Lessons From the Land of Lincoln and Obama
Today's blog is by Eboo Patel and Samantha Kirby.
Yesterday, we commemorated the bicentennial anniversary of Abraham Lincoln's birth - and comparisons between Obama and Lincoln are flying fast and furious. Obama started his campaign for the presidency in Springfield, Ill., on Lincoln's birthday weekend. Obama was sworn in on the same bible that Lincoln used at his first inauguration in 1861. Neither had extensive experience in Washington before election. And so on.
But there is another analysis floating around during this time of remembrance -- a more critical look at the myth of Lincoln in the history books, and the complexities we might have missed.
"In Lincoln: On Race and Slavery," author Henry Louis Gates Jr. makes the points that Lincoln, though opposed to the institution of slavery, did not always embrace racial equality. (Through his presidency, his views changed, especially as he came to know Frederick Douglas.) Despite the reality of his imperfections and prejudices, Lincoln will be remembered first and foremost as "the Great Emancipator." He has been so thoroughly mythologized that, according to Gates, only Jesus has more books written about him.
But Lincoln was not a deity, he was just a man. He had weaknesses, he made mistakes, and he came to change his views over time as he learned new information and formed new relationships. Similarly, Barack Obama, no matter how inspirational, how visionary and how capable, is just a man. And we cannot rely on one man to change the course of our country - because there is always more to the story than the myth can tell.
Yesterday, Obama offered these words at Lincoln's bicentennial celebration: "And so even as we meet here today, at a moment when we are far less divided than in Lincoln's day, but when we are once again debating the critical issues of our time - and debating them fiercely - let us remember that we are doing so as servants to the same flag, as representatives of the same people, and as stakeholders in a common future."
As we look back, let's remember the story of unity that the myth of Lincoln teaches us -- the story of unity that Obama stresses time and time again. Because the greatest comparison we can make between these two men is their tremendous commitment to serve their nation in a time of crisis.
Hopefully we remember that the true history of our nation cannot be summed up with the story of one, but is written by the actions of many. And we must write this story by answering the call to serve in our own ways -- as men and as women, as Christians, Jews and non-believers, and most of all as Americans.
By
Eboo Patel
|
February 13, 2009; 10:37 AM ET
| Category:
Interfaith Issues
,
Personal Religion
,
Religion & Leadership
,
Religion & Politics
Share This:
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Beware the Faith-Based Funding Trap |
Next: Rumi on Love: Making Sense of Ecstasy
Posted by: vjg3 | February 16, 2009 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Hardly anyone in the United States, including in the Republican party, during the Civil War believed in racial equality. So to criticize Lincoln for not being a believer in racial equality is unfair, in the context of the 19th century CE.
Before 1861 only a very small minority of northerners advocated the abolition of slavery. Had there been no American civil war, slavery probably would have continued for at least until well into the 20th century CE. Nobody contends Lincoln was perfect, so the notion of myths surrounding him and his life has little, if any credence.
Abraham Lincoln, in his personal life, the terrible personal tragedies he endured, his occasional bouts with depression, fatalism show his greatness as a human being, both apart from and including his role as president. Any comparisons between Lincoln and Obama, or any other president, are hardly worthwhile. Lincoln had to deal with a crisis, the Civil War, greater than any other president.
Contemporaies often consider the problems and crises of their era to be among the most challenging in the nation's history. Yet there were numerous recessions and depressions, that were worse than modern recessions since 1940. The standard of living of the vast majority of people was quite low, with very long working hours for rural and urban workers, before the 1940's.
Posted by: Aprogressiveindependent | February 16, 2009 3:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Well, if I should play your game that Lincoln was "just a man", then he was a man much despised, at the time of his death and the nation he led was fractious prone, witness the copperheads in the North, the South in the South. When he was elected president a southern newspaper claimed the states desolved. I was at Arlington House some time ago and a person in full Confederate regailia was showing people the sites-kept calling the Lincoln Memorial the Imposter Memorial. Lincoln did save us, as did Washinton, Roosevelt and Reagan and now Obama. Yes you can argue only God can save us but then God-if you believe that stuff-isn't going to come down from Heaven and tell Obama and the Republicans and Democrats"step aside the Almighty will fix the economic situation." We,I don't deify Obama, we don't deify the President, we mere mortals just made the Presidency, Congress and the Judiciary to run things. The fact that gods come out of those institutions like Lincoln nemisis Stephen Douglas-the Little Giant, is just a byproduct, of whom they represent, like Strom Thurmond,John C. Calhoun and Daniel Webster. but their forces like leader of the abolitionist movement or the plantation system, are great. As President Kennedy once said, "here on earth, God's work must truely be our own."
Posted by: comdien | February 16, 2009 12:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment
If Lincoln, a white president, had to go to WAR to unify the country, what are expectations of a black president, attempting to do the same?
Posted by: demtse | February 15, 2009 5:31 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The deification of Lincoln only proceeded after his death. Deification of a sitting president is an unusual burden to lay upon someone because, he, like all of us, has feet of clay. He is bound to disappoint and once a flaw is found in a god, his tumble can be mighty hard.
The lesson for all of us is that they are us. We must all own our government whether the person we voted for holds the office or his opponent.
Posted by: edbyronadams | February 14, 2009 10:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Mr. Patel noted: "Lincoln didn't save us; Obama can't either."
And neither will the warmongering, womanizing long-dead Arab named Mahound!!!
Posted by: CCNL | February 13, 2009 3:55 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.











I would like Mr. Patel- the so-called "moderate", educated American Muslim to discuss the plight of non-Muslims in 57 intolerant Islamic nations?
And how does he explain the fact that there are no significant number of minorities in these Islamic nations and why do Muslims once in majority call themselves an Islamic republic to insult the non-Muslim population?