Julia Neuberger

Julia Neuberger

Chair, Commission on the Future of Volunteering in England

Baroness Julia Neuberger is an ordained rabbi and member of Britian's House of Lords. The "On Faith" panelist also is a trustee of the British Council, Jewish Care, and the Booker Prize Foundation, as well as founding trustee of the Walter and Liesel Schwab Charitable Trust. She has served as Chairman of Camden & Islington Community Health Services NHS Trust and Chief Executive of the King's Fund—a major independent health charity. Currently she chairs the Commission on the Future of Volunteering in England . In the House of Lords, she is a Liberal Democrat member and in early 2006 she was Bloomberg Professor at Harvard University Divinity School . Neuberger writes, speaks, makes trouble, and has published several books, of which the latest is The Moral State We're In (2006). She is working on a book about old age, and thinking about a new book on death and dying, as well as one as a counterblast to Richard Dawkins on why religion is so important in the rather godless United Kingdom. Close.

Julia Neuberger

Chair, Commission on the Future of Volunteering in England

Baroness Julia Neuberger is an ordained rabbi and member of Britian's House of Lords. The "On Faith" panelist also is a trustee of the British Council, Jewish Care, and the Booker Prize Foundation, as well as founding trustee of the Walter and Liesel Schwab Charitable Trust. more »

Main Page | Julia Neuberger Archives | On Faith Archives


Parents Should Share Doubts As Well as Beliefs

It would help if they were prepared to talk to their children about their doubts as well as their faith, about the fact that we all worship the same God

» Back to full entry

All Comments (6)

adults chat

Anonymous:

Patty:

"Conducting a life based on faith takes a great deal more courage than conducting a life on the basis of evidence."

Following Aristotle's precepts -- perhaps the problem is that a life based on faith exhibits too much self-confidence -- moving one beyong courage into the realm of rashness.

The two most important things I've taight my children about religion are the phrases "I don't know" and "I might be wrong".

So far, so good.

Andy:

Thank you, Rabbi Neuberger. I would add that it is also important for parents to share with their children whatever practices help them to experience sanctity in their lives (e.g., praying, meditating, listening to music, walking outdoors, etc.)

raji:

I advise my child,with mixed faith parents.That faith is where or what you are comfortable with in your heart,which you are able to act upon.Any commitment to a religion is a personal declaration and can not be imposed by someone else.I share what I understand about both religions,and willing admit that there is a lot I do not know.So I push the sound heart approach.

Patty:

"The proper position to take . . .?" Mr. Wolfe, you sound as dogmatic as those you condemn. Conducting a life based on faith takes a great deal more courage than conducting a life on the basis of evidence. In fact, the more evidence I have, the more faith I have in God! I wish you well, Mr. Wolfe.

Exactly. The proper position to take is agnosticism. Remember why Huxley invented the term "agnostic." He noted that dogmatic individuals were always telling him what they "know," whereas he did not know and did not see any evidence that the know-its were any more intelligent than he was. Nobody knows whether the universe and this earth are the product of a creator or multiple creators, or the product of a chemical mixture that exploded. Atheists and religionists share their primary characteristic in common: they are both dogmatists. But they are dogmatists without conclusive evidence one way or the other. The intelligent, rational human being does not accept the pronouncements of either on faith: on faith either in the authors of scriptures, clerics pontificating on the scriptures, or scientists whether they be the most brilliant physicists of all time. We are creatures who must of necessity conduct our lives on the basis of evidence. At present there is no conclusive evidence on how the universe and its components, or this earth and its creatures, came to exist.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to editor and producer David Waters.