Michael Otterson

Michael Otterson

Media relations director, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

“On Faith” panelist Michael Otterson has served as director of media relations for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints since 1997. As senior spokesman for the church, Otterson has worked with most major publications, TV and radio networks, and other news media in the United States and overseas on issues ranging from the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City to the Church’s burgeoning international growth and diversity. A convert to the Mormon faith, he worked as a journalist for 11 years before being appointed director of the Church’s public affairs office in London in 1976 – the first such office outside the United States. After opening and managing a new Pacific Area public affairs office in Australia, Otterson moved to the United States in 1991 to help oversee the church’s international public affairs from its Salt Lake City headquarters. In a church that operates worldwide with a lay clergy, Otterson has served twice as a stake president (leader of a group of church congregations), in both England and Australia. He is now a US citizen. Close.

Michael Otterson

Media relations director, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

“On Faith” panelist Michael Otterson has served as director of media relations for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints since 1997. As senior spokesman for the church, Otterson has worked with most major publications, TV and radio networks, and other news media in the United States and overseas on issues ranging from the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City to the Church’s burgeoning international growth and diversity. more »

Main Page | Michael Otterson Archives | On Faith Archives


« Previous Post | Next Post »

No Theological Test for Citizenship

From the beginning of their history, Christians were outsiders.

It was easy for members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the 19th century to see parallels between the New Testament church and their own faith's experience with the American public, which ranged from exclusion to violent persecution. Historians can argue about who was to blame for all of that, but it’s undoubtedly true that to be a Latter-day Saint in those times was to be outside the mainstream, and deliberately so.

How much has changed in a century! Today, Mormons are everywhere. They are your neighbors, the teachers of your school children, your bankers and doctors. They may even be your senators and Congressmen. In that respect, Mormons long ago entered the American mainstream.

Yet this week’s question implies more than whether individual Mormons make good neighbors and citizens. The question behind the question is whether the American public is ready to accept the legitimacy of the Mormon faith as a belief system that should be afforded equal respect alongside more familiar faiths.

This is America. We don't ask Jews to be less Jewish, or Catholics to be less Catholic in order to be a respected part of our multi-faceted society. The differences between Mormons and other Christians are the reasons for our existence as a church. Our understanding of the purpose of life, the nature of God, our relationship to Jesus Christ, and much more, are central to the way Latter-day Saints define themselves, and that ought to be OK with everyone whether they agree or not with the doctrine. Just as there is no religious test for federal office, so there is no theological test for citizenship.

While disagreeing theologically, Mormons have no trouble about embracing Catholics, Baptists and Methodists as fellow Christians, or Jews and Buddhists as respected fellow citizens of faith. Mormons are entitled to the same respect afforded any other part of our society. It is un-American to treat them as one of the last groups about which blatantly intolerant comments are still seen as politically acceptable.

Repeatedly in the past few weeks, major newspapers have suggested that since Mormons are prominent on the political landscape this is a suitable time for a clearer definition of "Mormonism." Some writers have referred to a historical "Mormon moment" or "seminar moment for Mormons." That suggests moving beyond the superficiality with which the news and entertainment media usually treat religion, and more into the type of dialogue that could be fostered by the twin documentaries that aired on PBS earlier this week (American Experience and Frontline).

If there is going to be more open, honest, thoughtful and mutually respectful public discussion about The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, with serious people talking about a serious subject, then I believe Mormons generally will welcome it.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (307)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.