Obama's Screw Up
President Obama yesterday gave five interviews in which he said that the "self-induced injury" of two of his appointees having to withdraw because of tax problems was his fault. "I screwed up," he repeated. Not even "We screwed up," but "I screwed up." Wow, that looks like taking personal responsibility. But is it a good idea for a president to be so direct about taking personal responsibility, or could it ultimately weaken his presidency for Obama to say, just two weeks out, "I screwed up"?
In the last eight years, being President seemed to mean "never having to say you're sorry." In fact, that pop philosophy from the 1970 novel and film Love Story seemed to guide the non-apologies of many in the previous administration including Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Alberto Gonzalez and John Yoo to name only a few. In fact, most of the above are still vigorously non-apologizing, especially about the torture of detainees.
Yes, change has come to Washington, at least in this. But is it a good idea for the President to say, "I screwed up"?
When I became President of Chicago Theological Seminary (a much smaller presidential job), I asked an experienced president of another graduate school for what that president considered the most important advice. She said, "You'll screw up. It's not a matter of if you'll screw up, but only when you'll screw up. The only thing to do is to recognize it, admit it, fix what you can and move on." This is the truth. I followed that advice, because, in fact, I did screw up sometimes.
I learned the hardest part is "recognize it." We have to credit that by and large people in leadership positions are trying to do a good job. Just because I profoundly disagree with George W. Bush or Dick Cheney or even Alberto Gonzalez, doesn't mean I can't acknowledge that by their lights they were trying to do what they thought was best for the country.
Obama too is trying to do his best. I believe he is right that Tom Daschle is the best person to head Health and Human Resources and it will now be much harder to get much better health care policy passed in this country because Daschle will not be leading that effort.
But what Obama realizes, and what I came to believe the previous administration could not ever acknowledge, is that good intentions are not enough. In fact, good intentions can produce a lot of harm especially because when you intend the good, it is awfully hard to recognize the harmful effects of your acts. As Justice Louis Brandeis once said, "The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding."
The idea that good intentions can result in great harm, even result in evil, is evidently a deeply held belief of Obama's. This exact question actually came up during the most recent presidential campaign. Candidates Obama and McCain were both invited to a forum on leadership at Rev. Rick Warren's Saddleback Church in California.
Rev. Warren asked both candidates about evil: "Does evil exist? And if it does, do we ignore it? Do we negotiate with it? Do we contain it? Do we defeat it?" Each of these men answered very differently. Barack Obama said, in part, "Now, the one thing that I think is very important is for to us have some humility in how we approach the issue of confronting evil, because a lot of evil's been perpetrated based on the claim that we were trying to confront evil." When the same question was asked of John McCain, he replied, forthrightly, "Defeat it."
Obama is acting on the belief he articulated to Rev. Warren. This is the practice of having some humility, of telling it like it is, of just recognizing you screwed up, saying "I screwed up," fixing what you can and then moving on. It can be a strong model of leadership and one that is especially suited to these anxious times. With Obama, we know where we stand. When he tells us things aren't going so well, there's no panic. In fact, it seems to have the opposite effect and is very calming to people.
My oldest son, who is a physicist and also a graduate of the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, remarked to me a few days ago that President Obama had gone on television that day and said we are a long way from being out of this financial crisis because the banks have yet to write down significant amounts of bad debt. Obama said this, it was repeated on many news channels, and yet the Dow went up slightly because of other economic indicators.
People are getting used to Obama telling them what's what and it is helping us face reality. Members of the previous administration, last spring, couldn't even bring themselves to say the word "recession" and kept denying financial reality. When they were finally forced to admit the financial crisis, from then on every slightly negative word about the economy, especially from the President, sent the Dow spiraling down.
But you've got to watch it. One more thing I learned as President: keep the screw ups to a minimum. You can go to the "I'm sorry, I screwed up" well once too often and then it does weaken your administration. The alternatives will then be less transparency or less confidence in your leadership. The truth-telling is good, though. Keep that and for God's sake vet these candidates before you nominate them. And good luck.
By
Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite
|
February 4, 2009; 9:40 AM ET
Share This:
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Not All Holocaust Denial Is Equal |
Next: Waiting for the Second Coming of Sadat
Posted by: flipper49 | February 5, 2009 1:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
It is refreshing to have anyone admit a mistake. Not, "I acted on the intelligence at hand" or "Hey, I wasn't the only one who screwed up."
Posted by: djmolter | February 5, 2009 12:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment
BO is the leader of the Immoral Majority. His appointments simply reinforce this.
If he and his staff cannot even correctly read background checks, how in the world are they going to spend trillions of our taxes responsibly???????
Posted by: CCNL | February 5, 2009 11:32 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Not to sound too much like an apologist, but I may not be able to help it.
Look at it this way.
Would Hillary Clinton ever admit to making a mistake like this, even if she really did?
The people of the United States elected Barack Obama partly to break the mold, to shatter paradigms in Washington, to change the direction the so-called leadership in this country was heading.
Hard to break eggs without dribbling a little on the counter.
What's more important is to see what's going RIGHT with this process. The president has staff that make recommendations to him for people to fill these positions. He either approves or disapproves them based on that information. It then goes to the Senate for their Advice and Consent (remember the novel?).
Either the president's advisors can screw up, the president can screw up, or congress can screw up. They act as checks and balances when they critically, and fairly evaluate appointees. The worst excesses, and attrocities, happen when things run too smoothly, when eveyone acts as a rubber stamp in the process.
