Religion Stay Home!
How would you respond to radical Muslim clerics in northwest Pakistan -- now under Islamic law -- who are calling for expansion of Islamic law across the entire federal republic of Pakistan. Should any nation be governed by religious rules.
The more the world grows, the less need there is for religion and the more need for God. They are not one and the same, you know. Religion has proven to be a harsh, judgmental and a very effective tool for turning people away from God. Religion has proven to be the breeding ground for people who want to control other people, in the name of God.
Enter Pakistan. The recent push by Islamic extremists to get rid of democracy and put religion in its place is a tragedy and a travesty against God. Killing innocent people in the name of God is religion, not God. Discriminating against women, gays, blacks, people with HIV/AIDS is religion, not God.
Sufi Mohammed said in a statement that supporting an infidel system (that would be a democracy) is a sin. He said that the violence between extremists railing against the federal government could have been greatly reduced had the government respected the wishes of the extremists years ago.
That's control, not religion.
Religion and government have always come to blows when it has come to vying for control, but the sad thing is that religion is not supposed to be about oppression, which is what control amounts to.
One might be able to make wiggle room for the "sins" of government; for all its espouses on morality, government is supposed to be about control, power, conquest. Even so-called democracies are about control.
But religion is supposed to be about liberation. People are supposed to feel liberated because of a loving, inclusive God who does not force people to believe, but only encourages them, with the promise that believing in a higher good makes for a better life.
When religion steps into the role of government, a.k.a. control, it loses its claim of goodness and morality. When religious leaders kill "in the name of God," they move from being divine to despotic.
Swati leaders described religious guys in black turbans terrorizing people who oppose the religious types, riding through towns and villages cutting off ears and noses of their so-called "enemies."
What? People are enemies because they choose to be religious democrats, believing both in government and religion, but as separate entities?
In the Hebrew scriptures, Chapter 11 of the Book of Hosea, God cries out, "When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son, but the more I called Israel, the more they went from me."
Could it be that God, the one God of us all, is calling the extremists to undo the uneasy marriage that has been forged between religion and government? Are the religious types losing an opportunity to bring people to God by being too entrenched in government, and too willing to do what government is supposed to do?
I think so.
By
Susan K. Smith
|
April 21, 2009; 4:14 PM ET
Share This:
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: The President and the Christian Ethic |
Next: Talibanization of Pakistan
Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | April 27, 2009 10:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I hear people say they've "found God" when what they mean is they've "found Being Nice". I can Be Nice without all the ridiculous accretions that are inherent in whatever form of the word "God".
Posted by: DavidBarron | April 24, 2009 6:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Hey Rev Sue:
Your blog stirs my thinking on the deep divide between God and religion. I believe it was Thomas Merton who suggested that as soon as man begins to act like God, he behaves like the devil. It never ceases to amaze me of the over-the-top and bizarre things that happen in the name of "religion." The Taliban expansion seems to be an example of "do right" dogma. They are merely replacing one "thing" with their "ain't nobody right but us thing." It is unfortunate that some would appoint themselves as vice-gods assigned to clean up things by tearing them down. This movement is scary!
Perhaps Howard Thurman was correct when responding to a person critical of Christianity. Thurman observed that some expressions of Christianity are "about Jesus" while he sought to be "of Jesus." I believe that as humans we will always "get it wrong" whenever we begin to insist that we are always right through violence and intimidation. Thanks for a thought-provoking article.
Ozzie Smith
Posted by: jr4111checkitout | April 24, 2009 8:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Theocracy is a reality that is diametrically opposed to democracy. What you call and describe as "religion" in government in this article is a theocratic understanding of society and unfortunately that is the same understanding one fings in the sacred texts not only of Islam but also of Judaism and early Christianity.
Posted by: Jamila1 | April 23, 2009 11:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment
As a believer, I left the following of religion long ago to follow a spiritual path. It's unfortunate that religion and spirituality don't necessarily coexist.
Posted by: djw531 | April 23, 2009 8:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment
In past days they had a division of power, which was the Church and the Rulers.
In the United States we have the three branches of government to balance the power. We have a separation of Church and State and religious freedom to worship the god or gods of your choosing or none at all.
This prevents government from being beholden to one line of religious thinking over another and thus no one religion can cut the power of men in government to represent the people and not a certain religion.
If this were not the case and the religion gained more power over the people then the church or religion could label any particular endeavor of government as good and/or evil.
In doing so then the church would rule the land and give the human rights to their god rather than giving it back to the people.
