Jan Willis

Jan Willis

Scholar-practitioner of Tibetan Buddhism

“On Faith” panelist Janice Willis is a professor of religion at Wesleyan University. One of the earliest American scholar-practitioners of Tibetan Buddhism, Willis has published numerous essays and articles on Buddhist meditation, hagiography, women and Buddhism, and Buddhism and race. Her latest book was Dreaming Me: An African American Woman’s Spiritual Journey (2001). Willis also is the author of The Diamond Light: An Introduction to Tibetan Buddhist Meditation (1972), On Knowing Reality: The Tattvartha Chapter of Asanga's Bodhisattvabhumi (1979), Enlightened Beings: Life Stories from the Ganden Oral Tradition (1995); and the editor of Feminine Ground: Essays on Women and Tibet (1989). She has studied with Tibetan Buddhists in India, Nepal, Switzerland and the U.S. for four decades, and has taught courses in Buddhism for 32 years. In December 2000, Time magazine named Willis one of six “spiritual innovators for the new millennium.” In 2003, she was a recipient of Wesleyan University’s Binswanger Prize for Excellence in Teaching, and she was profiled in a 2005 Newsweek article about “Spirituality in America.” Close.

Jan Willis

Scholar-practitioner of Tibetan Buddhism

“On Faith” panelist Janice Willis is a professor of religion at Wesleyan University. One of the earliest American scholar-practitioners of Tibetan Buddhism, Willis has published numerous essays and articles on Buddhist meditation, hagiography, women and Buddhism, and Buddhism and race. more »

Main Page | Jan Willis Archives | On Faith Archives


Environment Should Be Everybody's Priority

To contribute to our own destruction--by being irresponsible--seems most illogical.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (11)

Bill L:

Paganplace, don't understand sarcasm?

Sandy, what's that you said about name calling?

Sandy:

Bob,

Are you "special"? Did you ride the short bus to school? The lack of intelligence, name-calling and overall small midedness of your posts suggests that you are indeed mentally retarded. If this is not the case then I would like to apologize to mentally retarded people everywhere for lumping them in with the likes of Bob.

Bob, get a job....

Paganplace:

To wit. We do not have the goods for *anyone* to go to Mars and survive, never mind find a habitable planet to despoil again. We couldn't slinghot a craft around *Jupiter* for more speed without subjecting a human being to lethal radiation doses, just from being there, never mind what you'd get on the way.


If we *had* the technology to do that, then we'd have the technology to live in habitats on a frozen or boiling Earth...

Which we don't.

'Oh, we'll just leave the planet.'

Like that justifies being what we all know is greedy and shortsighted.


What are you, an *#&$^@?*

Or are you just dreaming of it cause you can't imagine a world going on without *you*?

Was that unkind?

Seems people are kind of operating under certain illusions, though.

I assure you the spacelift capacity isn't there. Not even for Donald Trump.

Paganplace:

Umm, I'm not sure anyone has pointed this out to you, 'Anonymous,' but 'we' have neither the payload boost capacity, actual propulsion, radiation shielding, or even sustainable *plants to eat on the way, never mind a destination that would enable your children to be that snide in a hundred years, according to projections.

That's for *anyone,* never mind *everyone.*

You wanna talk about space travel, then odds are you'd *dream* of finding a place after several generations of travel with tech we don't have, that as hospitable as even a messed-up Earth.

You want sci fi, how bout a sci fi world where people have universal and nearly instantaneous access to all kinds of information about who's screwing who to make money off screwing up the planet, hoping they'll be able to make people compliant enough about them being rich enough to survive the effects of *their* exploitation...

Basically, tell me how what the corporate interests want *wouldn't* result in some kind of feudalism, while everyone's primed to think it's just a 'tribulation' and if you don't like it, you're 'impious.'

'We' should go to another planet? If we could have a thousandth of our population live in space for that trip, we'd never need to leave.

If you like living in cans, either way, that is.

Anonymous:

Environmentalism is elitist, racist, Luddite claptrap. Stop the pious handwringing. We should use up this insignificant dust speck of a planet and move on.

Bobster:

Dear Ms. Willis,

A well written article. I agree with all your points, except one. You mentioned "common sense".
In this Brave New World commom sense appears to have died a quite death years ago. Or at least thats what the the Psychologists, and Psychiatrist tell us all. Now we americans need proof and instructions for everything we do, and or need to do. A committee with subsequent sub-committees and only the most educated people on them are now allowed to decide what is "right" and "proven" to work. I am being humourous of course. If what you wrote was only so simple, and it is really. But yet our leaders will continue to fight like cats and dogs for fear the other party will get recognized for something they did not do. So in effect, nothing really gets done. Unless we as individuals do what little we can for our planet, regardless of what we believe about God, or don't believe. A really good article. And I don't know if I am resistant to Gores film because it is so sad, and scary, or because I feel so bad because of what my species which includes me has done to this world.

Norrie Hoyt:

Jan Willis,

A very nice essay.

Don't be upset by BOB'S unkind comment. As far as I can tell, all his comments are like that.

I think his one-sentence comment on another fine essay was "What a piece of crap!"

As you well know, we have to put up with all kinds of creatures here in this samsaran (or is it samsaric?) world. Bob's one of them.

Personally I wish he'd return to his home planet. Isn't it called Grubazon? (It's the seventh down from the top of the Buddhist planes of existence, I believe.)

Best wishes to you.

Brambleton:

I don't think Ms. Wallis is offering anything different than how most Americans probably feel already.

Of course, mandating Al Gore's "documentary" is really quite ridiculous.

Realist:

Wow, a panellist actually makes sense and gets shot down in flames. I think this is the twighlight zone.

Bob:

"It is not only “people of faith” who should make care for the environment a major priority; everyone should do so, whether they are Christian, Muslim, Buddhist or completely secular, non-religious human beings."

Wow, what an insight! You mean all human beings should be concerned about their future, regardless of race, creed, or political party affiliation?? You're sooo brilliant! You must be a woooman! Oh boy, wow!

Moron.

Bill L:

I loved how you put your essay until the last sentence. Al Gore is to science as Jimmy Neutron is to drama {he's a cartoon}. There's even a touch of drama in cartoons.
Al Gore may have true warnings, but his solutions will bring down this country while leaving China and others untouched.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.