Barack Obama doesn't know exactly what will or will not fly through Congress in this new administration. As long as the Senate is grading fairly, I don't mind the President getting a few C's and D's on these issues; as long as he learns from them and makes the right choices on the major issues when the crunch hits.
Posted by: mhoust | February 5, 2009 10:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I once criticized an outstanding employee for not making any mistakes. I told him it was a compliment, now turn it up until he found the edge, even if he stepped over it occasionally.
Mistakes are one way to measure performance. If you are not making any at all, you are not pushing yourself. It is not making mistakes that matters, but the ability to recognize, correct and minimize them. Our past president did none of the above. This one is off to a good start.
Posted by: garethharris | February 5, 2009 8:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Bush did the right thing by never admitting to anything? This is neochristian morality for you - a glaring example.
I remember working in McClean for a hateful, old Irish Catholic racist who told me never to apologize for anything. I bet he voted for Bush, too.
Posted by: coloradodog | February 5, 2009 7:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment
BO is the leader of the Immoral Majority. His appointments simply reinforce this.
If he and his staff cannot even correctly read background checks, how in the world are they going to spend trillions of our taxes responsibly???????
Posted by: CCNL | February 5, 2009 12:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment
It didn't seem to be a strategy not to appear weak that motivated Bush to never admit a mistake - it seemed to be a genuine failure of character.
He displayed the kind of hubris seen in someone who had, literally, everything handed to him - legacy appointment to Yale; used his father's connections to invest in the ball team and the failed oil business; used his father's connections again to get state side duty when others were dying in Viet Nam; and the Supreme Court to appoint him to his first term.
Just admitting to a mistake puts Obama light years ahead. He'll make his share of them, but he'll also learn from them.
Posted by: EnemyOfTheState | February 4, 2009 7:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment
hi i useually enjoy and agree with your assertions and opions and reflections.... i find myself a little baffled and confused at who i'm reading.. i could be wrong but the topic and the main point seems to be acnowledging reality and getting things right...instead of pretending or wishing, which is what we i think all said we wanted when we went to the polls. how is it possible that people can so soon try to paint themselves into that same corner again by trying to be god and perfect.. instead of human beings with a reliance on gods guidance which is show through people, time and experience with in my way of thinking no one being close to perfect. i don't know about you but if i was ruthlessly honest with looking at every choice made during a day it woun't be long before i found i made a simple mistake because i am..human... i meant to be perfect,,, i certainly din't try to do things wrong but being human it seems that it becomes apparrent quite often that my first response was not the correct one or perhaps was the first step twowards a more correct answer. if the idea is to get it right then i do not understand how you feel a leaders prestige, stature and ability to accomplish things could be hurt by trying to do something better or make something right.. correct me if i'm wrong but didn't we just try the idea of a few people being all wise and making all the choices maybe lincon had it right whenhe said you cant fool all the people all the time .. it makes sense to me to work with the idea that input and choices and options are better than pretending everything is ok... but thena agin i'mjust a dyslexic artis and the son of a blueridge mountain hillbilly i'm not 2 brite lol i most likely got this wrong..
Posted by: artistkvip1 | February 4, 2009 6:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment
It's nice seeing how a President can behave if he has a compliant and supportive press corps.
GWB did the right thing when faced with an aggressively hostile press - he never admitted to anything. Boy, if he had, they would have torn him apart. They tore him apart anyway - sometimes with faked documents - there was no reason to give them any more ammunition that necessary.
Anyway, kudos to Obama for being willing to admit a mistake.
Posted by: ZZim | February 4, 2009 5:44 PM
Report Offensive Comment
For those of us who have always felt his election was a mistake because this is not the time to have a president who requires "on the job training", this does not bode well for his administration. He appears to be the naive, weak, pushover that we thought he would be.
This after his ridiculous interview broadcast to the "Muslim World" in which he bashed his own country in an effort to placate the aggrieved (what a laugh) Saudis and their censored audience. He let Pelosi run all over him to the tune of $895 billion with a ridiculous spendathon/stimulus plan that even Senate dems may not support without a major restructuring.
It's been like amateur hour up till now, hopefully he'll get it together before some school-yard bully in the guise of Putin starts giving him a wedgie.
Posted by: FH123 | February 4, 2009 5:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The 'I screwed up' route is indeed refreshing, especially after the last 3 decades of presidents.
I think the only way that route could work against the current administration is 'I screwed up again.'
As long as Obama shows each time he's screwed up that he's LEARNED from the screw up, the American people will appreciate him more and more.
Posted by: outlawtorn103 | February 4, 2009 5:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Take it easy. He'll be fine. The man is an organizational genius.
Posted by: rslavelle | February 4, 2009 4:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Every day I find another reason to admire Obama. Of course, his apology will not play well with those who prefer their President to be as infallible as their God. Since Bush never apologized, did that make him infallible? Hardly! Honesty in government is very refreshing and will be far more productive in the long run. It just won't appear as tidy as when all information is controlled or suppressed by a dictator.
Posted by: JimZ1 | February 4, 2009 2:57 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.











Let's face it...BO "apologized" only because the nation knew he'd made another sheister choice! If there had been any question as to Daschle's guilt in not paying taxes, BO would NOT have said anything to defend himself. You people STILL can't read him? Haven't you watched his body language? He lies almost every time he appears on TV! Wake up, people...please!