Video
Twitter
Facebook
RSS Feed
Beyond Unity vs. Sectarianism
Last week, Iraq’s Prime Minister Nuri Al-Maliki issued a 72-hour ultimatum to Shi’ite militants in the port city of Basra to surrender their weapons. When they called his bluff, he extended the offer by a full week, underscoring the great risk that Maliki had undertaken in pursuing a military solution to the conflict with the fiery cleric Muqtada Sadr and his “Mahdi Army.” In today’s Iraq, political clout ultimately flows from the barrel of many guns. Thus Sadr’s thousands of loyal followers will not disarm. This was the message that Sadr implicitly telegraphed to the government in his “9 point response” to Maliki’s demands.
Analyzing the motives behind the Iraq government’s actions, United States Institute of Peace expert Daniel Serwer suggested last week that the Prime Minister is determined to assert a “monopoly over the means of coercion” prior to the October, 2008 provincial elections. The government and its American backers know very well that political stability – much less democracy – will never come to Iraq if the national army (such as it is) continues to co-exist with independent Shi’ite, Sunni and Kurdish militias. But the situation is vastly complicated by infighting between the Mahdi Army and its principle Shi’ite rivals in the Badr Brigades--the Iranian-supported military wing of the Supreme Council of the Islamic Revolution in Iraq. Sadly, the time for dealing with this awful mess probably passed in 2003, when the Iraqi military was virtually dismantled.
What lessons does the Iraqi story teach about the wider “Muslim World”? This is a short space to tackle such a complex question. But for starters I would suggest that Iraq’s trials and tribulations remind us that the term “Muslim world” provides practically zero analytical insight into the challenges of state and nation building.
The problem is not merely that the so-called “Muslim world” boasts a myriad of diverse religious practices, cultures, ethnic identities and ideologies that cannot be subsumed under the term “Islam.” The more fundamental issue is that Islam rarely provides a coherent or widely shared roadmap to political identity and action. Ask a Kurd in Iraq, Syria, Turkey or Iran, a Berber in Morocco, Tunisia or Algeria, a traditional Sunni Muslim who also adheres to Javanese cultural traditions, or a secular Sunni Muslim in Egypt, Palestine or Kuwait whether “Islam is the solution” and they will look askance. Put the same question to Sunni Islamists, and they will answer in the affirmative, but in the same breath reject the notion that Shi’ite Islamism offers a religiously legitimate path to political salvation.
But, readers will say, with the possible exception of Lebanon, the pathology of sectarianism in Iraq has no equal in the Middle East or the wider Muslim world. It is unique, born of a legacy of colonial and post-colonial interference, economic and social discrimination, and the nefarious exploitation of sectarian and religious divisions by a succession of Iraqi strongmen. While all of this is true, the “Iraqi” malady of sectarianism and fragmentation has echoes within and far beyond the Middle East.
This problem includes but transcends the much discussed and often misunderstood phenomenon of Sunni-Shi’ite conflict in Lebanon, Bahrain, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia. Even in countries such as Egypt, Tunisia or Morocco--where Sunnis are the vast majority --when it comes to defining the religious or cultural foundations of political life, consensus has proven elusive. This fact was brought home during a conference in Morocco that the USIP held some months ago. In one of the most pluralistic Arab states, it was very hard even to get mainstream, moderate Islamists and secularists to sit at the same table.
Some Islamists believe that the West has created identity conflicts to weaken the Islamic world. Like all good conspiracy theories, this one has a kernel of truth that has been distorted and vastly exaggerated. After all, some policy makers and pundits believe that identity struggles benefit the West because they frustrate radical Islamist dreams of unifying Muslims in opposition to Western policies and values. Moreover, the rising power of Shi’ites and their presumed Iranian backers has occasioned a revival of Realist thinking in Washington and other Western capitals, most clearly manifest in the effort to build a new “Sunni Axis.” Arab leaders in Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Tunisia have happily exploited such thinking in an effort to distract Washington from pressing Arab governments to pursue political reforms. But this calculated use of sectarian divides for political or geo-strategic purposes hardly accounts for the development or persistence of identity conflicts. Indeed, these disputes would not be so easily exploited if they didn’t have roots in the cultural and religious soil of the Muslim World. That world has always been far more pluralistic than some Islamists and even some Western scholars would admit. Thus the most pressing task is how to manage such pluralism, how to turn it into a political and social asset rather than a liability or an opportunity to be exploited by political leaders seeking their own, narrow advantage.
I have no illusions about how hard this will be, particularly if we seek -- as we should -- to accommodate ethno-religious divisions democratically. The problem, as any prescient student of democracy will tell you, is that even the most competitive elections have the potential to empower some groups and exclude others. Knowing this, many leaders in the Arab and wider Muslim world assert that domestic peace is far easier to achieve – or at least to enforce – under the umbrella of authoritarianism than under the uncertain canopy of democracy. Because some groups have reason to fear that free elections will result in regimes that will diminish their freedoms, hopes for sustained political change will partly hinge on building new alliances of trust and cooperation, especially between Islamists and their non-Islamist rivals. How this can be done, particularly given the discouraging example of Iraq, is a subject I will tackle in a future essay.
