Who's inside the Muslim box?
President Obama, after saying that building a mosque at Ground Zero fit our "commitment to religious freedom," backtracked, saying he wasn't commenting on the 'wisdom' of building it so close to 'hallowed ground.'
A Fox News poll showed that while 61 percent of Americans believe that Cordoba House has a constitutional right to build near Ground Zero, 64 percent believe it is not appropriate to do so.
Does Obama's hedging show a lack of ethical convictions? Does Hamas' endorsement change the debate? What is behind public opposition to the site? Can you believe in religious freedom but not believe the mosque is appropriate?
When people argue over religion, they tend to forget a simple question: Is it better to be happy or to be right? In societies that practice religious toleration, the answer falls to the side of happiness. Being right on matters of God is left up in the air. That's a good practical reason to remind people that, of course, anyone who wants to build a mosque has the right to do so, even if questions of zoning, local acceptability, and so on also enter the picture. In the case of Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf , a moderate cleric who has openly divorced himself from political issues, he can tolerantly be seen as a force for good -- he describes himself as a bridge builder between cultures.
Anyone who tries to make hay out of this issue wants to battle over who is right and who is wrong. Politicians fan public controversy for their own gain, and it's dubious if they contribute to anyone's happiness. President Obama deserves credit for making a sane, measured, adult statement about the proposed Islamic center -- that has always been his style. His later clarification, in which he said that he wasn't endorsing the center or agreeing with the wisdom of building it, gave Republicans a wedge for some flip-flop rhetoric. The kerfuffle is just that. Hamas also saw something to gain by wooing Obama, very clumsily, in their endorsement of the project, but it's an obvious ploy, as is the right wing's cry that Obama, Rauf, and Hamas are on the same page.
Moderate Muslims chafe at being put into the same box with jihadis and other extremists. Right wingers jump into the box with them, however, because it holds any kind of close-mindedness, propaganda, xenophobia, and intolerance. That's one of the perpetual ironies of such self-righteous clashes. Both sides need each other, and in their declared hostility they pretend not to notice that each is pulling one end of the same rope. It's a sign of life returning to normal that most Americans aren't interested in joining the tug of war. With a majority saying that the imam has a right to build his center, the 39% who disagree or have no opinion amount to the same percentage, more or less, that Republicans, Tea Partiers, and the right in general manage to attract at this moment. In tough times, when people are unsettled already, offering a bogey man works.
If the same Islamic center had been proposed before 9/11, it wouldn't have attracted the slightest notice beyond zoning hearings. If it had been proposed the day after 9/11, one shudders to think about what Rauf would have been exposed to. But people are in a shadow zone right now, worried about terrorists, suspicious of Islam despite their best intentions, and jumpy about the Muslims among us who are doing nothing more dangerous than seeking a place to worship in their own way. Beneath the surface, it's really our own consciousness that remains in uncertainty. One looks forward to the day when Muslims are not forced into the same box with their irate counterparts on the opposite side. That box is too full already.
By
Deepak Chopra
|
August 18, 2010; 12:37 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Renewable Energy |
Next: Right to build vs. right to ask questions
Posted by: artistkvip1 | August 24, 2010 4:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment
I do not agree at all with Chopra although I love his books. Being a Hindu from India, I see the utter failure of mosque building as projects to bridge the inter-faith divide or to heal wounds. So, one more mosque near Ground Zero will contribute exactly zilch towards that lofty goal stated by Imam Rauf.
We have hundreds of mosques in India which have done nothing to heal the Hindu-Muslim divide in India or encourage an iota of tolerance across the border in Pakistan. In fact, the inter-faith divide is wider now than ever before. I think it is time people start calling a spade a spade and not embellish painful truths. I find the Islamic philosophy openly detrimental to building inter-faith understanding in a spirit of universal brotherhood. Entire Muslim populations in Islamic countries are brain-washed in poisonous Islamic concepts such as infidel versus believer (of Islam) called upon to see the world divided into one that is ruled according to Islamic tenets and another that is alien to it. How can Muslims truly come to embrace religious tolerance and equality before the eyes of Allah? It is impossible if they believe the Koran.
Either Allah is wrong or the rest of us is wrong. Both cannot be right Mr. Chopra. No amount of mosque building can resolve the root cause of separation in Muslim minds. That is why I keep saying--in my book, EVEN GOD MUST MAKE SENSE! (Remember, even Krishna had to argue with and convince Arjuna, His Charioteer, on the battlefield). No, I have not given Him the right to say whatever He wants. This basic right to question God is affirmed by the Buddha Himself. So Hindus have nothing in common with Islam. Muslims might as well have come from Mars.
Posted by: arkns | August 21, 2010 11:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Let’s see: 39% either disagree that the imam has a right to build his center or have no opinion. And magically, that’s the same percentage the right manages to attract at this moment. So I guess we're supposed to conclude it's the same 39% in both cases, meaning it must just be those wascally Wepublicans opposing the mosque, unlike the other 61% of “good” people!
Nice try, Deepak, but hinting that two populations are one and the same simply based on a percentage value sure smacks of being “an obvious ploy” to let you criticize the right wing, as is your wont. But I’m calling you on it, because I doubt you can show that that's the case. If you have evidence to that effect, I challenge you to furnish it. Otherwise, maybe it's time to back off from the Republican bashing, as you've become rather too transparently biased.
Also, the real facts are that something like 70% of Americans OPPOSE the mosque plan, even as a majority also agree that the imam has the right to build it. (In other words, they agree he can but think he shouldn’t.) See this AP item about NY voters: http://tinyurl.com/2cym5ee.
And btw, there are even Muslims opposed to the mosque, as discussed in this AP item: http://tinyurl.com/26degtm. Where do they fit into your "evil Republicans" world view?
Posted by: MikeFS | August 19, 2010 12:04 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.

Twitter










i am disss-A-pointed in the great thinker ? dk on this 1... ignorance iz biliss with regaurds to right and wrong? and with the president i voted for and who was the best choice avialabe i say get some guts... only a coward or an emotional or mental defect wood hide behind a nobel peace prize while killing more, he still has time like Reagen did..after he was shot (i voted for him twice felt better about the second time) to do some good things for the world. i don't believe in violence i do believe in olooking at history and actual truth. and enlarging wars when given the ..actual choice in life.. and where is campaign finace reform the cornerstone of america getting america back peacefully... perhaps the greates injustice 2 justice happens in american courts ewhre companies that know they are wrong morrally and legally can hide behind money and actually gag the truth from coming out to be know by all.. to give the vitums the actual choice of nothing or silence and money should deserve a special place in hell.. things get corrected not fixxxed when the problem becomes know to moral people. if you want to reform the legal system in america bring not justice but actual truth that all can see and the justice ..will actually happen in real life.. secrects are things people are ashamed to have other peopele actually see in real life.. people who think they can buy a job as a represtative.. are insane and should not be allowed to partricipate in business or government.. i would say religion 2 but that wood be against the contitution which i actually believe in more than the people who wood use anything to divide and..conquer .. 4 what ... please check me twice you great man i live in a trailer park with real disabilities and am deniied a chance to actually participate and contribute to life because i can't fit in when yo haaaave a diss-ability or in my case several it is not a matter of being a prima donna but actually surviving .. lets get it right or quit pretending 2 be moral and smart maybe there is big difference between being crazy and useless and having a dissability perhaps i have more ... spirituallity than many because if i didn't have it i would be insane and think the truth ... didn't matter lets see if the on faith moral people choose to censor these words like many other worthy words i have written