RSS Feed
The Religious Counterculture
A narrative running through countless news articles over the last eighteen months goes something like this. Over the last 20 years, evangelicals, led by Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson, could be counted on to vote Republican and focus on a couple of hot-button issues such as abortion and sexuality. Today, the movement’s younger generation, represented by Rick Warren, has a broader set of concerns which include care for the environment and social justice issues. As a result it is less rigid and more likely to vote Democrat. We might even look forward to the end of the ‘culture wars’ conflict. This, however, is an unfortunate oversimplification.
First, how do we define evangelicals? Let’s take it broadly to mean Protestants who believe in the full authority of the Bible and who don’t take the creeds metaphorically, but think Jesus was pre-existent God, he did die for sins and rise physically from the dead, and you must be born again through faith in him. If we define it that way, then I am knee-deep in the next, younger, more multi-ethnic generation of evangelicals. I pastor a church in Manhattan with several thousand of them—mostly singles in their 20s and early 30s and I rub shoulders with the next generation of pastoral leaders. And here is what I see.
It’s true that these younger orthodox believers are broader in their political concerns than most of the last generation. They are less defensive toward the culture, more concerned about the common good of their cities and the poor. But that doesn’t mean they are slowly morphing into mainline, liberal Christians. The kind of Christianity growing rapidly around the world today is of a robust, orthodox kind. Don’t get me wrong. There are always people on the edges of a movement who are on their way out and make a good interview. But, in general, younger evangelicals are not moving from a Republican view of the world to Democratic one. It’s much more complex. If anything, as they read the Bible, they are coming to positions more in line with Catholic social teaching. They continue to support traditional Christian views of abortion, sexuality, and family, but now they also care more for the environment and racial justice, while being more reticent to use military force than were their elders. They hold to both traditional conservative and traditional liberal positions. This is why they will be increasingly unhappy with either of the straight party lines.
Behind some of the articles on less-conservative-evangelicals is the assumption that religious believers will inevitably become less religious and more secular as they receive more education and contact with the wide world. That is a condescending theory, and it doesn’t appear to be proving true. Exhibit A is the surprising number of cutting edge scholarly books, in all kinds of fields, written by believers who defend theses that elites of last generation thought were in the dustbin of history. Here are just three examples.
Nicholas Wolterstorff, emeritus professor of philosophy at Yale, has just written Justice: Rights and Wrongs which makes the case that it was not the Enlightenment but Christianity that produced our understanding of human rights, and that no account of rights makes sense without the existence of God. It has already been called the best book on justice since John Rawls. The sociologist Christian Smith edited The Secular Revolution, a volume overturning the idea that the secularization of society was the inevitable outcome of modernization. It shows it was the achievement of people who removed all religious reasoning from the public square in order to gain more power in cultural institutions.
Richard Bauckham, of St. Andrews University, has written Jesus and the Eyewitnesses. For 150 years most academic Bible scholarship viewed the New Testament gospels as oral traditions, shaped and revised to fit community needs and written down many years later. Bauckham shows that they were not oral traditions but rather oral histories, preserved intact and taken down from the mouths of living eyewitnesses who were named in the texts. Bauckham’s volume will make generations of Biblical scholarship obsolete.
Out in society, the ‘person in the street’ still thinks that religion is the enemy of human rights, that the Bible is a lot of legends written down years after the real events, and that becoming modern, educated, and secular are the same thing. But there are now high-level arguments that refute all of these ideas. Will these books and religious beliefs win the day? I don’t look for that. However, they, and many other books like them, will create the foundations for a continuing, significant, and growing orthodox religious counter-culture that will insist on speaking out of its convictions in public discourse, and will do so in increasingly sophisticated ways.
In his New York Times column (“‘Religious Right May Be Fading, but not the ‘Culture Wars’” Feb 16, 2008) Peter Steinfels says that we are at a very ‘strange juncture’ in our society. As evangelicals like Rick Warren are calling for a broader public agenda, and just when writers like Nicholas Kristof urge us to stop demonizing religious believers and work side by side on the world’s problems, we are barraged by a wave of books that not only say that all religion is poison, but that even respect for religion is bad. Every new book trumpeting the glories of strong secularism seems to become a best seller.
Secularism and orthodox faith are both growing while moderate, mainline religion is withering, as Mark Lilla powerfully argues in The Stillborn God. Neither side, therefore, should expect the other to go away. Each side is strengthening. If anything, it seems to be the secular voices that now are the most strident, disdainful, and self-righteous. Just when many orthodox believers seem to be extending an olive branch to secular people, the public rhetoric against them has been turned up louder than anyone can ever remember it. I hope that won’t continue.
Dr. Timothy Keller is author of the new book "The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism." He is founding pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church in New York City.
By Timothy Keller |
March 13, 2008; 9:53 AM ET
Share: Email a Friend | 
Technorati
| Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: The Struggle of Forgiveness |
Next: Britney and Us
Posted by: DZ | March 14, 2008 9:05 AM
Report Offensive Comment
While I don't claim to know Wolterstorff's intentions, I've heard similar arguments made to support the false claim that America is a "Christian nation" or that our government should favor Christianity at the expense of other religions.
I agree that religious believers should not be condemned. I must add, however, that such condemnation is not the main problem. Instead, that problem is that America's religious discourse is dominated by fanatics like James Dobson and Tony Perkins whose agenda is explicitly theocratic. I suspect that a huge percentage of Americans, including many Christians, have never even heard of Warren and Kristof, and may be the poorer for it.
Posted by: Tonio | March 13, 2008 10:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Brilliant thoughts especially those that remind us of the religious roots of our institutions and rights. Thanks for contributing.
Posted by: Sam | March 13, 2008 9:30 PM
Report Offensive Comment
WE are COME!
[joz][evz][.us]
[FREE][PRiZEZ for Home on Weekends via a weekly RAFFELL] and a Weekend BLOG from Sat-12:Noon until SUN:Midnight!, coming Soon Soon Very Soon!
Please visit from time to time. Thanka Shame!
Things are getting better, never worse! PROMiSE, on me Honor!
There will a GOOD PHiLOSOPHY {NEW} {SONG} coming from O.U.R. OLD songs too! AND for ALL the world to enjoy [freely] each week too!
And No More Deleating my or YOUR ESSAY's again by Anyone!!
Genuine FREEDOM OF THOUGHT IS HERE!
Huggs n Kisses to ALL!
Posted by: Anonymous | March 13, 2008 2:45 PM
Report Offensive Comment
J
O
Z
E
V
Z
.
U
S
J
O
Z
E
V
Z
.
U
S
Posted by: Anonymous | March 13, 2008 2:08 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Unfortunately, the 'olive branch' doesn't always seem like much more than the same old stick with some camouflage on it... and a lot of the 'refutations' of certain ideas ...well, both unconvincing and part of certain political agendas after all.
As promising as it is that younger evangelicals may be putting more concern toward real and present and important social issues, (And a little amusing that evangelicals hasten to take the credit for things that in large measure, they still actively-oppose and seek to roll back,) people who believe in our secular nation, with the promise of liberty and justice for *all,* not just Christians, are right to be wary, and in fact, insist on certain standards of reason, when it comes to our government.
Posted by: Paganplace | March 13, 2008 11:42 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Mr. Keller,
Very good post.
Thank you...
Posted by: Angela | March 13, 2008 10:48 AM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.
Oh, please. No orthodox believer has offered an olive branch to an unbeliever, ever. If you want to be taken seriously, provide even one example.