John Esposito
Founding director, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, Georgetown University

John Esposito

Professor of religion, international affairs and Islamic studies.

 ALL POSTS

A Long Way to Go: A "Predestined" Media

The media has improved its coverage in recent years. An increasing number of networks and newspapers have religion reporters or advisers. However, since its main drivers (market share and maximization of profits) are media coverage, it is “predestined” to be unbalanced or biased.

The emphasis on “headline events” often means a predominant focus on the negative, sensational, violent. The “dark side” of religion predominates over coverage of religions more transcendent and transformative aspects. This is reflected across the religious spectrum. Mainstream evangelicals are eclipsed by the preferential coverage given to more militant and strident evangelicals like Pat Robertson who can be counted on for provocative sound bites. Warith Deen Muhammad, leader of the majority of African American Muslims has often been eclipsed by the more combative Louis Farrakhan. Much needed coverage of the pedophilia problems of the Catholic Church were rarely complimented by stories that also show the faith that informs the lives of most Catholics.

Most glaringly in recent years, Islam and Muslims have come to be viewed primarily through the lens of religious extremism and terrorism. Media tend to focus disproportionately on this dangerous and deadly minority who threaten global security and offer minimal coverage of the faith and lives of the mainstream majority of Muslims. Prominent media commentators use Islamophobic (anti-Muslim) language and make outrageous unsubstantiated charges that responsible editors allow regarding Judaism and Christianity. There is a growing propensity in the media in the name of balanced coverage of Islam and Muslims to have a “counter voice” on virtually any story. Especially favored are ex-Muslims, those who publicly repudiate Islam and like some prominent non-Muslim ideologues do not distinguish (as they would when talking about other faiths) between mainstream Islam and religious extremism but rather see the religion of Islam itself as inherently flawed and dangerous.

"Balance" has come to mean that any discussion of Islam and Muslims include someone who is a "militant critic." Yet, we don't expect that every discussion of religion include an atheist, that every discussion of the meaning of Passover or Easter include someone who will deny the historicity or relevance of these beliefs and rituals, that every panel on some aspect of Jewish or Christian faith and belief include "critics" with preference given to those who have rejected the faith and are often not experts as much as "professional critics," that is, make a career of slamming their former faith. While criticism and dissent are important and must be heard, they are not necessary or relevant to every story or report.

Notably absent in the mainstream media is coverage of Islam and Muslims is coverage of the erosion of civil liberties. While stories on global terrorism and domestic threats are important to us all, at the same time how many stories have gone one step further and focused on the thousands of Muslims indiscriminately arrested, detained, monitored and interviewed and not found guilt or released for lack of evidence; the number of Islamic charities shut down but despite the passage of years not successfully prosecuted; the continued detention of Muslims like Prof. Sami al-Arian, whose jury verdict as well as the post-trial agreement forged by Justice Department and Defense attorneys were ignored by the trial judge.

Since 9/11, I am constantly asked (or the charge is made): “Why don’t Muslims in America and globally speak out against religious violence and terrorism?” To which my response is that the absence of such statements is either due to the fact that Muslims do not speak out or that, as is the case, the media too often does not find these stories “newsworthy.” I then refer them to internet sites like Beliefnet and others where these statements may be found.

Inadequate media coverage is compounded by the fact that many, though certainly not all, reporters come to stories with little or no background on religions and the very topics they cover. This was a major reason why after 9/11, I wrote the book, What Everyone Needs to Know About Islam.

Is there more media coverage of religion today than in the past? Yes. Are there reporters and stories that make an important contribution to better understanding? Yes. However, are there serious and substantial problems resulting in a dangerous bias in the coverage provided by many media outlets? Most assuredly, Yes. We still have a long way to go in a world in which in many societies, religion has become a more pronounced presence and factor in personal and public life, in domestic and international politics.


The emphasis on “headline events” often means a predominant focus on the negative, sensational, violent. The “dark side” of religion predominates over coverage of religion's more transcendent and transformative aspects.

This is reflected across the religious spectrum. Mainstream evangelicals are eclipsed by the preferential coverage given to more militant and strident evangelicals like Pat Robertson who can be counted on for provocative sound bites.

Warith Deen Muhammad, leader of the majority of African-American Muslims has often been eclipsed by the more combative Louis Farrakhan. Much needed coverage of the pedophilia problems of the Catholic Church were rarely complimented by stories that also show the faith that informs the lives of most Catholics.

Most glaringly in recent years, Islam and Muslims have come to be viewed primarily through the lens of religious extremism and terrorism. Media tend to focus disproportionately on this dangerous and deadly minority who threaten global security and offer minimal coverage of the faith and lives of the mainstream majority of Muslims.

Prominent media commentators use Islamophobic (anti-Muslim) language and make outrageous unsubstantiated charges that responsible editors allow regarding Judaism and Christianity. There is a growing propensity in the media in the name of balanced coverage of Islam and Muslims to have a “counter voice” on virtually any story.

Especially favored are ex-Muslims, those who publicly repudiate Islam and like some prominent non-Muslim ideologues do not distinguish (as they would when talking about other faiths) between mainstream Islam and religious extremism but rather see the religion of Islam itself as inherently flawed and dangerous.

"Balance" has come to mean that any discussion of Islam and Muslims include someone who is a "militant critic." Yet, we don't expect that every discussion of religion include an atheist, that every discussion of the meaning of Passover or Easter include someone who will deny the historicity or relevance of these beliefs and rituals, that every panel on some aspect of Jewish or Christian faith and belief include "critics" with preference given to those who have rejected the faith and are often not experts as much as "professional critics," that is, make a career of slamming their former faith.

While criticism and dissent are important and must be heard, they are not necessary or relevant to every story or report.

Notably absent in the mainstream media is coverage of Islam and Muslims is coverage of the erosion of civil liberties. While stories on global terrorism and domestic threats are important to us all, at the same time how many stories have gone one step further and focused on the thousands of Muslims indiscriminately arrested, detained, monitored and interviewed and not found guilt or released for lack of evidence? Or stories on the number of Islamic charities shut down but despite the passage of years not successfully prosecuted; the continued detention of Muslims like Professor Sami al-Arian, whose jury verdict as well as the post-trial agreement forged by Justice Department and Defense attorneys were ignored by the trial judge?

Since 9/11, I am constantly asked (or the charge is made): “Why don’t Muslims in America and globally speak out against religious violence and terrorism?” To which my response is that the absence of such statements is either due to the fact that Muslims do not speak out or that, as is the case, the media too often does not find these stories “newsworthy.” I then refer them to internet sites like Beliefnet and others where these statements may be found.

Inadequate media coverage is compounded by the fact that many, though certainly not all, reporters come to stories with little or no background on religions and the very topics they cover. This was a major reason why after 9/11, I wrote the book, What Everyone Needs to Know About Islam.

Is there more media coverage of religion today than in the past? Yes. Are there reporters and stories that make an important contribution to better understanding? Yes. Are there serious and substantial problems resulting in a dangerous bias in the coverage provided by many media outlets? Most assuredly, Yes.

We still have a long way to go in a world in which in many societies, religion has become a more pronounced presence and factor in personal and public life, in domestic and international politics.

By John Esposito  |  March 28, 2007; 8:18 AM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: In UK, Fuddy-Duddies, Happy-Clappies, or Worse | Next: All the News That Fits the Stereotypes

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



The reason Islam's negative, sensational, and violent aspects are so well publicized is that they present a clear threat to the non-Muslim world.
In fact, one could argue Islam's transformative power is negative - it transforms otherwise peaceful people into mass murderers and suicide bombers.
Esposito also fails to mention that violence against non-Muslims are fully supported by the Quran and Hadith.

Posted by: jhimmi | July 21, 2008 2:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This article seems to repeat the 2nd paragraph through the end of the article. From the second "The emphasis on “headline events”" to the end seems to be a duplicate, though perhaps slightly different.

Oh, and kudos Mr. Esposito, the article's spot on, I'd say.

Posted by: Kearns | September 16, 2007 6:55 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I'm sure if the so-called American Muslims had organized a 100,000 strong demonstration against "the subversion of the Religion of Peace by Islamo-crazies" in some place like Washington DC all the news providers would find that event 'news worthy'.

Just a suggestion to bear in mind in the event an Islamo-crazy who's hijacked the Religion of Peace blows up something big in the USA, after slipping through the FBI net.

Posted by: Gary Boxleitner | April 16, 2007 12:43 AM
Report Offensive Comment

ross:

Mr. Esposito,
The appeasers of islam just dont get it, the core of islam is rotten, there are no virtues found in this cult.

Esposito why do you refuse to debate Ali Sina ? You have been challenged more than once and you get to select the topic, why do you avoid him ?

The posts can be made right here (instead of FFI) if it is acceptable to you.

http://www.faithfreedom.org

http://www.faithfreedom.org/forum/index.php

Posted by: ross | April 13, 2007 8:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Much can be hidden in statistics, particularly if you survey or if you are subjective.

If you make it a point that an American TV program showing yet another Islamic terrorist attack/bombing is biased against Muslims, then you'll rack up the 'Americans are sooo mean to Muslims' points.

If you see this as just presenting the facts then you'll come to a different conclusion. Hey, has anyone considered that the news report of yet another Islamist suicide bombing is true?

Compare such journalistic facts with the anti-American, anti-Jew hatred on Arab TV? Is there any comparison? Did anyone scale the 'bias'?

Hands up those who think al-Jazeera is a better news provider than the average American TV network. Yup - just as I thought. All these subjective analysis. Has anyone actually sat down and watched al-Jazeera with its blatantly pro-Palestinian, pro-Ummah, pro-Islam, Muslims-can-do-no-wrong, Muslims are such VICTIMS, programs? No?

A case in point was the pathetic pro-Iraqi slant during the second Gulf War. Unbiased al-Jazeera certainly is not. I'd much rather watch Fox News than al-Jazeera anyday, and that's saying something.

How many of you have seen the mainstream Egyptian TV serial portraying the Jews as blood-sucking parasites who make motzas out of Christian boys' blood? It was still showing a couple of years ago.

I can tell you that Muslims in general don't speak out against Islamic terrorism because they agree with it. It's in their scriptures - read Surah 9 at-Taubah for god sake. Turn on Arab TV and see the absolute hatred of Jews, America, Christians openly spouted. Much of this is on Memri and youtube - you only have to look.

Posted by: Murad | April 11, 2007 10:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment

ppppp

Posted by: Anonymous | April 5, 2007 3:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

well this didnt print out as the poll taken but as the poll itself - heres the link-

http://www.projectmaps.com/PMReport.htm

Posted by: victoria | April 2, 2007 9:37 AM
Report Offensive Comment

since that seems to have been a conversation stopper- im going to tuck this poll in here as it seems this blog has stagnated-and it wont interfere with a flow-

Zogby International

Polling/ Market Research

Public Relations Service

Supported by The Pew Charitable Trusts

NEWS RELEASE

Embargoed until Wednesday, December 19, 2001, 9:30 A.M.

AMERICAN MUSLIM POLL

Nov/Dec 2001

For further information, Please Contact:

Project MAPS: Zogby International

Muslims in American Public Square John Zogby, President and CEO

Sulayman Nyang, Co-director Alan Crockett, Vice President, Communication

Zahid Bukhari, Co-director Will Daley, Special Projects Editor

Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding 1750 Genesee Street

Georgetown University Utica, New York 13502-5418

37th & O St., NW Ph: 315-624-0200 x 240

Washington, DC Fax: 315-624-0210

Ph.: 202-687-2947, Fax: 202-687-6001 E-Mail: mail@zogby.com

E-Mail: zhb@georgetown.edu www.zogby.com

www.projectmaps.com

Subject Page


I. Introduction 2
II. Methodology and Sample Characteristics 3
III. Executive Summary 6
IV. Narrative Analysis 9

Tables Page

Table 1. Political Activity 12

Table 2. Importance of Politics 13

Table 3. Involvement in Community Activities 15

Table 4. Agreement with Statements 17

Table 5. Views on Terrorist Attacks 20

Table 6. Views on U.S. Foreign Involvement 23

Table 7. American’s Attitudes Toward Muslims 26

Table 8. Favor/Oppose Domestic Issues 28

Table 9. Favorability toward Congress and Corporations 30

Table 10. Importance of Religion 33

Table 11. Fairness of Muslim Media Portrayal 35

Appendix A: Questionnaire 36-50

I. Introduction

Project MAPS: Muslims in American Public Square is presenting the results of the first ever systematic poll of American Muslims. The Poll covers the following four areas:

1) Demographics: gender, generation and ethnicity, U.S. born and immigrants, income and education levels, age and occupation.

2) Religious practices: relationship with the mosque, conversion to Islam, importance of religion in their life and interaction between the mosque and politics.

3) Opinion and behavior on social and political issues, party affiliation, voting in the presidential election, foreign policy and other domestic issues relating to religion and public life.

4) September 11th and its aftermath: reaction, backlash, President Bush’s handling of the crisis, war against terrorism and military action in Afghanistan


The project commissioned Zogby International to conduct the Poll through phone interviews of a nationwide representative sample of the American Muslim population during the months of November and December 2001. The questionnaire was developed with the help of Dr. Ihsan Bagby, Project MAPS team and staff of Zogby International.

Project MAPS seeks to document the role and contribution of the Muslim community in the American public life. It is a three-year research project that began in 1999 with the support of The Pew Charitable Trusts. The Pew Charitable Trusts are supporting the MAPS project as part of a larger examination of seven major religious groups in the United States and their place in public life. The Project is housed at Georgetown University's Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding.

The project team is also working to produce two edited volumes, Who’s Who among American Muslims, and a directory of the Islamic Centers and Muslim Organizations. The project website, www.projectmaps.com, has all information of the activities and development of the project.

II. Methodology and Sample Characteristics

Zogby International interviewed 1,781 persons, 18 years and old, nationwide who identify themselves as Muslim. From November 8 through November 19, 2001, phone interviews were conducted. The telephone list was created by matching the zip codes of 300 randomly selected Islamic centers, against their respective local telephone exchanges. Listings of common Muslim surnames were then identified from the local telephone exchanges and called.

