Pamela K. Taylor
Co-founder, Muslims for Progressive Values

Pamela K. Taylor

Taylor is co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values, former director of the Islamic Writers Alliance and strong supporter of the woman imam movement. She blogs at A Modern Muslim

 ALL POSTS

Abortion Rights Pose a Multitude of Moral Dilemmas

Whether we should rescind or amend Roe v. Wade is perhaps the single most difficult question for me to answer. The moral conundrums created by abortion are complex and the process of weighing which results in the least harm to the greatest number of people gives me different answers on different days, even from hour to hour.

My emotions and my conscience steadfastly reject abortion. It is quite clear that life begins at conception. The entity that is to become an adult human being has its start at that moment, and continues to grow and change until it dies. We do not give human beings the right to terminate a person's life simply because that life is dependent on others for its survival -- say, if the person were to develop Alzheimer's, or became paraplegic in a terrible accident. It seems morally bankrupt to say that because a fetus is dependent upon its mother for survival, she has the right to take its life, especially when we do not apply the same logic in other instances.

There are cases, however, where abortion is called for. When the mother's health is endangered, for instance. But where to draw the line, how to determine if sufficient risk exists to merit an abortion quickly turns into a slippery slope, one where women's agency can become subsumed by well-meaning doctors or governmental regulation. On the one hand, it would seem obvious that the woman should determine the amount of risk she is willing to take. On the other hand, all pregnancies carry some risk to the mother's health. Given that, I can see a case for keeping all abortion legal based purely upon the health risk to the mother.

Then again, an abortion procedure it not without its own risks. Furthermore, studies have shown that women who have had abortions are nearly four times as likely to die in the year following their procedure than those who haven't, and that a woman is 10 times more likely to attempt suicide if she has had an abortion in the last six months than is a comparable woman who had not had an abortion.

Obviously, there are few easy answers even in a case which seems as cut as dried as abortion to protect the mother's life and/or well-being.

Other cases which are commonly considered reasonable justification for abortion, such as rape or incest, are even more problematical. I feel intense empathy with the agony of having to gestate a child that is the product of rape. Inflicting nine months of emotional and physical trauma upon a woman who has already suffered a violent crime is unconscionable. And yet, taking the life of the person-to-be -- who is absolutely innocent -- is equally unconscionable. Does the benefit of sparing a mother the harm of having to carry the product of a rape outweigh the harm of taking that child's life? Some days I feel yes, some days I feel no, other days I feel that can only be decided by the woman herself.

Least palatable of all is abortion because the mother and father are unwilling to care for the child, or unable to care for it adequately. Unfortunately, the vast majority of abortions appear to fall in this category. Studies by the organization whose stated goal is to ensure unlimited access to abortion have shown that approximately four percent of women seeking abortion do so for health reasons or after a rape. Those same studies show that 87 percent of abortions are sought because the parents do not feel prepared to deal with a child (or another child). Three percent of women seeking an abortion did so due to issues with the fetus, and another 6 percent cited reasons not listed in the survey.

I sympathize with men and women who feel overwhelmed emotionally and economically by the prospect of child (whether the first or an additional one). I empathize with the loss of personal freedom and choices that an accidental child can impose on them. But can we morally justify absolving people for the consequences of their actions when that absolution involves ending the life of another person? My heart says no. When we make the choice to be sexually active, or to use certain forms of contraception that are less reliable than others, then we need to be ready to accept the consequences of those actions.

Obviously, many teenagers make those choices without being able to fully appreciate the long-term implications of what they are doing. Many make choices that are not ideal since the most reliable birth control may be effectively inaccessible to them, either due to costs, parental refusal to facilitate obtaining that birth control, or lack of information. Not to mention the impulsiveness of teenagers, and the all too common feeling that bad things can't or won't happen to them. Even so, ending a life hardly seems comparable with a drastic change in the course of one's life.

Complicating the entire issue is the subject of the harm created if abortion should be re-criminalized, exempting the small percentage done for health issues (maternal or fetal) and rape or incest.

In the U.S., since 1977, over 1.3 million abortions have been performed every year. Can you imagine the resources required to raise 1.3 million more children every year? The additional costs to the health care system, the educational system, the welfare system, our housing resources. The economic impact alone is staggering.

Can you imagine the emotional and financial impact upon our teenagers and young adults who make up the vast majority of women getting abortions? And the horrors of tens of thousands of back alley abortions, and the burden it would put on our legal system to prosecute those women?

