifixion, there is no Christianity.

Muslim writers and leaders in our age must be very careful in dealing with these announcements from the scientific community. Although many Muslims, including Muamar Qaddafi of Libya and his recent statement about the Muslim view of Jesus death and resurrection, have argued that even when science affirms Jesus' DNA categorically, their faith in his miraculous birth and upliftment to heaven is protected since the Quran verse says that someone else, not him, suffered the humiliation of Crucifixion.

Real or imagined, this Muslim view is the one-trillion-light-years historical and metaphysical position serving as the equator between the two Abrahamic faiths. The gap is even wider with Judaism and the rest of the World religions.

The DNA claim is part of the larger question of evolution versus creationism or intelligent design. The debate has not been resolved in the West.The evolutionist are banking heavily on the achievements of science in the province of DNA research. The effectiveness of DNA in the world of criminality has given hope to many in the scientific community that the mysteries of the past could be resolved through science.

So long as humans lived in this world with mythological, metaphysical and scientific compartments, this state of affairs will remain unchanged. Relics of these competing paradigms are in our daily languages. Muslims, Jews and others in the Anglo-Saxon world still consciously or unconsciously use the term, "keep your fingers crossed." Ali A.
Mazrui, a distinguished African Muslim writing about the Sociology of the English Language many years ago, reminded English-speaking Africans about this fact.

Similarly, remnants of the pre-Christian European thought still reverberate in the firmaments of all of us when we say, "knock on word." Here we appeal to our ancestors in pre-Christian times whom we thought lived on trees. Christianity did not totally remove this view from our mental states.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (11)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.