An additional sample of Afro-American Muslims was taken in-person December 7-9, 2001, at locations in New York, Washington, D.C., Atlanta, GA, and Detroit, MI. The additional surveys were required to account for Afro- American Muslims with Anglo-American or non-Muslim surnames who were not called on in the telephone survey. The percentage of Afro-American respondents was weighted to reflect 20% of the American Muslim population.

The margin of error is 2.4%. Margins of error are higher in sub-groups.

Sample Characteristics


Frequency

Percent
Total

1,781

100

Region
East

685

39
South

380

21

Central/Great Lakes

486

27
West

229

13

Ethnicity

South Asian

Pakistani

Indian

Bangladesh

Afghan

584

308

130

78

68

32

17

7

4

4

Arab

461

26

Afro-American

358

20

African

132

7

Other

159

14

Not sure of ethnicity

23

1

Gender

Male

1,051

59

Female

730

41

Marital Status

Married

1,225

69

Single, never married

344

19

Divorced, separated, widowed

189

11

Age Group

18-29

393

23

30-49

878

51

50-64

346

20

65+

118

7

Did not answer age

46

--

Education


108

6

HS Grad

215

12

Some College

430

24

College Grad

1021

58

Did not answer

7

--

Sample Characteristics—continued


Frequency

Percent

Income

Less than $15,000

145

10

$15,000-$24,999

152

10

$25,000-$34,999

187

13

$35,000-$49,000

256

17

$50,000-$74,999

320

22

$75,000 or more

420

28

Did not answer income

301

--

Occupation

Managerial

221

12

Medical

170

10

Professional/Technical

395

22

Sales

87

5

Clerical

46

3

Service

77

4

Blue-Collar/Production

44

3

Student

137

8

Homemaker

173

10

Teacher/education

114

6

Retired

82

5

Other occupation

198

11

Not sure of occupation

30

2

Year Emigrated

Year emigrated: Pre-1970

138

12

1970-1979

284

25

1980-1989

412

36

1990-present

274

24

Did not say what year emigrated

33

3

Registered Voters
Registered to vote

1,399

79
Not registered to vote

378

21

Likely to Vote (among registered voters)
Very likely to vote

1,182

85
Somewhat likely to vote

126

9
Not likely to vote

77

6

Party Affiliation (among likely voters)

Democrat

518

40

Republican

300

23

Independent/Minor party

367

28

Libertarian

9

1

Did not answer party

113

9

III. Executive Summary

This survey demonstrates an eagerness of American Muslims to fully participate in American public life. This eagerness is tempered by the experience of discrimination since September 11and by negative portrayals of Muslims in the media. Below are the key results.

Demographics

· Three quarters of surveyed American Muslims (74%) are under 50.

· Nearly three fifths (58%) are college graduates.

· Eighty-five percent are Arab, African, Afro-American or South Asian.

· Half (50%) earn more than $50,000 annually.

· Seven in ten (69%) are married.

· Two fifths (39%) live in the East.

· Thirty six percent are born in the U.S.

· Three-fifths (60%) of those not born in the U.S. arrived here after 1980. Over one- third (36%) arrived during 1980-1989, while 24% arrived from 1990 to the present.

· The American Muslims surveyed were born in 80 countries, including the U.S.

Voting Habits

· Two fifths of American Muslims (40%) are Democrats, 23% are Republican and 28% are independent.

· Eight in ten (79%) are registered to vote.

· Of those registered to vote, 85% say they are very likely to vote.

· Most Muslims not registered to vote say it is because they are not citizens (53%); 71% say they intend to vote.

· The majority (55%) of Afro-American Muslims voted for Gore, while the majority (54%) of Arabs and 49% of South Asians voted for Bush. A majority of Pakistanis (56%) also voted for Bush.

Political Opinions

· Over a third (36%) of American Muslims describe themselves as moderate in terms of their political ideology; over one-quarter (27%) say they are liberal to very liberal; one-fifth (21%) say they are conservative to very conservative.

· One-third of American Muslims have visited political websites (34%) or donated time or money to a political candidate (33%). Forty-five percent have changed their lifestyle in support of a cause, like the environment.

· Over two-fifths (43%) say it is very important to participate in politics, and 54% of African American Muslims agree on its importance.

· American Muslims favor big government solutions to issues like health care (93% favor universal health care) and poverty (93% support more generous government assistance to the poor).

· American Muslims are conservative on many social issues. They support the death penalty (68%); oppose gay marriages (71%); support making abortions more difficult to obtain (57%); oppose physician-assisted suicide (61%), and support banning the sale and display of pornography (65%).

· In addition, American Muslims support prayer (53%) and the display of the Ten Commandments (59%) in schools, and they support vouchers to send their children to private schools (68%).

Participation in Mainstream American Life

· American Muslims almost unanimously support donations to non-Muslim social service programs, like aid to the homeless (96%), efforts to become more involved in civic organizations (96%) and participation in the American political process (93%).

· Over three-fourths (77%) of American Muslims are active in organizations that help the poor, sick, elderly or homeless.

· Seven in ten (71%) are active at their Mosque or at other religious organizations.

· Over two thirds (69%) are active in school or youth programs.

· Nearly half (46%) are active in a professional organization.

· American Muslims are less active in public affairs organizations (33%), veteran’s organizations (24%) and labor unions (17%).

· The majority (54%) do not consider America an immoral society.

· Seventy percent immigrant Muslims does not agree that America is an immoral society, though, U.S. born Muslims (49%) and African American Muslims (57%) are at odds with the morality of American society.

· Most American Muslims (68%) do not feel the portrayal of Muslims and Islam in the media is fair. Three in four (77%) do not consider the treatment of Muslims and Islam in Hollywood fair.

Religious Practice

· Two-thirds (66%) American Muslims offer some of the daily prayers (salah). Nearly half (47%) say they offer all five prayers daily. Slightly more than one-fifth (22%) say they make salah occasionally or go for only Eid prayer, while 13% accept they never pray.

· Half of American Muslims attended their mosque for Friday or daily prayer in the preceding week (49%).

· Younger American Muslims aged 18-24 (62%) and African American Muslims (69%) are more likely to be involved in activities at their Mosque than American Muslims as a whole (48%).

· Eight in ten say the role of Islam and the importance of spirituality in their daily lives is very important (79% each).

· The majority (57%) says mosques should express their views on social and political questions.

· One-fifth (19%) of American Muslims are convert to Islam. Reading about religion and influenced by a fellow Muslim are the main reasons for conversion (38% and 22%).

Impact of September 11th

· President Bush earns an overall 58% approval rating from American Muslims on his handling of the terrorist attacks on September 11. Also, two-thirds (66%) agree with the Bush administration’s assertion that the war is being fought against terrorism, not Islam.

· Despite this approval, three-fifths (61%) feel the attacks could have been prevented, almost two thirds (64%) feel the military effort could lead to further terrorist attacks and over two-thirds (68%) say the military effort could lead to a more unstable Middle East.

· Half of the American Muslims (51%) support the military action against Afghanistan, while 43% oppose it.

· Over three-fourths (79%) say American foreign policy in the Middle East led to the attacks, while two thirds (67%) suggest that a change in America’s policy in the Middle East is the best way to wage the war against terrorism.

· A majority of American Muslims (57%) says the attitude of Americans toward Muslims and Arabs since September 11 has been unfavorable.

· A majority (52%) of Muslims say individuals, businesses or religious organizations in their community have experienced discrimination since September 11. The most commonly kind of discrimination has been verbal abuse, cited by one-quarter (25%) of respondents.

Foreign Policy Issues

· A vast majority (84%) of American Muslims agrees that the US should support a Palestinian state.

· Seventy percent agree that the US should reduce its financial support to Israel.

· Three-fifth (61%) agrees, and one fifth (22%) disagrees, that the US should reduce its support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world.

· Almost two third (63%) agree with the Secretary of State’s description that the Kashmir issue is the central issue between India and Pakistan. One-fifth (21%) has no opinion on the issue.

IV. Narrative Analysis

Voting Habits:

2. Are you registered to vote in the United States?

Yes 79%

No 21

Over three quarters (79%) of American Muslims are registered to vote, while 21% are not. Among ethnic categories, African Americans are most likely to say they are registered to vote (87%). Nine in ten respondents over 50 say they are registered (92%), while fewer aged 18-29 say so (70%). Women (81%) are more likely than men (77%) to say they are registered.

*990. Why are you not registered to vote?

Not a citizen 53%

Not interested/never thought about it

/never got around to it 17

My vote doesn’t make a difference 4

Too difficult to register 3

Other 20

Not sure 4

Of the 21% not registered to vote, 53% say they are not registered because they are not citizens. Seventeen percent say it is because they are not interested or have not gotten around to it. Twenty percent cite other reasons. Not surprisingly, respondents not born in the U.S. are more likely to say they are not registered because they are not citizens (65%).

3. Do you intend to register to vote?

Yes 72%

No 5

Not sure 2

Of the 21% percent not registered to vote, 72% say they intend to register. Of African Americans not registered to vote, 46% do not intend to do so.

4. How likely are you to vote in national elections?

Very likely 85%

Somewhat likely 9

Not likely 6

Not sure 1

*Note: The numbering of questions conforms to the survey instrument. Non-sequential numbering is due to internal office procedures.

Among the 79% of Muslims registered to vote, 85% say they are very likely to vote, while nine percent say they are somewhat likely to vote. Among ethnic groups, South Asians (87%) and Arabs (85%) are more likely to vote, than African Americans (81%). 18 to 29 year olds are much less likely to vote (71%) than other age groups.

991. Why are you not likely to vote in national elections?

Usually don’t like the choice of candidates 23%

Generally not interested 15

Never enough time 14

My vote doesn’t make a difference 14

Other 21

Not sure 14

Of those who are not likely to vote, the largest percentage, (23%), say they do not vote because they usually do not like the choice of candidates. An additional 15% say they are generally not interested.

African Americans and respondents ages 30 to 49 (35% each) are most likely to cite a dislike of candidates as the reason they do not vote.

5. In the 2000 election, the candidates were Democrat Al Gore, Republican George W. Bush, Reform Party’s Pat Buchanan, and Green Party’s Ralph Nader. For whom did you vote?

Bush 42%

Gore 31

Nader 12

Someone else 2

Buchanan 0

Not sure 13

Forty-two percent of American Muslims say they voted for Bush, while 31% chose Gore, and 12% went for Nader.

Although 55% of African Americans went for Gore, 20% voted for Bush. Among Arabs 54% opted to vote for Bush. Among South Asians (49%) who went for Bush, 56% were Pakistanis. Nader’s support was highest among Arabs (17%).

6. In which party are you either registered to vote or do you consider yourself to be a member of – Democrat, Republican, Independent/minor party, or Libertarian?

Democrat 40%

Independent/minor party 28

Republican 23

Libertarian 1

Not sure 9

Forty percent of American Muslims describe themselves as Democrats, while 28% say they are independents or members of a minor party, and 23% are Republican.

More respondents over age 50 are Democrats (43%) compared to other age groups, and 18-to-29 year-olds are more likely to say they are Independent (31%).

African Americans (55%) are more likely to be Democrats. Arabs are divided among the Republican and Democrat parties (30% each), and an additional 32% of Arabs say they are independent. Pakistanis are more Republican (34%) than Democrats (22%). One third (33%) of Pakistani also consider themselves as independent.

Political Opinions & Participation:

906. Which description best represents your political ideology?

Progressive/very liberal 9%

Liberal 18

Moderate 36

Conservative 19

Very conservative 2

Libertarian 2

Not sure 14

Refuse 2

Over one-third of Muslim Americans describe themselves as ideological moderates (36%), while 19% describe themselves as conservative and 18% say they are liberal. The population skews liberal, with over one-fourth (27%) who say they are liberal or very liberal, compared to 21% describing themselves as conservative or very conservative.

Among the major ethnic groups, Arabs are more likely to say they are moderate (42%) than South Asians (35%) and African Americans (33%).

7. Would you consider yourself to be an active member in your political party?

Yes 25%

No 71

Not sure 4

One-quarter (25%) of American Muslims say they are active members of their political party, while 71% say they are not. African Americans (32%) and respondents age 65 and over (30%) are more likely to say they are active members of their political party. South Asians (22%) and 18-to-29 year-olds (22%) are much less likely to say so.

8 – 13. Have you ever…

Table 1. Political Activity (ranked by highest yes %)


Yes %

Called or written the media or politician on a given issue,

or have you signed a petition

50

Changed your lifestyle in support of a cause, like the environment

45

Attended a rally in support of a politician or a cause

40

Visited a political web site

34

Given a contribution or volunteered your time or services

to a political candidate

33

Participated in a boycott of a product or a business

30

Half of the American Muslims say they have called or written the media or a politician on a given issue, or signed a petition. African Americans are most likely to have done so (63%), while South Asians (42%) and Africans (41%) are much less likely. Respondents ages 18 to 29 (54%) and 50 to 64 (53%) are more likely to have called or written the media or a politician about an issue.

Forty-five percent say they have changed their lifestyle to support a cause. Again, African Americans are most likely to have done so (51%), while South Asians (40%) and Africans (34%) are much less likely to have done so. Respondents 18 to 29 (52%) are much more likely than older respondents (43% of those 50 to 64 and 27% of those 65) to have changed their lifestyle.

Two-fifths of respondents say they have attended a rally in support of a politician or cause. Again, African Americans are most likely to have done so (60%), while South Asians (29%) and Africans (32%) are much less likely to have done so. Respondents 18 to 29 (47%) are more likely to have done so, while those 30 to 49 (36%) are less likely to say they have attended a rally.

One-third of American Muslims overall say they have visited a political website; given a contribution or volunteered their time or services to a political candidate, and participated in a boycott of a business or product.

Those who are most likely to have visited a political website are those who are ages 18-29 (46%); conservatives and Republicans (38% each); and African Americans (37%).

Close to half of African Americans and those age 50 and over (47% average) have given a contribution or volunteered on behalf of a political candidate. Also, 36% of Muslim men have done so.

Half of African Americans (50%) participated in a boycott of a business or product. Those with some college (37%) are also more likely to have boycotted a place or item.

14 - 15. How important is it for you to participate in politics? How important would you say it is for your children to participate in politics?

Table 2. Importance of Politics


For You %

For Your children %

Very important

44

46

Somewhat important

38

29

Not important

17

16

Not sure

2

9

The majority of American Muslims say political participation is very or somewhat important to them personally (82%), while three quarters (75%) say it is very or somewhat important for their children to participate in politics.

