Brad Hirschfield
Rabbi, President of the National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership

Brad Hirschfield

Named as one of the nation’s 50 most influential rabbis in Newsweek, and one of the top 30 “Preachers and Teachers” by Beliefnet.com.

 ALL POSTS

Good News for Whom?

This week’s release of a manifesto signed by a group of Evangelical Christian leaders is good news for all of us, but is not without its problems. Before addressing that issue however, the direct question is about the definition of the term evangelical itself. In my mind, an Evangelical is one who believes in the Good News of Jesus as savior and seeks to spread that News as widely as possible.

Contrary to what many expect and most Jews fear though, spreading the News is not always about conversion. To be sure, my experience of most Evangelical Christians is that they hope for it, but that their sense of mission is far richer and more complex -- based on the notion that everything they do, can serve as a witness to the good news in which they believe and which they hope all will eventually share.

The good news about this new manifesto is that it uncouples the presumed linkage between this particular faith and a particular set of political policies and prescriptions. For example, there is no necessary correlation between being a good evangelical and being a good Republican. This is good news for anyone, including myself, who shares the evangelical position that our most deeply held religious beliefs, should be relevant to our political, social, and cultural aspirations, but is concerned about failing to see how those beliefs can be manifested by politicians with widely divergent policies.

For example, might one not argue that supporting gay marriage is actually a pro-family position consistent with a portion of traditional beliefs, even if it runs counter to common Evangelical understandings of the biblical ban on homosexuality? Might one not argue that a pro-capital punishment policy on the part of some Evangelicals runs against the mercy of God which should be witnessed on Earth?

Anything which sensitively argues for the fuller inclusion of our most deeply held beliefs while opening up the range of possible understandings of those beliefs is for me, a good thing. On the other hand, there are lines in this manifesto which make me pause.

While I appreciate the signators disavowal of coercion in any form, be it political, spiritual or cultural, as an appropriate means of sharing the good news of their faith, the fact remains that they do affirm their belief that their faith in Jesus is the only complete truth and the only means through which one can be saved.

Since I do not share their concern with that kind of salvation, their belief in it does not bother me. But the fact is that every tradition or culture which imagines that ultimately everyone must be like them ends up doing some pretty dangerous things. And for that, this document needs to be more accountable….but so do members of any community, including my own, when their redemptive expectations are paired with real political or military power.

Finally, the claim that Evangelicals are defined theologically and not politically, socially or culturally is specious. The truth is that their theological beliefs shape the other three realities, nor can they escape the fact that those beliefs are in turn influenced by them. Like all of us, they understand their faith within the context of their political, social and cultural experience.

This is not a claim for the relativism which would make them, and me for that matter, cringe. It is a plea to admit that none of us can rise above that fact and must therefore practice our faith with more than a little humility. Not so much that we experience the paralyzes of most post-moderns, but just enough to remember that not only we, but our understanding of that which we believe, may in fact be fallible.

By Brad Hirschfield  |  May 15, 2008; 11:06 AM ET  | Category:  Theology
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Obama and the Muslims | Next: Evangelicals are Not Weird

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Carol:

Re: Your comments

Absolutely, I agree. Jews have to come out of the closet and take their books with them. Let there be light. I've found that some Christians are quite interested in Jewish self-understanding, even to the point of being annoyed that their previous instruction led them to believe that Judaism was the equivalent of the "Old Testament."

Enough with diffidence.

Posted by: Josh | May 21, 2008 3:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The irony of both Christianity and Catholicism is that they know absolutely nothing about the faith they presume to have replaced.

Part of the problem resides with us Jews, who continue to try to translate Judaism in terms they "know" and that we think they will understand.

Hence, one sees such abominations as "the Jews believe in Yahweh," a nineteenth-century German scholarly construction, having nothing to do with the observance of Judaism.

It is up to us, either to get back into the conversion business or to patiently explain the rudiments of Judaism to them, once they start extolling.

