Don't Panic, But Do Mind Your Own Business!
In this crisis, most of us should resolutely mind our own business, act charitably toward neighbors in need, comfort the fearful, and resolutely vote against those who would use this crisis to expand their power. The temptation to respond to every trouble brought to our attention by the media is a snare and a delusion.
It is a snare, because it traps us in fear and wastes time better spent solving problems actually under our control. This is dangerous because fear mongers can con the unwary into accepting tyrants through alarmist rhetoric.
The fear of failure often convinces those who have not yet failed to fail on the best terms they can get from a tyrannical state that promises to save them from imagined terrors.
False historical analogies abound to feed our panic, but these are not the 1930's. Stalin and Hitler do not stand across the Atlantic, unemployment is not at one-quarter to one-third of the population, and the real wealth of the last eighty years will not suddenly vanish.
Oddly, it is the delusion behind our response to this national crisis that also affords us some comfort. We don't even know the scope of the crisis or what caused it, let alone how to solve it, but facile responses from rhetorically gifted politicians allow us the joy of feeling that someone is in control when we are not.
If we are not very careful, then we will be whipped into rage by political operatives to their own benefit. They will play the dangerous game of blaming our problems on someone else. If we listen, then we will avoid the more mundane, but vital task of knowing self and changing what we can actually change in ourselves.
Many of us are taught to worry globally, and behave parochially, so we can avoid meaningful change locally. By worrying about the global economy, I can ignore my own wasteful use of personal resources. I rage against Wall Street, when in reality I should go cut up my credit cards.
The deepest problem is that by worrying about someone who is not my neighbor, I can avoid concern for my actual neighbor. I have students who panic about poverty in the Sudan, but who are disinterested in the poor of our hometown.
In a crisis of this sort, my grandfather gave me some good advice: we should mind our own business. Our actual neighbor who wants and needs our help is our business, but our culture makes it easier to know the troubles of someone else's neighbor (across the world), than our physical compatriot. If we are not careful our compassion will be drained by images of all the suffering of mankind in general to the point that we have nothing left to give the particular unemployed fellow in the apartment across the way.
It is more than enough for most of us to do our duty to our family and local community. Occasionally we will have national duties so it is important to know the times. To keep living well locally we will have to pay some attention to national and global issues.
One of those occasional national duties is voting for President and Vice-President in times that pundits assure us are troubled. We shouldn't make too much of the troubles, however, because the times are pretty nearly always troubled. Politicians generally think every election is the most important of our lifetime, because for them it is.
Voting out of fear and anger seems unlikely to produce a wise and prudent decision. Instead, the traditional Christian should vote out of his best experience, philosophy, and best hopes for the culture.
My best hope is that government will protect our right to life, our absolute liberty to do good deeds, and our pursuit of happiness.
Government cannot create real rights, such as life, goodness, or happiness, so most traditional Christians wish government to have a restricted role. We want government that defends God-given rights, not government that is god.
By that standard there are, as usual, no great choices on the ballot. People searching for a political messiah will have to wait longer for His coming. That One is certainly not on the ballot. We must choose between very fallible teams.
Despite those quibbles, the choice is not so difficult. Only one team will protect innocent human life at all stages of development, and only one even pretends to limit the scope and power of government. Only one team lacks messianic pretense, so dangerous in this time. Both teams have promise, but only one has the humility to limit their promises.
As a result, based on my hopes and not my fears, based on optimism and not anger, I will be voting for Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin.
By
John Mark Reynolds
|
October 20, 2008; 1:29 AM ET
Share This:
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Reject the Politics of Hate |
Next: Empowering Women, the Catholic Experience
Posted by: Paganplace | October 20, 2008 4:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Well, DMZ, I wouldn't dismiss the founding document of our nation so lightly, ...that's a statement of founding principles, though not the excuse for Dominionist Christianity they claim it is... they choose to rewrite 'Endowed by their creator with unalienable rights' to mean, 'They said Creator, they must have meant Christians of a stripe that didn't really exist yet can alienate people from these rights whenever they want.'
That's not what that means.
It may not be legal code, but it is founding principle, a whole lot more than is any claim human rights can be abridged by anyone who convinces enough people 'God Sez So.'
