Cal Thomas
Syndicated political columnist

Cal Thomas

Thomas, a veteran of broadcast and print journalism, writes a twice-weekly column that appears in over 500 newspapers around the world.

 ALL POSTS

Pope Put Himself At Physical Risk By Going To Turkey

The Pope's remarks September 20 in Regensburg, Germany were in the context of a theological address and appeal for dialogue between Christians and Muslims about the nature of faith and whether the application of it can ever lead to violence.

This one paragraph was ripped out of context and used as a pretext to incite anger and violence against the Pope. It produced the kind of anti-religious rhetoric (against Christians) which, when applied to Muslims, is not tolerated.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached."

If these were the Pope's words and thoughts, Muslims might properly have been offended. But he was quoting part of a 14th century conversation between a Byzantine emperor, Manuel II Paleologus, and an educated Persian on the subject of Islam and Christianity. The emperor's point was not only to speak of the futility of spreading faith through violence, but to emphasize it is not the way to please God.

The Pope's address was well-reasoned and researched and in context it is a humble and rational call to let God be God and let the rest of us serve Him in humility and loving kindness. The Pope's point was that good behavior will attract far more adherents to faith than acts of violence and compulsion (the latter is specifically forbidden by the Koran).

The Pope's trip to Turkey is an example of a biblical mandate to "love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you." (Luke 6:27-28) The question is, will such a peaceful and kind demonstration of Christian faith impress and persuade those of the Muslim faith for whom offense too often appears to be a part of faith.

Jesus preached and demonstrated turning the other cheek and what came to be known as the Golden Rule ("Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"). The two faiths seem in conflict between those who would turn the check and those who would strike the cheek; between those who take offense at everything and He who remained silent while He was spat upon, cursed, mocked and crucified.

The Pope has put himself at physical risk by going to Turkey. But God put Himself "at risk" by coming to Earth and offering Himself as a sacrifice for our sins. Who is setting the better example for his faith?

By Cal Thomas  |  November 28, 2006; 11:36 AM ET
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: The Flavor of Thanksgiving | Next: Praise More Desirable Now Than Condemnation

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Google is the best search engine Google

Posted by: Kristen Stoltz | May 18, 2007 4:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

I strongly support the Papal visit to Turkey, and look forward especially to his visit to Istanbul, where Christian, Jewish and Muslim spiritual leaders frequently mingle, and church bells and Islamic calls to prayer intermix..

As for suicide bombers, it is explicitly banned in the Koran to commit suicide.. There are more than a billion Muslims in this world, from Bosnia, to Turkey to Indonesia, and the overwhelming majority is saddened and shocked when they hear terrorist acts. Please stop branding these crazy guys as Muslims, they are not Muslims! they carry a political agenda and commit acts any true Muslim vehemently opposes.

Posted by: Mary Elizabeth Dunn | November 28, 2006 4:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yes, just because there are "turn the other cheek" Christians and Muslims doesn't mean that the violence in the world will stop. We will still have incidents like the Oklahoma City bombing and 9/11, we will still have wars like Iraq and Darfur.

I think that you can only save yourself from your animal nature.

Posted by: FRIEND | November 28, 2006 4:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Question. Were the Muslims that hijacked the airplanes and flew them into the WTC born with that attitude or did they get it through being indoctrinated into the Muslim FAITH?

It doesn't matter that there are "turn the other cheek" Muslims. There will always be Muslims like the ones who did the deed, 9-11-2001. Well, only as long as there are Muslims. They seem to be self destructing. Before anyone can make peace with them they must make peace with themselves.

Posted by: yestme | November 28, 2006 3:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think the anger has only a little to do with the Pope's comments. The anger is brought on by the inequalities and past confrontations of the two great peoples.

I think there are people in both Christianity and Islam that have a 'turn the other cheek' philosophy. In both peoples, the powerful, the desperate, and the gullible are drawn into the violence and can sometimes justify it through their particular interpretations of the holy books.

Posted by: FRIEND | November 28, 2006 2:13 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thanks Cal, for being willing to put yourself out here on the line for your faith. I read your columns and articles with pleasure as many Believers do. I urge all who call themselves Believers and Followers in Christ (the word Christian is way too watered-down) to be as bold as Cal Thomas.

As an answer to your question, I must ask a question. Do we (Believers) really understand the beliefs of Islamic followers? Or do we press our faith onto theirs in order to make sense out of it? It seems that the latter is true to me. We cannot understand how a person would die in a suicide bombing raid but would we not gladly die to persecution before we betrayed our Lord? We are identified as Believers in Christ by our love for others just as the Islamic followers are now being identified by their hatred for us. Both are equally strong examples of their respective faith.

I question the Pope's trip to Turkey as religious or as showing love to those who hate and spitefully use us. I think he travels for political reasons. He can never persuade others to faith in Christ, that is the Holy Spirit's job, but he can definitely sow the seed of God's Word. I think he missed a great opportunity to do that when he first insulted his audience. How can they hear without the preacher?

Posted by: MARK EATON | November 28, 2006 1:49 PM
Report Offensive Comment

He/she will justify the killing as "call" from allah. All anyone needs to do anything (murder, rape, theft etc.) is the "call" from god. "God told me" is good enough for many people and all the justification they need.

Posted by: Real | November 28, 2006 1:38 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Yeah. And I take a risk every time I drive a car. It's a calculated risk and he took it to score political points with his base constituency.

If there was any real risk, and if he really believed the dogma he preaches, he would go to Turkey on a donkey, carrying nothing but an olive branch. I'm sure God would protect hm.

Posted by: smafdy | November 28, 2006 1:35 PM
Report Offensive Comment

IF ANYONE UNJUSTLY KILLS A PERSON, IT IS AS IF THEY HAVE KILLED ALL OF HUMANITY.
Qu'ranic verse

Of course there is no justification for such an action. Anyone who would do such a heinous act is not muslim, but a crazy person.

Posted by: Victoria | November 28, 2006 1:24 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The pope is in danger. He is not welcome in muslim countries.

If a muslim "hears the voice" of Allah to kill the pope than he/she will try. Because he/she is "called" upon to kill him in the name of their religion.

Anyone can justify anything in the name of their religion. Does that sound reasonable?

Posted by: Real | November 28, 2006 1:12 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I think the Pope would do well to say "Mea culpa" first- rather than throwing the first stone. I don't believe the remark was taken out of context because there was no following disclaimer- no disassociation by Benedict after the comment. If there were such a benign intention- the inference would not have been made. The question should not be shifted to the response of the muslim community- but the motive behind what he surely knew would be an incendiary quote. Bt including this condemnatory quote- there is an implied comlicity in his sympathies which Benedict never explains. The entire speech goes on to claim to be endorse reason in faith- but such an inflammatory and accusatory quote at the outset, somewhat belies any declarations of reason due to the fact that it is an unreasonable asessment of a particular faith. I wouldn't address an audience with an opening quote from Hitler, say, and not expect a response from the Jewish or Roma or Jehovah's Witnesses or homosexual contingents who might be offended by such an assertion.
The Pope is knowingly keeping the pot stirred by going to Turkey...let's not forget he is opposed to their inclusion in the EU- so I do question your asessment at the innocuous nature of his visit there.
peace

Posted by: Victoria | November 28, 2006 1:09 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company