Mark S. Sisk

Mark Sisk

Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of New York

The Right Rev. Mark Sean Sisk has been Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, one of the Episcopal Church’s largest dioceses with over 200 congregations since 2001. Before returning to New York as Bishop Coadjutor in 1998, the "On Faith" panelist served for 14 years as President and Dean of Seabury-Western Theological Seminary in Evanston, Illinois. The bishop also worked as a parish priest for 10 years before his predecessor Bishop Paul Moore asked him to join his staff as Archdeacon of Westchester, Putnam and Rockland Counties in New York. Mission, worship and nurture are the three main focus areas of Sisk’s episcopacy. At the root of each is the promise of keeping our Lord and our faith centered in our lives while we work together to help the most vulnerable in our society. He believes that his and other moderate, socially conscious Christian viewpoints need to be heard. It is his hope to function as a bridge-builder in dealing with the important social issues confronting us as a nation. Sisk earned a degree in economics from the University of Maryland and a Masters of Divinity at General Theological Seminary in New York. He was ordained in 1967. Close.

Mark Sisk

Bishop, Episcopal Diocese of New York

The Right Rev. Mark Sean Sisk has been Bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of New York, one of the Episcopal Church’s largest dioceses with over 200 congregations since 2001. Before returning to New York as Bishop Coadjutor in 1998, the "On Faith" panelist served for 14 years as President and Dean of Seabury-Western Theological Seminary in Evanston, Illinois. more »

Main Page | Mark Sisk Archives | On Faith Archives


Morally Wrong to Abandon Iraq Simply To Save Ourselves

War is evil. War represents a failure of leadership. Nevertheless, as this is a far from perfect world, I believe that there are times when war can be justified.

Theories of when a war can be justified are practical and widely embraced, especially amongst our nation’s military leaders. To be considered a just war the conflict needs to be the last resort to settling a dispute, it must be defensive in nature; it must have clear objectives; operationally, it must be proportional to the threat, and it must have a good chance of success with minimum loss of life.

Additionally, the target of attack must be combatants. Not only are non-combatants illegitimate targets, excessive non-combatant casualties disqualifies the conflict as just in any sense.

Though this theoretical understanding of just war provides a useful framework for considering war, it hardly answers all the questions. It leaves plenty of room for argument when faced with the practical realities of any given situation. However, it is now clear that, contrary to the President’s original claims, this war fails to meet virtually all of the standards that might qualify it as just.

Among the gravest moral dangers of this war however, is the extent to which we, as a nation, have been led to embrace the tactics of our terrorist enemy. I think especially of our present Administration’s acceptance of torture as though it were a legitimate tactic in the war against torturers. Or the secret prisons in which the innocent as well as the guilty have been swept up into silence; a terrorist tactic against terrorists. We are a better nation than that.

We, as well as the courageous and loyal men and women of our armed forces who follow the orders of their commanders, deserve much more than this from our leaders.

But we have what we have: a tragic war of our instigation which is leveling a society. We have ignited a conflagration we do not understand and can not control. We are obligated to return to civilized standards for conducting war even when our opponents do not behave in a civilized manner and to recognize that we cannot fix what we have broken, though we may, working with others, be able to be part of that fixing.

Having unleashed this pandemonium of tribal blood-letting it would be wrong of us to abandon the field simply to save our own lives.

We must take those steps that will, as quickly as possible, bring to an end the civil war that is engulfing Iraq. Many argue that the way to do that is to get out of the middle of it by bringing our troops home. Apparently the President believes that the war must be escalated to be resolved.

He needs to make the case why he is right this time when he has been so wrong for so long.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (31)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.