Religion in a hookup culture
Q:Do your religious beliefs exalt or stigmatize sex (or both)? Is religion a useful tool for helping young people navigate the treacherous world of sex, love and relationships? Does religion present an alternative view of sex and sexual relationships to the culture at large? Should it?
Since my academic research centers on attitudes about sex in relation to faith on college campuses, I'll tackle part two of this week's question: Is religion a useful tool for helping young people navigate the treacherous world of sex, love and relationships?
In my survey work and interviews with college students across the U.S. at Catholic, evangelical, private-secular, and public universities, and subsequent campus lecture visits to discuss this very topic, I found three very different attitudes among young adults about whether religion is useful in navigating hookup culture, sexual decision-making and identity formation, romance, and love:
1) For the committed, evangelical college student, it is impossible to separate your religious affiliation and commitments from anything to do with sexual decision-making, activity, and identity. Your faith is at the core of who you are, and everything you think and do flows from there. With regard to navigating dating, sex, and romantic relationships, the Christian tradition can portray this task as overwhelming dangerous--as a series of extremely important don'ts--which adds enormous stress to an already stressful journey during adolescence. That's the not so good news participants offered in my study. But most evangelical college students want their faith to speak to them about everything, including sex and relationships, so even if they are struggling with what their religion teaches on this (the many don'ts), they are committed to that struggle and they are in it for the long hall because they love their faith tradition. Period.
2) Your average college students at Catholic, private-secular, and public institutions generally laugh at the possibility that religious tradition might have anything to say to them in light of the world they live in: hookup culture, where sex is perceived as simply a casual thing, and they feel pressured to go right along with this attitude, even though for most young women and men, privately they don't like this situation at all. Catholic students especially spoke with great sarcasm about the "don'ts" with regard to sex in the Catholic tradition, which make them feel alienated, and which make them think that Catholicism is utterly out of touch with the realities of what they face in navigating sex and hookup culture today.
3) There is another type of student from across the four institution types who also might fit one of the other two categories as well, who is either really stressed about what religion tells them about sex, or thinks it's useless, but who has a feeling that in the realm of spirituality, there is a lot of possibility, flexibility, and exciting potential for them in the way of making their sex, dating, and romantic lives more fulfilling, meaningful, and generally, might offer more livable rules and is far more inclusive of same-sex relationships and sexually active histories. So spirituality--not institutional, organizational religion, but spirituality--is an exciting space where students suspect they might actually find useful tools for navigation. They just aren't sure how to find them or pursue these suspicions they have.
That's where we come in, though, right? To help our students discover, investigate, and try on the wonderful spiritual practices and tools that we have the luck to know about from our research, scholarship, and lives, many of which come straight out of the same religions the students have rejected. It's just that we don't often think to apply and adapt practices like discernment, adoration, and lectio divina (to take a few common ones from the Catholic tradition) for use within the context of hookup culture. But wow do they have a lot to offer once you go there.
By
Donna Freitas
|
April 23, 2010; 9:29 AM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Sexuality and Paganism |
Next: Religions need to get real in dealing with sex
Posted by: seventytimesseven | May 2, 2010 5:01 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Can you please say a little more about what you mean by the word "spirituality" in this context? Any specific examples of ways college students have found this "spirituality" to help them navigate decisions about sex?
Posted by: jiji1 | April 28, 2010 3:10 PM
Report Offensive Comment
B2O2;
"It boggles my mind. Can someone explain this apparent insanity? Would you choose this course of action in ANY other area of your life? Why"
She didn't choose anything. She was indoctrinated. It's like being hypnotized.
She'll be that way forever.
Posted by: Rongoklunk | April 25, 2010 9:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment
It's always painfully amusing to watch this poor woman go through ever-more-desperate contortions as she strives to rationalize the continued association she keeps with her abusive life partner, Catholicism.
And really, what better source for wisdom on sexual matters could there be than a group of (supposedly!) chaste men who have had ZERO experience (according to the advertising) in a "hookup", much less a sound, lasting relationship?
Why seek out friends and older people who've actually BEEN THERE when you can get "authoritative" advice from clerics who don't know you and have ABSOLUTELY NO experience in the question at hand?
