Randall Balmer

Randall Balmer

Columbia University professor, author

Randall Balmer, an Episcopal priest, is professor of American religious history at Barnard College, Columbia University, and a visiting professor at Yale Divinity School. His most recent book is “God in the White House: A History: How Faith Shaped the Presidency from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush” (HarperOne). The “On Faith” panelist has written ten other books, including Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts the Faith and Threatens America and Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey into the Evangelical Subculture in America, which was made into a three-part documentary for PBS. Balmer was nominated for an Emmy for his script-writing on that series. His second documentary, Crusade: The Life of Billy Graham and a two-part examination of the creation-evolution debate, In the Beginning: The Creationist Controversy, also aired on PBS. Balmer has lectured at the Chautauqua Institution, the Commonwealth Club of California and the Smithsonian Associates and been a visiting professor at Rutgers, Yale, and Princeton. He has published widely in academic journals and his syndicated commentaries on religion in America have appeared in newspapers across the country. He is editor-at-large for Christianity Today. A spiritual memoir, Growing Pains: Learning to Love My Father's Faith (2001) was named spiritual "book of the year" by Christianity Today. He is currently at work on a history of religion in North America. Close.

Randall Balmer

Columbia University professor, author

Randall Balmer, an Episcopal priest, is professor of American religious history at Barnard College, Columbia University, and a visiting professor at Yale Divinity School. His most recent book is “God in the White House: A History: How Faith Shaped the Presidency from John F. Kennedy to George W. Bush” (HarperOne). The “On Faith” panelist has written ten other books, including Thy Kingdom Come: How the Religious Right Distorts the Faith and Threatens America and Mine Eyes Have Seen the Glory: A Journey into the Evangelical Subculture in America, which was made into a three-part documentary for PBS. Balmer was nominated for an Emmy for his script-writing on that series. more »

Main Page | Randall Balmer Archives | On Faith Archives


Is It About Discipline or Control?

I’ve yet to encounter anyone in my travels throughout North America who said, “Yes, I’m a member of a cult!”

» Back to full entry

All Comments (8)

Louann Meyer:

unpossibleness carpogam retype stintless nonpossession haughland anemometrographically inconsistence
City-Data.com: Primghar, Iowa
http://www.daddezio.com/cemetery/junction/CJ-VT-NDX.html

Michale Short:

unpossibleness carpogam retype stintless nonpossession haughland anemometrographically inconsistence
Landscape Flower Growers Inc.
http://www.ferrignosa.com/eng/default.asp

Anonymous:

Andrea,

that, of course, can be said of cults AND religions!

Andrea Hess | Empowered Soul Blog:

Great distinction! I would add that the purpose of a cult seems to be to serve itself or its leadership, rather than serving the individual member.

Blessings,
Andrea
http://www.EmpoweredSoul.com/blog

Henry James:

Prof Balmer should know that he doesn't need to invent his own definition of cults. There are pretty standard, academically accepted lists of characteristics.

All you need to do is google "cult characteristics" and you will get 3-4 similar and vetted lists.

One can then compare a group such as the Mormons to the list, compared to, say, Unitarians,

and see that Mormons are much more "cult=like"than Unitarians.

Whether one then dares use the word Cult to describe the Mormons in public is a political question.

In the same way that I fit most of the characteristics attributed to the class "homosexuals", but whether you dare call me one in public is a political question. Meet you in the Twin Cities Mens Room and we'll discuss the ramifications.

Brock:

By your definition, didn't the first century christians tightly regulate their members? Didn't the Apostle Paul advocate not even eating with a "brother" who was a fornicator or a greedy person or an idolater or a reviler or a drunkard or an extortioner?

Seems pretty controlling to me. Your friends couldn't be ones that sleep around, have money, watch football every weekend or drink a lot. That's 90%+ of the people in the US.

I find it fascinating that in a forum deemed as religious, there are precious few comments related to the "Holy Scriptures" of whatever religion is being represented. Pretty telling regarding what people know about their religion.

My simple view is, most people in the West have as their religion what makes them feel good. It has little to do with anything written in the bible, koran, talmud, etc. etc. etc.

Norrie Hoyt:

A cult is a religion with no political power.

- Tom Wolfe

Lady Jane:

I would include in that definition of a cult another point. When one is restricted to people they can associate with or even speak to outside of absolute necessity is another sign of being in a cult IMHO.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.