Posted by: Paganplace | October 20, 2008 2:37 PM
Report Offensive Comment
JMR:
Is there some special kind of water that you right-wing Christians drink that makes it impossible for you to know or understand our history? Chuck Colson committed the same anti-historical error just last week.
Life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are addressed only in the Declaration of Independence, and that document has nothing whatever to do with the law of the United States. It addressed only independence from England, was not produced by any representative body of the people, and it wasn't ratiefied by anyone or anything. The only set of principles under which we the people consent to be governed in the Constitution of the Unites States. Nothing else. BTW, assuming you know what they were, the Articles of Confederation don't have anything to do with U.S. law either.
Also, rights are human created. God has nothing to do with them and is irrelevant to any consideration of rights and powers. I am an atheist, but I have exactly the same rights that you do. Those rights are granted and guaranteed by the Constitution, nothing else.
Posted by: DMZ1 | October 20, 2008 11:53 AM
Report Offensive Comment
"Only one team will protect innocent human life at all stages of development, and only one even pretends to limit the scope and power of government. Only one team lacks messianic pretense, so dangerous in this time. Both teams have promise, but only one has the humility to limit their promises.
As a result, based on my hopes and not my fears, based on optimism and not anger, I will be voting for Senator John McCain and Governor Sarah Palin.
If your philosophical arguments are as poorly thought out and erroneous as you column, i fear for the students you teach. From your snide "That one" (how original!) to your outright outrageous assertion that Obama -Biden are suffering from messianic pretense, this column is just another in a long sad line of Republican garbage disguised as a professional writing attempt.
Limit the power and scope of the government? Where have you been that lat 8 years as the republican Party has expanded the governments scope and intrusive powers into our everyday lives? And McCain voted 90% of the time with Bush. You aren't voting for them out of your hope and your optimism. you voting for them based on your blindness and ignorance.
Posted by: sparrow4 | October 19, 2008 2:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I mean, hey, after how many years of trying to use their Bible to horn government into the very most personal and probably disappointingly-non-titillating places in *my* life in order to justify injustice in property and probate law, after 'sincerely having concerns' about the thinnest accusations around one of our most upstanding citizens....
....*Now* they say 'Let's mind our own business?'
Really?
Really?
Come on.
Posted by: Paganplace | October 18, 2008 10:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
I mean, you don't have to look very far back right here on On Faith to see these *very conservative preachers* trumpring the ultimate God-given favor upon all these GOP policies of unrestrained capitalism, mere months ago...
Skipping nary a beat, they'd have you believe that all of a sudden, it wasn't a 'Christian nation' but one run by non-Christians all along.
Who's been consistent, here?
Posted by: Paganplace | October 18, 2008 10:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"As regards fear, the Obama campaign is indulging a little bit of fear tactics on taxes and healthcare, "
That's not so much 'indulging fear' as actually presenting the math, to counter blind accusations 'Obama will raise your taxes' ....when that's not true.
That's actually saying, 'This is what MCCain actually promises to do. Here is how this will add up'
Fear? Well, I'd be afraid of it. But it's not blind or deceptive fear. It's not the same as the fearmongering about 'fining joe the plumber' that mccain lied to our faces three times about despite knowing better...
It's about what the unadvertised portions of McCain's ideology-based plan actually *say they will do to us.*
See?
It's actually what the man says he's going to do. ...He just claims it's about something else.
Don't be fooled. When the GOP loses a sense of 'right and might' their next step is to say, 'We're all the same kind of bums here in Washington. Vote for me anyway.'
Posted by: Paganplace | October 18, 2008 10:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment
ONE PRETENDS TO LIMIT SCOPE AND POWER OF GOVERNMENT.
HOWEVER REagan spent more than teh entire 200 years before him
BUsh/ Cheny , of course cut what would make Americans and infrastructure stronger and did teh war lining the pockets of a few for oil while bankrupting USA dollar and soul.
here in CA IN CHURCHES the FAR right is preaching Armageddon is on schedule and mccain sings about bombing human beings.
THE DIFFEReNCE IS GOP Action -not words HAS BEEN Towards A 2 CLASS SOCIETY SUPPORTING THE MILITARY and Defense Industry and with extremist fundamentalist Palin added in who yesterday said she liKED NH, in the northwest !?
