God in Government

Abortion Foes Rally Online Against Health Care Reform

By William Wan

Abortion foes -- including some leaders among religious conservatives -- put on a massive webcast last night aimed at rallying anti-abortion forces against current health care reform bills in Congress.

If the organization and strident words during the webcast are any indication, the anti-abortion tide that is rising against President Obama's health care plan may shape up to be a sizable force in coming weeks. The webcast was notable for strong invective and apparently large turnout, and it laid out plans for continuing campaigns in coming weeks. (One notable setback for its organizers, however, was former presidential candidate Mike Huckabee, who had been prominently promoted as a lead speaker in the event but never showed. He was taken off the website's speaker list sometime before broadcast started at 9 p.m. Will update if we get any word on why.

Some highlights from the webcast:

* James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, opens his pre-recorded message with this opening salvo: "The health care bill being advanced by congress is the abortion advocates' dream come true."

* Charmaine Yoest, president of Americans United for Life, equates the health care plan to "a stealth agenda to impose FOCA [the Freedom of Choice Act favoring abortion rights]."

* Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, made claims that are sure to be challenged by abortion rights advocates that the proposed health care reform will be a bailout bill for abortion clinics and groups like Planned Parenthood.

It's an interesting time in long-raging culture war over abortion.

A new bill proposed by two Democratic, U.S. Reps Tim Ryan and Rosa DeLauro, is aimed at encouraging pregnancy prevention and greater government support for young mothers. It was supposed to mark a new era in the abortion fight built upon "common ground" between those for and against abortion.

But from the way the conservative Christians were railing last night against not only the health care reform bills, but against the Ryan-DeLauro bill, it's tough to say whether there's a real thaw in relations. Some different opinions on this. Some believe it's notable that Christian groups are backing the Ryan-DeLauro group, including a few Catholic leaders (although it's not likely to get support from hardline conservatives like U.S. Catholic Bishops). Some interesting analysis here on that and how Obama may weigh in on the issue.

In any case, a few more details on last night's webcast, which began at 9 p.m., lasted almost two hours, and, according to organizers, drew more than 35,000 listeners. The webcast featured 19 speakers (some of them pre-taped, most of them live) and was billed as the "largest pro-life event in history."

Some future actions laid out by organizers: prayer campaign among churches and letter writing campaign over next few days to Congress.

By William Wan  |  July 23, 2009; 10:30 PM ET  | Category:  God in Government Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Attorney General Meets with Young Muslim Americans | Next: President Ruling Out 'Government-Funded' Abortions?

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



The current plan is about CONTROL, not HEALTH. Read it ObamaSheep!

Posted by: StandAgainstSocialism | July 27, 2009 4:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

FEAR, UNCERTAINTY, DOUBT
Limbaugh has rallied his "Christian" lemmings well against health care for the poor and their children. I;m sure their Jesus is real proud of them.

Posted by: coloradodog | July 25, 2009 8:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Ryan/DeLauro is a good piece of legislation that addresses many of the important issues, including comprehensive sexuality education, family planning, and support for pregnant and parenting women. Preventing unintended pregnancy, ensuring abortion access and funding family planning initiatives are intertwined issues and should be dealt with together. But this bill is only a piece of the reproductive health and justice agenda we hope to see.

In addition to reducing unintended pregnancies, we must work together to address the circumstances that result in the decision to have an abortion. Poverty, social inequities, lack of education, sexism, racism and unsupportive relationships can severely restrict a woman's ability to freely choose.

Rev. Debra Haffner
http://debrahaffner.blogspot.com

Posted by: Religious_Institute | July 24, 2009 11:59 AM
Report Offensive Comment

ABORTION:

G.K. Chesterton once said, “Those who destroy life, destroy happiness.”

http://www.gargaro.com/mother_teresa/quotes.html

"I feel that the greatest destroyer of peace today is abortion, because it is a war against the child. a direct killing of the innocent child, murder by the mother herself. And, if we accept that a mother can kill even her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another? How do we persuade a woman not to have an abortion?

As always, we must persuade her with love, and we remind ourselves that love means to be willing to give until it hurts.

Jesus gave even his life to love us. So the mother who is thinking of abortion, should be helped to love - that is, to give until it hurts her plans, or her free time, to respect the life of her child. The father of that child, whoever he is, must also give until it hurts.

By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own child to solve her problems. And by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world.

More so the court has dissolved man’s paternal rights to his child, an abomination. The unchaste father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So, abortion just leads to more abortion

Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching the people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want. That is why the greatest destroyer of love and peace is abortion. "

"So please don't kill the child. I want the child. Please give me the child. I am willing to accept any child who would be aborted, and to give that child to a married couple who will love the child, and be loved by the child.

From our children's home in Calcutta alone, we have saved over 3,000 children from abortions. These children have brought such love and joy to their adopting parents, and have grown up so full of love and joy!"—February 1997—National Prayer Breakfast in Washington attended by the President and the First Lady.

"What is taking place in America," Mother Theresa said, "is a war against the child. And if we accept that the mother can kill her own child, how can we tell other people not to kill one another.

Any country that accepts abortion, is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what it wants. It is a poverty to decide that a child must die so that you may live as you wish."

Posted by: TTWSYFAMDGGAHJMJ2 | July 24, 2009 11:12 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Mother Theresa:
"America needs no words from me to see how your decision in Roe v. Wade has deformed a great nation. The so-called right to abortion has pitted mothers against their children and women against men.

It has sown violence and discord at the heart of the most intimate human relationships. It has aggravated the derogation of the father's role in an increasingly fatherless society. It has portrayed the greatest of gifts -- a child -- as a competitor, an intrusion, and an inconvenience. It has nominally accorded mothers unfettered dominion over the independent lives of their physically dependent sons and daughters"

And, in granting this unconscionable power, it has exposed many women to unjust and selfish demands from their husbands or other sexual partners. Human rights are not a privilege conferred by government. They are every human being's entitlement by virtue of his humanity

The right to life does not depend, and must not be declared to be contingent, on the pleasure of anyone else, not even a parent or a sovereign." (Mother Theresa -- "Notable and Quotable," Wall Street Journal, 2/25/94, p. A14)

Posted by: TTWSYFAMDGGAHJMJ2 | July 24, 2009 10:45 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company