So is this what happens when government becomes a religion?
Posted by: tyson41 | April 23, 2009 8:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Religions that are supposed to have been founded on the premise of creating and maintaining a moral code have too often been obsessed with sustaining the human code: believe what we believe, or be disgraced because you don't. That is not what God says, but it is what the "religious folk" believe. It's sad that religions have moved so far away from Him. Above all the human hatred and human judgment, is the love of God. A God who loves ALL of his children. A God who is transcendent above petty human squabbles for power. He asks simply for everyone to love thy neighbor as He loves us. He doesn't love any sinner on this earth less because they have sinned. And EVERYBODY on this earth has sinned. He doesn't love any person less because they don't live by the human code of believing in the Muslim God or the Christian God, because He is the God of ALL people. Any nation, government, religion, or people who try to force their religion on a society in His name is not living by His word. God is not an oppressive God and He does not justify killing in His name. I wish that the Islamic extremists would just take a step back for a minute and think about what their purpose is and is not. War only begets more wars, He only wants peace for all of his children.
Posted by: spellady08 | April 23, 2009 12:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Religions that are supposed to have been founded on the premise of creating and maintaining a moral code have too often been obsessed with sustaining the human code: believe what we believe, or be disgraced because you don't. That is not what God says, but it is what the "religious folk" believe. It's sad that religions have moved so far away from Him. Above all the human hatred and human judgment, is the love of God. A God who loves ALL of his children. A God who is transcendent above petty human squabbles for power. He asks simply for everyone to love thy neighbor as He loves us. He doesn't love any sinner on this earth less because they have sinned. And EVERYBODY on this earth has sinned. He doesn't love any person less because they don't live by the human code of believing in the Muslim God or the Christian God, because He is the God of ALL people. Any nation, government, religion, or people who try to force their religion on a society in His name is not living by His word. God is not an oppressive God and He does not justify killing in His name. I wish that the Islamic extremists would just take a step back for a minute and think about what their purpose is and is not. War only begets more wars, He only wants peace for all of his children.
Posted by: spellady08 | April 23, 2009 12:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The World's great religions embody grand, noble, lofty ideals. Religious followers on the other hand, are not so inspiring.
Posted by: mrobertb | April 22, 2009 9:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Religion has been raising human consciousness for centuries. Whatever man is now, whatever little consciousness he has, the whole credit goes to religion. Politics with out religion has been a curse, a calamity; and whatever is ugly in humanity, politics is responsible for.
The fact is that Politics interfere with the religion and for material gains vilify religion.
Writes John Esposito:
"For more than four decades governments formulated policy in the midst of a superpower rivalry that defined the globe and the future in terms of the visible ideological and military threat posed by the Soviet Union. In the aftermath of the cold war, the fall of the Soviet Union and the discrediting of communism have created a "threat vacuum" that has given rise to a search for new enemies. For some Americans the enemy is the economic challenge the Japanese or the European Community represent. For others it is an Islamic world whose 1 billion Muslims form a majority in more than 48 countries and a rapidly growing minority in Europe and America. Some view Islam as the only ideological alternative to the West that can cut across national boundaries, and perceiving it as politically and culturally at odds with Western society, fear it; others consider it more a basic demographic threat...........
The causes of the resurgence are many and differ from country to country, but common catalysts and concerns are identifiable. Secular nationalism (whether in the form of liberal nationalism, Arab nationalism, or socialism) has not provided a sense of national identity or produced strong and prosperous societies. The governments in Muslim countries-- mostly nonelected, authoritarian, and dependent on security forces--have been unable to establish their political legitimacy. They have been blamed for the failure to achieve economic self-sufficiency, to stem the widening gap between rich and poor, to halt widespread corruption, to liberate Palestine, to resist Western political and cultural hegemony. Both the political and the religious establishments have come under criticism, the former as a westernized, secular elite overly concerned with power and privilege, and the latter (in Sunni Muslim nations) as leaders of the faithful who have been co-opted by governments that often control mosques and religious universities and other institutions".
Extemist religious party latestly has won in Israel???
Posted by: SPARK1 | April 22, 2009 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.











i believe individuals who happen to be muslim share the innate desires for peace, love and harmony, but,
HELP!!!!
i've been asking this question over and over (apologies to those who've seen it) on various threads, but still no answer:
are there verses you can quote from the koran (that were not later superseded by the ugly medina verses) and hadith that promote tolerance, fairness, equality, freedom of religion, self-determination etc...?
please, i would really like to know.