Those costs must also be weighed against the moral unpalatablity of killing fetuses.

While I debate with myself about when abortion should and should not be legal, it seems to me there are many concrete steps this country can and should take to minimize the need for that debate.

Comprehensive sex education should be implemented in all schools. That means education that emphasizes that abstinence is the only fail proof way to prevent pregnancy, and that there are sound emotional reasons to delay sexual involvement, as well as providing accurate information about contraception and the real life challenges of having a baby.

Reduce the life costs of having a child. Ensure that quality day care is available for all children whose parents want or need it. Make health insurance affordable for all families. Cultivate a supportive atmosphere for women who choose to put their children up for adoption, and for children who are adopted. Cultivate a society that holds fathers-to-be as responsible for their choices as we hold mothers-to-be.

I believe we can go a long way to reducing abortions by changing the way our society views sex, sex ed, and by reducing the costs of having an unplanned child (whether you keep it or give it up for adoption.)

Even so, the demand for abortions will never disappear. But at least fewer women will be faced with having to make that awful choice, and we will be confronted with fewer moral conundrums each year.

By Pamela K. Taylor  |  September 25, 2008; 10:00 AM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Abortion and the Goddess | Next: Advance Liberty, Overturn Roe

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



my user id for the previous post doesn't show- it's sparrow4
-sparrow

Posted by: Anonymous | September 29, 2008 2:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I have no real knowledge to assess the koran or even, really the bible. There are others far more knowledgeable but to Asim I say, I think you don't know your history, nor do you know much about other religions. calling Judaism or Christianity corrupt because you believe in the koran is not an argument, it's an opinion, one which you would have to back up by more than your interpretation of the koran, or the teachings of Imans.

Pamela, you wrote:"I am totally against legislating morality, except in those cases where one person's moral agency impacts the life of another person. Abortion is not simply a moral decision, it is one that impact the very life of another individual, albeit a dependent individual." You make the mistake most pro-lifers make. You ignore the rights of the woman. You ignore her life and her worth. And you do this because you believe life begins at conception. I do not. Your belief- and it is clearly a belief,comes from your religious belief. Mine comes from both my study of science and my religious beliefs.

We die when our bodies can no longer function- when the body can no longer bind the soul to itself because of illness or accident. I believe this is also true of fertilization- there is no soul, hence it is not a child until the body is developed enough to hold a soul. All a developing mass of cells is a potential human being. but by insisting on this, or even more extremely, believing eggs must also be protected, hence birth control is also a no-no, you degrade the women into nothing more than a baby incubator. You are essentially holding her body for ransom. And for a woman who has been raped to be forced to bear that child- you may as well rape her over and over again.

Life is about choice- we chose to send young men and women to war, knowing full well they may be killed or kill. Abortion is the same thing- a hard choice but as a society we have to choose whether or not a woman is more important than a potential child, whether or not we can afford, as a society, to hold her body in ransom to that child until it is born, and whether or not we will choose to not be our sister's keeper so much as her prison guard.

I fear a society that is incapable of feeling compassion for a young, frightened and hurt victim of incest, ignorance or rape is incapable of kindness, innate goodness or equality. a society that reaches inside a woman's body and determines to hold it hostage is a society that really has no regard for human life, all their arguments to the contrary.If you can't grant that right and dignity to the living, what makes you think you can bestow it on the unborn?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 29, 2008 2:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hmmm, one solution? How about a global/UN DNA databank? i.e. Every global citizen would have their DNA on record.

In rape cases, the rapists would then be identified immediately? Said rapists would be severely punished, made to pay reparations to include child care or in some cases castrated? Global enforcement agencies such as the UN, US military, NATO, INTERPOL et al would track down said low life?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 28, 2008 11:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Halozcel

Asım from SA is asking Mrs.Pamela Taylor her opinion about rape of Bosnian women(let me remind not only muslim women,but Croatian and Serbian women had been raped as well)

Asım,
What is your opinion and consideration about Kuwaiti muslim women who had been raped by Iraqi muslim invaders and Iraqi women who are being raped by the armed muslim insurgents ?
And,Darfurian women being raped and genocided by muslim terrorists ?

Asım,
You write many times that *authentical original divine scriptures before they were corrupted by those people*
You have been asked by the bloggers many times,but you couldnt reply.I ask one more time.
Who corrupted *authentical original divine scriptures* and when had occured and why they doctored ?
Dont 1.8 Billion Christians know this corruption,but only you and e few fanatics know.
From the beginning of Christianity,all documents had been being reserved at Vatican.Who and when corrupted ? Please,please I want your knowledge.

