Phil Davis
Manager, Christian Science Committees on Publication for The First Church of Christ, Scientist, Boston

Phil Davis

Davis is a professional Christian Science practitioner -- available to help others through prayer -- and one of about 200 authorized Christian Science teachers in the world.

 ALL POSTS

An Obama Nation of Citizens

What's your reaction to President Obama's recent statements to the Muslim world that "the United States is not, and never will be, at war with Islam" and that "we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation"?

First, I think it is very important to quote the whole of the statement that President Obama made at a press conference with Turkish President Abdullah Gul, which is, "We do not consider ourselves a Christian nation, or a Jewish nation, or a Muslim nation. We are a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values."

I am comfortable celebrating a nation "bound by ideals and a set of values," most of which I would consider to be Christian, but none of which should be considered exclusively so. As a Christian, I firmly believe that all the moral and spiritual direction humanity needs is identified in, and promoted by, a proper understanding of the Bible's teachings. However, I do not feel that Christians have a monopoly on either recognizing God's direction or living according to the good values which that divine direction promotes. In fact, I feel that Jesus drew us towards the opposite conclusion, by praising the merits of a "good Samaritan", a man from a neighboring people who were despised by his audience. Jesus was surely alerting anyone who would listen to the fact that goodness is vindicated by the individual living of love, wherever that takes place, not by adopting a particular religious or ethnic label.

One of the great challenges for people of all religions is that, over time, adherents of a faith can begin to see their denomination as a club for the elite rather than as a daily call to humbly live the spiritual ideals of the religion's founder. Jesus, as a Jew, faced this challenge with the religious leaders of his day who had submerged the spirit of Abraham's fidelity to an ever-communicative God within a package of ritual laws.

Likewise Christianity, in the centuries since the healing thrust of its first exponents, has often been challenged by a temptation to substitute doctrines and dogma for moment-by-moment listening to, and obeying, God's direction. More challenging still is when such doctrines and dogma are used as a measuring stick for evaluating who is or isn't a "true" Christian. Jesus put it differently. He said "By their fruits ye shall know them." To me, this suggests I should judge how well I am doing at being a Christian (or in my faith as a Christian Scientist) by looking at the practical results of my efforts to love my neighbor as myself. That is, how well am I doing at seeing my fellow men and women as children of the same all-loving God, regardless of their denomination (or lack of one), and how well am I doing at responding to them with love on that basis?

Christian Science founder, Mary Baker Eddy, wrote of Christian Science, "I named it Christian, because it is compassionate, helpful, and spiritual." ("Retrospection and Introspection", p. 25). This, you could say, is Christianity measured by ideals and values that also describe the best of the United States, and which are qualities that Jews, Muslims and other good citizens also rejoice in.

These universal spiritual values, to the degree they are respected and acted on, do not pitch denomination against denomination, nor nation against nation. These qualities are not at war with Islam as a religious teaching, with individual Muslims, or with predominantly Islamic nations. They are, though, a living prayer that can help remove the sting of partisan politics, proselytizing and fundamentalism from all religions and nations.

By Phil Davis  |  April 15, 2009; 10:06 PM ET
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: President's Statements Too Simplistic | Next: A "Christian" Nation Wouldn't Act This Way

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



What a great article--right on the money (so to speak).

I appreciated your clarifying the "rest of the story" regarding what our president said. Too often we tend to take a snippet of another's remarks and run with them before knowing what we are responding to.

Reading the other comments as well as your article reminded me of a situation a few years ago. I was visiting a Baptist church regularly to hear the pastor conduct a bible study on the Book of Mark. This man had nearly 30 years under his belt as a minister and was very knowledgeable.

At one point he stopped and looked at those listening to him and said (as nearly as I can recall), "I am not a Baptist. I am a follower of Christ. And, if you think of yourself as a Baptist, a Methodist, a Catholic, or any other denomination or religion, you are missing the mark. And, you need to reconsider your relationship with God, because that is all that counts."

During another session he said, "I don't believe that you need to be baptized to get into heaven, but you do have to be baptized to be a member of this church!"

Too often we fixate on the wrong things--probably because they are easier to do than to strive to be more gentle, kind, honest, loyal, merciful and pure. These qualities are foundational for all major religions, and in performing them in our own way we unite as one in a better world.

Posted by: dlg4341 | April 24, 2009 5:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

It's a good column, this, certainly what I'd call a more 'moderate' Christian view, though maybe too apologetic about the fact that, while, yes, many civilized values are in fact ones our Christian friends value as well as any other America, they do not have their *origins* in Christianity, nor does 'Christianity' have the right to claim to grant or remove them or make them conditional.

Not in America, anyway.

This kind of notion we hear too much of from 'Christians' is mostly based on the idea that anything non-Christian must be evil, corrupt, decadent (ha, also commie treehugging bent on destroying our plasma TVs and Hummers.) That any goodness and freedom among us, Christians 'created' and thus, like their God, are empowered to 'take away'

Many American values have also become Christian values... don't doubt that the Enlightenment didn't also have a strong element of people thinking the God of Christianity or the Providence of Deism wouldn't also be much-better pleased by America than the oppressions and destructions of a Europe torn apart by sectarian war.

Though this has not always been the case, with Christians and Christianity, and all too easily you fall to fear and temptations of a sense of vanity and control, even when it hurts you.

What's different about America at her best is in *fact* that our government has been shaped *beginning* from a notion that we are essentially good and free and capable of being sufficiently-wise to *honor* what we have been given to use, unalienably.

That we may believe as we see fit, but must *strive to live as though* all peoples are capable of governing ourselves by reason, under Liberty, and that this is the *only* business of government, not interpreting Bibles or 'commanding' thou shalt have no other Gods or ceremonially-appointed representatives before some view or other.

But *freedom.*

Even if you have to believe that your view of God wants *me* eternally-tortured, that maybe it's not for you to bring that kind of irrationality 'down here' for him.

Posted by: Paganplace | April 21, 2009 3:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think your statement is useful because it reflects how our nation is open to people who hold a variety of religious & moral beliefs. Still, your statements can be misused by ideologues which today are prevalent on the right of our political spectrum in today's Republican Party who eagerly advocate restricting religious freedom & individual liberty based on religious arguments in areas of abortion & gay marriage (both of which many religious & non-religious institutions in the U.S. accept).
It would've been even more useful if you discussed how our Constitution's Framers sought to protect religious freedom & individual liberty by not allowing strictly religious principles, Christian, Jewish, or otherwise to be the basis for our laws & rights. For example, if we're a Christian Nation why would our founders prohibit religious tests for elected office if they supposedly wanted certain religious ideals to be favored? if we're a Christian Nation why would our founders include in the Constitution the principle of equal rights if they favored the rights of its Christian citizens? The answer is that from a legal & Constitutional point of view, we are not a Christian Nation.

Posted by: Civilius | April 17, 2009 10:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company