What Islam Really Says About Violence, Rights and Other Religions
Gomaa, Fadlallah, Mubarak, Khan, Siddiqi, Ellison, others | On Faith
What Islam Really Says About Violence, Rights and Other Religions
Gomaa, Fadlallah, Mubarak, Khan, Siddiqi, Ellison, others | On Faith
All Comments (16)
uistn unyslafj vejpq nxairo lmai hdatqfwjo unjyqdp
June 8, 2007 3:21 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on June 8, 2007 03:21
uistn unyslafj vejpq nxairo lmai hdatqfwjo unjyqdp
June 8, 2007 3:20 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on June 8, 2007 03:20
uistn unyslafj vejpq nxairo lmai hdatqfwjo unjyqdp
June 8, 2007 3:19 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on June 8, 2007 03:19
uistn unyslafj vejpq nxairo lmai hdatqfwjo unjyqdp
June 8, 2007 3:18 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on June 8, 2007 03:18
I agree. Religion is a private matter best left up to the student's parents.
Besides, there are not enough experts who can actually teach an intelligent, well-rounded course in comparative or historical religions to support such a mandate. Not to mention there is no money in the budget to pay such instructors.
March 13, 2007 2:36 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 13, 2007 14:36
Watch this video from a US soldier about atrocities he and other US soldiers commit on a daily basis in Iraq against innocent people:
http://www.turntoislam.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4315
March 12, 2007 11:18 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 12, 2007 23:18
Eve Favorite,
The martini secret, quantity of water = quantity of vermouth, was given to me by a great gentleman, who was an active Episcopalian.
They (the northeastern Episcopalians) really do know their martinis, and that the grass isn't any greener in Nigeria.
Best wishes.
March 12, 2007 11:32 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 12, 2007 11:32
David R.,
I agree with your aims and goals. I just think that in many school districts, you won't see what you'd like. Rather, lots of implicit and explicit indoctrination, and an ambience of "this course points the way to salvation".
Regards.
March 12, 2007 11:20 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 12, 2007 11:20
Great to hear, Norrie - I noticed with relief that you seemed pretty relaxed on another thread (in a reference to Episcopalians' preferred cocktails)
March 11, 2007 10:34 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 11, 2007 22:34
E Favorite,
I appreciate your concern for my well-being, I really do.
But in this religious cyber-universe, it's so much more fun, it really is, to be overwrought.
And in this non-cyberworld of Iraq etc., I really need some fun!
But thanks, E Favorite - and watch your cholesterol!
Best wishes.
March 11, 2007 5:12 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 11, 2007 17:12
Norrie - did we read the same article?
You say:
Georgia's law is about...scripture's self assertion that it is religious truth....
No objective scrutiny or alternative views to the Biblical text are being presented.
Georgia is teaching religion, fundamentalist born-again religion, in the public schools - no way around it."
Norrie - I'm afraid this subject is making you frantic. The course hasn't even been taught yet, so you can't possibly know how it's going to be going to be handled.
Seriously - I suggest you contact the Georgia Board of Ed. and find out exactly what their plans are. If it turns out to be your worst fears, then contact spearation of church and state groups and get them on the job.
But please, don't work yourself into a frenzy without all the facts -- that's what overly zealous religious people do.
March 11, 2007 4:26 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 11, 2007 16:26
(Sorry, Anonymous was me, forgot my name.)
Norrie: Well, then they are teaching religion, and it does not belong in a public school. But I don't then see how this is pertinent at all to the question of whether schools should teach *about* religion, in order to prevent exactly the kind of narrow cultural education you're describing. It should be made clear to the people who are tasked with teaching the curriculum that the classes are not for their moral or religious betterment, but rather to make them aware of what goes and has gone on in the world and why.
I don't know about making such a class mandatory, because I can hardly quantify what makes each class in a school important, but the option should at the very least be available. It is an undeniably important area, and it is an area in which many people grow up extremely ignorant.
March 11, 2007 3:21 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 11, 2007 03:21
Bravo, Bishop.
March 10, 2007 10:11 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 10, 2007 22:11
Anonymous,
Yes, they are. Georgia's law is about teaching scripture, including scripture's self assertion that it is religious truth.
No other scriptures (Islamic, Buddhist, etc.) are being taught.
No objective scrutiny or alternative views to the Biblical text are being presented.
Georgia is teaching religion, fundamentalist born-again religion, in the public schools - no way around it.
March 10, 2007 11:45 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 10, 2007 11:45
Teaching religion and teaching about it are rather different things.
March 10, 2007 3:01 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 10, 2007 03:01
Bishop Sisk,
You're right. This AP/WAPO story shows why:
HOT OFF THE WIRE:
"Georgia public schools move towards teaching Bible
"By DOUG GROSS
Associated Press
Thursday, March 8, 2007; 9:16 PM"
ON THE FRONT PAGE OF THE WAPO TODAY
Notice that no other religion's scriptures are being taught.
Want to bet on whether the classes will have an Episcopal or a Fundamentalist cast to them?
This Georgia law shows exactly why religion should not be taught in the public schools!
March 9, 2007 10:05 PM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on March 9, 2007 22:05