God in Government

Sikhs Press Army On Hair, Turban Restrictions

By Michelle Boorstein

Two Sikhs who serve in the Army have filed legal complaints seeking the right to continue wearing the uncut hair and turbans required by their faith.

Capt. Kamaljeet Kalsi, a doctor specializing in emergency medicine, and Second Lt. Tejdeep Rattan, who is in his last year of dental school, have been finishing their medical educations and are scheduled to begin active duty on July 1 -- but both refuse to take off their turbans or cut their hair.

Both men say they were told when they were recruited (Kalsi in 2001 and Rattan in 2006) that they could keep their hair and headcoverings, which Sikhs call "articles of faith" that bind them, publicly, to their religious tradition. Kalsi did years of rotations through military hospitals and the issue was never a problem, his advocates say.

Now that both men are about to start active duty, their superiors have told them that they must comply with military rules on appearance. But the men and their advocates say the rules aren't being applied fairly to everyone.

In 1981 the Army put in place rules banning unshorn hair and conspicuous religious items. Then in 1986 the Supreme Court agreed that the Army could ban a Jewish psychiatrist from wearing a yarmulke. The next year Congress passed legislation that was signed into law saying there could be room for "neat and conservative" religious items if they don't conflict with someone's military duties.

Now Kalsi and Rattan, the advocacy group The Sikh Coalition and some high-powered private attorneys say exceptions have been made - but not for Sikhs, keeping this religious minority from serving.

The men filed complaints last week to their superiors and yesterday expanded those to the inspectors general of the Department of Defense and the Army. They say they'll file federal lawsuits if their superiors turn them down. If the men are unsuccessful, they will be honorably discharged and required to pay back medical and dental school loans, according to Amardeep Singh, executive director of the Sikh Coalition.

By Michelle Boorstein  |  April 15, 2009; 8:35 AM ET  | Category:  God in Government Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Warren's Varnished Pulpit
and Views on Proposition 8
| Next: Obama, Bernanke: Two Faiths, Two Speeches

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



"We that live on can never forget those comrades who in giving their lives gave so much that is good to the story of the Sikh regiment. No living glory can transcend that of their supreme sacrifice, may they rest in peace. In the last two world wars, 83,005 turban wearing Sikh soldiers were killed and 109,045 were wounded. They all died or were wounded for the freedom of Britain and the world, and during shell fire, with no other protection but the turban, the symbol of their faith."
British General Sir Frank Messervy
KCSI, KBE, CB, DSO


Colonel GB Singh served in the US Army for over 27 years, reaching the rank of Colonel before retiring.

Colonel Arjinderpal Singh Sekhon served as a cardiologist for over 22 years.
http://www.nriinternet.com/NRIpoliticians/USA/A_Z/S/Arjinderpal_Sekhon/Command_ceremony/index.htm

Bhagat Singh Thind served in the US Army DURING WORLD WAR I.
http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/SSEAL/echoes/chapter10/chapter10.html

Numerous Sikhs earned the British Victoria Cross for their sacrafices during WWII.

The Sikh Regiment is the highest decorated regiment in the Indian Army.

Anybody who doubts Sikhs should serve in the military needs to read this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Saragarhi

Sikhs make great soldiers. The British Army recognized this, why can't the Americans?

Posted by: BSS11 | April 15, 2009 7:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company