African Americans are most likely to say politics is very important to them personally (54%). Arab respondents are most likely to consider politics as very or somewhat important to them personally (86%). But South Asians are less likely to be concerned about politics, with 77% saying it is very or somewhat important to them personally.

Likewise, African Americans are most likely to say it is very important for their children to participate in politics (55%). Arabs say it is very or somewhat important for their children to do so (79%). South Asians, again, are least concerned about whether their children participate in politics (72%).

16. How often do you discuss politics with family and friends?

Always 35%

Sometimes 50

Hardly ever 9

Never 6

Not sure 1

Eighty-five percent of American Muslims always or sometimes discuss politics with family and friends, while 15% hardly or never do so.

Nine in ten African Americans (90%) and those who earn $75,000 or more (91%) say they discuss politics with family and friends, while 88% of respondents 18 to 29 do so.

17. How often would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs?

Most of the time 60%

Some of the time 26

Only now and then 8

Hardly at all 5

Not sure 1

Three-fifths (60%) of American Muslims say they follow government and public affairs most of the time, while a quarter (26%) follow public affairs some of the time. Older respondents most avidly follow public affairs, with 65% of those 50 to 64 and 73% of those 65 or older saying they do so most of the time. Likewise, 72% of African Americans say they follow public affairs most of the time.

18. What do you consider to be the most important issue facing American society today?

Terrorism/fear/safety/security 27%

Economy/employment 10

American awareness/issues 7

Racism/discrimination/equality/ignorance/tolerance 7

The war 6

Civil liberty/human rights/freedom 6

Foreign policy 6

Family/morals 6

Peace/unity 5

Education 4

Islam/Muslim issues 2

Politics 2

Lack of religion/communication/understanding 2

Health/environment 1

Nothing 1

Not sure 9

19. What do you consider to be the most important issue facing the Muslim American community today?

Stereotyping/prejudice/profiling/racism 21%

American and Muslin relations/image 15

Ignorance/misunderstanding/discrimination 12

Terrorism/September 11 backlash/war/crime 11

Acceptance/accountability/tolerance/civil rights 7

Present climate in the U.S./unity/issues 6

Morals/religion/values 5

Politics/involvement 4

Awareness of Islam/Muslims/Middle East 2

Education 2

Media/communication 2

Foreign policy 1

Economy/jobs 1

Not sure 8

No/nothing/no problems 2

20 – 29. I am now going to read a list of community activities, please tell me if you have ever donated time, money, or been an officer of any of the following.

Table 3. Involvement in Community Activities (ranked by highest total participation %)


Total

% *

Donated

time

Donated money

Served as

an officer

Combination

of these

None of these

Any organization to help

the poor, sick, elderly or homeless

77

18

32

--

27

22

Any mosque or other religious organizations

71

16

19

--

36

29

School or youth programs

69

27

12

2

27

32

Any professional organization

46

15

13

1

18

51

Any neighborhood, civic

or community group

45

23

7

1

15

54

Any arts or cultural organization

42

14

16

1

12

56

Any ethnic organizations

36

12

9

--

15

63

Any Muslim political action public affairs organization

33

12

8

1

13

66

Any veteran’s or military service organizations

24

7

13

1

4

75

Any trade or labor unions

17

6

5

1

6

82

*Combines those who say they donated time, money, served as an officer or engaged in a combination of these activities. It does not include none.

Over three-quarters of Muslim Americans (77%) say they have been involved with organizations to help the poor, sick, homeless or elderly. Respondents 65 and older are much more likely to say so (84%). So are African Americans (84%), while South Asians (73%) are less likely to say so. Those who earn $35,000-$50,000 are more likely than those in other income levels to say they have been involved (86%).

Seventy-one percent say they have been involved with a religious organization or a mosque. Those born in the U.S. (81%) are much more likely than not U.S.-born (65%) to say they participate. Those 18 to 29 (74%) and 50 to 64 (76%) are more likely than other ages to say they are involved. African Americans are most likely to say they have been involved in their mosque (86%), while Arab (67%), African (60%) and South Asian respondents (64%), are less likely to say so.

Over two-thirds say they have been involved with school or youth programs. Women (76%) are much more likely than men (62%) to say they are involved. African Americans are much more likely to say they are involved (77%), while South Asians are much less likely (59%).

Other community activities enjoy participation from less than a majority of American Muslims as a whole, although some exceptions in sub-categories are worth noting.

While 46% of American Muslims overall participate in professional organizations, majorities of African Americans (55%), those born in the U.S. (57%), and those earning $75,000 or more (84%) say they participate.

While 45% of American Muslims say they are involved with a neighborhood or community group, 61% of African Americans, 56% of those born in the U.S. and majorities of age groups 50-64 (52%) and 65 and older (56%) say they do.

While 42% of American Muslims say they participate in an arts or cultural organization, majorities of African Americans (55%), 55-69 year olds (52%), and those with an income of $75,000 or more (55%) say they do.

While 36% of American Muslims say they participate in an ethnic organization, 57% of African American Muslims say they do.

One-third (33%) of American Muslims say they participate in a Muslim public affairs organization, but 55% of African American Muslims say this.

While 17% of American Muslims participate in a labor union, 32% of African American Muslims and 29% of American Muslims born in the U.S. say they do.

30 – 37. Do you agree or disagree with the following statements?

Table 4. Agreement with Statements (ranked by agree %)


Agree*

Disagree*

Muslims should donate to non-Muslim social service programs like aid for the homeless

96

3

Muslims should be involved in American civic and community development organizations to improve America

96

3

Muslims should participate in the political process

93

4

Muslims should be involved with the American media and the educational system to change the image of Islam

91

6

Muslims should participate in interfaith activities

88

6

Muslims should financially support worthy non-Muslim political candidates

88

8

The influence of religion and spiritual values in American life should increase

83

11

America is an immoral society

37

54

(*Agree combines strongly and somewhat agree; disagree combines strongly and somewhat disagree.)

There is very little disagreement among American Muslims that they should interact with and support the broader, non-Muslim society. Yet, American Muslims are divided on the question of the morality of American society.

American Muslims almost unanimously agree that Muslims should donate to non-Muslim social service programs, that Muslims should be involved in American civic and community development organizations (96% each), and that Muslim should participate in the political process (93%).

Nine in ten (91%) also say Muslims should be involved in the American media and educational system to change the image of Islam. A similar majority says Muslims should financially support worthy non-Muslim political candidates (88%).

Most American Muslims support participation in inter-faith activities (88%) and most say the role of religion in American life should increase (83%).

The majority (54%) disagrees that America is an immoral society, though over one-third (37%) say that it is. Nearly half of U.S.-born Muslims (49%) and 57% of African American Muslims consider American society immoral, whereas under a third of foreign-born Muslims (30%) say so.

38. How satisfied are you overall with the way things are going in American society today?

Very satisfied 20%

Somewhat satisfied 39 Satisfied 59%

Somewhat dissatisfied 25

Very dissatisfied 12 Dissatisfied 38%

Not sure 3

Six in ten (59%) American Muslims are satisfied with the way things are going in American society; one fifth (20%) are very satisfied. Arab (60%), African (63%) and South Asian respondents (67%) are more likely to be satisfied.

Over a third (38%) are dissatisfied with the way things are going in American society.

September 11 and its Aftermath:

39. In your own words, why do you think the United States was targeted for the terrorist attacks?

Foreign policy 30%

U.S. image in the world 14

Terrorism/easy target 6

Political problems/government 5

Greed/hatred/extremism/ignorance/ignorance/jealousy/revenge/anger 5

U.S. support of Israel 3

Misunderstanding/lack of communication 3

Social/cultural/moral issues 3

Ignoring Palestine 1

Don’t know/not sure 28

40. Overall, how would you rate President Bush’s handling of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?

Excellent 27%

Good 31 Positive 58%

Fair 21

Poor 17 Negative 38

Not sure 4

Nearly three in five respondents (58%) give Presidents Bush a positive rating in handling of the terrorist attacks, including one-fourth who rate it as excellent (27%). Over one third (38%) give the president negative ratings.

President Bush receives more positive ratings from adults 30 and older (average 63%) than from 18-29 year-olds (47%). Those not born in the U.S. (64%) are more likely than U.S.-born respondents (47%) to give Bush positive ratings. Majorities of South Asians (66%) and Arabs (57%) give the presidents positive ratings, compared to 40% of African Americans.

A majority of African Americans (55%), and 49% each of those born in the U.S. and 18-29 year-olds, give negative ratings to President Bush’s handling of the terrorist attacks.

41. How confident are you of President Bush’s ability to handle this crisis?

Very confident 29%

Somewhat confident 28 Confident 57%

A little nervous 25

Very nervous 15 Nervous 40

Not sure 4

Most American Muslims (57%) are confident of President Bush’s ability to handle this crisis, while two in five (40%) are nervous.

Those who are confident in the president’s ability to handle the crisis include more adults 30 and older (61%) than 18-29 year-olds (48%); more men (60%) than women (52%); more people born outside the U.S. (64%) than those born here (45%), and nearly twice as many South Asians (68%) as African Americans (37%).

One-half or more of 18-29 year-olds (49%), African Americans (58%), and U.S.-born Muslims (52%) are among those who are nervous about Bush’s ability.

42. Do you consider yourself more patriotic, less patriotic, or the same as before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks?

More patriotic 41%

Less patriotic 5

The same 52

Not sure 3

A majority (52%) says their patriotism is the same now as compared to before the terrorist attacks. Two in five (41%) now consider themselves more patriotic, and 5% say their patriotism is now less.

Majorities of Republicans (50%) and South Asians (52%), as well as pluralities of Africans (44%), those not born in the U.S. (47%), and people with household incomes less than $15,000 (47%), consider themselves more patriotic now as compared to before Sept. 11.

African Americans (71%), Independent voters (61%), and U.S.-born respondents (62%) are among those most likely to say their patriotism is the same now as before.

43 & 44. Do you agree or disagree that the attacks could have been prevented? Do you agree or disagree that the terrorist attacks were inevitable?

Table 5. Views on Terrorist Attacks


Agree

Disagree

Not sure

The attacks could have been prevented

61

22

17

The attacks were inevitable

37

40

23

Three in five Muslims (61%) agree that the terrorist attacks could have been prevented, while approximately one in five (22%) disagrees. Seventeen percent are not sure if the attacks could have been prevented.

Respondents are more evenly divided upon whether the attacks were inevitable or not. Just fewer than two in five (37%) agree the attacks were inevitable, while another two in five disagree (40%). Here, nearly one in four (23%) is not sure.

A majority within each sub-group agrees that the attacks could have been prevented. Still, 18-29 year-olds (30%) and U.S.-born respondents (28%) are more likely than adults 30 and older (average 20%) and Muslims born outside the U.S. (19%) to disagree.

Those who are more likely to agree that the attacks were inevitable include African Americans (50%), people born in the U.S. (48%), and Democrats (42%).

Those more likely to disagree that the attacks were inevitable include on average 46% of Republicans, college graduates, and residents of the Central/Great Lakes region.

45. In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, do you feel the U.S. is fighting a war on terrorism or a war against Islam?

Terrorism 67%

Islam 18

Not sure 16

Two-thirds of respondents (67%) feel that the U.S. is now fighting a war on terrorism. Less than one in five (18%) feels the U.S. is fighting a war against Islam.

Those who feel the U.S. is fighting a war against terrorism include three-quarters or more of South Asians (76%), Republicans (77%), residents of the South (73%), and people with household incomes less than $15,000. Adults 30 and older (70%) and Muslims not born in the U.S. (73%) are more likely than 18-29 year-olds (61%) and U.S.-born respondents (56%) to agree that the U.S is fighting a war on terrorism.

Among the most likely to say the U.S. is fighting a war against Islam are 31% of African Americans and an average 23% of 18-29 year-olds, those born in the U.S., and residents of the Eastern United States.

46. Do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose the U.S. military action against Afghanistan?

Strongly support 29%

Somewhat support 22 Support 51%

Somewhat oppose 17

Strongly oppose 26 Oppose 43%

Not sure 6

A slight majority (51%) supports the U.S. military action against Afghanistan, while more than two in five (43%) oppose this action.

Those in support include South Asians (61%), seniors 65 and older (63%), people not born in the U.S. (58%), and men (57%).

Among those who oppose the military action are an average 56% of 18-29 year-olds, African Americans, and U.S.-born respondents, as well as half of women (49%).

47. Do you agree or disagree that the military effort could lead to more terrorism aimed at the U.S.?

Agree 64%

Disagree 21

Not sure 14

Nearly two-thirds (64%) agree that the American military effort against Afghanistan could lead to more terrorism aimed at the U.S. One in five (21%) disagrees, and 14% are not sure.

Three-quarters (an average 77%) of 18-29 year-olds, African Americans, Independent voters, and those born in the U.S. agree that that the military effort could lead to more terrorism aimed at the U.S. Women (68%) are also slightly more likely than men (62%) to agree.

Among those who disagree are one-third of African Muslims (34%) and one-quarter or more of residents of the West (29%) and people not born in the U.S. (26%).

48. Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree that the military effort could lead to more instability in the Middle East and across the Muslim world?

Strongly agree 46%

Somewhat agree 23 Agree 69%

Somewhat disagree 10

Strongly disagree 10 Disagree 20%

Not sure 12

Over two-thirds (69%) of American Muslims agree that the U.S. military effort against Afghanistan could lead to more instability in the Middle East and across the Muslim world. Nearly half (46%) strongly agree. One in five (20%) disagrees that this military action could lead to further instability.

Most likely to agree are an average 76% of 18-29 year-olds, African Americans, Arabs, Independent voters, U.S.-born Muslims, and people with household incomes of $75,000 or more.

Among those most likely to disagree are 26% each of seniors 65 and older and people with household incomes of $15,000-$24,999.

49. How much of an impact do you think U.S. policy in the Middle East had to do with the attacks?

Strong impact 63%

Slight impact 16

Very little impact 6

No impact whatsoever 5

Not sure 10

Over three in five (63%) American Muslims think U.S. policy in the Middle East had a strong impact in the terrorist attacks. A minority (27%) says U.S. policy had little to do with the attacks.