It boggles my mind. Can someone explain this apparent insanity? Would you choose this course of action in ANY other area of your life? Why?
Posted by: B2O2 | April 25, 2010 1:17 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Christianity's foundational theoretician, Augustine of Hippo, believed that:
- Adam's prelapsarian erection would have been under his voluntary control
- that the passionate, troubling, disobedient sexual impulses we experience in our postlapsarian existence are part of the punishment visited on humankind by God
- that sexual activity between married spouses, if done for its own pleasurable sake and not for procreation, is a sin but forgivable [Journal of the History of Sexuality, Soble]
Western man still labors under his curse.
Posted by: tojby_2000 | April 25, 2010 10:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The authoress is pathetically confused and ignorant.
Posted by: thebump | April 25, 2010 8:46 AM
Report Offensive Comment
What the "hookup culture" needs to understand:
Although most religions warn us about the dangers of pre/extra-marital sex, it is obvious we are not paying attention as pre/extra-marital intercourse and other pre/extra-marital sexual activities are out of control with over one million abortions and 19 million cases of STDs per year in the USA alone.
from the CDC-2006
"Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) remain a major public health challenge in the United States. While substantial progress has been made in preventing, diagnosing, and treating certain STDs in recent years, CDC estimates that approximately 19 million new infections occur each year, almost half of them among young people ages 15 to 24.1 In addition to the physical and psychological consequences of STDs, these diseases also exact a tremendous economic toll. Direct medical costs associated with STDs in the United States are estimated at up to $14.7 billion annually in 2006 dollars."
How in the world do we get this situation under control?
A pill to temporarily eliminate the sex drive would be a good start. (Andy Rooney of 60 Minutes calls it an anti-desire pill - 4/18/2010). And teenagers and young adults must be constantly reminded of the dangers of sexual activity and that oral sex, birth control pills, condoms and chastity belts are no protection against STDs. Might a list of those having an STD posted on the Internet help? Sounds good to me!!!! Said names would remain until the STD has been eliminated with verification by a doctor. Lists of sexual predators are on-line. Is there a difference between these individuals and those having a STD having sexual relations while infected???
And the following data need to promulgated so everyone is aware that today's contraceptives don't always work to the degree advertised: (from the Guttmacher Institute)
Percentage of women (men) experiencing an unintended pregnancy (a few examples)
Method Typical
Pill (combined) 8.7
Tubal sterilization 0.7
Male condom 17.4
Vasectomy 0.2
Periodic abstinence 25.3
Calendar 9.0
Ovulation Method 3.0
Sympto-thermal 2.0
Post-ovulation 1.0
No method 85.0
(Abstinence) 0
(Masturbation) 0
Posted by: YEAL9 | April 23, 2010 6:21 PM
Report Offensive Comment
But don't we already have separation of church and sex?
Posted by: biograph1985 | April 23, 2010 2:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










Firstly, I find it rather disheartening that those who chose to tear apart Ms. Freitas work are so far removed from her understanding. She does not write from the perspective of an "indoctrinated" or "hypnotized" person but rather puts forth ideas she has gained through legitimate academic research.
Secondly, I wanted to comment on a particular posting which said:
"...what better source for wisdom on sexual matters could there be than a group of (supposedly!) chaste men who have had ZERO experience (according to the advertising) in a "hookup", much less a sound, lasting relationship? "
To that I say that most political theorists are not politicians nor are editors authors (grant it there are exceptions to this rule). I cannot explain the gift of total consecration, or the source of grace it is for the Catholic Church. In regards to this audience, I may as well be trying to convince my cat. Point in case is that those who promise a life of celibacy are not asexual beings. Just as a poli sci academic may have never practiced politics, they do know the subject deeply and intimately, as they have devoted their life to studying it. Just because they have never worked on the hill themselves, doesn't mean that the advice they would give to someone who does is worthless. As a matter of fact, they may be able to see past the "politics of politics" so to speak and guide the seasoned politician in a better direction.
Many priests do truly understand romantic relationships and can guide those struggling in one.
Also, Augustine may be a saint, but he is not Christ (or Mary Poppins) and is therefore imperfect. The Catholic church does not teach such things. Sadly, not enough Catholics read Augustine today to even be able to become confused or troubled by what he said in that instance.