Jesus in the 21st century would be different from Jesus and his message in the context of New Testament times.
That said, the Jesus of the Gospels and Paul's epistles, would be neither a Democrat nor a Republican, at least not as these parties are currently configured.
He would be seen as a radical (and by some as politically naive), as in counter establishment and counter cultural, preacher and candidate. Jesus ministry, worldview and message would be inclusive not exclusive, reject an "us" and "them" vision, emphasize peace not war, the Eight Beatitudes rather than sanctions and weapons of mass destruction, unequivocally condemn social and economic injustice, support the ordination of women (given what we now know about the role of women in Jesus and apostolic times).
He would be against the excessive institutionalization and "hierarchization" of religion and denounced the emphasis on doctrine and law over the faith and spirituality. He would be dismayed at the propensity of some religious leaders and their followers to confuse their "Cs," to substitute conflict and condemnation for caring and compassion.
The Jesus of the Gospels would be against excessive secularization and modern forms of nationalism that produced European colonialism, a 20th Century that was perhaps the bloodiest century in history, and a Bush administration that "used" God and the promotion of democracy as an excuse for pursuing a failed foreign policy that has alienated many of our friends and played into the hands of our enemies. Jesus would have believed in a law and order and moral accountability but balanced by mercy and compassion.
So clearly, opposition candidates and the media, as well as self-righteous religious leaders, would have a field day with this politically naive, unrealistic candidate!
Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.
Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