More than two-thirds of African Americans (70%), Arab Americans (68%), and people with household incomes of $75,000 or more (73%) think that U.S. policy in the Middle East had a strong impact in the terrorist attacks. U.S.-born Muslims (70%) and 18-64 year-olds (average 64%) are more likely than those born outside the U.S. (59%) and seniors 65 and older (51%) to agree.

An average 31% of African Muslims, seniors 65 and older, women, and people with household incomes less than $35,000 feel that U.S. policy in the Middle East played lesser importance in the attacks.

50. If you had to choose ONE of the following ways to wage the war against terrorism, which would you choose?

Changing America’s Middle East policy 67%

Using U.S. Military Covert/Special Forces 7

U.S. Air Force bombing 2

Use of strategic nuclear weapons 1

Attacking Iraq 1

Contracting with mercenaries 1

Biological warfare 1

None of the above/Other 14

Not sure 8

Over two-thirds (67%) of American Muslims would change America’s Middle East policy to wage the war against terrorism. The other options proved much less popular. In total, approximately 13% would choose to wage the war against terrorism by using more physically drastic measures, including the use of Special Forces, bombing, and nuclear and biological weapons. Fourteen percent would choose other options.

An average 75% of Arabs, and people with household incomes of $75,000 or more would choose to change America’s Middle East policy to wage the war on terrorism. Three-fifths or more of respondents within each region, party, age, income bracket, and gender would also choose to change American policy towards the Middle East.

51 – 53. Do you agree or disagree with the following?

Table 6. Views on U.S. Foreign Involvement (ranked by agree %)


Agree

Disagree

Not

sure

The U.S. should support a Palestinian state

84

8

8

The U.S. should reduce financial support to Israel

70

14

16

The U.S. should reduce its support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world

61

22

17

Large majorities agree that the U.S. should support a Palestinian state (84%); reduce financial support to Israel (70%), and reduce support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world (61%).

Over a fifth (22%) disagree that the U.S. should reduce its support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world; 14% disagree that financial support to Israel should be reduced; 8% of American Muslims do not feel that U.S. should support a Palestinian state.

Those who are most likely to agree that the U.S. should support a Palestinian state include an average 89% of Arab Americans, Republicans, Independents, college graduates, people with household incomes of $75,000 or more, men, and residents of the South and Central/Great Lakes regions.

Thirteen percent each of 18-29 year-olds and people with household incomes of $15,000-$24,999 are among respondents most likely to disagree that the U.S. should support a Palestinian state.

An average 76% of Arab Americans, those born in the U.S., Independent voters, people with household incomes of $75,000 or more, and residents of the West and Central/Great Lakes regions agree that the U.S. should reduce financial support to Israel. Adults age 18-64 (average 71%) are more likely than seniors 65 and older (60%) to also agree.

Among the most likely to agree that the U.S. should reduce its support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world are Arabs (66%), Africans (65%), South Asians (64%), and residents of the West (69%). Muslims not born in the U.S. are more likely to agree than those born here (65% to 54%), as are more adults 30 and older than 18-29 year-olds (63% to 54%), and more men than women (67% to 52%).

An average 29% of African Americans, 18-29 year-olds, U.S.-born Muslims, and women disagree that the U.S. should reduce its support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world.

54. Secretary of State Colin Powell has described the Kashmir issue as the central issue between India and Pakistan. Do you agree or disagree with this assessment?

Agree 63%

Disagree 16

Not sure 22

Nearly two-thirds of respondents (63%) agree the Kashmir issue is the central issue between India and Pakistan. Sixteen percent disagrees with Powell’s assessment. Over a fifth (22%) are unsure.

South Asians (81%), people with household incomes of $75,000 or more (75%), and an average 71% of Republicans, college graduates, residents of the West, Muslims not born in the U.S., and men agree with the Secretary of State’s assessment.

Those who disagree with Powell include an average 22% of 18-29 year-olds, African Americans and U.S.-born Muslims.

55. How would you describe the opinion of Americans toward Muslims and Arabs since September 11?

Very favorable 12%

Somewhat favorable 25 Favorable 37%

Somewhat unfavorable 34

Very unfavorable 23 Unfavorable 57%

Not sure 6

A majority of American Muslims (57%) says the opinion of Americans toward Muslims and Arabs since September 11 has been unfavorable. Over one-third (37%) says Americans’ opinions have been favorable since the terrorist attacks.

South Asians (45%), adults 50 and older (average 44%), and Muslims not born in the U.S. (41%) are among those more likely to describe Americans’ opinions as favorable.

An average 64% of 18-29 year-olds, African Americans, Arabs, and U.S.-born Muslims say that the opinion of Americans toward Muslims and Arabs has been unfavorable.

56. I will now read you several statements about American’s attitudes toward Muslims that you have experienced in your own personal experience and the attitudes of Americans toward Muslims overall -- in the society as a whole. Please tell me which statement best reflects Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims since the September 11 attacks.

Table 7. American’s Attitudes Toward Muslims


%

Statement A: In my experience and overall, Americans have been respectful and tolerant of Muslims

41

Statement B: In my experience, Americans have been respectful and tolerant of Muslims, but American society overall is disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims

33

Statement C: In my experience and overall, Americans have been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims

8

Statement D: In my experience, Americans have been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims, but American society overall is respectful and tolerant of Muslims

13

Not sure

4

Two-fifths of American Muslims (41%) say that in their experience and in the overall society, Americans have been respectful and tolerant of Muslims. A third (33%) says that Americans have been respectful and tolerant of Muslims in their own experience, but that American society overall is disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims.

Fewer than one in ten American Muslims (8%) say that Americans has been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims in their personal experience and as a society in general. Thirteen percent have personally experienced disrespect and intolerance, but consider American society overall respectful and tolerant of Muslims.

Those who have found Americans to be respectful and tolerant of Muslims in their own experience and overall include, one-half of South Asians, Southerners, and Muslims not born in the U.S. (average 49%), and an average 45% of Republicans and adults 30 and older.

Respondents who have personally experienced Americans being respectful and tolerant of Muslims, but find that American society overall is disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims, include an average 38% of African Americans, Democrats, and U.S.-born Muslims.

Muslims born in the U.S. are twice as likely as those born outside the country (11% to 6%) to say that Americans have been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims in their own experience and overall. African Americans (11%) and 18-29 year-olds (12%) are among others who agree.

Among those who say that in their experience, Americans have been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims, but American society overall is respectful and tolerant of Muslims, are 18-29 year-olds (17%) and U.S.-born Muslims (16%).

57. Have any individuals, businesses or religious organizations in your community experienced anti-Muslim discrimination since the September 11 attacks?

Yes 52%

No 41

Not sure 6

A slight majority of American Muslims (52%) knows of anti-Muslim discrimination in their communities since the terrorist attacks. Two in five (41%) have not seen or heard any local anti-Muslim discrimination since September 11.

Adults age 18-29 (66%) are among the most likely to have experienced anti-Muslim discrimination in their communities. Residents of the Central/Great Lakes region (61%) are more likely than those in other areas of the country to agree. Others who have experienced this discrimination include more African Americans and Arab Americans (56% each) than people of other ethnicities; more Muslims born in the U.S (62%) than those born outside the country (47%), and more women (57%) than men (49%).

Adults age 50 and older (average 51%), South Asians (48%), and respondents living in the East (45%) are among those who have not experienced anti-Muslim discrimination in their communities since the September 11 attacks.

58. Which of the following best describes anti-Muslim discrimination you have experienced personally or that has been experienced in your community.

I am not aware of any discrimination 39%

Verbal abuse 25

Racial profiling by police resulting in a stop,

search or arrest 8

Physical abuse or assault 6

Destruction of property 6

Denial of employment 3

Boycott of Muslim- or Arab-operated businesses 2

Combination of above choices 7

*Other 2

Not sure 4

*Other: Threatening phone calls (6); Negative looks (5)

The media has been very offensive (3); Ignorance (3)

Bad attitudes towards Muslims; Courts issued a court appearance after 1 1/2 years -- I thought it had been dropped; Kicked out of clubs; Not accepting students into medical school;

People handing out discriminatory pamphlets about Muslims.

One in four (25%) says verbal abuse is the most prominent form of anti-Muslim discrimination they have personally experienced or seen in their community. One in twelve (8%) know, or have been subjected to, racial profiling by police. Six percent have each seen or experienced physical abuse or destruction of property. Two in five (39%) have not personally experienced, nor seen or heard, any local anti-Muslim discrimination.

Those who cite verbal abuse as the most prominent form of discrimination are an average 31% of 18-29 year-olds, Arab Americans, Independent voters, residents of the Central/Great Lakes region, and women.

African American Muslims (13%) are the most likely to have experienced racial profiling, either personally or in their communities.

59 – 79. Now I am going to read you a list of issues that are being discussed in this country today. Please tell me if you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose each issue.

Table 8. Favor/Oppose Domestic Issues (ranked by favorability %)


Favor*

Oppose*

Not

sure

Eliminating all forms of racial discrimination

96

2

2

Providing universal health care for citizens

94

4

2

Providing more generous government assistance to the poor

93

5

2

Stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment

92

6

3

Increasing foreign aid for poorer countries

87

10

3

Stronger laws to fight terrorism

84

10

6

Making it more difficult for people to buy guns

79

18

3

More cuts in the income tax

74

21

5

Allow religious institutions to apply for government funding to provide social services

73

22

5

The death penalty for persons convicted of murder

68

27

5

Providing vouchers to families for tuition in private

schools, including religious schools

68

25

7

Banning the public sale and display of pornography

65

30

5

Allowing public schools to display the 10 Commandments

59

33

8

Making abortions more difficult to obtain

57

35

8

Allowing non-denominational prayers to be read in the classroom

53

38

9

Allowing more research using stem cells

52

28

21

Eliminating affirmative action programs that give some consideration to minorities in hiring and entrance into college

42

49

9

Making it legal for doctors to give terminally ill patients the means to end their lives

33

61

7

Racial profiling to combat crime

28

63

9

Allowing research related to human cloning

27

63

10

Allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally

20

71

9

(*Favor combines strongly and somewhat favor; oppose combines strongly and somewhat oppose.)

Almost all American Muslims favor eliminating all forms of racial discrimination (96%); providing universal health care for citizens (94%); providing more generous government assistance to the poor (93%), and stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment (92%).

Nearly three-quarters or more favor increasing foreign aid for poorer countries (87%); stronger laws to fight terrorism (84%); making it more difficult for people to buy guns (79%); more cuts in the income tax (74%), and allowing religious institutions to apply for government funding to provide social services (73%).

Majorities favor allowing public schools to display the 10 Commandments (59%) and allowing non-denominational prayers to be read in the classroom (53%).

Muslim Americans are divided on eliminating affirmative action programs that give some consideration to minorities in hiring and entrance into college (42% favor, 49% oppose).

Over three in five oppose allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally (71%); racial profiling to combat crime (63%); allowing research related to human cloning (63%), and making it legal for doctors to give terminally ill patients the means to end their lives (61%).

Although large majorities of African Americans are in favor, they are the most likely to oppose making it more difficult to buy guns (28%) and oppose stronger laws to fight terrorism (15%).

Republicans (80%) and Muslims not born in the U.S. (75%) are much more likely than Democrats (60%) and U.S.-born Muslims (55%) to favor the death penalty for persons convicted of murder. Arab Americans, South Asians, and Africans (average 74%) are also much more likely than African Americans (48%) to favor the death penalty.

Adults age 18-29 (79%) are much more likely than those 50 and older (average 60%) to be in favor of school vouchers.

Republicans (70%) have a much higher likelihood than Independents (51%) to favor allowing public schools to display the 10 Commandments.

Seniors 65 and older (65%) are much more in favor than 18-29 year-olds (47%) of allowing non-denominational prayers to be read in class.

Majorities of South Asians and Arabs (57% each) are more in favor than African Americans (37%) of allowing research using stem cells.

Muslims who favor eliminating affirmative action programs that give consideration to minorities in hiring and entrance into college include more Republicans (50%) than Independents (34%), and more Arabs (45%) and South Asians (48%) than African Americans (29%).

Residents of the West (47%) and seniors 65 and older (49%) agree more than 18-64 year-olds (average 43%) and residents of the East (29%) and Central/Great Lakes regions (30%) that it should be legal for doctors to give terminally ill patients the means to end their lives.

South Asians, Africans, and Arabs (32% each) are twice as likely as African Americans (16%) to favor racial profiling to combat crime. People with household incomes less than $50,000 (average 35%) are also twice as likely as those with household incomes of $75,000 or more (19%) to be in favor of racial profiling.

South Asians and Arabs (33% each) are more than twice as likely as African Americans (13%) to favor allowing research related to human cloning.

80 - 81. Overall what is your opinion of the Congress…of business corporations?

Table 9. Favorability toward Congress and Corporations


Favorable*

Unfavorable*

Not

familiar

Not

sure

Congress

52

30

14

4

Business corporations

57

23

14

6

(*Favorable combines very and somewhat favorable; unfavorable combines very and somewhat unfavorable.)

Over half of Muslims (52%) favor Congress and corporate America. Three in ten do not favor Congress, while nearly a quarter does not favor corporate America.

African Americans are nearly divided in their assessment of Congress and corporate America. Forty-three percent support congress and corporate America while 42% give it an unfavorable rating. Sixty-two percent of men and South Asians, 51% of women and 48 percent of Arabs also endorse Congress and corporate America.

All five age categories support Congress and corporate America, with 55% of those in the 55-69 age bracket leading the way.

Religious Practice:

Finally, I am going to ask you some questions about religion and how it impacts your daily life.

82. On average, how often do you attend the mosque for salah and Jum’ah Prayer?

More than once a week 31%

Once a week for Jum’ah 24

Once or twice a month 10

A few times a year especially

for the Eid 14

Seldom 9

Never 11

Nearly a third (31%) of those interviewed attend salah and Jum’ah services more than once a week, while nearly a quarter (24%) visit a mosque once a week for Jum’ah.

Forty-nine percent of African Americans attend salah and Jum’ah services more than once a week. That’s more than twice as many who go once a week . Meanwhile, 33% of South Asians attend salah and Jum’ah services more than once a week ,while 28% go once a week.

