Lisa Miller

Lisa Miller

Belief Watch

“On Faith” panelist Lisa Miller is a senior editor at Newsweek. She oversees all of the magazine's religion coverage and writes the regular "Belief Watch column. She edited Newsweek’s “Spirituality in America” double issue, which looked at the rise of spirituality and why many Americans are choosing to seek spiritual experiences outside traditional religions. She has supervised publication of major cover stories including “Sex, Shame and the Catholic Church,” (March 2002), “The Bible and the Qur’an,” (February 2002), “Fighting Addiction,” (February 2001), and “God and the Brain,” (May 2001). Miller came to Newsweek from the Wall Street Journal, where she was an award-winning senior special writer covering religion for the paper’s front page since 1997. Prior to the Journal, Miller worked at the New Yorker, Self magazine and Harvard Business Review. In 1998, she won a New York Newswomen’s Club award for feature writing. She earned a B.A. in English from Ohio’s Oberlin College. Miller is writing a book about contemporary beliefs and conceptions of heaven. Close.

Lisa Miller

Belief Watch

“On Faith” panelist Lisa Miller is a senior editor at Newsweek. She oversees all of the magazine's religion coverage and writes the regular "Belief Watch column. more »

Main Page | Lisa Miller Archives | On Faith Archives | Belief Watch


Wright Shows He's No Politician

His talk on Monday showed him to be a complex figure--a man of great intelligence and vision who, in a sense, is refusing in spite of Obama’s declining poll numbers to stop preaching the message he’s preached all along.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (18)

ubuibiok:

I think that Rev. Wright has stumbled into a very large fortune...that fancy DVD everone was showing was copyright protected. Who's laughing now ?

Milton Richardson:

Good job Lisa, I think you treated Wright fairly.

Thomas Baum:

There is a lot of talk about "black churches" and "white churches", what about "Jesus's Church"?

Take care, be ready.

Sincerely, Thomas Paul Moses Baum.

Garyd:

More excuses for lying from the pulpit what a shame.

The problem is that there are far too many Jeremiah Wright's in the Black community and to few Obama's and Cosby's.

Hoping For the Best:

It is my deepest wish that Americans would get to a place in which we allowed ourselves to take opportunities like this to grow through the past that plague us. But our egotistical need to see only from our own prospective is what is going to keep our country the "greatest country in the world" in name only.

I am discouraged as I listen to the rhetorical regarding the comments of Rev. Wright. I am saddened that a person could serve a community for the equivalent of someone’s lifetime and all the blood, sweat and tears that are invested in that service would be reduced to a few sound bites cleverly feed to mass media. Frankly, I am taken aback that we are unable to get past the words of a preacher (spoken in “his house,” never-the-less) and move into what is felt by many people OF this country as the spoken word that best represents the experiences of their lives, simply due to a roll of the pigmentation dice.

After we are finished debating who is right and who is wrong, it is my hope that we focus on a few facts:

Racism still exists and many people are expectedly and unexpectedly affected by it on a daily basis. Rev. Wright lives (and preaches) from his prospective, because that is human nature – we all engage in this way of living. Rev. Wright’s constituents are mostly African American and irrespective of your economical status; racism becomes the common denominator of people of color. When one is dealing with a force that you feel more aggressively than you can articulate, one needs a common ground for deliverance – the black church becomes that source. It is difficult for white people to fully understand the affects of racism, because it is not their experience. Starting an honest dialogue about racism is scary; so many people would rather debate the superficial definition of the term, rather than discuss how to abolish the behavior.

But as Americans, claiming to live in the “greatest country in the world,” we can continue to ignore the feces spreading from the proverbial elephant in our proverbial room and watch our society continue to crumble due to old beliefs and ill feelings from the past. Or we can pay attention to our past and learn how to create a better future for our children and grandchildren.

I personally have hope for the latter.

BGone:

SOMEONE said, "Right now, Wright is enjoying the attention, and most importantly, the money."

The money says it all. Preacher is a **cushy** job that can bring in the big bucks. There are a lot of starving preachers no doubt but there are big successes like America's pastor Billy G. Rich is a word that has been associated with high faith since Constantine decreed tithing. And yes, there are the intangibles, status, prestige, attention and more.

How much does preaching contribute to the economy? How much does it take out of the economy? Somewhere I heard that all issues are economic. Could that be so? There are those things money can't buy like love and we know churches are bubbling over with love of God.

Makes one wonder what gives when Jesus said, "sell all your earthly possessions and distribute to the poor" when preachers, black ones perhaps more than white, prey upon the poor in the name of Jesus. Did Jeremiah ever give that "off the shelf" sermon about how much more Jesus loves the poor woman that gave half of her money even though it was a pittance compared to the amount given by the rich man who only gave a small percentage of all he had?

Paganplace:

In an ideal world, Wright's speech (I saw the second half and some bits from earlier on, ) would highlight the *big differences* between himself and Obama.

I found Wright pretty impressive, actually, but it should be obvious that Obama's by no means in lockstep with the guy, as the media and Swiftboaters want to lead people to think.

Once again, of course, the media leapt to label things and make it about Obama.

Frankly, there's a difference between a message given and what message is taken away. The Wright press conference should have made this obvious to all.

