Martin Marty

Martin Marty

Award-winning author and professor emeritus, University of Chicago

Martin E. Marty is Fairfax M. Cone Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus at the University of Chicago, where he taught religious history, chiefly in the Divinity School, for 35 years, and where the Martin Marty Center has been founded to promote “public religion” endeavors. For a decade prior to entering academia, the “On Faith” panelist served parishes in the west and northwest suburbs of Chicago as an ordained Lutheran pastor. Marty is the author of more than 50 books including Righteous Empire: The Protestant Experience in America (1970), for which he won the National Book Award. His additional honors include the National Humanities Medal, the Medal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the University of Chicago Alumni Medal, the Distinguished Service Medal of the Association of Theological Schools, and the Order of Lincoln Medallion (Illinois’ top honor). Marty has served as president of the American Academy of Religion, the American Society of Church History, and the American Catholic Historical Association. He also has served on two U.S. Presidential Commissions and was director of the Fundamentalism Project of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the Public Religion Project at the University of Chicago. He is Senior Regent of St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota. Close.

Martin Marty

Award-winning author and professor emeritus, University of Chicago

Martin E. Marty is Fairfax M. Cone Distinguished Service Professor Emeritus at the University of Chicago, where he taught religious history, chiefly in the Divinity School, for 35 years, and where the Martin Marty Center has been founded to promote “public religion” endeavors. more »

Main Page | Martin Marty Archives | On Faith Archives


« Previous Post | Next Post »

Prayers in the Senate "To Whom it May Concern"

It is important to separate three questions:

First: should there be prayers to open U. S. Senate sessions?

Second: should Hindus and others of "other religions" be assigned the task of offering prayer there?

Third: is the extraordinary occasion of a Hindu prayer a good opportunity to debate the first question?

While siding with James Madison that it is important to draw a line of distinction between religion and the civil authorities (often called "separation of church and state," I am among those who would not make an absolutely tidy solution to issues connected with it. That is, to promote NEW activities which gives legal support to worship activities in public places and on public occasions, it seems to many of us that time-honored customs, so deeply ingrained in culture and custom that few notice them, can be allowed to survive.

The cost of purging the public sphere of all historic traces is probably higher than the beneficial results of doing so might be. The "new" ones tend to be "in your face:" "we" and "our religion" belong, and "you and "yours" don't. So I'd fight about the appropriateness of "establishing" and paying for Senate chaplaincy some other day.

Would the case have come up had there not been Wiccan, or Hindu, or Muslim prayers? No doubt senate chaplaincy is debated from time to time, but when a non-Jew, non-Christian prays the debate takes on a different, more volatile character. It is hard to see on what grounds one can favor one group's prayers and exclude another's (all things being equal!) In a pluralistic society, prayers designed to favor and please one assertive and overly-defined constituency at the expanse of others seems manifestly unfair.

The cynic might say--and some mornings it is hard to wake up without carrying a bit of cynicism with one--that the prayers are all right because they don't mean anything anyhow. If particular, they are offensive; if general, they are still rooted in particular communities (e.g., Jewish, Chrsitian), but more likely are so bland and unnoticeable that they might well be thought of as praying directed "to whom it may concern."

Prayer means something, means more, when it grows out of the stories and devotion and practices of praying communities, nurtured in church and synagogue and mosque, than it does when everything is flattened out to appeal to a general public in a general way.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (32)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.