Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite
Professor, Chicago Theological Seminary

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite

Former president of Chicago Theological Seminary (1998-2008), Thistlethwaite is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

 ALL POSTS

"Frightened" tea party comes to Chicago

The tea party movement held a rally in Daley Plaza today at noon. A core group of about 300-400 mostly middle and retirement aged white people listened to speeches and carried signs. "Axis of Evil--Obama, Pelosi and Reid," "Abolish the Federal Reserve," "My Favorite Marxist" [with a picture of President Obama as an alien], "Please dispose of socialism carefully," and "Reload and Repeal" as examples. Around them another circle, about half as large, more racially and ethnically diverse, with Chicago police walking between, was made up of the anti-tea party folks. They carried signs like "Teabagging = bigotry," "CHI-town is Obama country," "Support health care," and "Equal rights for Gay Americans." Anti-war signs abounded. At first glance, the whole plaza looked exactly like democracy in action.

I walked around, asking people if they'd talk to me. When I identified myself as a blogger for The Washington Post's On Faith site, quite a few of those with tea party signs or T-shirts refused to speak to me, and two men pointedly turned their backs. A couple of folks were willing to talk, however, and I spent nearly half an hour sitting on benches in the shade with an older couple from Wheaton, Ill.

"I've never been active in politics before," the husband confided. They didn't want to give me their names, but they were just fine with my writing down their words. "I've been to five tea parties now," he continued. His wife, with tea bags dangling from her straw brimmed hat, nodded vigorously. "He's even been to Washington DC."

"Why?" I asked. "What got you to get involved with this movement?"

"I'm frightened," he replied. "I'm frightened," he repeated.

"Of what?" I asked.

"Obama is fundamentally changing our country, he's overturning our capitalist system and he wants to centralize all power in DC and take it away from the states."

This couple was of retirement age. I asked them if they were on Medicaid. They both nodded. They also are on Social Security. "Aren't those big government programs?" I asked. "Well, we wish we didn't have to take this money, but we need it," the wife replied.

I asked them if they were Christians and active in their church. They assured me they were. The husband had a copy of the Constitution in his hand, so I asked him about what he thought about the Establishment clause of the first Amendment and political activity like this. "People have been brainwashed about separation of church and state," the husband assured me. "The government's plan is to get rid of religion." They encouraged me to listen to Sandy Rios, a right-wing radio commentator in Chicago. Rios is the President of Culture Campaign. She formerly served as President of Concerned Women for America. The mission of the Culture Campaign is to "to engage Christians in actively living out and declaring biblical truth in a secular, humanistic American culture." Sandy Rios has spoken at their independent church in Wheaton.

As we all finished up our water bottles and were getting up to move on, the husband came back to me. "I'm frightened," he repeated. "You write that."

And so I did. These are nice folks. I believed him. And I believe it's important. The diffuse and yet very real fear that seems to underlie at least this couple's motivation to attend tea party rallies shouldn't just be put down to political differences in a democracy.

I spoke to several other tea partiers, ones who would talk to me, and I got pretty much the talking points of "big government growth, government erosion of individual liberties, and return to the traditional roots of American culture." Nobody else volunteered they were fearful. But the man carrying this sign was saying that too: "I don't give a [expletive deleted] that Obama is black, it scares the [expletive deleted] out of me that he's red." The "Marxist" and "Socialist" signs, especially the one's with Obama as the Joker, those signs say "fear" to me.

About an hour into the rally, there was a scuffle. I couldn't see, but the crowd became more charged. Chicago Police moved in. "What was that about?" I asked several people closer to the stage. "A guy went crazy and started shouting." "He was just a plant to make us all look crazy." This was debated among the crowd for a short while, and then things calmed down and the drone of the speeches continued.

I also talked to some of the protesters. A retired man from Chicago carrying a sign that read, "Health Care on Demand," said he was a long time social justice advocate. I asked him what he thought of the tea party movement. "Amorphous," he responded.

