James Anderson

James Anderson

Co-founder, Alban Institute

"On Faith" panelist James Anderson is a retired Episcopal priest, an almost full-time volunteer in the community, a part-time farm manager, and independent writer. Anderson was one of four founders of the Alban Institute in Washington, D.C., and served as first president of its board. The Institute has grown to become one of the most respected sources of help in the nation to local congregations. Anderson is the author or co-author of three books on ministry in the local church: To Come Alive (1973) and The Management of Ministry (1978), co-authored with Ezra Earl Jones, have been widely used in the training and education of clergy. Anderson, who has wide experience as an advisor and consultant to a variety of religious organizations, also served as assistant to the Bishop for Congregational Development for the Episcopal Diocese of Washington and director of Field Studies for the Cathedral College of the Laity at the Washington National Cathedral. He's currently writing a book with Bishop Jane Holmes Dixon examining the 40-year history of the effort to fully integrate women into the ordained ministry of the Episcopal Church. Close.

James Anderson

Co-founder, Alban Institute

"On Faith" panelist James Anderson is a retired Episcopal priest, an almost full-time volunteer in the community, a part-time farm manager, and independent writer. He's currently writing a book with Bishop Jane Holmes Dixon examining the 40-year history of the effort to fully integrate women into the ordained ministry of the Episcopal Church. more »

Main Page | James Anderson Archives | On Faith Archives


Religious Bureaucracies Sometimes Hinder Environmental Activism

Many weeks went by until it gradually dawned on me that my letter to the bishop was not going to be answered. It never was.

» Back to full entry

All Comments (2)

Norrie Hoyt:

Rev. Mr. Anderson,

Your experience, while regrettable, is very common for those who have to deal with any sort of organization, be it business, governmental, or religious.

I was head of two state government agencies and occasionally resorted to the same strategy employed by your Presiding Bishop: IGNORE IT AND IT MAY GO AWAY.

I often received a letter on a subject I simply didn't want to deal with. I'd place a bet with myself on whether, if I ignored the letter and didn't reply to it, the writer wouldn't pursue the subject, the issue would vanish, and I'd be home free.

I was amazed and sometimes saddened at how often and how well my ploy worked.

I was also frequently on the other side of the fence: my letter went unanswered. To deal with that I developed a strategy which I would have recommended to you:

*** Call the Bishop.

*** If no answer, show up at his office and
confront him. If necessary, push past the receptionist.

*** If that didn't work, do one of the following, the order being determined by the facts on the ground:

(A) Give the story to the press, in hope that the reporting will embarrass or force the Bishop to respond;
(B) Organize a protest at/in the Bishop's office, and call the press (including TV) - tell them to bring their photographers.

*** If nothing has worked, make up good print and TV ads to embarrass and coerce the Bishop, and run them every day til your money runs out.

*** Still no results:

Give up your Christian beliefs, become a Cathar, and accept that the Lord of This World is the "Ignorant Demiurge".
This deluded being thought he was the Godhead, while actually he was only a lesser, narcissistic diety, who had created matter and the universe, the central and universal characteristic of each being an evil nature.

I appreciate that you were simply being a good Christian ("turn the other cheek") when you didn't challenge the Bishop on his uncivil non-response to your letter.

But sometimes a little Muscular Christianity is necessary to advance The Good.

Of course, it's always possible the the Bishop never got your letter. Another reason you might have called his office - to find out.

Best wishes.


J. Rhinehart:

Mr. Anderson,

It is sad your well-thought letter did not receive the attention and action it deserved. Perhaps those in the main office didn't want to wade through a long missive. (Did you put a synopsis at the beginning?)

Don't give up. Try again.

I have often thought that we need a permanent panel of experts, perhaps a rotating volunteer panel, constantly evaluating all our activities and their long-term consequences. Such a panel would have to have teeth.

Post a comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.