Posted by: Carol | May 19, 2008 11:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Where did you get the idea that all Christians are stamped out as with a cookie cutter? While we share certain beliefs we have many different ways of worship.

Posted by: Garyd | May 15, 2008 6:16 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Thank you, Rabbi. I agree. I'm a Jewish interfaith activist in Memphis, TN. I was very impressed with much of the Evangelical statement, e.g. the reference to "the freedom, justice, peace, and well-being that are at the heart of the good news of Jesus"; I can't help but recall that Jesus was Jewish. As a Muslim friend says to me frequently, "There are good people in all religions - people who believe in loving the one God, and loving their neighbor. If we could get together on that and not worry about the minor differences, we could make a great difference in the world."

I recently had occasion to attend a Presbyterian Sunday School one morning, and a Muslim Sunday School the same evening. The texts were different - one a parable from the New Testament, the other a parable from the Koran. But the lesson was identical in both classes: it is appropriate for the believer to pass on the message (of belief) to people, but not appropriate to force the issue. Whether the recipient accepts the message is in the hand of God.

I've seen enough good works done by enough Christians who clearly love their neighbor that I'm not offended when they tell me how the message of Jesus inspires them in that direction. I'll listen when a Christian tells me how Christianity will help the poor, the sick, the stranger. I'm much less interested in hearing that non-belief will cause me to go to hell, or long lectures on the need for forgiveness of sin (which I surely need but can receive from God my own Jewish way, thank you.)

I must admit to being more comfortable in some ways with Islam, which shares the Jewish position that good Christians, good Jews, good Muslims, all go to heaven (in the Jewish phase, "the righteous of all nations have a place in the world to come.")

I often wish Jews were better at spreading the values we have learned from God, and in accepting others into our midst. In the meantime, I give considerable credit to those Christians and Muslims who have been effective at spreading the good lessons of love of God and love of neighbor taught by all three faiths. I'm delighted to see Christianity spread by those who live and spread the Gospel of caring for the sick, the elderly, the poor, the stranger - in ways that address the problems of this world rather than merely "selling tickets to heaven" to those who will profess belief.

Posted by: Edward Ordman | May 15, 2008 3:56 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Rabbi Hirschfield, your even-handedness is appreciated, and I agree with much of what you say here. Here's where I don't quite though:

You write, "...the fact remains that they do affirm their belief that their faith in Jesus is the only complete truth and the only means through which one can be saved."

"...But the fact is that every tradition or culture which imagines that ultimately everyone must be like them ends up doing some pretty dangerous things."

Their affirmation of their faith in Jesus as the way, the truth, and the life is not the same thing as them imagining that everyone must be like them. Catholic me, like them, thinks I'm right, but I in no way think that everyone else must be like me, and I am well aware that I am not omniscient. It'd be nice if they did share my faith, for their own salvation (in my opinion), but it is not for me to decide or vainly attempt to influence God's plans for other people; my own actions are plenty for me to worry about!

Posted by: worth | May 15, 2008 1:06 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Rabbi said "their belief in it does not bother me" It should as they go after the weak, young, and old of those belonging to Judaism. "spreading the News is not always about conversion" It is about destroying thy neighbor. That was why they were sent into the world, and out of Israel. Their existence in the Israel pollutes the Holy Land.

Followers of Jesus,

"shadow of death light is sprung up"

But Jesus said unto him, Follow me; and let the dead bury their dead.

"let the dead bury their dead."
"as he taught in Capernaum."
"he came and dwelt in Capernaum"
"Galilee of the Gentiles"
"The people which sat in darkness saw great light"
"shadow of death light is sprung up"

This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.
These things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.

Now when Jesus had heard that John was cast into prison, he departed into Galilee;
And leaving Nazareth, he came and dwelt in Capernaum, which is upon the sea coast, in the borders of Zabulon and Nephthalim:
That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying,
The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim, by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles;
The people which sat in darkness saw great light; and to them which sat in the region and shadow of death light is sprung up.

Posted by: harold | May 14, 2008 2:14 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company