Robert Parham
Executive Director, Baptist Center for Ethics

Robert Parham

Parham is executive editor of EthicsDaily.com and executive director of its parent organization, the Baptist Center for Ethics

 ALL POSTS

Burqa Battle Is Over Competing Visions of Religion in Public Square

President Obama recently criticized a French law that prohibits Muslim girls and women from wearing body- and face-covering garments in public schools.But French President Sarkozy this week gave his support to attempts to bar Muslim women from wearing body-cloaking robes such as the burqa. What's your view? Is this a private religious matter or a public/government one? Is the burqa welcome in America?

The burqa should be as accepted in American life for Muslims as the bolo tie is for Texas Baptists, the yarmulke is for Jews, the ornate cross-necklace is for Catholics and the plain clothing is for the Amish.

The battle over the burqa, an outer garment worn by some Islamic women, has broken out between President Barack Obama and French President Nicholas Sarkozy.

Obama said in Cairo: "[I]t is important for Western countries to avoid impeding Muslim citizens from practicing religion as they see fit--for instance, by dictating what clothes a Muslim woman should wear. We cannot disguise hostility towards any religion behind the pretence of liberalism."

Sarkozy said this week in a speech at the Palace of Versailles: "The burqa is not a sign of religion, it is a sign of subservience. It will not be welcome on the territory of the French republic."

"We cannot accept to have in our country women who are prisoners behind netting, cut off from all social life, deprived of identity," said the French president. "That is not the idea that the French republic has of women's dignity."

Sarkozy reflected hostility toward religion; Obama displayed respect for religion.

Their disagreement is over two competing visions about the role of religion in Western culture. The American vision is of a pluralistic democracy where all religions are equal in the public square. The French vision is one of a secular society, a society that dictates to religion.

The American vision advances the separation of church and state. The state can't establish a religion--religion is freely practiced. As such, the state doesn't tell people of faith what to wear.

The French vision marginalizes religion, controlling religion when it tells people of faith what to wear.

While American Christians boast about the superiority of our vision of religion over the French, our cocky talk has a deep flaw. When some of us talk about religious liberty, we are really talking about religious liberty for the Christian version of religion. We think non-Christians ought to accept the dominant expressions of Christianity--our holidays, our language, our form of prayer, our day of worship. Non-Christians should just be happy that we allow them to practice their faith, preferably out of sight. Of course, second-class citizenship isn't really religious liberty for all.

The practice of the American vision is imperfect and in need of constant reformation. Nonetheless, I wouldn't trade it for any other way.


By Robert Parham  |  June 25, 2009; 10:59 AM ET
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Secularism's Attempt to Veil Religion | Next: Free to Wear?

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Are you living in the real world? Or a protected, wealthy environment where you go to nice cocktail parties, and your kids elite schools, and all you know are other well-educated, respectful, polite folks. Come down to earth a bit and visit our other world...I cannot believe you defend the burka! How would your precious cocktail parties flow, if all the women guests were wering them, your children's school's, your workplace...go ahead, tell me!
I suppose you willingly allow any heinous practice and its expression in our public places...Is there any practice you would ban? For Heaven's sake! We forbid every inhuman thing, from cock-fighting, dog-fighting, protect every species, protect children and ban drugs that may harm...yet clothe this practice in religion and everyone it all for it. Most of these commentators will not be running into hordes of women such as these on their streets as so feel quite comfortable with the occasional apparition...Thanks alot all you high-minded folks...You are safe knowing you won't have to really live with the consequences...

Posted by: educated | June 25, 2009 3:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

You seem to argue that any behavior is acceptable, if it is done in the name of religion. That is an irrational premise and a strange one for a Christian to take. It is an article of religion for Muslims that they are to kill anyone, especially Christians, who will not submit and convert to Islam. Consult the Koran. The Koran also commands Muslims to slaughter Jews, who are singled out for particular contempt. The fact that Islam demands this behavior does not give it one shred of legitimacy. Anyone who argues that these murderous behaviors are to be tolerated because they are religious is hopelessly evil and/or an utter fool.

So it is with the burka. To be fair, the Koran does not require the burka. It is culturally imposed by those Islamic adherents who value the utter subjugation and objectification of womanhood more than usual,even in Islam. To be condemned to walk in a shroud with only a slit or worse, a screen from which to peer out at the outside world is a torture and a nightmare.You extol Obama. Obama is callous in his disregard for the freedom of Muslim women. His endorsement of Islam and all its hideous assaults on the human dignity, freedom and human choice, is as unAmerican as it is cruel.

You clearly think very little of women's freedom in general and Muslim women in particular by your endorsement of this hideous badge of slavery. Your own religion would teach you to refrain from calling evil, good, and good, evil.It would counsel you to refrain from shameful deeds of darkness, but rather to expose them. Sarkozy has brought the inhumanity of the burka to the light, and is behaving far more in conformity with Christ than those who would justify this tyranny against women in the name of religion.

Posted by: Br0nwyn | June 25, 2009 3:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Until one of you religious simpletons can prove that there is a god, then no respect should be given to religions. They are a made up means of controlling people and providing "answers" for those who absolutely refuse to think for themselves. Religions are akin to Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, Tooth Fairy, and invisible friends. Until these "religious leaders" can finally admit that there is no god and that their religious lives have been in vain, all the rest of us can do is to show disdain for these intellectuals flaws.

Posted by: bob2davis | June 25, 2009 1:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company