Men outnumber women, 35% to 26% in attending both services more than once a week. Yet 25% of men and 22% of women attend once a week. More than one-third (34%) of those in the 35-44 age group make more than one visit a week to a mosque, while 28% of those18-24 years-old visit once a week.

83. Excluding salah and Jum’ah prayer, how involved are you in the activities at the mosque. Would you say that you are…

Very involved 19%

Somewhat involved 29 Involved 48%

Not very involved 24

Not at all involved 28 Not involved 52%

Nearly half (48%) of those surveyed are involved in the activities at their mosques, while a majority (52%) is uninvolved.

Sixty-nine percent of African Americans participate in mosque activities along with 52% of women; 47% of South Asians; 45% of men and 39% of Arabs. By age, 62% in the 18-24 age category are actively involved in mosque programs while 55% in the 35-54 age category are not.

84. Which of the following best describes how you have volunteered for your mosque?

Charity work 23%

Fundraising efforts 17

Prayer arrangements 14

Sunday school activities 13

*Other 25

Not sure 9

Less than a fourth (23%) volunteers for charity work at their mosques, while 17% are involved in fundraising, and 14% in prayer services. African Americans and Arabs are equally active (26% to 25%,respectively) in charity work, as are men (23%) and women (21%).

Charity work is a favorite of 25% of those in the 25-34 age range, while 34% in the age group of 70-plus tend to work on prayer arrangements.

85. Did you happen to attend a mosque for Jum’ah prayers or salah in the last seven days?

Yes 49%

No 50

About half of American Muslims have attended Jum’ah prayer or other salah in the past seven days, while 49% say they have not attended.

Meanwhile, nearly three-quarters of African Americans (70%) have attended a mosque service in the past seven days. Those who are also likely to have attended are 57% of men; 55% of South Asians and more than half of those in the 18-24 age group. Sixty percent of women did not attend a mosque for prayer during the seven-day period.

86. Concerning daily salah or prayer, do you in general, pray all five salah daily, make some of the five salah daily, occasionally make salah, only make Eid Prayers, or do you never pray?

Pray all five salah daily 47%

Make some of the five salah daily 19

Occasionally make salah 17

Only for Eid Prayers 5

Never pray 10

Not sure 2

Nearly half (47%) of American Muslims say they offer the five salah daily. An additional one fifth (19%) report that they offer some of the five daily salah. An additional 22% only pray occasionaly or for the Eid, while 10% never pray.

Among those who offer the five salah daily are 58% of African Americans; more than half the women (52%); 47% of Arabs and 41% of South Asians. Forty-five percent of those in the 35-44 age group also offer five salah daily.

87 - 88. How important is religion or spirituality in your daily life? Is it very important, somewhat important or not very important? Would you say the role of Islam in your life is very important, somewhat important or not very important?

Table 10. Importance of Religion


Very important

Somewhat important

Not very important

Importance of religion or spirituality

79

17

4

The role of Islam in your life

79

16

5

Nearly all American Muslims say spirituality (96%) and Islam (95%) is very or somewhat important in their daily lives. Four of five Muslims say spirituality and Islam (79% each) is very important in their daily lives.

Eighty-nine percent of African Americans and 84% of women list religion or spirituality as important in their daily lives. So do 77% each of South Asians and the

25-34 age group.

Also, 89% of African Americans report that Islam is important in their daily lives, along with 86% of those in the 18-24 age group, 83% South Asians and 82% of women.

89. Were you raised as a Muslim or did you convert?

Raised 80%

Convert 19

Eighty percent report they have been raised Muslims. Another 19% are converts.

Nearly all South Asians (98%) and 95% of Arabs report being raised Muslim. Among African Americans, 60% say they are converts, while 39% also say they were raised Muslim.

90. What was the main reason you converted to Islam?

Read about the religion and was inspired to convert 38%

Was influenced by a fellow Muslim 22

Married someone who was a Muslim 13

*Other 24

Not sure 3

Nearly two fifths (38%) say they read about the religion and were inspired to convert. Meanwhile, 22% cite the influence of a fellow Muslim.

Forty-three percent of South Asians report marrying a Muslim, while 41% of African Americans say they read about it before converting. Better than one-third (36%) of Arabs also add that reading helped in their conversion. About one-fifth (22%) say they were influenced by others.

Before converting, 43% of men say they read about Islam, while 33% women did the same.

91. In your opinion should mosques keep out of political matters or should they express their views on day-to-day social and political questions?

Should express their views 57%

Should keep out of politics 37

Not sure 6

A majority of Muslims (57%) support political expression in the mosque, while more than a third (37%) say the mosque should keep out of politics.

Those who support day-to-day social and political questions are African Americans (79%), Arabs (62%), men (55%) and women (60%).

Only South Asians (51%) believe mosques should keep out of political affairs. In contrast only, 16% of African Americans agree.

92. Do you think it’s right for khatibs to discuss political candidates or issues in the khutbah?

Yes 41%

No 47

Not sure 12

Nearly half of Muslims (47%) say it is not right for khatibs to discuss political candidates or issues in the khutbah, while two-fifths (41%) say this is permissible.

Those who believe it is not right for khatibs to discuss political candidates or issues in the khutbah includes 79% of African Americans, 62% of Arabs, 47% of men and 46% of women.

Only the South Asians (51%) believe discussion should take place.

93 - 94. Do you think the media… Hollywood is fair in its portrayal of Muslims and Islam?

Table 11. Fairness of Muslim Media Portrayal


Yes

No

Not sure

The media

25

68

7

Hollywood

13

77

10

Most American Muslims say Hollywood (77%) and the media (68%) do not fairly portray Muslims and Islam.

African Americans and Arabs show the strongest disapproval of the treatment of Muslims and Islam in Hollywood (86% and 85% respectively) and the media (74% and 77% respectively). Failing grades also come from South Asians for Hollywood (65%) and the media (61%). More than three-quarters of men and women complain about the lack of fairness in Hollywood (a 78% average), while an average 68% of men and women say the media is not fair.

*************

Appendix A-- Questionnaire

Peace Be Upon You. Hi, my name is _____ and I’m doing a poll of Muslim adults nationwide for Zogby International. May I speak with a Muslim in the household?

1. Are you a Muslim?

1. Yes 2. No (End) 3. Not sure (End)

2. Are you registered to vote in the United States?

1. Yes (to 4) 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

(Ask only if Q2 >1)

990. Why are you not registered to vote? (Do not read choices. Choose only ONE.)

1. Not a citizen

2. Not interested/never thought about it/never got around to it

3. Too difficult to register

4. My vote doesn’t make a difference

5. Other (Please specify )

6. Not sure (Do not read)

3. Do you intend to register to vote (All responses to 906)

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

(Ask only if Q2 =1)

4. How likely are you to vote in national elections?

1. Very likely (to 5) 2. Somewhat likely (to 5) 3. Not likely 4. Not sure (do not read)

(Ask Q991 only if Q4 > 2) (All responses to Q906)

991. Why are you not likely to vote in national elections? (Do not read choices. Choose only ONE.)

1. Never enough time

2. Generally not interested

3. Usually don’t like the choice of candidates

4. My vote doesn’t make a difference

5. Other (Please specify )

6. Not sure (Do not read)

(Ask Q5 only if Q4

5. In the 2000 election, the candidates were Democrat Al Gore, Republican George W. Bush, Reform Party’s Pat Buchanan, and Green Party’s Ralph Nader. For whom did you vote?

1. Gore 2. Bush 3. Buchanan 4. Nader 5. Someone else 6. Not sure (do not read)

6. In which party are you either registered to vote or do you consider yourself to be a member of – Democrat, Republican, Independent/minor party, or Libertarian?

1. Democrat 2. Republican 3. Independent/minor party 4. Libertarian 5. Not sure (do not read)

906. Which description best represents your political ideology?

1. Progressive/very liberal

2. Liberal

3. Moderate

4. Conservative

5. Very conservative

6. Libertarian

7. Not sure (do not read)

8. Refuse (do not read)

7. Would you consider yourself to be an active member in your political party?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

8. Have you ever given a contribution or volunteered your time or services to a political candidate?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

9. Have you ever visited a political web site?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

10. Have you ever called or written the media or politician on a given issue, or have you signed a petition?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

11. Have you ever attended a rally in support of a politician or a cause?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

12. Have you ever participated in a boycott of a product or a business?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

13. Have you ever changed your lifestyle in support of a cause, like the environment?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (do not read)

14. How important is it for you to participate in politics?

1. Very important 2. Somewhat important 3. Not important 4. Not sure (Do not read)

15. How important would you say it is for your children to participate in politics?

1. Very important 2. Somewhat important 3. Not important 4. Not sure (Do not read)

16. How often do you discuss politics with family and friends?

1. Always 2. Sometimes 3. Hardly ever 4. Never 5. Not sure (Do not read)

17. How often would you say you follow what’s going on in government and public affairs

1. Most of the time 2. Some of the time 3. Only now and then 4. Hardly at all 5. Not sure (do not read)


18. What do you consider to be the most important issue facing American society today? ____________

19. What do you consider to be the most important issue facing the Muslim American community today? ____________

I am now going to read a list of community activities, please tell me if you have ever donated time, money or been an officer of any.

20. School or youth programs (such as day care centers, PTA, scouts or little league)

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

21. Any arts or cultural organization (like public TV stations, museums)

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

22. Any neighborhood, civic or community group (such as a block club, neighborhood watch)

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

23. Any organization to help the poor, sick, elderly or homeless

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

24. Any professional organization

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

25. Any mosque or other religious organizations

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

26. Any trade or labor unions

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

27. Any veteran’s or military service organizations

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

28. Any ethnic organizations

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (do not read)

29. Any Muslim political action or public affairs organization

1. Donated time

2. Donated money

3. Served as an officer

4. A combination of these

5. None of these

6. Not sure (Do not read)

Do you agree or disagree with the following statements.

30. Muslims should be involved with the American media and the educational system to change the image of Islam.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

31. Muslims should be involved in American civic organizations and community development organizations to improve America.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

32. Muslims should participate in the political process.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

33. Muslims should financially support worthy non-Muslim political candidates.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

34. Muslims should participate in interfaith activities.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

35. Muslims should donate to non-Muslim social service programs like aid for the homeless.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

36. America is an immoral society.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

37. The influence of religion and spiritual values in American life should increase.

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

38. How satisfied are you overall with the way things are going in American society today?

1. Very satisfied 2. Somewhat satisfied 3. Somewhat dissatisfied 4. Very dissatisfied 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

Now I will read you some questions concerning the events of September 11 and their aftermath.

39. In your own words, why do you think the United States was targeted for the terrorist attacks?

40. Overall, how would you rate President Bush’s handling of the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?

1. Excellent 2. Good 3. Fair 4. Poor 5. Not sure (Do not read)

41. How confident are you of President Bush’s ability to handle this crisis?

1. Very confident 2. Somewhat confident 3. A little nervous 4. Very nervous 5. Not sure (Do not read)

42. Do you consider yourself more patriotic, less patriotic, or the same as before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks?

1. More patriotic 2. Less patriotic 3. The same 4. Not sure (Do not read)

43. Do you agree or disagree that the attacks could have been prevented?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

44. Do you agree or disagree that the terrorist attacks were inevitable?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

45. In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, do you feel the U.S. is fighting a war on terrorism or a war against Islam?

1. Terrorism 2. Islam 3. Not sure (Do not read)

46. Do you strongly support, somewhat support, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose the U.S. military action against Afghanistan?

1. Strongly support 2. Somewhat support 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read)

47. Do you agree or disagree that the military effort could lead to more terrorism aimed at the U.S.?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

48. Do you strongly agree, somewhat agree, somewhat disagree or strongly disagree that the military effort could lead to more instability in the Middle East and across the Muslim world?

1. Strongly agree 2. Somewhat agree 3. Somewhat disagree 4. Strongly disagree 5. Not sure (Do not read)

49. How much of an impact do you think U.S. policy in the Middle East had to do with the attacks?

1. Strong impact 2. Slight impact 3. Very little impact 4. No impact whatsoever 5. Not sure (Do not read)

50. If you had to choose ONE of the following ways to wage the war against terrorism, which would you choose?

1. Changing America’s Middle East policy

2. Use of strategic nuclear weapons

3. Attacking Iraq

4. Contracting with mercenaries

5. Using U.S. Military Covert/Special Forces

6. U.S. Air Force bombing

7. Biological warfare

8. None of the above/Other (Do not read)

9. Not sure (Do not read)

51. Do you agree or disagree that the U.S. should reduce financial support to Israel?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

52. Do you agree or disagree that the U.S. should support a Palestinian state?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

53. Do you agree or disagree that the U.S. should reduce its support of undemocratic regimes in the Muslim world?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

54. Secretary of State Colin Powell has described the Kashmir issue as the central issue between India and Pakistan. Do you agree or disagree with this assessment?

1. Agree 2. Disagree 3. Not sure (Do not read)

55. How would you describe the opinion of Americans toward Muslims and Arabs since September 11?

1. Very favorable

2. Somewhat favorable

3. Somewhat unfavorable

4. Very unfavorable

5. Not sure (Do not read)

56. I will now read you several statements about American’s attitudes toward Muslims that you have experienced in your own personal experience and the attitudes of Americans toward Muslims overall -- in the society as a whole. Please tell me which statement best reflects Americans’ attitudes toward Muslims since the September 11 attacks:

Statement A: In my experience and overall, Americans have been respectful and tolerant of Muslims.

Statement B: In my experience, Americans have been respectful and tolerant of Muslims, but American society overall is disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims.

Statement C: In my experience and overall, Americans have been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims.

Statement D: In my experience, Americans have been disrespectful and intolerant of Muslims, but American society overall is respectful and tolerant of Muslims.

1. Statement A

2. Statement B

3. Statement C

4. Statement D

5. Not sure (Do not read)

57. Have any individuals, businesses or religious organizations in your community experienced anti-Muslim discrimination since the September 11 attacks?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

58. Which of the following best describes anti-Muslim discrimination you have experienced personally or that has been experienced in your community: (Read choices, choose only one)

1. I am not aware of any discrimination.

2. Verbal abuse

3. Physical abuse or assault

4. Destruction of property

5. Denial of employment

6. Boycott of Muslim- or Arab-operated businesses

7. Racial profiling by police resulting in a stop, search or arrest.

8. Other (Please specify: ________)

9. Not sure (Do not read)

Now I am going to read you a list of issues that are being discussed in this country today. Please tell me if you strongly favor, somewhat favor, somewhat oppose or strongly oppose each issue.