Besides,you accuse Christians to corrupt/doctor *original scriptures*,but,what about your book.
First written quran had been set on fire/burnt by Eboo Bakr and present quran collected during the time of third caliph Utman.
Is your book Authentic and Original ?
Abraham(He was not a person,it was the name of Jewish Clan) had lived 38-39 centuries B.P.(Before Present)
Kaaba had been built 16-17 centuries B.P.
Your *original divine scripture*which had been sent by revelation to an *unlettered man* first word *read* says;Kaaba had been built by Abraham.
How could a man who had lived 38 centuries B.P. build a building which dated 16-17 centuries B.P. ?
Is this your *authentical original divine scripture* ?

Posted by: Anonymous | September 28, 2008 7:16 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hi Asim,

I really don't know what I personally would have done in that instance. And it's one of those cases where the morality of the situation just breaks down for me. I certainly would not judge anyone for any choice they made in that situation.

As for legislating morality, paganplace, I am totally against legislating morality, except in those cases where one person's moral agency impacts the life of another person. Abortion is not simply a moral decision, it is one that impact the very life of another individual, albeit a dependent individual. At that point, the law does have a role to play. We do not allow people moral agency to take life or not at any other stage of the game, with very few exceptions (like self-defense, which is analogous to an abortion to prortect the woman's life/health). But you cannot go out and commit vigilante style justice, nor can you murder someone because they make your life hard. I think the state does have business in regulating morality where moral agency bears directly impinges upon other people's rights to life.

Pamela

Posted by: Anonymous | September 27, 2008 5:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Anonymous,

Your translation doesnt give exact notion.

Allah(not God) Compassionate towards you.Merciful(only and only *true believer muslim*
Allah hates from non-muslim/infidels

*Clear revelation* describes Trinity as *Father,Son,Mary*,is this *clear revelation* ?

*The Light*.Yes,light.
Could you show any *enlightened muslim country* ?
The Light is The Civilization.
The Light is Human Rights.

Halozcel

Posted by: Anonymous | September 27, 2008 1:15 PM
Report Offensive Comment

He is the One who sends down to His servant clear revelations, to bring you out of the darkness into the light. God is Compassionate towards you, Merciful

Quran 57-9

Posted by: Anonymous | September 27, 2008 3:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment

*sigh.* Forgot to sign the last post. The login seems to not be posting my screen name. -Paganplace

(And whoever's testing, I don't think there's anything that can be done on the user end at this point.)

Posted by: Anonymous | September 26, 2008 1:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Whether we should rescind or amend Roe v. Wade is perhaps the single most difficult question for me to answer. The moral conundrums created by abortion are complex and the process of weighing which results in the least harm to the greatest number of people gives me different answers on different days, even from hour to hour."

Well, I'd just say, if it's a 'dilemma and conundrum,' then maybe it's not for government to decide how people of good faith, reason, and intention, resolve it in their own bodies.

Now, some may be comfortable overturning Roe v Wade and blaming the victims for the cosial consequences, but I wonder if even *they* want to see what happens in the law when the 'right to privacy,' particularly about one's own body goes away.

Maybe I could Google your genome. Maybe someone who *really* likes you could clone you off your HMO's blood samples for a nominal fee...

This is a *legal* ruling. Most notably about the right to privacy. It has *legal* implications. Like what happened to contract law and our right to sue corporations or petition the government for a redress of grievances under certain 'defense of marriage' initiatives, the court ruling is about the *law,* and whatever you think about that, ...the 'issue' is another matter.

The biggest thing this 'national debate' seems to do is teach people it's actually about 'a moral decision,' (and that it's yours to make for others) and whether or not it's OK for the state to make that decision in someone else's body.

