R. Gustav Niebuhr

R. Gustav Niebuhr

Director of the Religion & Society Program, Syracuse University

Gustav Niebuhr is an associate professor of religion and the media, an interdisciplinary position in the College of Arts & Sciences and the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Since June 2004, the “On Faith” panelist has directed the Religion & Society Program, an interdisciplinary undergraduate major. Niebuhr served as a visiting fellow/scholar in residence at the Center for the Study of Religion at Princeton University from December 2001 to 2003. Supported by a Ford Foundation Grant, he conducted research on religious diversity and interfaith collaboration. Prior to his academic tenure, Niebuhr was a national correspondent for The Washington Post, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, writing feature and analytical articles, and reporting on news about religion. He won several awards, including the 1993 Templeton Religion Writer of the Year Award from the Religion Newswriters Association. His articles have appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the New York Times Book Review, the Carnegie Reporter, the Christian Century, Tricycle: The Buddhist Review and Beliefnet.com. An experienced public lecturer,Niebuhr most recently spoke at Auburn Theological Seminary in May 2006 on “Is ‘Tolerance’ a Social Good?” and at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in May 2005, he lectured on “Religion as News.” Close.

R. Gustav Niebuhr

Director of the Religion & Society Program, Syracuse University

Gustav Niebuhr is an associate professor of religion and the media, an interdisciplinary position in the College of Arts & Sciences and the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Since June 2004, the “On Faith” panelist has directed the Religion & Society Program, an interdisciplinary undergraduate major. more »

Main Page | R. Gustav Niebuhr Archives | On Faith Archives


Not Another Religious Test!?

Maybe we ought to ask people running for elective office if they completely agree with all the individuals they are variously close to--their spouses, siblings, friends, physicians, attorneys, bankers... Gee, we've got the makings of a real inquisition here. What fun.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (12)

Soja John Thaikattil, Sydney, Australia:

Dear Professor Niebuhr

I wish you a wonderful Easter 2008!

Soja John Thaikattil
Sydney, Australia

Anonymous:

NOTICE: iNTENT To SUE after failing to heed me et al humble request:
ATTENTION: WAPO, N.Y. Times, N.Y.Post, et al:

Ye have used "Bad Judgement" and Ye have openly Discriminated against Us and ye are also in out-right (wrong) "ViOLATION" of This Holy Cosmic Nations U.S. CONSTiTUTiON, Federal Law(s) (i.e., FCC Rules etc..) Federal Court Order.. etc..


"i" Warned ye!


NOTE BLOGGERS Of The WORLD, here on CYBER-SPACE et al:

"i" , WE, will Post , On O.U.R. APOCALYPTIC WEb Site, the Status of THE LAW SUTE AGAINST the Party's mentioned Above, i.e. NEWSWEEK, et al! Thank You!


Note: Please do not click on blue, simply key-in black the letters, thanka shame!:


HELLO WORLD!


Please HU {MATE} S, not HUMANS, Visit Us from time to TiME. Thanka Shame!


E=eponymousECLATi, iS The NEW-SONG & e=mc2, iS FiAT-LUX!


http://JO][ZE][VZ][.US]
.J
..O
…Z
….E
…..VZ.US
http://JO][ZE][VZ][.US]
.J
..O
…Z
….E
…..VZ.US
http://JO][ZE][VZ][.US]


WAPO, YE SiNNED A GREAT SiN! You will be taught a Great lesson, This is the only Recourse!

March 19, 2008 8:08 AM

Zarathustra:

Mr. Niebuhr,

Your use of the phrase "religious test" is a bit overblown isn't it? A religious test would be for the gov't to require you to swear that you are of a certain religion in order to allow you to take office. We're not there yet. There is nothing in the constitution that requires individual citizen voters to use or not use religion as their criteria for selecting a particular candidate. In fact, we have the right to use any criteria we want. We can be ignorant of history, ignorant of foreign policy, ignorant of the candidates proposals even, much less the impact they might have and we still have the right to cast that vote. We can dismiss someone because of their skin color, or their accent or anything else and we don't even have to make up a decent reason if we don't want to, we won't be locked up for it. It's ironic isn't it, that we have a system free from a religious test, but we use our freedom of the secret ballot to implement something that looks a lot like a religious test?

Garyd:

Mr. Niebuhr in a country where 80% of the population claims some sort of religious affiliation there will always be some sort of religious test. It may not always be public but it most certainly be applied in the privacy of each believer's heart. When he steps into the voting booth.

Were it not for his twenty year relationship with Pastor Wright it wouldn't and shouldn't matter what Pastor Wright says. However he was associated with him for twenty years and you can certainly see some traces of the impact of Pastor wright's sermons in what Michelle Obama has said.

The only difference between Pastor Wright and the Grand Dragon of the KKK is the color of the skin of the people they hate and despise.

Fay:

There are certain topics I never discuss with certain friends. Religion with one friend--who is a religious nut, we never go there cause always fight. Politics with another friend, who is a anti-gov nut, we never go there cause we always fight.

So why do we expect our polititians to go there?
O'm starting to think the media WANTS a fight, so they take us there.

Anonymous:

Blacks need to start taking some personal responsibility for high rate of high school drop out, sexual promiscuity, children born out of wedlock, , absence of male parenting/role models, drugs, crime, incarceration, AIDS, and lack of personal responsibility instead of playing the victim hood game and blaming everyone else for their plight! Until that time there will always be hate mongers & race baiter,s to use them and profit from their plight like the Rev. Wright, Rev. Jessie Jackson and Rev. Al Sharpton as well as 10,s of thousands of White and Black Politicians. In fact the whole Democrat party! Hands outs, instead of a hand up, is the means of keeping Blacks down and economic Slaves! Keeping Blacks as an race of victims instead of a race of achievers is in the best interest of Black preachers and Democrat politicians! Blacks will never be lead to the promise land by hate mongering Preachers like Rev. Wright or by bottom feeding Politician that wants and works to keep Blacks in the Ghetto on Welfare, and voting Democrat!

Anonymous:

" WaitMinute:

You may not agree your friend. But if your friend is a racist and hate America from his heart, do you still want him be your friend, mentor, .. for 20 years?"


Good point.

Been There:

It's not hard to understand the basis of Rev. Wright's "racism". When your ancestors have been enslaved, raped, beaten, murdered, and lynched, it's not hard. When your ancestors are counted as three-fifths a person, it's not hard. When you are forced to ride the back of the bus, enter through the back door, walk to a one room shack to attend school while white children ride past you on school buses to brick schoolhouses, it's not hard. When you are beaten while trying to vote, it's not hard. When you are denied, scorned, and belittled because your skin is brown, IT'S NOT HARD.

WaitMinute:

You may not agree your friend. But if your friend is a racist and hate America from his heart, do you still want him be your friend, mentor, .. for 20 years?


Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.