Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite
Professor, Chicago Theological Seminary

Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite

Former president of Chicago Theological Seminary (1998-2008), Thistlethwaite is a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress.

 ALL POSTS

Warren Buffett, American Dumbledore

Warren Buffett has long been called "the Wizard of Omaha," but recent financial gyrations in world-wide markets have greatly increased his wizardry quotient. You could not open a paper over the weekend or listen to a financial newscast without Buffett's wizard qualities being mentioned.

But the financial sector tends to be silent on exactly what kind of wizard they think Buffett is. Is he more like Gandalf of the Lord or the Rings, or does he favor Dumbledore of the Harry Potter series?

It's Dumbledore hands down. Gandalf dies and rises in the Lord of the Rings; he is a divine figure. Dumbledore is all too human. He makes mistakes, and he is mortal. Remember he runs a school. He teaches Harry Potter, but does not have all the answers. The lesson of Dumbledore is that there is no magic that can solve all your problems. Problems get solved as people grow up and learn to work together.

If Buffett is Dumbledore, then the presidential candidates (both of them) are Harry Potter. This fits. While Barack Obama and John McCain agree on nothing else, they do agree on Warren Buffett. Both would make him Secretary of the Treasury. That's our first clue that Buffett really is a wizard of no common order.

The Harry Potter series is not just a sequence of coming of age stories. The books are an extended metaphor for the struggle for spiritual meaning and purpose in a world that is dominated by consumption and a slave to the machine age.

The Wizard of Omaha has famously said, "Beware of geeks bearing formulas." Many Americans do not realize it, but one reason for the huge gyrations of the market in recent weeks has been that computer formulae are driving the selling and buying. Vast quantities of stock are brought and sold through computer programs--when this does that, then buy or sell. No humans are allowed to think. Nobody but Buffett, that is.

Much of the determination of Americans to pick presidents who are mediocre and not obviously smart is due to the fact that in our hearts we know we have lost control to the machines and we despair that human intelligence is not equal to them. Better to just pick someone with whom you can have a beer. We resent the machines and the geeks who made them.

I can feel this resentment in myself. It is not just the accusatory blinking all day long of the same digital time and date on my VCR, it is that I know I do not fundamentally understand my Blackberry, my iPod, my Bluetooth device, these new wireless home phones we just got or even my computer. I skate along on the surface of these machines, but when they don't respond to the simple commands I have learned to get along with them, I have no clue what to do next except turn them off and back on in the vain hope that they will heal themselves.

But Buffett is Dumbledore. The intelligent human is making a comeback. The most important lesson Buffett has to teach Americans is that only human smarts can make good judgments about what to do and what not to do in a crisis. And if he can teach that not only to the candidates, but to the American people, that is truly wizardry.


By Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite  |  October 14, 2008; 12:35 PM ET
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Guilt by Association Un-American and Un-Christian | Next: Calming the Perfect Storm

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Persiflage, Thank you. Supremely well said!

Posted by: Jakey2 | October 17, 2008 9:15 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hey, don't pick on us geeks! You guys did that enough during high school. We got complexes, and wound up running the world. That geek that you picked on in school now runs your cellular phone network. Have a nice day.

Posted by: Athena4 | October 15, 2008 4:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I suspect that what rightwingers find particularly offensive about Buffett (currently #1 in world wealth ranking) is that he not only supports Obama, but also supports the idea of higher taxes for the rich - including himself.

No matter how many republicans have gotten rich off of his investing genius, he's clearly no 'oracle' in their tiny minds when it comes to sharing political (or global) views!

On the other hand, between Buffett, George Soros and current Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman we'd have our financial crisis solved in a jiff - and had people of this caliber been in charge in the first place, it never would have happened....

Brother, and to think the neocons are still equivicating on global warming! Two steps forward and one step back - sure sounds like the McPalin foxtrot if you ask me.

Yes indeed, the time for wizardry in government has never been more timely.

Time to send the sorcerer's apprentice back to Alaska.

Posted by: persiflage | October 15, 2008 4:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's too bad you consider such things beyond your ken, because they're not. And Buffet isn't a wizard, he's just a clever man and salesman who counts on others not knowing as much as he does. The essential info is all available on the internet for anyone to cull through. But, if he truly is a AGW (anthropogenic global-warming) believer, that's one strike against his intelligence. I'd suspect, instead, he's promulgating his supposed belief in AGW to promote social buy-in to the self-enriching "plans" he promotes.

Posted by: DoTheRightThing | October 15, 2008 2:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think you slightly missed the point ... Buffet's reference to "geeks" is not merely about automated computer trading of stocks. It is largely about the increasing prevalence of maths and physics "geeks" aka "quants" and "quant traders" in investment banks and hedge funds across the world. 99% of these people have no common sense whatsoever, and have never EVER grasped the cold hard fact that any financial instrument is worth only what someone else is prepared to pay for it. Their mathematical modelling is completely pointless, they are all wrong. Try telling them that options were traded before Black-Scholes and they stare at you disbelievingly. Combine these dangerously clever muppets and their criminally ignorant and greedy managers with a glut of cheap borrowed money that allowed them to leverage themselves to the moon and back and you get the mess we're in now.

Oh, and BTW, in my 15 years of working for an IB Buffet has always been known the SAGE of Omaha. I'm sure you can find it on Bloomberg if you have access to the real thing.

Posted by: Penguin68 | October 15, 2008 10:49 AM
Report Offensive Comment

It's the ORACLE of Omaha.

Posted by: ShleeShlog | October 15, 2008 9:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ms. Thistlehwaite makes an interesting analogy, as repeatedly, this weird machine which is Wall Street trots out its "experts" with their often rosy prognostications, while the Oracle sticks to his knitting, paying no heed to their often foolish thoughts, and takes the correct course.

Posted by: Jakey2 | October 15, 2008 8:33 AM
Report Offensive Comment

>The most important lesson Buffet has to teach >Americans is that only human smarts can make good >judgments about what to do and what not to do in a >crisis.

A misguided piece, and wrong conclusion. "Human smarts" are just as fallible in resolving the crisis as in creating it in the first place. Fortunately for all of us, the basic remedy for the liquidity crunch is well-known since the Great Depression. There is no mystique or wizardry in finding it.

Posted by: Pavel_N | October 15, 2008 5:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Does this make Alan Greenspan Gollum?

Posted by: CynthiaD1 | October 15, 2008 4:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment

What an inane, pointless piece. Why would anyone bother to write it, let alone 'think' it. Why did I read it? Why am I wasting my time responding to it? I suppose because I can't resist interjecting a bit of common sense to a generation that totally lacks that quality. Dumbledore, indeed. Stuff and nonsense, rather.

Posted by: dbwheeler | October 14, 2008 10:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

She's better when she's not trying to talk about religion... which is kinda sad.

Posted by: charlesbakerharris | October 14, 2008 6:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company