I also happened upon Kathy Kelly of Voices for Creative Non-Violence, the long-time anti-war tax resister, peace activist and three-time Nobel Peace Prize nominee. She and other anti-war folks were also protesting taxes, only because tax dollars are used to support war. Kathy lives at a subsistence level to avoid paying taxes. "I can't imagine changing my life so I can contribute to the devastation of war," she told me. In addition, she observed that because of her commitment to living at a subsistence level, she can't own a car and she consumes very little fossil fuels, just helping to save the planet."The IRS is my spiritual director," she argued. Now that's not something you hear every April 15.

I wish I could be more like Kathy Kelly, calmly witnessing for peace as the tea party unfolds around her. But I'm frightened too. I'm frightened of the undercurrent of fear that was right below the surface of Daley Plaza in Chicago today.

--------------

Note to commenter Veritas9: The comment from the folks who say they were the ones I talked to at Daley Plaza shows how hard communication is along these lines of difference. I took quite careful notes, and indeed the gentleman did say three times that he was frightened, crossing back to speak to me as they were walking on. I'm sorry, but they did not choose to give me their names. They were filmed by a reporter at one point and they seemed to give him their names, but they didn't choose to give them to me. I was turned away at that time to make room for the reporter and his cameraman; giving their names to that reporter may be what he is remembering. I know in conversation people are often less specific than they wish to be. They did say Sandy Rios spoke at their church without the detail included below about which part of the church. The exchange about the plan to get rid of the government was the gentleman saying "their plan is to get rid of religion." I then asked, "Who?" and he replied, "The government." No generalities about totalitarianism. I didn't say they were poor, but I did say they were nice. I liked them and I believed them. But such an exchange does go to show how far we are from understanding one another even when we sit and talk. I walked away wondering how communication across such differences could be improved. Blogging conversations may not be the way, and certainly this post and the comment gives us food for thought on that, but I wrote what I heard and then wrote down on my pad.

By Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite  |  April 15, 2010; 3:22 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Time to heal the hate | Next: Methinks Jim Wallis doth protest too much

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



I am sorrowfully disappointed with the misrepresentations by Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite of my wife’s and my statements at the Daley Plaza, Chicago, Tea Party held at noon on April 15, 2010. I am the man she quoted as saying “I’m frightened” in response to her question, “what got you involved in this movement?” I actually made this statement as an afterthought at the end of our discussion. I never said “You write that.” I answered her question with four or five opposing points against our current government administration.
“I’m frightened” is a good story heading for her purposes but has little to do with my reasons and my wife’s reasons for joining the tea party. In order for her story to work we had to be poor, mislead, frighten old people, which we are not and I vehemently resent her twisting our story for her pretend journalism.
Allow me to correct some lies. She said we didn’t give our names, we did and she was taking notes. She quotes my wife “He’s even been to Washington D.C.” my wife said “we were in Washington D.C. “ She prints that she asked if we were on Medicaid, the government program for the poor. She actually asked if we were on Medicare and she said her husband was a doctor so I assume she knows the difference. My wife answered she was on Medicare and I told her I was on a very expensive program for myself but I was against Obamacare. She and I had a five minute discussion about religion and the separation clause in the first amendment. I told her why I thought it was being incorrectly applied and I said that a hallmark of totalitarian government was destroying religion, she chose to quote me saying “the government’s plan is to get rid of religion.” She said Sandy Rios had spoken in our church. This is not true; we told her our church provided our church auditorium for Culture Campaign meetings, which were public meetings, Sandy didn’t speak to our congregation.
Outside of these corrections Susan’s blog is her opinion, but her opinion is built on the misinformation she conveys.
My wife and I are not poor. My wife is not “the little old lady, “she is a reformed liberal activist and owns her own company. Tea Parties are political expressions of citizens and we attend them for political expression, intellectual agreement and because we enjoy them. They are an American tradition kind of like war protests.

Posted by: veritas9 | April 16, 2010 12:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well, I agree "things they are achanging."

