John Dominic Crossan

John Dominic Crossan

Lecturer and professor emeritus, DePaul University

Irish-born John Dominic Crossan is a professor emeritus in the religious studies department at DePaul University in Chicago. Between 1950 and 1969, he was a member of a 13th-century Roman Catholic religious order, the Servites, and remained an ordained priest from 1957 to 1969. He has delivered lectures to secular and lay audiences from Scandinavia to Australia to Japan to South Africa. The On Faith panelist has authored 23 books and his writings have been translated into 11 languages. His work focuses on the historical Jesus, earliest Christianity and the historical Paul. Core titles include “The Historical Jesus,” “The Birth of Christianity” and “In Search of Paul,” co-written with archaeologist Jonathan L. Reed. Dr. Crossan’s next book, “God & Empire: Jesus Against Rome Then and Now,” is scheduled for publication in February. The professor earned a doctor of divinity degree at St. Patrick’s College in Maynooth, Ireland and a humanities doctorate at Stetson University in Florida. The American Academy of Religion and DePaul and Stetson universities have recognized him with awards for scholarly excellence. His Web site is www.johndominiccrossan.com. Close.

John Dominic Crossan

Lecturer and professor emeritus, DePaul University

Irish-born John Dominic Crossan is a professor emeritus in the religious studies department at DePaul University in Chicago. Between 1950 and 1969, he was a member of a 13th-century Roman Catholic religious order, the Servites, and remained an ordained priest from 1957 to 1969. He has delivered lectures to secular and lay audiences from Scandinavia to Australia to Japan to South Africa. The On Faith panelist has authored 23 books and his writings have been translated into 11 languages. more »

Main Page | John Dominic Crossan Archives | On Faith Archives


The Earth is a World Heritage Site

The answer, from the biblical tradition, is 'yes, yes, and yes again' with that 'yes' beginning from the great inaugural Parable of Creation in Genesis 1.

In that great fiction of cosmic origins God has eight big chunks of global stuff to work with in organizing our world. Count, for example, the number of times you find the phrase “And God said: ‘Let [something] be …’” in that opening chapter.

But those eight chunks must be squeezed into six days so that we have only one of them on the first, second, fourth, and fifth days but two of them on the third and sixth days. It would be hard for authors to signal their purpose more clearly. And it is this.

The creation of the world can take only six days because the crown of creation is the Sabbath Rest. It is not because rest is for worship but because rest is worship. It is the creational actualization of the distributive justice which is the character of the biblical God. That is why we have the Sabbath Day “so that your ox and your donkey may have relief, and your home born slave and the resident alien may be refreshed” in Exodus 23:12 and Deuteronomy 5:12-15.

That is why the Sabbath Year is for the freeing of slaves and the remitting of debts in Exodus 21:2-11 and Deuteronomy 15:1-11. That is why the Sabbath Jubilee is for the restitution of all alienated rural property in Leviticus 25:8-31. It is always about the Sabbath’s distributive justice for animals, humans, and the land itself.

In that imaginary vision, it is Sabbath justice and not human presence which is the crown of creation. (We humans are actually the work of a late Friday afternoon—not a time, normally, for anyone’s best work.) But Genesis repeats twice in Genesis 1:26a and 27 that humanity—female and male alike in 1:27—is made in the image and likeness of God. And in what that divine image and likeness consists is explained immediately afterwards—and again twice in 1:26b and 1:28. It consists in our vocation to administer God’s distributive justice as stewards and not owners of the earth—to rule the earth like that God who so loves the world.

In terms of my last posting on religio-political bilingualism, let me try that in three different versions. A first way: We are God’s wager that human beings with free will won’t destroy God’s earth and themselves with it. A second way: We are an evolutionary experiment to see if moral conscience can replace chemical instinct. A third way: Our first parents said let’s give the kids the keys to the car and see if they learn to drive before they destroy others, kill themselves, and wreck the car.

Please e-mail On Faith if you'd like to receive an email notification when On Faith sends out a new question.

Email Me | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook

Reader Response

ALL COMMENTS (11)

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.