Brad Hirschfield
Rabbi, President of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership

Brad Hirschfield

Named as one of the nation’s 50 most influential rabbis in Newsweek, and one of the top 30 “Preachers and Teachers” by Beliefnet.com.

 ALL POSTS

The Dangerous Hypocrisy of Theocrats

How would you respond to radical Muslim clerics in northwest Pakistan -- now under Islamic law -- who are calling for expansion of Islamic law across the entire federal republic of Pakistan. Should any nation be governed by religious rules.

The real debate here is about who decides what's right for people, people themselves or God. That's the difference between the democracies in which we all want to live and the theocracies which some hope to create both in Pakistan and right here at home. Yes, that's right, I said in which we all want to live, even the theocrats. They just hate to admit it.

The irony is that even for the theocrats it's a matter of choice - they choose to hear the call of God in a particular way and therefore would like to establish a government which accords with their hearing. I appreciate that desire. I even sympathize with it, since I assume that all well-meaning people aspire to use their most deeply held values to establish what they deem to be the best form of government.

The problem I have with the theocrats is not simply the many conclusions they reach with which I disagree. After all, they have the same problem with me! And it's not that I am certain I am right and they are wrong, either. Were that the case I would be guilty of the same arrogance which I find so noxious in them.

The problem I have, and we should all have, is with any group, religious or secular, which seeks to strip from others the very rights and liberties which they themselves hold dear. And no matter how often someone thumps their Bible, Torah, or Qur'an, telling us that they are only doing "what God says", the bottom line is that they have chosen to follow that path.

I know of no contemporary theocrat who reports being coerced into their particular theo-political posture. They should admit that and then accord the rest of the same freedom. Failing to do otherwise marks them as mean-spirited hypocrites who would do to others precisely what they experience being unfairly done to them. And that politics of revenge is something which no healthy political system can tolerate. Not to mention it being a deeply sick twist on the notion of doing unto others....

By Brad Hirschfield  |  April 23, 2009; 7:48 AM ET
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Fundamentalism the Real Issue in Religious Rule | Next: Totalitarians in Religious Clothing

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



i believe individuals who happen to be muslim share the innate desires for peace, love and harmony, but,

HELP!!!!

i've been asking this question over and over (apologies to those who've seen it) on various threads, but still no answer:

are there verses you can quote from the koran (that were not later superseded by the ugly medina verses) and hadith that promote tolerance, fairness, equality, freedom of religion, self-determination etc...?
please, i would really like to know.

Posted by: walter-in-fallschurch | April 27, 2009 10:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Nice article, Rabbi, saying what you mean, there.

Just for discussion, though:

"The real debate here is about who decides what's right for people, people themselves or God."

Or is phrasing the question that way exactly what leads to all this tragedy and corruption?

Actually, perhaps the elephant in the room is that it's a lot easier to phrase things this way and claim to 'speak for God' than it is to actually *do* it. Especially when constrained by the further demands of a religion that constitutes a rival authority.

Frankly, I think the religions which have the most obvious problems governing without corrupting both... are religions which structurally *are* attempting to be books of law and forms of government. Of course there's a rivalry: it's 'serving two masters' as the monotheists say.

"The irony is that even for the theocrats it's a matter of choice - they choose to hear the call of God in a particular way and therefore would like to establish a government which accords with their hearing. I appreciate that desire. I even sympathize with it, since I assume that all well-meaning people aspire to use their most deeply held values to establish what they deem to be the best form of government."

I wonder if that isn't a monotheist problem.

My most deeply-held values about the best form of government, (well, I suppose they take different shapes in different lives, ...the *deepest* values, perhaps, one learns along the way, whatever the source, if you need a source beyond who and what we are...)

...My most deeply-held values about good government, though, these are things we *bring before the Gods* not claim *came from them* and are to be imposed.

I *really* believe in this America thing, and that's the kind of creature I'll *be* when I next meet the Gods in the way most like you may relate to.

All due props to Deities involved, (it's a co-creative process in many Pagan views) ...but stuff we made out of it is stuff we made out of it. We should be doing all our Gods proud, *facing *them,* rather than turning around and claiming, 'Obey! They *command* what someone cames up with.'

Posted by: Paganplace | April 25, 2009 3:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

We should appreciate & recognize the historical & ongoing value of the U.S. Constitutional seperation of church & state along w/ freedom religion & no religious test for office...
Our historical rejection of theocratic governments has enabled people to worship or not worship God as they choose w/out officially supported coercion or intimidation...which has often happened in nations w/ state religions

Posted by: Civilius | April 24, 2009 9:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The problem with theocracies and well as many religions is that someone one decides what God wants and anyone who disagrees with that person is speaking heresy. The problem with a theocracy is that it pretends to gives someone power that only God can give. To me saying you are God's choosen to rule is blasphemy. And saying that you know without a doubt how God wish's to rule is blasphemy.

Posted by: Nosmanic | April 23, 2009 11:33 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company