But the *law* is about the *law.* Overturning it has broader scope than that.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 26, 2008 1:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

test

Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2008 11:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Reality Check

1. Abraham founder/father of three major religions was either the embellishment of the lives of three different men or a
mythical character as was mythical Moses, the "Tablet-Man" who talked to burning bushes and made much magic in Egypt.
Many of the 1.5 million Conservative Jews and many of their rabbis have relegated Abraham to the myth pile along with most if not all the OT.
Current crisis:
Realization that the Jews are not god's not chosen people.
simpletoremember.com/vitals/ConservativeTorah.htm

2. Jesus was an illiterate Jewish peasant/carpenter/simple preacher man who suffered from hallucinations and who has been characterized anywhere from the Messiah from Nazareth to a mythical character from mythical Nazareth to a mamzer from Nazareth (Professor Bruce Chilton, in his book Rabbi Jesus). Analyses of Jesus’ life by many contemporary NT scholars (e.g. Professors Crossan, Borg and Fredriksen, On Faith panelists) via the NT and related documents have concluded that only about 30% of Jesus' sayings and ways noted in the NT were authentic. The rest being embellishments (e.g. miracles)/hallucinations made/had by the NT authors to impress various Christian, Jewish and Pagan sects.

The 30% of the NT that is "authentic Jesus" like everything in life was borrowed/plagiarized and/or improved from those who came before. In Jesus' case, it was the ways and sayings of the Babylonians, Greeks, Persians, Egyptians, Hittites, Canaanites, OT, John the Baptizer and possibly the ways and sayings of traveling Greek Cynics. www. earlychristianwritings.com/theories.html

For added "pizzazz", Catholic/Christian theologians divided god the singularity into three persons and invented atonement as an added guilt trip for the "pew people" to go along with this trinity of overseers. By doing so, they made god the padre into god the "filicider".

Current crises:

Pedophiliac priests, atonement theology and original sin!!!!

3. Luther, Calvin, Smith, Henry VIII, Wesley et al, founders of Christian-based religions, also suffered from the belief in/hallucinations of "pretty wingie thingie" visits and "prophecies" for profits analogous to the myths of Catholicism (resurrections, apparitions, ascensions and immaculate conceptions).

Current crises:

Adulterous preachers, "propheteering/ profiteering" evangelicals and atonement theology. .


4. Mohammed was an illiterate, womanizing, lust and greed-driven, warmongering, hallucinating Arab, who also had embellishing/hallucinating/plagiarizing scribal biographers who not only added "angels" and flying chariots to the koran but also a militaristic agenda to support the plundering and looting of the lands of non-believers.

This agenda continues as shown by the assassination of Bhutto, the conduct of the seven Muslim doctors in the UK, the 9/11 terrorists, the 24/7 Sunni suicide/roadside/market/mosque bombers, the 24/7 Shiite suicide/roadside/market/mosque bombers, the Islamic bombers of the trains in the UK and Spain, the Bali crazies, the Kenya crazies, the Pakistani “koranics”, the Palestine suicide bombers/rocketeers, the Lebanese nutcases, the Taliban nut jobs, and the Filipino “koranics”.

And who funds this muck and stench of terror? The warmongering, Islamic, Shiite terror and torture theocracy of Iran aka the Third Axis of Evil and also the Sunni "Wannabees" of Saudi Arabia.

Current crises:

The Sunni-Shiite blood feud and the warmongering, womanizing (11 wives), hallucinating founder.


5. Hinduism (from an online Hindu site) - "Hinduism cannot be described as an organized religion. It is not founded by any individual. Hinduism is God centered and therefore one can call Hinduism as founded by God, because the answer to the question ‘Who is behind the eternal principles and who makes them work?’ will have to be ‘Cosmic power, Divine power, God’."
The caste/laborer system and cow worship/reverence are problems when saying a fair and rational God founded Hinduism."

Current crises:

The caste system and cow worship/reverence.

6. Buddhism- "Buddhism began in India about 500 years before the birth of Christ. The people living at that time had become disillusioned with certain beliefs of Hinduism including the caste system, which had grown extremely complex. The number of outcasts (those who did not belong to any particular caste) was continuing to grow."
"However, in Buddhism, like so many other religions, fanciful stories arose concerning events in the life of the founder, Siddhartha Gautama (fifth century B.C.):"

Archaeological discoveries have proved, beyond a doubt, his historical character, but apart from the legends we know very little about the circumstances of his life. e.g. Buddha by one legend was supposedly talking when he came out of his mother's womb.

Bottom line: There are many good ways of living but be aware of the hallucinations, embellishments, lies, and myths surrounding the founders and foundations of said rules of life.

Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2008 8:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Only three prayers mentioned in Quran according to an Indian cleric


http://members.tripod.com/Signs_Magazines/issue4/profile_chekannur_moulavi.htm

Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2008 8:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2008 7:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: Anonymous | September 25, 2008 7:47 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"Koranist":

Firstly,
How could u claim that only the Koran stands up without the Sunnah? But the Koran was revealed to the Prophet-and he was the examplary person to interpret it and show Muslims its true meanings in real life. Besides the Koran says nothing about the five daily prayers and how to perform them?? Prayers is the backbone of a Muslim's faith after the Shahadah-as an example.

Secondly,
When God in the Koran addresses the people of the book-Jews and christians-God refers to the authentic original divine scriptures before they were corrupted by those people;let me give u one clear and unequivocal example: the Koran states clearly that those who say Jesus Christ the son of mary, IS the son of god are disbelievers-Kafroun-or if they say Jesus is one of the three-trinity-are also Kaafroun-meaning that they don't believe in the Oneneness of God, absolute Monotheism and deny such fact.

Cleraly,the gospels of Jesus were corrupted;Also if the old testament was not corrupted, the Jews would have believed in Jesus and the Christians would have believed in Muhammad-those who already embraced Islam at the time-we are concerned with those who did not.

Also where is and whatever happened to the Gospel of St Barnabis Which clearly prophesizes the coming of the Prophet Muhammad.

Moreover, how could the two faiths be authentic-Judaism and Christianity-when they failed to prophesize the coming of a world religion that is based on the same authentic faiths of Abraham, Moses and Jesus??

The so called "koranists" are clearly suspect in their motives and their position flies in the face of logic,reason and facts and have no bases on which to stand.It is like saying I believe in Christainity without Jesus-in the sense disbelieving in the gospel which he preached-leaving for the moment what happened to it after his death.

Why would any sane person want to drop the Sunnah of the Prophet???? It is the gold mine of wisdom and light that guides Musslims.

Muslims understand the difference between the Koran and the Sunnah-that is why Muslims recorded the Sunnah nearly two centuries after the Prophet so as not confuse it with the Koran.
Think about it long and hard-u just don't make any sense.

Posted by: Asim, San Antonio | September 25, 2008 7:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Pamela,
Well-thought out it and profound piece.

Am intersted in your opinion about the en masse rape of Bosnian Muslim women of all ages by the Serb Orthodox Christians to humiliate these females and destroy their self-esteem.

What do u think they should have done in such a case?

Posted by: Asim, San Antonio | September 25, 2008 7:07 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bullcrackers and tartar sauce, Pamela. Anti-abortion believers seem to focus on the life of the unborn as more essential and crucial than the lives of people already here. That sort of mentality condemns women as nothing more than mere breeders, whose only purpose is continued lines of succession. It's an ancient mentality, and one that smacks of misogyny.

Posted by: Ashley | September 25, 2008 4:00 PM
Report Offensive Comment

All this just makes me tired. You are making an enormous problem out of something that should really not be that. An early abortion is not such a big deal, it shouldn't be dangerous - at least less dangerous than a full time pregnancy - and it shouldn't have to cause the woman or girl any remorse. Why would someone commit suicide because of an abortion? Not if it's early and the woman is not told this is BIG and a DILEMMA. I don't buy all the guilt you are heaping on pregnant women.

Anyone should have access to day after-pills if necessary. It's not something she should have to discuss wit anyone else, unless she wants to. Young people must get proper sex education in school, and then access to birth control - preferably condoms, since they also offer some protection against diseases. You can only make an informed decision of you are informed.

Religion is really messing people's lives up sometimes.

Posted by: asoders22 | September 25, 2008 3:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Famous Adoptees