59. The death penalty for persons convicted of murder

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

60. Allowing gays and lesbians to marry legally

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

61. Providing more generous government assistance to the poor

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

62. Allowing research related to human cloning

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

63. Allowing more research using stem cells

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

64. More cuts in the income tax

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

65. Making it legal for doctors to give terminally ill patients the means to end their lives

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

66. Allowing religious institutions to apply for government funding to provide social services

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

67. Allowing public schools to display the 10 Commandments

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

68. Allowing non-denominational prayers to be read in the classroom

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

69. Providing vouchers to families for tuition in private schools, including religious schools

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

70. Banning the public sale and display of pornography

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

71. Making abortions more difficult to obtain

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

72. Making it more difficult for people to buy guns

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

73. Eliminating affirmative action programs that give some consideration to minorities in hiring and entrance into college

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

74. Stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

75. Increasing foreign aid for poorer countries

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

76. Stronger laws to fight terrorism

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

77. Eliminating all forms of racial discrimination

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

78. Providing universal health care for citizens

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

79. Racial profiling to combat crime

1. Strongly favor 2. Somewhat favor 3. Somewhat oppose 4. Strongly oppose 5. Not sure (Do not read.)

80. Overall what is your opinion of the Congress? Is it…

1. Very favorable

2. Somewhat favorable

3. Somewhat unfavorable

4. Very unfavorable

5. Not familiar

6. Not sure (Do not read.)

81. Overall what is your opinion of business corporations? Is it…

1. Very favorable

2. Somewhat favorable

3. Somewhat unfavorable

4. Very unfavorable

5. Not familiar

6. Not sure (Do not read.)

Finally, I am going to ask you some questions about religion and how it impacts your daily life.

82. On average, how often do you attend the mosque (mah-sk) for salah (sal-AH) and Jum’ah (Joom-AH) Prayer

1. More than once a week

2. Once a week for Jum’ah (Joom-AH)

3. Once or twice a month

4. A few times a year especially for the Eid (Eed)

5. Seldom

6. Never

7. Not sure (Do not read)

83. Excluding salah (sal-AH) and Jum’ah (Joom-AH) prayer, how involved are you in the activities at the mosque (Mah-sk). Would you say that you are…

1. Very involved 2. Somewhat involved 3. Not very involved 4. Not at all involved 5. Not sure (Do not read)

(Ask Q84 only if Q83

84. Which of the following best describes how you have volunteered for your mosque (mah-sk)?

1. Prayer arrangements

2. Sunday school activities

3. Fund raising efforts

4. Charity work

5. Other (Please specify: _______)

6. Not sure

85. Did you happen to attend a mosque (Mah-sk) for Jum’ah (Joom-AH) prayers or salah (sal-AH) in the last seven days?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

86. Concerning daily salah (sal-AH) or prayer, do you in general, pray all five salah (sal-AH) daily, make some of the five salah (sal-AH) daily, occasionally make salah (sal-AH), only make Eid (Eed) Prayers, or do you never pray?

1. Pray all five salah (sal-AH) daily

2. Make some of the five salah (sal-AH) daily

3. Occasionally make salah (sal-AH)

4. Only make Eid (Eed) Prayers

5. Never pray

6. Not sure (Do not read)

87. How important is religion or spirituality in your daily life? Is it very important, somewhat important or not very important?

1. Very important 2. Somewhat important 3. Not very important 4. Not sure (Do not read)

88. Would you say the role of Islam in your life is very important, somewhat important or not very important?

1. Very important 2. Somewhat important 3. Not very important 4. Not sure (Do not read)

89. Were you raised as a Muslim or did you convert?

1. Raised 2. Convert 3. Not sure (Do not read)

(Ask only if Q89 = 2)

90. What was the main reason you converted to Islam?

1. Read about the religion and was inspired to convert

2. Married someone who was a Muslim

3. Was influenced by a fellow Muslim

4. Other (Please specify )

5. Not sure (Do not read)

91. In your opinion should mosques (mah-sks) keep out of political matters or should they express their views on day-to-day social and political questions?

1. Should keep out of politics 2. Should express their views 3. Not sure (Do not read)

92. Do you think it’s right for khatibs (KAH-tibs) to discuss political candidates or issues in the khutbah (COOT-bah)?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

93. Do you think the media is fair in its portrayal of Muslims and Islam?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

94. Do you think Hollywood is fair in its portrayal of Muslims and Islam?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

Thanks, we’re done. I just need some statistics.

95. Which of the following best describes your ethnicity?

1. Afghan

2. African

3. African American

4. Albanian

5. Arab

6. Bangladeshi

7. Bosnian

8. Indian

9. Iranian

10. Malaysian

11. Pakistani

12. Turkish

13. Other (Please specify: _____________)

14. Not sure (Do not read)

96. Were you born in the U.S.?

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not sure (Do not read)

(Ask Q97 only if Q96 = 2 or 3)

97. What is your country of birth? _______________

98. What is your father’s country of birth? ______________

99. What is your mother’s country of birth? _______________

(Ask Q100 only if Q96 =2 or 3)

100. If you were born outside America, what year did you arrive in America? ________

701.What is your age? _______________

(Ask Q101 only if Q89 = 2)

101. If you were not raised a Muslim what year did you convert? ________

903. Which of the following best describes your highest level of education?

1. Less than high school graduate

2. High school graduate

3. Some college

4. College graduate

0. Refuse (Do not read)

913. Which of the following best describes your occupation?

1. Managerial

2. Medical

3. Professional/Technical

4. Sales

5. Clerical

6. Service

7. Blue-Collar/Production

8. Student

9. Homemaker

10. Teacher/education

11. Retired

12. Other (please specify_________)

13. Not sure (do not read)

0. Refuse (do not read)

914. Which of the following best describes your marital status?

1. Married

2. Single, never married

3. Divorced/widowed/separated

4. Not married, living together

5. Not sure/Refuse (Do not read)

102. Is your husband or wife a Muslim

1. Yes 2. No 3. Not married 4. Not sure (Do not read)

103. How many people live in your household? __________

916. How many of them are adults 18 and over?

1.1 2.2 3.3 4.4 5.5 6. 6 or more 7. Not sure (do not read) 0. Refuse (do not read)

917. How many of them are children 17 and under?

1.1 2.2 3.3 4.4 5.5 6. 6 or more 7. None 8. Not sure (do not read) 0. Refuse (do not read)

921. Which of the following best represents your household income last year before taxes?

1. Less than $15,000

2. $15,000-24,999

3. $25,000-34,999

4. $35,000-49,999

5. $50,000-74,999

6. $75,000 or more

0. Refuse

922. Gender (Do not ask, simply record.)

1. Male 2. Female


Posted by: victoria | April 2, 2007 9:34 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Posted by: victoria | April 1, 2007 4:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I will stand on my prior observation as well, and will resist the urge to post a rebuttal, which we know will be of no use.

Au revior.

Posted by: Phaedrus | March 31, 2007 11:20 PM
Report Offensive Comment

i think that was the point phaedrus-

so i stand the same-

any poison found exists in the heart of the finder of poison- but its not inherent in the qur'an (wich was your implication)

Posted by: victoria | March 31, 2007 10:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Victoria:

I know exactly what the hadeeths are. I have read several of them, as well as the entire Koran, as I have stated to you previously

I certainly hope that you are not claiming that there are no differing opinions within the islamic world on the meaning of Koranic verses, because that would serve to undermine your oft-expressed view that Islam is not monolithic in its thought and practice.

Posted by: phaedrus | March 31, 2007 9:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

hadeeths arent verses phaedrus- they are sayings of the prophet(pbuh) transmitted by his companions

so the fact remains-
the ayats are not hadeeths- the hadeeths are the sayings

Posted by: victoria | March 31, 2007 8:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"any of the rationalizations for terrorist mentality come from purely questionable or eve made up altogether hadeeths-"

The fact that there exists the opportunity for, and the many instances of, disagreements about what certain verses actually mean, makes my point quite nicely.

I am not going to get back into this with you, as we have travelled this road before. I wanted to clarify the point that I was making to Muslim Man, and am satisfied that I have done so. I am content to simply disagree with you on the rest, although other Muslims you say you respect, agree with my perspective

regards,

P.

Posted by: phaedrus | March 31, 2007 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Saturday, March 10, 2007
U.S. MEDIA'S EYE ON ISLAM IN AMERICA: News media focuses on divisions between Muslim Americans

This past week was unusual as several major American media outlets ran feature stories on Muslim Americans and the state of Islam in the United States. The first appeared in Thursday's Washington Post and was focused on sectarian divisions between Sunni and Shia Muslims in northern Virginia. The story was framed around the question of "could Iraq happen here?" with tensions between local Muslims highlighted as well as efforts by Muslim leaders to bridge sectarian divides.

A similar story appeared in the NY Times today and focused on the relationship between African-American Muslims and immigrant Muslims within NYC. The two stories appearing so close together in two major rival papers is most likely not a coincidence, either the NY Times decided to follow the WP with their own feature, or the WP got wind of NY Times feature (which is much longer and more in depth) and decided to run a short feature providing their own local angle on a similar topic.

I recommend the NY Times article - its a good read and not only explores the relationship between black Muslims and immigrant Muslims, but also provides an exemplar of post-September 11th intolerance and fear toward Muslim congregations, even "moderate" or "progressive" ones. If what the article describes is true and accurate about Congressman Peter King and his treatment and attitude toward his local Muslim congregation post-September 11th - and his novel - it is simply mind blowing to me that this guy is in office.

On an academic note, the type of conflict frames, especially those exploring sectarian divisions, the media use to cover Islam may have an impact on attitudes toward Islam. For example, as my previous post notes, media and public opinion indicators since March 2006 suggest the media's increased focus on sectarian conflict in Iraq is correlated with an substantial increase in the number of Americans who have a generally unfavorable opinion of Islam (a rise of 10 percentage points).

Lastly, Louis Farrahkan, the infamous long-time leader of the Nation of Islam, was also profiled on CNN this week. He is stepping down from his leadership post due to health reasons and is now calling for greater peace and understanding between Muslims and non-Muslims. Some see his passing of the leadership torch and the emerging new leadership among the Nation of Islam as possible signs of the group moving toward more "mainstream" Islam.

Posted by: V | March 31, 2007 4:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Tuesday, March 13, 2007
MEDIA TENOR RELEASES REPORT COMPARING AL JAZEERA, EUROPEAN, AND AMERICAN TELEVISION NEWS CONTENT:

Media Tenor, a German company which specializes in global content analysis of television and print news, released a presentation the other day comparing the news content of several Arab TV channels, al-Jazeera, al-Jazeera English and other American and European TV channels. The pdf of the presentation may be found here.

Some key points from the presentation regarding news content related to both anti-Americanism and Islamophobia are:

*
"Negative news dominates the image of Islam [all facets of Islam, just not radical Islami]" on Western TV channels. According to Media Tenor, 65% of all media coverage of Islam on U.S. television is negative! NOTE - COMPARE THIS TO ARAB TV WHERE BETWEEN 20-30% OF ALL COVERAGE ABOUT U.S. IS NEGATIVE DEPENDING ON THE CHANNEL!

*
Al-Jazeera's "reporting about the U. S. government, Congress and the armed forces is marked by restrained negativity, not surpassing the amount of negative news for instance in Germany. There are only minor differences between the Arab and English versions of al-Jazeera."

*
"About 2/3 of U. S. news reports are from the U. S., 20 to 25% from Islamic countries, mainly from Iraq. The rest of the world is of little importance in U.S. TV news. Even Al-Jazeera International displays a wider horizon."

*
"Despite its layout as pan-Arab TV channel, Al-Jazeera in English dedicates a bigger share of its newscasts to U.S. domestic policy issues and U.S. domestic security than ABC, CBS or NBC."

*
"No excessive [my emphasis] criticism of Bush on Arabic TV Screens" compared to U.S. television - with "British and Italian TV most negative about U.S." even compared to Arabic channels.

*
"While U.S. TV news report about foreign countries mainly in the context of U.S. interests, Al-Jazeera deals with domestic affairs of a wider number of countries, broadcasting news from a bigger share of the world than U.S. networks."

*
"Arabic News frames Islam in political context" - about 50% of the news coverage according to Media Tenor's figures. Maybe one reason we see a resurgence of Pan-Muslim identity in the region according to Telhami/Zogby's latest poll.

Posted by: vic | March 31, 2007 4:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment

im going to use this blog to post some negative depictins or studies of muslims in the western media because it seems more friendly to such posts-

im posting positive ones on the other panelists blogs- these would set up a furor of denial and anger possibly and i dont want to poke the bears.

Editors Weblog -
Blogarama - The Blogs Directory
Monday, November 14, 2005
Study reveals Western media coverage contributes to negative views of Islam

A new report entitled “Western Perceptions About Islam and Muslims”, released last week at the NewsXchange conference in Amsterdam, reveals that Arab Muslims are typically portrayed in a stereotypical and negative fashion by the media in Western Europe and the United States.

The report is the result of a study, commissioned by the Kuwaiti government and undertaken by Communique Partners of San Francisco, which involved a survey and a series of interviews with media experts.

Stereotypes of Arab Muslims are reportedly most obvious in television coverage, although they also exist in the print media. The report states: "In print stereotypes are not so obvious, except in cartoon caricatures, but they still occur and anti-Muslim bias is more insidious. The terms Islamic or Muslim are linked to extremism, militant, jihads, as if they belonged together inextricably and naturally (Muslim extremist, Islamic terror, Islamic war, Muslim time bomb)." (See previous postings here and here).

The Western media has also been criticized for its misuse of the word 'jihad'. In an article entitled 'Intent of 'jihad' missed in translation as 'holy war', Faysal Ruwayha asserts:"Muslim scholars explain that jihad, literally means 'to struggle' and that the word pertains first and foremost to mastering one's passions and leading a virtuous life."

Newspaper coverage has a strong impact, second only to television coverage, on the perceptions of Arab Muslims, with 36% of Western Europeans and Americans admitting their opinions of Arab Muslims are strongly influenced by newspaper reporting.

