Pamela K. Taylor

Pamela K. Taylor

co-founder, Muslims for Progressive Values

"On Faith" panelist Pamela K. Taylor is co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values and director of the Islamic Writers Alliance. She is a member of the national board of advisors to the Network of Spiritual Progressives, and served as co-chair of the Progressive Muslim Union for two years. Taylor is a strong supporter of the woman imam movement, which seeks the full participation of Muslim women in every aspect of life, including the pulpit. In July 2005, she became the first woman in centuries to officiate Friday prayers in a mosque when the United Muslim Association of Toronto and the Muslim Canadian Congress invited her to serve as guest imam. (This event followed a number of services, sermons and prayer sessions led by women held in private venues because no mosque agreed to host them.) In February 2006, when the former Grand Mufti of Marseilles visited Toronto, he requested that Taylor lead him in congregational prayer as an unequivocal demonstration of his support for female imams. Taylor has also been active in interfaith dialogue for 20 years, both in local initiatives and speaking at numerous conferences, universities, and churches. She received her MTS from Harvard Divinity School, and writes regularly on spiritual matters and the Islamic faith. She has essays in Nurturing Child and Adolescent Spirituality: Perspectives from the World's Religious Traditions (2006) and the forthcoming The Veil: Women Writers on Its History, Lore, and Politics (2007). She has written hundreds of articles and opinion pieces for newspapers, magazines, and journals, and is an award winning poet. Close.

Pamela K. Taylor

co-founder, Muslims for Progressive Values

"On Faith" panelist Pamela K. Taylor is co-founder of Muslims for Progressive Values and director of the Islamic Writers Alliance. She is a member of the national board of advisors to the Network of Spiritual Progressives, and served as co-chair of the Progressive Muslim Union for two years. Taylor is a strong supporter of the woman imam movement, which seeks the full participation of Muslim women in every aspect of life, including the pulpit. more »

Main Page | Pamela K. Taylor Archives | On Faith Archives


Daily Life is a Jihad

1. WHAT IS JIHAD? UNDER WHAT CONDITIONS DOES ISLAM SANCTION THE USE OF VIOLENCE? WHAT WOULD YOU TELL SUICIDE BOMBERS WHO INVOKE ISLAM TO JUSTIFY THEIR ACTIONS?


The term jihad literally means "struggle" and is understood in the Qur'an to mean struggle for the good -- whether that be an inner struggle for righteousness, or an external struggle for justice. The greatest jihad, according to the Prophet, is the struggle to control one's baser desires. He described the strong man as one who could control his temper, not one who could beat others in a fight.

Accordingly, you will hear many American Muslims describe their daily life as a jihad. In particular, they will refer to the struggle to observe religious laws in a society which presents countless opportunities, incentives, and even pressure to violate them as a jihad. Wearing hijab is often described as a jihad, as it exposes the wearer to constant quetioning and negative judgements. So too observing rules against the consumption of alcohol, which may exclude American Muslims from social and business gatherings, is often seen as a struggle between the desire to get ahead in this world and the desire to uphold Islamic law.

More difficult than either of those is the spiritual quest. At a time when many Muslims feel under seige -- from extremists who are wreaking havoc among our bretheren in the Muslim world and attacking our homes, from Islamophobes who make egregious attacks on Islam itself, and from those who see every Muslim as a potential terrorist -- the challenges to American Muslims' faith and spirituality have never been greater.

For many of us, 9-11 was a shock not only because our homeland had been attacked in a horrific manner, but because people calling themselves Muslims had done it. It provoked a deep spiritual crisis within the community, making us question if fundamental beliefs that Islam is a religion of peace, inclusive, and teaching intercommunal harmony were indeed accurrate, making us confront questions of how devout Muslim could have come to the conclusion that such a vile act could ever be justified as Islamic. For some it was a wakeup call that they could not turn a blind eye to the extremism festering within our midst; for others it was more tempting to simply walk away from the Muslim community, to say these people are not my people. For a large part of the community, this spiritual crisis resulted in denial that 9-11 and other acts of terrorism were committed by Muslims at all.

Whatever the spiritual response, the struggle to hold onto one's faith, to continue to improve one's character, to reach out to others through good deeds, has indeed been an intense struggle for many American Muslims. Many of us feel caught between the need to defend Islam from those who defame it through fear, ignorance or malice, the imperative to support those Muslims who have been unfairly targete in the war on terror, and the clear and desperate need for reform within Muslim communities, whether it be confronting extremism or oppressive governments.