Andy Berlin - entrepreneur: chairman of Berlin Cameron & Partners
Anthony Williams - politician
Aristotle - philosopher
Art Linkletter - comedian
Bo Diddley - musician, performer
Buffy Sainte-Marie - musician, actress
Carl-Theodor Dreyer - Danish film director
Charlotte Anne Lopez - Miss Teen USA
Christina Crawford - author
Clarissa Pinkola Estes - author
Crazy Horse - Lakota war chief
Dan O'Brien - decathlete
Daunte Culpepper - football player
Dave Thomas - entrepreneur: founder of Wendy's
Debbie Harry - singer
D.M.C. - hip hop artist
Edgar Allan Poe - poet, writer
Edward Albee - playwright
Eleanor Roosevelt - First Lady
Eric Dickerson - athlete
Faith Daniels - news anchor
Faith Hill - country singer
Freddie Bartholomew - actor
George Washington Carver - inventor
Greg Louganis - athlete
James MacArthur - actor
James Michener - author
Jean Jacques Rousseau - philosopher
Jesse Jackson - minister
Jesus - adopted by Joseph the carpenter (Bible)
Jett Williams - country singer and author
Jim Palmer - athlete
John J. Audubon - naturalist
John Hancock - politician
John Lennon - musician
Langston Hughes - poet and writer
Larry Ellison - entrepreneur: chief executive of Oracle
Lee Majors - actor
Leo Tolstoy - writer
Les Brown - motivational speaker
Lynnette Cole - Miss USA 2000
Malcolm X - civil rights leader
Mark Acre - athlete
Matthew Laborteaux - actor
Melissa Gilbert - actress
Michael Reagan - author, talk show host
Moses - Biblical leader
Nancy Reagan - First Lady
Nat King Cole - singer
Nelson Mandela - politician
Patrick Labyorteaux - actor
Peter and Kitty Carruthers - figure skaters
President Gerald Ford - politician
President William Clinton - politician
Priscilla Presley - actress
Ray Liotta - actor
Reno - performance artist, comedian
Sarah McLachlan - singer
Scott Hamilton - figure skater
Sen. Paull H. Shin - politician
Sen. Robert Byrd - politician
Steve Jobs - entrepreneur: co-founder of Apple computer
Surya Bonaly - figure skater
Tim Green - football player/commentator
Tim McGraw - country singer
Tom Monaghan - entrepreneur
Tommy Davidson - comedian
Victoria Rowell - actress
Wilson Riles - educator

Posted by: Concerned The Christian Now Liberated | September 25, 2008 11:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The Koran came to confirm the previous scriptures. There is nothing in the Koran about the previous scriptures being corrupted.

ay: "O People of the Book! Ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law, the Gospel and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord, If only they had stood fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that was sent to them from their Lord, they would have enjoyed happiness from every side. There is from among them a party on the right course: But many of them follow a course that is evil. (5,68-69)

Let the People of the Gospel judge by what God hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what God hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel. (5,47)

But why do they come to thee for decision, when they have (their own) Law before them?- Therein is the (plain) command of God; yet even after that, they would turn away. For they are not (really) people of faith. (Surah 5, Maida, verse 43)

5.44. It was We who revealed the law (to Moses): therein was guidance and light. By its standard have been judged the Jews, by the prophets who bowed (as in Islam) to God's will, by the rabbis and the doctors of law: for to them was entrusted the protection of God's book, and they were witnesses thereto: therefore fear not men, but fear me, and sell not my signs for a miserable price. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what God hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers.

5.46. And in their footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the Law that had come before him: We sent him the Gospel: therein was guidance and light, and confirmation of the Law that had come before him: a guidance and an admonition to those who fear God.

To thee We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety: so judge between them by what God hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If God had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to God; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye dispute; Surah 5 Verse 48


All food was lawful to the Children of Israel, except what Israel made unlawful for itself, before the Law (of Moses) was revealed. Say,"Bring ye the Law and study it, if ye be men of truth." (Surah 3, Al-i-'Imran, verse 93)

And if thou (Muhammad) art in doubt concerning that which We reveal unto thee, then question those who read the Scripture (that) was before thee... (Surah 10, Jonah, verse 94)

O People of the Book, now has come to you Our Messenger, clarifying to you much of that you used to conceal of the Book and passing over much ." (5:15)


"It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth, the Book, confirming what went before it; and He sent down the Law (of Moses) and the Gospel (of Jesus) before this, as a guide to mankind, and He sent down the criterion (of judgment between right and wrong)," (3:3).

2.41 And believe in what I reveal, confirming the revelation which is with you, and be not the first to reject Faith therein, nor sell My Signs for a small price; and fear Me, and Me alone.

2.89 And when there comes to them a Book from Allah, confirming what is with them,- although from of old they had prayed for victory against those without Faith,- when there comes to them that which they (should) have recognized, they refuse to believe in it but the curse of Allah is on those without Faith.

2.91 When it is said to them, “Believe in what Allah Hath sent down, “they say, “We believe in what was sent down to us:” yet they reject all besides, even if it be Truth confirming what is with them. Say: “Why then have ye slain the prophets of Allah in times gone by, if ye did indeed believe?”

Koran came to CONFIRM the previous scriptures. Real Islam is only Koran

Posted by: koranist | September 25, 2008 2:56 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Post a Comment




characters remaining

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company