37% of survey respondents said they were exposed to very little news coverage of Arabs and Islam, and nearly 75% stated that they think the media reports accurately on Arab Muslims and Islam 50% of the time, not often, or never.

In response to the question “What can be done to improve the perception of Arab Muslims and Islam?”, respondents from the Communique study frequently answered: an increase in positive coverage of Arab Muslims and Islam, increases in education and communication, more media balance, a decrease in the religious zealotry of radical Muslims and a reduction in terrorism.

Chris Yalounis, one of the authors of the Kuwaiti sponsored report, told the NewsXchange conference that "The image of Islam has been hijacked by extremists and it is time to take it back."

Also at the NewsXchange conference, a Reuters editor in charge of the agency's new Middle East service questioned why "if the west was serious about coming to terms with Islam and understanding what the Middle East was all about" have more Western organisations not bought this service, which provides a "very good daily view of life in the Middle East.

In addition to the Reuters Middle East service, other initiatives such as Al Jazeera International have appeared, pledging to circulate new perspectives on the Middle East and Islam. Al Jazeera is set to launch its new English language channel this spring, the channel wil have broadcasting centres in Doha, Kuala Lumpur, London and Washington, and will provide a fresh Middle Eastern view on international news and current affairs. Nigel Parsons, head of Al Jazeera International, has stated that finding American cable companies that will transmit the new Al Jazeera in English has proved difficult.

Sources: Media Guardian.co.uk (here and here), Followthemedia.com, news-press.com

Posted by: victoria | March 31, 2007 4:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Well theres still an inherent misperception that the verses are there to be found or misunderstood-

people have to really stretch and take things wildly specific to try to stretch it to fit anything remotely violent- this is the point- its not there

any of the rationalizations for terrorist mentality come from purely questionable or eve made up altogether hadeeths-

for instance the idea of 72 virgins comes from a sheikh who chose to interpert a word that menas grapes to mean virgins-

this isnt in the quran- its an idea supplanted by an individual-

so i still balk at your misrepresentation of the qur'an- while its eas to find violence in the bible the qur'an is distinctly NOT the bible-

and is overwhelmingly consistent in it message of peace

Posted by: VICTORIA | March 31, 2007 4:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

victoria:

I would have thought that you would have known me a little better than this by now. Of course I do not believe that all, or even most, Muslims are violent and hateful. And I would not, and have not implied that in this, or any of my posts.

My point is that the violent and hateful Muslims, however many of them there might be, read the same Koran as the rest, and find ingredients that prove lethal to many others, most of them fellow Muslims. One can say the same for some Christians, who utilize Biblical passages to justify all manner of cruelties, historically and presently.

Inerrantism and literalism are the problems.

I hope this sets things to right.

Posted by: Phaedrus | March 31, 2007 2:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

muslim man- an excellent analogy- if i may- i will borrow its usage in the future-

now jakob is yakuv and is telling us that if we hear voices in our heads we should go get checked out-

thanks jakob- thats a comfort

phaedrus-
yes if some of the ingredients were lethal the ALL would die-

but the analagous comparison of the qur'an doesnt lead us to the conclusion that there is 'poison' in it-

because mostly all the muslims now and in history have gotten it right or close to right- using the basic materials provided-

by your reasoning- EVERY SINGLE MUSLIM WHO EVER LIVED WOULD BE VIOLENT AND HATEFUL-

such a violent and hateful people would have no compassion and would have subjugated the entire world by now (there have always been enough of them)

but most muslims ARE NOT VIOLENT OR HATEFUL-

as a matter of fact phaedrus- conduct your own little study and find one hateful muslim on these boards-

if you can sift through the very hateful prejudice spewed at them to do so-

go on- its a challenge-

so thanks for your analysis- it actually PROVES that the ingredients (qur'an) in the recipe (islam) ARE healthy.

Posted by: victoria | March 31, 2007 12:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Muslim Man:

You write:

"I can hand 20 students the same recipe but get a few exceptional dishes and a few terrible ones. This is the same for revelation. It doesn't make the recipe bad."

I appreciate your analogy in part, but would rebut that if some of the ingredients in this particular dish are lethal, it does not matter how any of them might taste.

Posted by: Phaedrus | March 30, 2007 11:52 AM
Report Offensive Comment

victoria, I was referring to crime stats from 2003, but unfortunately I don't have a specific url at my disposal to link to. From memory of one report, there were 1317 reported hate crimes against gays that year. Of these, a few hundered were of the name calling variety, which I hope we can agree, while wrong, are not egregious. A few hundered more were 'simple assault', which often is shoving or pushing, but of course can be worse.

I do not have stats on general assault stats across the country, or sexual assault, but of course the sad total would be in the tens if not 100s of thousands per year. Every form of violence is terrible. But violence against gays is certainly not the national tragedy some make it out to be.

(I only pop up on here 2/week or so - if I don't answer, I'm not ignoring, merely working) :)

Posted by: tomh | March 29, 2007 3:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

This is idle talk. Why does your opinion on a religion not your own have any relevance? The only opinion that matters is the one of your own way of life.

Disbelieving in something you never believed in is like affirming the bogeyman doesn't live under your bed. Would it matter that I think Religion XYZ is pure evil? It would if I were a practitioner. Then I'd be entering into disbelief.

Humans are violent. Humans are peaceful. Religion is a guidance system for those whose hearts are healthy.

I can hand 20 students the same recipe but get a few exceptional dishes and a few terrible ones. This is the same for revelation. It doesn't make the recipe bad. It means only that some students have an aptitude for cooking while others need more guidance. Tweaking the recipe will hardly change the normal distribution of aptitude.

Posted by: Muslim Man | March 29, 2007 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Victoria:

Printing "studies" by discredited organizations of hate groups like If Aaerica Knew which supports the hateful type of Islam espoused by genocidal terror groups like Hamas causes a disservice to everyone. Until the Palestinians embrace a loving Islam as espoused by Dr. Esposito which recognizes the differences between all of us they will continue to wallow in their despair. We need more Islamic leaders to come to the fore and remind us that the Jews and Christians are also people of the book and share a devotion and love of the Holy Land. We need less distorted studies that attempt to demonize Israel and more exposure of the hatred practiced by Hamas and Hezbollah that demonize Islam. Only until all Muslims speak out against the true crimes against Islam as practiced by these descendants of those who supported HItler during WWII (e.g., the GRand Mufti of Jerusalem) and voice support for the Jewish people to live in peace in their tiny state in a sea of Islamic countries will there be true peace as envisioned by our prophet, may he blessed in peace.

Posted by: Assaf | March 28, 2007 11:39 PM
Report Offensive Comment

“G-d Bless UNITED States of America & FRIENDS!


(((( DOWN WITH IRAN's Rule By THEOCRACY ))))


(((((((((((( DOWN W/ SAUDI Style MONARCHY ))))))))))


((( Reward for MAHMOUD Ahmadinejad's TONGUE )))


(( DOWN WITH PERSIA's GOV. by THEOCRACY ))

USE YOUR ((( H.U.E.R.I.S.T.I.C.S ))) NOT RELIGION

(-: (((((( VOTE FOR SECULAR THINKING MINDS )))))) :-)

Posted by: JOZEFS | March 28, 2007 8:23 PM
Report Offensive Comment

halozcel,
Here we go again:same unfounded naive polimics and Islam bashing you repeat every where on these threads,why not for a change get educated a bit on islam so at least you can hide your ignorance and haterd;we mess your partner "Xtian the not so liberated."

Posted by: Asim | March 28, 2007 6:46 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Victoria,
Thanks for the study. We know how the victims,esentially Palestinian civilians, were/are killed: by the Israeli army directly-bullets, artillary and tank shells,aircraft strafing and missiles, house buldozing and assissinations "targeted killing" and torture in Israeli prisons were over ten thousand Palestinians are incareserated including women and children.

Posted by: Asim | March 28, 2007 6:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The above post is mine.

Professor Esposito,
Thanks for this insightful analysis. This is one of rare pieces that articulates objectively and eloquently the state of affairs of how and why is Islam portrayed the way it is in America:Media bias, senstionalism and especially self-serving Politics. Unfortunately there are so many "instant experts on Islam and terrorism" embraced by the US media-a sharp difference from European media for example-and hence the serious rift in public opinion between US and Europe on the Iraq war.


Posted by: Asim | March 28, 2007 6:27 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Professor Esposito,
Thanks for this insightful analysis. This is one of rare pieces that articulates objectively and eloquently the state of affairs of how and why is Islam portrayed the way it is in America:Media bias, senstionalism and especially self-serving Politics. Unfortunately there are so many "instant experts on Islam and terrorism" embraced by the US media-a sharp difference from European media for example-and hence the serious rift in public opinion between US and Europe on the Iraq war.

Posted by: Anonymous | March 28, 2007 6:22 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Religions are businesses like all businesses with exceptions, no product, no service. They collect the money and give the suckers what they ask for. Over a trillion tax free, tax deductible dollars will go from America to the Vatican over the next 20 years at the present rate. With inflation...

L Ron Hubbard any different than Bill Graham? Billy operates off tax free, tax deductible "gifts to God" while L Ron's gang gets taxed like they were WalMart. Freedom of religion does NOT include a lot of religions, only those officially endorsed by the government. That's endorsed and definitely not established ;)

Posted by: BGone | March 28, 2007 6:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment

ON: Scientology & Going under:

MOST of the PSYCHOLOGISTS & PSYCHOTRISTS & Freudian & Jung fiens are PRO-RELIGIOUS or PRE-Apocalyptic "CooCoo" or "Copa Cabana" So to speak.

Yes, That is the way they will label you "PSYCHOTIC" and or "Dysfunctional" or even "Dangerous" if you give them a out of this [Truth] World philosophy or vision.

If you hear voices in your head then it is best to "Check-In" and yes, get examined.

But:
DIANETICS: Like "NOVELIST" MOSSES, JESUS, MOHAMAD et at, includes another Pre-Apocalptic Biblio "Novelist" Mr. Lafayette, RONNY, HUBBARD him self, preaches a "Psychiatric" type of brain washing faith that includes, guess what, you guessed it, MORALITY.

And upon close examination and by using the ECLATi-On "Technique" of the INSIGHT & PATTERN RECOGNITION power and using the FREUDIAN SLIPS OF GENUINE Prophecy Powers, aginst what is said and running rampant, in Hubburds eponymous or so called "Dianetics", Does show me and others how stupid and mixed up they are in their minds. And their "GOING CLEAR" concept or teaching , is nothing but going blind & getting in debt. Ya Ya.


Ronny Hubbs "TIME-TRACK" or "PRE-NATAL" reversing or remembering oneself form UTERO is a nut cases attempt to make you see yourself as if out side of your body seeing yourself.
This is a Mental "Manipulation of the Psych: and NOT (NDE) or Near Death Experience. i think a NDE is the ultimate human experience. especially when I had TWO (2) of them both in my pre-teens. Ya Ya.


So better give me your money Mr. Tom Cruise et at.. singer Madonna too (Lover of Secret Mysticism). SCIENTOLOGIST's are like Vultures waiting for a well-off but-confused “Sucker(s)” like you. I went under ground with them. And they indeed operate like those Purse/Wallet gold digging “GYPSYS” who read ones palms and sucker you in via naiveness.

Thats how they operate. 'B.I.G. B.I.Z", Ya Ya.

Believe & trust in your vibrations & Heuristics AND YOU WILL SURELY FIND the ECLATi in You & things too. This is a high in ITSEL and IT is all truly FREEY. Ya. yA. tA tA.

So, Ronny Hubbard and his QUASI "SCIENTOLOGY" is another classic case of "Market Share" grabbing or in search of that "SUCKER," OUT THERE ion cyberspace or elsewhere, that is said out there, that is born every minute of the day somewhere.


Even Albert Einstein knew Hubbard et al were "MISHIGINNA" “crazy” or stupid like. Ya Ya. :-)

Posted by: Yacub Yosif | March 28, 2007 5:41 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Bill C:

All religions are "religions of war" and Islam is no exception. Religion was founded on the principle that some dead could be prevented from going on to their next lives. That began as the hacking up of the body and got a substantial face lift with the notion of a place called hell, invented (discovered?) by Pharaoh.

Moral people do what their leaders tell them to do including take the lives of other people. That's always done with gain of some kind in mind. The problem hell solves is the facing of the killed in the next world.

The whole story is at http://www.hoax-buster.org The Bible is bogus and the Qu'ran is a follow on hoax. They both serve the same purpose, assure killers (warriors) they will not have to face their victims in the next life becasue they, their victims are not worthy of life now or later. No one can be stopped from coming back to life so to hell with our enemies. Dream on jihad warrior and Christian soldier alike.

Posted by: BGone | March 28, 2007 5:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

you are right-

if it bleeds it leads

could you substantiate your figures?
i have no intention of bashing- i was not aware there are hundreds of assaults against gays every year

Posted by: victoria | March 28, 2007 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

thanks for the study.

There is more here than merely the numbers, however.

As Mr. Esposito stated, most people would agree that the media tend to report more sensational events.

In general, a suicide bomber killing people is more sensational and morally convicting than accidental collateral damage. So unless we know HOW each of the Palestinians & Israelis died, it is problematic to jusitfy bias in coverage due to conservatve/liberal, pro-Israel, etc.

Likewise, we've had far more reports of Ameircna casualties in Iraq than Iraqi dead, and waaaay more reports of war deaths than the thousands Saddam killed beforehand. I don't take this necessarily as anit-war bias; it's the media / public interest in Americna casualites.

What the facts DO support is many studies that admit the vast majority of print media people are self-described liberals. One can argue to what extent that it spills into their reporting, but it is obviously affects it somewhat. Of course talk radio has found a different niche/bias (hello, Mr Limbaugh!).

Lastly, the media does seem to be clearly biased in one area, and I tread lightly here because homosexuality is a very emotional subject. The media reports crimes like the murder of Matthew Shepard (sp?) over and over and over... and pretty soon people like Rep John Conyers actually believe there are a rash of hate crimes acorss the country, so much so that more legislation is needed. The facts speak differently, but I don't see the meida reporting that out of millions of crimes in the last decade, incidents of things like assault against gays (which of course individually are horrible and ought to be punished) are a few hundred per year; not exactly the #1 problem our country faces.