Slight wonder then, that daily life is seen as a jihad by many American Muslims.

This inner aspect of jihad is, of course, not the only manifestation of struggle. The Prophet told us, "When you see an evil action you must change it with your hand; if you cannot do so, with your tongue; if you cannot do so, change it with your heart." (Bukhari and Muslim) He described jihad as being with the tongue, the pen, the hand and the sword.

The first refers to sermons, lectures, exhorting one another to good. The second includes scholarly work, jurisprudence, articles, inspirational poetry. The third is working for good with your wealth and your time -- charity and volunteerism. The last refers to military struggle.

Depsite the many charges that Islam requires Muslims to slay all non-Muslims until they agree to convert, this is not the case. Rather jihad by the sword is specifically to relieve oppression. The Qur'an says, "How could you refuse to fight in the cause of God and of the utterly helpless men and women and children who are crying, "Oh our Sustainer! Lead us forth out of this land whose people are opressors, and raise for us, out of Your Grace, a protector, and raise for us, out of your Grace, one who will bring us succor!" (4:75)

It also is ruled by strict limitations. It is not to be aggressive, only defensive as God says, "Fight in God's cause against those who wage war against you, but do not commit aggression, for, verily, God does not love the aggressors." (2:190) If the other party sues for peace, then the Muslim side should cease fighting. "But if they desist, then let all hositlity cease, save for those who continue to commit oppression." (2:193) The Prophet further stipulated that in the course of warfare, non-combatants should not be harmed, nor should buildings, orchards, or farmland be destroyed. The Qur'an also tells us that our response should be commensurate with the provocation. "And one who attacks you, attack him in like manner as he attacked you." (2:194).

These precepts, coupled with the Prophet's teaching that suicide is a sin, make it clear that terrorist acts such as 9-11, the London, Bali and Madrid bombings cannot be justified by the Qur'an or the Prophet's words. Any attempt to do so by certain Muslim factions is illegitimate, dervied by twisting some texts and purposefully ignoring others.

At the same time, it is also quite clear that the Qur'an does not preach universal and unilateral pacifism. If all other means -- jihad via tongue and pen, ie negotiation and diplomacy -- fail, Muslims should stand up against oppression, aggression, and injustice militarily. It is a precept that I find resonant with the values I grew up with in New England, where the slogan "Give me Liberty or give me death!" was commonly championed.

2. HOW DOES ISLAM DEFINE APOSTASY? IS IT PERMISSIBLE FOR A MUSLIM TO CONVERT TO ANOTHER FAITH? HOW CAN LAWS AGAINST APOSTASY AND BLASPHEMY BE RECONCILED WITH THE KORANIC INJUNCTION OF "NO COMPULSION IN RELIGION"?

I believe that the classical laws regarding apostasy are wrong. Not only are they in direct conflict with the Qur'anic injunction, "Let there be no compulsion in religion," they ignore various other passages of the Qur'an which discuss the person who believes and then disbelieves.

For instance:

2:217: (...) if any of you turn back from their faith and die in unbelief, their works will bear no fruit in this life and in the Hereafter; they will be companions of the Fire and will abide therein

3:86 How shall Allah guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and (after) they bore witness that the messenger is true and after clear proofs had come unto them. And Allah guideth not wrongdoing folk

3:90 Lo! those who disbelieve after their belief, and afterward grow violent in disbelief: their repentance will not be accepted. And such are those who are astray.

4:137 Lo! those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe, and disbelieve, and then increase in disbelief, Allah will never pardon them, nor will He guide them unto a way.

Clearly, in all these instances, apsotasy goes without any worldly punishment.

Similarly blasphemy. Freedom of conscience is guaranteed by the verse which states there is to be no compulsion in religion. It is further bolstered by numerous assertions in the Qur'an that no soul is responsible for another -- thus while we should encourage good, and should disseminate what we believe are true teachings, it is not our place to force others to follow. Nor is it our place to punish those who believe differently than we do. Rather we are to leave it in God's hands to judge. (see for instance 2:113, 3:55, 7:87)

Equally important we see this put in practice by the Prophet and by his companions. The Prophet encouraged people to speak freely, and said that differences of opinion among his followers were a blessing from Allah. (reported in Bayhaqi)

A famous incident involves the second caliph Omar, who was pubicly challenged regarding his ruling on dowries. His response, rather than declaring the woman's position blasphemous, as we might see with those who challenge certain shari'ah rulings today, was to declare that he had been wrong.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (202)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.