Michael Otterson

Michael Otterson

Media relations director, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

“On Faith” panelist Michael Otterson has served as director of media relations for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints since 1997. As senior spokesman for the church, Otterson has worked with most major publications, TV and radio networks, and other news media in the United States and overseas on issues ranging from the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City to the Church’s burgeoning international growth and diversity. A convert to the Mormon faith, he worked as a journalist for 11 years before being appointed director of the Church’s public affairs office in London in 1976 – the first such office outside the United States. After opening and managing a new Pacific Area public affairs office in Australia, Otterson moved to the United States in 1991 to help oversee the church’s international public affairs from its Salt Lake City headquarters. In a church that operates worldwide with a lay clergy, Otterson has served twice as a stake president (leader of a group of church congregations), in both England and Australia. He is now a US citizen. Close.

Michael Otterson

Media relations director, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

“On Faith” panelist Michael Otterson has served as director of media relations for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints since 1997. As senior spokesman for the church, Otterson has worked with most major publications, TV and radio networks, and other news media in the United States and overseas on issues ranging from the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City to the Church’s burgeoning international growth and diversity. more »

Main Page | Michael Otterson Archives | On Faith Archives


Truly Sorry? Change Your Ways

A couple of years ago there was a knock at the door of my home one Saturday morning and I was greeted by an acquaintance, who asked for a few minutes. Invited inside, he proceeded to explain with some embarrassment how he had done something anonymously that was deliberately intended to hurt my reputation.

The reasons for this are no longer important. His confession took me aback, but his honesty in freely admitting his action, explaining his motive and asking for forgiveness was a remarkable act of personal courage. As he explained the feeling of remorse he had experienced, without any attempt at justification, and told how he had struggled with his action ever since, I found myself dealing not with feelings of anger and resentment on my own part, but of appreciation and respect. Furthermore I began reflecting on my own past actions and wondering how I might have unknowingly contributed to the problem.

I am certain I harbored no lingering ill-feelings, and I haven’t once thought of this incident until this week’s “On Faith” question caused me to reflect on it. But that apology worked for several reasons, all of them essential ingredients in a four-step process of repentance.

First, there has to be recognition that an action is wrong. That’s not always easy because personal pride and self-justification frequently get in the way. Most of us are much better at justifying our actions than assessing them from the viewpoints of others. My friend had the courage to look beyond his own self-interest and recognize what his actions looked like from another’s perspective.

The second step is asking for forgiveness from the wounded party or parties. If the first step is in place – genuine recognition of a mistake – the second is often easier than it might seem. Humans are, in my experience, often quick to forgive if they sense sincerity in the offender.

Public apologies, especially, have to be thoroughly genuine. If there is the slightest hint that the apology is merely a result of getting caught, or intended to deflect a threat to job or social position, it will ring hollow and impress no one.

Third is the issue of restitution. This means fixing the damage as far as is possible – compensating or restoring what was taken, whether material goods or damaged feelings or something else.

And fourth is the acid test of repentance. We don’t repeat the wrong. This may be the ultimate measure of sincerity, whether the apology is publicly or privately expressed.

Repentance and forgiveness are at the core of the gospel of Jesus Christ, because what the Lord wants from us ultimately is improved behavior. Jesus said plenty about repentance and forgiveness, and left us a pretty good formula for social harmony. It beats nurturing grudges and brooding about retribution.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (258)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.