Someone:

Wright doesn't want Obama to be elected president. Right now, Wright is enjoying the attention, and most importantly, the money. And if Obama isn't elected president, Wright can continue shouting his message from the housetops - It's all the white people's fault.

Felstein1:

Rev. Wright has consistently and truthfully noted that he is not a politician, but a preacher. He is not trying to seek the oval office, yet the media is trying to force him to be something he is not.

Unfortunately, American media has become so biased, that it has become insulting to any citizen who has taken the time and energy to obtain higher education. What is being propagated daily by so-called news venues is for individuals who do not take the time to check sources, and vet information that is broadcast throughout various medium.

If people will not vote for Obama because of what Rev. Wright says, or because he is supposedly Muslim, or because he is unpatriotic for not wearing a lapel pin, or elitist, then the media has done its job. Instead, the country will vote for the status quo - A white male who is accepted as having the best interests of the populace because he says so, not because he had to prove his faith, patriotism, or non-elitism.

ghostbuster:

Yea, how does John McCain get a pass. After all, he spent 20 year at Rev. Hagee's church drinking in the words of his spiritual advisor.

What a fantasy world.

Don't know why Obama supporters are so worried about painting McCain as an extremist just yet.

First of all, not many folks will believe McCain is a the worst thing since Hitler outside of leftist bloggers of a board like this or far right wing bloggers on a board that caters to them. Most importantly, Obama has gotta get by Clinton first. After the latest Wright speech, I'm really beginning to think that Wright is actually working to ensure a Clinton victory.

Are you not entertained?

preacher girl:

This is one of the most insightful and well balanced analyses of this controversy that I've read since it first erupted. As both a journalist and a black minister, I'm saddened by the extent to which most colleagues in the mainstream media fail to understand the complexities of the black church and our leaders, thus failing to convey the fullness of the African American experience for others to at least, hopefully begin to understand, even if they might not be equipped to appreciate it.

BGone:

Politics is all about persuading folks to vote for your candidate. Maybe Jeremiah is a Clinton or McCain supporter? Could he fear a black president would steal his poor depressed black folks thunder? Is he getting paid anything to speak yet, you know, like Bill Clinton?

Rosemarie McMichael:

I'm waiting for someone to examine John McCain's spiritual adviser, John Hagee, in as much detail as you have examined Rev. Wright. New Orleans and its gay parades so offended god he unleashed a hurricane. The Pope is the anti-Christ Hitler's antisemitism was the result of being educated at Catholic schools.

John Hagee is a hate monger, in a class by himself. Wright's remarks appear benign next to Hagee's, and yet McCain doesn't denounce or reject but in fact welcomes his endorsement. You call yourself a journalist? Then do your job. Examine John Hagee and spread the findings on front pages of magazines and newspapers.

Concerned The Christian Now Liberated:

WHO WOULD YOU VOTE FOR?

We in Denmark cannot figure out why you are even bothering to hold an election in the United States.

On one side you have a bi-ch who is a lawyer and married to a lawyer opposing a lawyer who is married to a bi-ch who is also a lawyer.

On the other side you have a true war hero who is married to a beautiful woman with a huge chest who owns a beer distributorship.


Is there really a contest here??

WDC:

Great article. If Obama fails to be nominated, he has this person to thank.

It makes one wonder why this preacher doesn't join Bill Crosby and try to push black people into a brighter future by taking advantage of what society at present (not "static") has to offer.

It makes one wonder if this is not at all about Obama. It is about a preacher who tries to steal the spotlight at the expense of a historical moment - a first black President elected. If he cared about Obama and the future of black people, he would have disappeared into the background.

patrick@onlyjesussaves.com:

RACISM in any color is still heinous and should be overtly rejected by all peace-loving Americans.
Patrick J Burwell/Patrick@OnlyJesusSaves.com

E Nelson:

Wright said: "I served six years in the military. Does that make me patriotic? How many years did (Vice President Dick) Cheney serve?"

BINGO

What more does Rev. Wright need to say? On April 7, 1775 the famous American Patriot, Samuel Johnson, said that the cries of patriotism are the last refuges of the scoundrel.

Stephen :

Rev. Wright wants to fire up the lost debate in thsi country about racism. That's all well and good but he's doing it at Obama's expense.

Just as many White Americans believe in black helicopters, the Bilderbergs, secret societies and all the rest, Black Americans believe that White America has systematically tried to eliminate them just as it has the Native American population.

The real question to all of this is whether Mr. Obama believes the message Rev. Wright has been delivering since he bacame a member of his church. If e believes all the things Rev. Wright says, then he needs to be man enough to admit that he believes that the US Government invented AIDS to kill blacks, that 9-11 was basically "what goes around comes around" and all the rest of Re. Wright's oft stated beliefs.

But, as we hold Mr. Obama's feet to the fire, we also need to hold Mr. McCain to the same standards. He needs to answer for the comments of his supporter and spiritual advisor Rev. Hagee. Rev. Hagee makes as many off the wall comments as Rev. Wright.

Is it because he's white that he get's less press for his spin on the world today, his take on the Bible and such?

Surely if a Black preacher can be taken to task for his believes, the same privelege must be give to the White preacher.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.