R. Gustav Niebuhr

R. Gustav Niebuhr

Director of the Religion & Society Program, Syracuse University

Gustav Niebuhr is an associate professor of religion and the media, an interdisciplinary position in the College of Arts & Sciences and the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Since June 2004, the “On Faith” panelist has directed the Religion & Society Program, an interdisciplinary undergraduate major. Niebuhr served as a visiting fellow/scholar in residence at the Center for the Study of Religion at Princeton University from December 2001 to 2003. Supported by a Ford Foundation Grant, he conducted research on religious diversity and interfaith collaboration. Prior to his academic tenure, Niebuhr was a national correspondent for The Washington Post, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, writing feature and analytical articles, and reporting on news about religion. He won several awards, including the 1993 Templeton Religion Writer of the Year Award from the Religion Newswriters Association. His articles have appeared in the New York Times Magazine, the New York Times Book Review, the Carnegie Reporter, the Christian Century, Tricycle: The Buddhist Review and Beliefnet.com. An experienced public lecturer,Niebuhr most recently spoke at Auburn Theological Seminary in May 2006 on “Is ‘Tolerance’ a Social Good?” and at Massachusetts Institute of Technology in May 2005, he lectured on “Religion as News.” Close.

R. Gustav Niebuhr

Director of the Religion & Society Program, Syracuse University

Gustav Niebuhr is an associate professor of religion and the media, an interdisciplinary position in the College of Arts & Sciences and the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications at Syracuse University. Since June 2004, the “On Faith” panelist has directed the Religion & Society Program, an interdisciplinary undergraduate major. more »

Main Page | R. Gustav Niebuhr Archives | On Faith Archives


Mass Media? Diverse Media, Diverse Treatments of Faith

What many of us would like in the public treatment of religion is an approach that's intelligent, informative, even provocative.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (9)

garyd:

Remember the theory that if you let 100 monkeys type long enough youeventually get a copy of a Shakespearean play? Well someone is apparently trying it. They haven't got Shakespear yet but they did get www.hoax-busters.org

Anonymous:

Old media is not controlled by just a few people. Only someone who doesn't work in the media or know much about it would say that. There are more newspapers than in just the half dozen major cities, you know. And there are many, many, many small chains or just family owned papers. MANY!

Anonymous:

Don't even try to read that hoax-buster website; it could truly make you insane. It makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. The guy who wrote it is obviously a nutcase, and not an authority of any sort. You might just find him as another member of the Jesus Seminar soon...

sparrow:

I agree that the media *appears* diverse - as in there are many types of media. It is, however, managed by only a few corporations.

And if you compare Major U.S. cities to other world cities, the U.S. cities pale in comparison to them. Take Mumbai, in India. They have at least twelve different daily newspapers - all independently owned.

FOr bgone's statement, it's interesting to read it in conjunction with the previous post. bgone stated that NBC and CBS believe that the bible is the word of god, just after anonymous finished saying that those two media outlets are owned by Jewish men.

Shawn B.:

What I see in the media is mostly neglect and apathy towards regligion. However, when it is mentioned it's usually negative (abusive catholic priests, evils of mega-churches, high profile leaders falling...).

***********************************

An aside to BGONE...

Wow...that is some serious academic research there (the hoax website). Did the author's 3-grader make those illustrations? Seriously.

I also doubt that NBC, ABC, and CBS concur that the Bible is the word of God.

Viejita del oeste:

BGone, you are wrong. The mainstream media does not "believe" that the Bible is the word of God, only acknowledges that many of their viewers and readers think so. By the way, if God himself does not exist, why do you concern yourself with what he could or could not have spoken or written? I do agree that there is not anywhere near enough diversity in the realm of public information. There is a bias on both d=sides in favor of celebrity worship, poorly proved arguments and ad hominem attacks.

mo:

mass heart and mass tongue.
the mass culture and mass media of society is the same.
the mass culture in the western society is based on 4:
1-ot
2-nt
3-philosophy and mythology of greco-roman.
4-science and technology of the time.

ot and nt donot exceed the boundry of the church ,because they donot have life system.

although the majority of the mass people of the western society are belivers ,but their actual life practice is securalism.,the best of securalism brought to the mass public liberalism and captialism,the mass buck culture and its mass tongue the mass media.

so in real life the religion that is being doctornized and ritualized in the western society is the religion of the buck and its mass tongue that it reach and preach day and night for the mass public.
scholars of religion as well as the mass public need to seriously sit down and examine and test their back ground ,if not, the buck will keep floating over morality and virtues.

BGone:

For example, "700 Club" has an almost different slant on religion as compred to CBS, NBC and ABC to say nothing of FOX. All agree on one thing, the Bible is the word of God.

The Bible is a proved hoax, http://www.hoax-buster.org so they're all wrong. That's how things have been for a long time. Many can and have looked back and seen the mistake of embracing the hoax in the past but few are capable of realizing the gravity of embracing it now.

Anonymous:

"A bit like religion and spirituality in America, the media are highly diverse"

You have to be kidding me!

Diversity a la Zell, who just bought the LA Times, Chicago Tribune, and dozens of other local TV stations and daily newspapers.

What about NBC which owns Universal pictures or the Time Warner (CNN, WB, and Warner Bros pictures) or how about Fox media etc.

There is no diversity in media aside from 5 or so major corporations. They control local, national news, magazines, newspapers and the motion picture industry. And of course we should never dare mention that the majority are Jewish men. Zucker - nbc, Meyers - WB, Redstone - MTV, Moonves - CBS, Geffen - Dreamworks, Grey - Universal. etc. etc. etc.

If you believe there is "diversity" in media then you are a fool.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.