The 21st century will not look like the 20th century. I think that is what frightens folks. But, dreaming we can keep it the same will not stop things from being different.

Are we to be dragged, kicking and screaming into the changes that have to be made? Or, can we envision and direct the change?

There are no more Marlboro men riding the range on their trusty horses with their trusty six-shooters at their side listening to the cows moo in the night.

Posted by: amelia45 | April 16, 2010 11:01 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm frightened that people are so willing to believe the story line from media figures like Sandy Rios.

My dad, who is getting quite old and in fact is just in the early stages of Alzheimers, calls me or my brother in a very agitated state sometimes after watching one of Glen Beck's shows.

He really thinks that terrible things are afoot in D.C. When Beck can proclaim his message, and have at least parts of it parroted by leaders such as Mitch McConnell, and then the radio has Rios, more Beck, Dr. Laura and all these other figures spouting similar tropes, it really builds up to a massive disinformation campaign.

I fear that we're not that far from some sort of 1930's German-esqu tipping point. Shudder.

Posted by: RalfW | April 16, 2010 1:22 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Obviously the RCC is not the only tax-exempt group lobbying Congress.

From guidestar.com:

“The tax-exempt The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith has a professional lobbying staff of approximately 528 in 28 offices nationwide, of those , two staff members based in Washington DC devoted 75% of their time, and the other devoted approximately 50% engaged in advocacy on (Congressional) legislative proposals related to federal hate crime laws, global anti-terrorism, the Middle East Peace Process, immigration issues, the use of government money to fund faith-based organizations and counter-terrorism proposals outside Washington, DC.”
The total revenue for the ADL in 2008 was $59,960,134 mostly coming from contributions and grants.

The largest of the lobbyists:(note the large sums of money being spent by health "profiteers" on lobbying )

Lobbying Client Total 1998-2009

US Chamber of Commerce $606,758,180
American Medical Assn $220,832,500
General Electric $196,410,000
AARP $175,702,064
American Hospital Assn $174,890,431
Pharmaceutical Rsrch & Mfrs of America $173,403,920
AT&T Inc $150,471,757
Northrop Grumman $143,005,253
Exxon Mobil $138,886,942
National Assn of Realtors $138,417,380
Blue Cross/Blue Shield $136,317,077
Business Roundtable $134,030,000
Edison Electric Institute $133,995,999
Verizon Communications $132,534,841
Lockheed Martin $122,340,423
Boeing Co $121,528,310
General Motors $106,914,483
Southern Co $104,620,694
Freddie Mac $96,194,048
Altria Group $93,650,000

Would the move to end donations and tax exemptions for any group (including Americans for Prosperity, Freedom Works, Tea Parties etc.) generate the added taxes/contributions needed to pay for universal health care?? No, but it sure would help!!!!

And the money spent by the health-"profiteers" on lobbying should be spent on health insurance for those who cannot presently afford it.

Posted by: YEAL9 | April 16, 2010 12:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment

CCN-Yeal, you wanna talk "non-profit" groups? Let's talk about the "Americans for Prosperity" group, that's behind the Tea Parties. They were founded by Koch Industries, one of the largest privately-held corporations in America. Then there's Freedom Works, whose found is Dick Armey, former Congressman and now lobbyist. Another bigwig behind the Tea Parties is Don Blankenship, owner of Massey Energy. Yep, the same Massey Energy that lost 29 miners due to a preventable mining accident this week - and who won't even let his workers take time off to go to the funeral of their fellow miners.

How does that compare with the non-profit groups that you're condemning?

Posted by: Athena4 | April 15, 2010 10:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I was at that tea party and I found it interesting that younger generations were chanting "Free healthcare for all". Do they honestly think the healthcare bill that just passed is going to be free? And how will they mandate that everyone have it or be taxed? And yes I have a sister who cannot get health care because she has a broken back but I also know of countless moochers who have disability and sure dont deserve it or need it. I'm not so sure what Christianity had to do with your article either or the fact that most of the people were white and middle class. Are you trying to pull a race card because I saw lots of eldery people with signs, passing out cards and talking and shaking hands with the crowd.