Posted by: Tomh | March 28, 2007 3:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Since opinions can lack credibility if one doesnt know the source of their reasoning, here is a study by a media watch group on the san francisco chronicle-touted as one of the more liberal mainstream newspapers ( not implying liberal is synonymous with fairness, but the more conservative media has the dual motive of justifying a war on a muslim country- and has been aggressively anti-muslim)

Our findings indicate significantly inaccurate coverage by the San Francisco Chronicle of these topics. We found a vast disparity in the likelihood of a death receiving coverage based on the ethnicity of the person killed. For the first six months of the current uprising, the San Francisco Chronicle reported on 111% of Israeli deaths and only 38% of Palestinian deaths in the headlines and/or the first paragraphs of the 251 articles on the topic.

This discrepancy was even more exaggerated in the Chronicle’s coverage of the killing of children. During the six- month study period, Palestinian children were being killed at a far higher rate than Israeli children — 27 % of Palestinians killed were under 18 (93 children), while only 6 % of Israelis killed were minors (4 children). Yet Chronicle headlines and/or first paragraphs reported the killing of only 5 Palestinian children, while headlines and/or first paragraphs reported 6 Israeli children killed (one Israeli teenager’s death was reported three times).

In other words, the Chronicle covered 150 % of Israeli children's deaths and only 5 % of Palestinian children's deaths, giving readers the impression that approximately equal numbers of youths had been killed on both sides. Thus, while the death of an Israeli child was prioritized above the killing of an adult, the killing of a Palestinian child was de-prioritized, despite the abnormally high percentage Palestinian children made up of the casualties. One would expect the fact that Palestinian children constituted such a high percentage of deaths to have been considered newsworthy in itself, not the reverse.

Regarding Chronicle coverage of cumulative totals, information that would have at least somewhat ameliorated the above misimpressions, we found that only 12 stories (or 4.8 %) of 251 news stories on this topic contained cumulative totals of deaths on both sides somewhere in the article. There was not a single report on the total number injured.

Finally, only 1.2 % of stories about Israel/Palestine contained information about U.S. aid to Israel and the Palestinians, despite the fact that such aid is an integral factor in the current conflict, and that aid to Israel accounts for approximately 30 percent of total U.S. international aid expenditures.

We are providing our findings to the San Francisco Chronicle in the hope that it will help them to fulfill their goal of accurately reporting the news. We are also providing this study to readers to help them evaluate the Chronicle as a source for understanding the Israel/Palestine conflict in all of its complexities.

Introduction

Beginning in 2003, If Americans Knew began issuing a report card to major media across the country on their coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This study of the San Francisco Chronicle covers the first six months of the current uprising (September 29, 2000 through March 31, 2001). We chose this particularly significant period because it set the context within which all subsequent reporting on the conflict is viewed.

Given that the media have a desire and a responsibility to cover this topic accurately, we provide these reports in the hope that our analyses can assist them in this goal.

In addition, we are making these reports public, as a way to help readers evaluate for themselves the reliability of their sources of information on this issue.

The goal of this report is to

* Establish agreed-upon standards for assessing accuracy in reporting
* Provide, in a consistent format, an assessment of the publication’s accuracy in reporting on the Israel/Palestine conflict.

Methodology

We recognize that reporting on Israel/Palestine has been an exceptionally controversial topic. Therefore, while there are many potential yardsticks for measuring accuracy, we chose criteria that would be universally acknowledged to be highly significant and not be construed as at all subjective.

1. Coverage of Casualties
We counted the number of Israeli and Palestinian deaths the San Francisco Chronicle reported on:

* In absolute numbers, and
* As a percentage of total deaths for Israelis and Palestinians respectively. We broke these numbers down into three specific categories:
o All headlines and/or first paragraphs
o Front-page headlines and/or first paragraphs only
o Children’s deaths reported in all headlines and/or first paragraphs. (No children’s deaths were reported on the front page).
* The number of times that cumulative totals of deaths and injuries were reported

We chose this yardstick because it is simple, quantitative and relatively immune to subjective interpretation. In addition, we wanted to discover whether the San Francisco Chronicle demonstrates even-handed respect for human life, regardless of ethnic or religious origin. Finally, because headlines are often among the most prominent aspects of coverage that the reader absorbs, we believe they play a disproportionate role in generating an overall impression about the conflict and the relative consequences for Israelis and Palestinians.

Additionally, we chose to count the number of times the Chronicle provided its readers with the total number of Israelis and Palestinians killed and injured because, given the ongoing nature of daily news reporting, an understanding of the overall context may be lost without such cumulative totals being periodically reported as accurately as possible.

2. U.S. Connection
Finally, we looked at how often the specific American connection to the conflict — U. S. aid to Israel/Palestine — was covered fully and accurately. We counted the number of times such aid was mentioned, and then evaluated whether the sum reported was accurate; for example, whether aid to Israel reported both major segments of U.S. assistance — military and foreign aid — as well as additional subsidies such as loan forgiveness programs (see Appendix B).
Coverage of Casualties

For the first six months of the current uprising, 72 San Francisco Chronicle headlines and/or first paragraphs reported on Israeli deaths. During this time, there had actually been only 65 Israelis killed (the discrepancy is due to the fact that a number of Israeli deaths were reported multiple times).

During the same six-month period, 129 reported on Palestinian deaths were reported in headlines and/or first paragraphs. During this time, 343 Palestinians had actually been killed. 2

The total numbers of Israeli and Palestinian deaths were obtained from the Israeli human rights organization B’Tselem.

Figure 1
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, 65 Israelis and 343 Palestinians were killed.

In other words, 111% of Israeli deaths and only 38% of Palestinian deaths were reported in San Francisco Chronicle headlines and/or the first paragraph of relevant articles.

Figure 2
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, the San Francisco Chronicle reported 111% of Israeli deaths compared to 38% of Palestinian deaths.
Front-Page Coverage of Deaths

For the first six months of the current uprising, 12 Israeli deaths were reported in the headlines and/or first paragraphs of the San Francisco Chronicle articles on the Israel-Palestine conflict. This constituted 18% of Israeli deaths.

Twenty-eight Palestinian deaths, or 8% of the total Palestinians killed, were reported in front-page headlines and/or first paragraphs.

In other words, Israeli deaths were given front-page prominence at a rate over twice that of Palestinian deaths.

Figure 3
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, the San Francisco Chronicle reported 38% of Israeli deaths compared to 8% of Palestinian deaths on the front page.
Coverage of Children’s Deaths

For the first six months of the current uprising, 6 Israeli children’s deaths were reported in the headlines and/or first paragraphs of the San Francisco Chronicle articles on the Israel-Palestine conflict, compared with 5 Palestinian children’s deaths. (Children are defined as those that are 17 and below).

Figure 4
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, the San Francisco Chronicle reported 6 Israeli children's deaths and 5 Palestinian children's deaths in headlines and lead paragraphs.

According to B’Tselem, during this time, there were actually 4 Israeli and 93 Palestinian children killed.3 Based on these totals, it is clear that, during this period, Palestinian children were being killed at a much higher rate than Israeli children. Children’s deaths accounted for 27% of the Palestinians killed, while children’s deaths accounted for only 6% of Israelis killed during this period.

Figure 5
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, 4 Israeli children and 93 Palestinian children were killed.

The next chart summarizes the reporting of children’s deaths for the whole six months. It compares the number of deaths reported in headlines and/or first paragraphs to the number of deaths omitted, for Israelis and Palestinians respectively. While only 4 Israeli children were killed during the study-period, every one received prominent coverage, and one received such coverage twice. In contrast, the killings of almost 90 of the Palestinian children merited no such headline coverage.

Figure 6
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, every Israeli child's death was reported prominently (sometimes more than once), while only 5 out of 93 Palestinian children's deaths were reported prominently.

* There were actually only 4 Israeli children killed during the first six months of the current uprising. One Israeli child’s death was reported in three different headlines.

In other words, 150% of Israeli children’s deaths and only 5% of Palestinian children’s deaths were reported by the San Francisco Chronicle in headlines and/or the first paragraph of relevant articles.

Figure 7
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, the Chronicle reported 150% of Israeli children's deaths and only 5% of Palestinian children's deaths.
Coverage of Cumulative Totals

During the first six months of the current uprising, the San Francisco Chronicle reported the total number of Israeli and Palestinian deaths in 12 out of 251 news articles (or 4.8% of news articles) on the Israel-Palestine conflict. During this period, Palestinians were being killed at a rate approximately 5.3 times greater than Israelis.

The Chronicle never reported the total number of injuries broken down by who was injured. Only once did the paper venture into this territory: in an article nine days into the conflict, paragraph 15 stated that there had been “...more than 2,000 injured, the vast majority of them Palestinian.” [Oct. 8, 2000, “Barak: ‘This is a turning point’: Israel prime minister threatens to use greater force, issues warning to Arafat”]

Figure 8
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, the Chronicle reported the cumulative number of Palestinians and Israelis killed in only 12 out of 251 articles on the issue.
Coverage of the US Connection

During the six-month study period, the San Francisco Chronicle reported partial information about U.S. aid to Israel/Palestine three times out of 251 articles (or in 1.2% of the stories) on the conflict. Never was the information provided full and accurate (see Appendix A - Tally Sheet B, and Appendix B).

Figure 9
Chart showing that during the first six months of the current uprising, the Chronicle reported on US aid to Israel and the Palestinians in only three out of 251 articles on the topic.
Conclusion

We are concerned about the results of this examination. We believe the readers of the San Francisco Chronicle, as well as all Americans, are entitled to full and accurate reporting on all issues, including the topic of Israel/Palestine.

Given that the Chronicle had ample coverage of this issue (251 stories), it is troubling that so much critical information for American readers was so minimally reported. Further, our findings suggest a pattern of distortion in San Francisco Chronicle coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict inconsistent with normal journalistic standards.

Such a pattern of distortion, in which readers were given the impression that the Israeli death rate was greater than it was, and that the Palestinian death rate was considerably smaller than its reality, may serve to misinform readers rather than inform them.

In particular, our study showed immense distortion in the coverage of children’s deaths. By covering nearly identical numbers of Israeli and Palestinian children’s deaths in headlines and/or first paragraphs, the paper suggested an equivalency in death rates for the two groups, when in actuality over twenty times more Palestinian children had been killed during this period, over 90 percent of them before the first Israeli child’s death.

Such coverage, in which virtually equal numbers of Israeli and Palestinian children’s deaths were given prominence, may give Chronicle readers an impression of balanced reporting that an examination of this six-month period does not justify.

We assume that the San Francisco Chronicle is as disturbed as we have been to find these shortfalls in its quest to provide excellent news reporting to its readers. Now that it has been alerted to these distortions in its Israel-Palestine coverage, we encourage the Chronicle to undertake whatever changes necessary to provide accurate news coverage of this vital issue. We hope that our next report will show an improvement. We will be pleased to report this to the public.
Endnotes

1. If Americans Knew is dedicated to providing full and accurate information to the American public on topics of importance that are underreported or misreported in the American media. Our primary area of focus at this time is Israel/Palestine.

2. These numbers do not include Palestinians civilians who died as a result of inability to reach medical care due to Israeli road closures, curfews, etc. The figure for Palestinian deaths is extremely conservative given that it was difficult for this organization to report on deaths in the Palestinian territories. Palestinian medical organizations report a higher number for this period. For example, the Palestine Red Crescent Society, internationally respected for its statistical rigor, reports that 409 Palestinians were killed during this time.

3. These numbers do not include Palestinians children who died as a result of inability to reach medical care due to Israeli road closures, curfews, etc. The figure for Palestinian deaths is extremely conservative given that it was difficult for this organization to report on deaths in the Palestinian territories. Palestinian medical organizations report a higher number for this period.
In other words, the Chronicle covered 150 % of Israeli children's deaths and only 5 % of Palestinian children's deaths, giving readers the impression that approximately equal numbers of youths had been killed on both sides. Thus, while the death of an Israeli child was prioritized above the killing of an adult, the killing of a Palestinian child was de-prioritized, despite the abnormally high percentage Palestinian children made up of the casualties. One would expect the fact that Palestinian children constituted such a high percentage of deaths to have been considered newsworthy in itself, not the reverse.

Regarding Chronicle coverage of cumulative totals, information that would have at least somewhat ameliorated the above misimpressions, we found that only 12 stories (or 4.8 %) of 251 news stories on this topic contained cumulative totals of deaths on both sides somewhere in the article. There was not a single report on the total number injured.

Finally, only 1.2 % of stories about Israel/Palestine contained information about U.S. aid to Israel and the Palestinians, despite the fact that such aid is an integral factor in the current conflict, and that aid to Israel accounts for approximately 30 percent of total U.S. international aid expenditures

now one might wonder- if this is a study of a liberal newspaper, what would a study of a conservative one reveal.


Posted by: VICTORIA | March 28, 2007 3:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Can anyone find any evidence that Islam is a religion of peace. Are its countries peaceful? Are the people more peaceful? (No they're more violent) Does the Koran preach pacifism? This is utterly stupid to make excuses for a religion which is violent to its core. Someone find me some evidence that Islam is a religion of peace.. What the laws of Muslim countries? ENOUGH ALREADY. Its roots are violent, its followers are violent, its book is violent, and its laws are violent. If someone can show me why this is a peaceful religion. Please, enlighten me.

Posted by: Bill C. | March 28, 2007 2:25 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Everyone needs to know about islam.Yes,lets learn.

Man can take four women.
Man can scourge woman.
Two women equals one man.

Who knows what islam is?

Yemen Republic,islam country(islam also means House of bliss)
Yes,house of bliss,population 21 millions,GDP only 20 billion dollars,per capita 900 dollars.

Sweden,kafir land(kafir,infidel means wrong path)
Yes,wrong path,pop.9 millions,GDP 370 billion,per capita 43000 dollars.

Citibank,market value over 4000 billion dollars.

Islamic bank,sukut bank(whatever it means because without golden coin so called islamic bank is an empty word but perhaps respectfull Lady may explain from Kuala Lumpur)
Market valu 2 or 3 billion dollars.

Who knows those?

Healty relationship can not be based on empty words,hypocricy and desert rules.
Core issue is not to know,but wrongness must be corrected.
Balanced relationship should be established on Human Rights and civilized values.

Everyone needs to come twentyfirst century.This is the solution.

Posted by: halozcel | March 28, 2007 12:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company