AS SHE PROMISED THE PORK BARREL STATE OF ALASKA THEY WILL CONTINUE TO TAKE IN $500 MORE PER PERSON THAN THEY GIVE OUT.
we cant continue to pay for gop lies that have already bankrputed America dollar and soul.
THE RIGHT HAS ALREADY TRAMPLED MUCH OF THE CONSTITUTION AND RIGHTS TO PRIVaCY AND MORE ..
FACISM WRAPPED IN A FLAG ISN'T FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY.
i wont be wearing a pin looks like a flag ill be voting to Take it Back to All the People
Obama/Biden
- your favorite
homeless multi disabled vet
Posted by: macdoodle1 | October 17, 2008 1:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment
So, anyway, *now* you say 'Mind your own business. Never mind that just happens to be when big corruption on Religious right candidates who spent half the year smearing.... just happens to be getting noticed...
Posted by: Paganplace | October 16, 2008 8:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment
"In this crisis, most of us should resolutely mind our own business, act charitably toward neighbors in need"
Bold words from someone representing a Religious Right establishment trying to tell everyone me getting joint property rights with my beloved was a bigger concern than the Religious-right-endorsed agendas I warned you could come to no good end.
I'm sure yer Jesus will love you for spending all that time coming after me, and acknowledge there was nothing you could do about the previous administrations you insistently voted for on the grounds anything else might not marginalize me enough.
As I said all along,
Bon appetit.
Posted by: Paganplace | October 16, 2008 8:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Lets say, John, that you are looking at a map. You see a continent with five states, each drawn in its own color, say, red, green, blue, brown and yellow. Those states have borders, citizens, laws and governments.
Suppose, now, we remove the boundaries of the states and mix the citizens of those states, so that citizens of every state live everywhere, geographically.
The states, their governments and their laws still exist, but are not defined geographically anymore. The states are now defined as groups of people who are citizens of a particular state.
What is required to make this work, if anything?
Posted by: cacxo | October 16, 2008 3:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Lets say, John, that you are looking at a map. You see a continent with five states, each drawn in its own color, say, red, green, blue, brown and yellow. Those states have borders, citizens, laws and governments.
Suppose, now, we remove the boundaries of the states and mix the citizens of those states, so that citizens of every state live everywhere, geographically.
The states, their governments and their laws still exist, but are not defined geographically anymore. The states are now defined a group of people who are citizens of a particular state.
What is required to make this work, if anything?
Posted by: cacxo | October 16, 2008 3:03 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Mr. Reynolds:
While I find most of your "column" insightful, wise and useful, I find your conclusion to be less well informed and inconsistent with your key words of advise. I ask you to revisit your choice with more honesty and Christian rigor.
Though I agree that the protection of innocent life is a very high priority for govenment, I don't think that there is any evidence that Mr. McCain would take better care of innocent soldiers (minimizing harm by keeping them out of foolish wars) or the falsely accused sitting on death row, or those in the nation whose life and physical health are being eaten away by poverty.
Furthermore, there is very little basis for your implications that Mr. Obama believes that Government power should be unlimited, or believes that he is a messiah, or that he is actually less humble than Mr. McCain. Obama is simply setting the bar higher for what our country can acheive, stating the goals of equality, compassion and charity that we all know are right for all of our people(do unto others as you would have them do unto you)and struggling to develop a more just and benficial balance of opportunities and rewards.
As regards fear, the Obama campaign is indulging a little bit of fear tactics on taxes and healthcare, but it is the McCain/Palin campaign, and Republicans in general, who are raising the specter of "Arabs", socialists, etc. to stir up fear,racism and hatred.
Measured against Jesus's commandment(s) to "Love God with all your heart and mind and love your neibhbor as yourself" I would say that Mr. Obama fares at least as well as Mr. McCain, and in fact more so by challenging all of us to walk the walk: to give up the "us and them" mentality and put love for our neighbors into action. That is not false messianicism, it is following Christ's teaching.
Posted by: jkarn | October 16, 2008 1:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.











(As an aside: Why doesn't Mr. Reynolds' column run in the same order as everyone else's? I always preferred it that way, but still. We all do develop habits. :))