Posted by: LDZave | April 15, 2010 9:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Then there is the "non-profit" group, The Center for American Progress. John Podesta is the president of the CFAP making over $250,000/yr with eight managers/fellows averaging $200,000/yr each. Contributions made to CFAP for 2008 were in excess of $28 million.

The Rev. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite currently works for the CFAP as a senior fellow. She was not listed on the IRS Form 990 for 2008 but senior fellows at the CFAP typically make $200,000/yr. Ref. guidestar.org

Those interested in social justice should direct donations away from "non-profits" like the CFAP and into things like universal health care.

Posted by: YEAL9 | April 15, 2010 6:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is what happens when too many mental patients are released prematurely and manipulated by twisted leaders. These little groups have yet to say anything of substance.

Posted by: revbookburn | April 15, 2010 6:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm afraid that the conservative movement has been taken over by paranoia and have turned to fear as well as half-truths as the predominant means of spreading their message.

The sensible conservatives would be exiled if they attempted to contradict the irrational fear that is being encouraged by their own leadership.

Posted by: rica_rodr | April 15, 2010 5:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

No, the problem with the Tea Partiers is that they're afraid that the "lazy welfare queens" (dog-whistle word for a racial epithet that begins with N) are gonna get something for nothing.

You know who the biggest "welfare queens" are? The corporations, NOT the blacks/Hispanics, etc.

Posted by: Athena4 | April 15, 2010 5:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Susan, thanks for this thoughtful piece. It seems fear and misinformation are what is driving the tea party movement.

Posted by: crucialruddy | April 15, 2010 5:11 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yeah. Wait until YOU get old and sick and need Medicare, dude.

My parents are in their late '70's. They have Medicare and Blue Cross from my Dad's former job. They are in good financial shape as compared to many other seniors. My Dad was hospitalized recently, and Medicare picked up 80% of the cost of his treatment, both in the hospital and nursing home. You know what my Mom said? "Thank God for Medicare and Lyndon Johnson."

My 40-some year old friend who didn't have health insurance through his job, and couldn't get it independently because of a pre-existing condition, not so much. He died from pneumonia, the same thing that my Dad had. Only HE didn't have socialist government health insurance that would have allowed him to go to the doctor without declaring bankruptcy. As it was, most of his estate went to pay his final hospital bills.

When you attend a funeral for someone who died because they didn't have health care, it kind of changes your perspective.

Posted by: Athena4 | April 15, 2010 5:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Berferd,

Without Social Security and Medicare how else would this couple get by? Not many people have the financial discipline to save all their lives for retirement or medical care later in life. Just look at the economic mess we are in to see the lack of financial discipline most people have. All of us have the freedom to make alternative investments if we want, I don't remember anyone telling me that I could not have an IRA or savings account. Think about the problems most low to middle income people would face without Medicare, Medicaid or Social Security. Would you feel comfortable investing this money into Wallstreet after what we've seen these last couple of years?

The problem with the Tea Party and the movement in general is the undercurrent of fear. Unfortunately many of the political conservative leadership has decided that their best path to regain power is to fan the intrinsic fear that people have towards the change that is needed to get our country back on track. Many of their leadship who should know better, have decided to use deception to further their own political goals.

Posted by: rica_rodr | April 15, 2010 5:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Susan, please, you know that baiting older conservatives who take Medicare or Social Security is a mean-spirited trick. You and all readers know they, like all of us, have been FORCED to pay into it all their lives on the promise they could get some of it back. They were not allowed alternative investments; they had no choice. It's wrong to hint they are some kind of hypocrites (as so many leftish bloggers are trying to do this past couple weeks) simply because these folks also want to cut government spending in general. It was their money to begin with. Be fair, or else go write for someone with an audience that is less aware of the facts and less able to reason fairly. Washington Post readers deserve better.

Posted by: berferd | April 15, 2010 4:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company