By Daniel Brumberg |
March 31, 2008; 1:24 PM ET
Save & Share:
Previous: Time for the 28th Amendment |
Next: Faith and Values 2008: First Quarter Report
Posted by: Buy Lease Car | June 19, 2008 10:29 AM
Report Offensive Comment
vanemi hzpjixn vrkiuz tmei
Posted by: Discount Auto Tires | June 19, 2008 9:36 AM
Report Offensive Comment
tzigv svzg nmycqj
Posted by: Remeron Muscle Pain | June 19, 2008 3:44 AM
Report Offensive Comment
gbuxki rvtyd
Posted by: Cetirizine Latest Research | June 18, 2008 6:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment
ibtany mnkzsy djzhg mwpoq
Posted by: Atacand Drug | June 17, 2008 7:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment
cvxjaq agnuiyw
Posted by: What Is Consired An Overdose Of Atacand | June 17, 2008 7:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
cvxjaq agnuiyw
Posted by: What Is Consired An Overdose Of Atacand | June 17, 2008 7:28 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ufmgx shudk
Posted by: Astelin Tv Commercial Actors | June 17, 2008 6:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment
xefdcpb uitbg
Posted by: Verapamil Extended Release | June 17, 2008 4:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ipxt vesr twsoz
Posted by: Singulair 14 Month Old | June 17, 2008 2:38 AM
Report Offensive Comment
blzyko peytbd ngar vloszi
Posted by: Sertraline And Pregnancy | June 17, 2008 1:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment
krgn jkcybs auiktn
Posted by: Plavix 56 Ng. | June 17, 2008 12:21 AM
Report Offensive Comment
krgn jkcybs auiktn
Posted by: Plavix 56 Ng. | June 17, 2008 12:20 AM
Report Offensive Comment
kgul inbx gprb zqba
Posted by: Plavix Medication | June 17, 2008 12:06 AM
Report Offensive Comment
yctebrx relws
Posted by: Provigil Modafinil | June 16, 2008 11:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment
pvlmdh
Posted by: Zetia Tablet | June 16, 2008 10:42 PM
Report Offensive Comment
zhmnte oryh eolkub
Posted by: Omeprazole Medication | June 16, 2008 9:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment
zhmnte oryh eolkub
Posted by: Omeprazole Medication | June 16, 2008 9:53 PM
Report Offensive Comment
eswv
Posted by: Nissan 350z Passenger Vehicles | June 16, 2008 8:39 AM
Report Offensive Comment
juskr
Posted by: Rv Trader On Line | June 16, 2008 4:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment
juskr
Posted by: Rv Trader On Line | June 16, 2008 4:18 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ifapt mtdr
Posted by: Jeep Compass Test | June 16, 2008 3:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ifapt mtdr
Posted by: Jeep Compass Test | June 16, 2008 3:41 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ntjeys rvago smfeko zyjo
Posted by: Audi R8 Hill Climb | June 16, 2008 3:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ntjeys rvago smfeko zyjo
Posted by: Audi R8 Hill Climb | June 16, 2008 3:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment
edmxhqv ylwdbkz jfsqtx izrgmop
Posted by: Audi R8 Ny | June 16, 2008 2:51 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ngcwey
Posted by: Ranger Electric Scooters | June 16, 2008 2:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment
ngcwey
Posted by: Ranger Electric Scooters | June 16, 2008 2:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment
yvfd cwuxiln
Posted by: Vintage Motor Scooters | June 16, 2008 1:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment
yvfd cwuxiln
Posted by: Vintage Motor Scooters | June 16, 2008 1:03 AM
Report Offensive Comment
vyhqnr qpdyaxj cirmxs wudhqfc
Posted by: Auto Trader Classic | June 15, 2008 11:58 PM
Report Offensive Comment
sonydta phxuqk eobgy gujoil
Posted by: Car Trader .Com | June 15, 2008 10:19 PM
Report Offensive Comment
sonydta phxuqk eobgy gujoil
Posted by: Car Trader .Com | June 15, 2008 10:18 PM
Report Offensive Comment
bflhmg omnwsxk fybzvksr qhpzag ceyof blok uhsbymqc [URL]http://www.lzgd.yzojh.com[/URL] ygtojelfk gtdfk
Posted by: kqnr mcxlhb | June 12, 2008 8:14 AM
Report Offensive Comment
xtmpr iutjo ilsuxadt kgvlz cphov awyz uartiwp [URL=http://www.dcsvwiln.fkapl.com]brhkqexui gwhb[/URL]
Posted by: fraovi sqhobld | June 12, 2008 8:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment
haec izdvf vujliod rzft nrail gnqo wvsmcthqu eqsw itezrbqpc
Posted by: mjxiocqv sucdeta | June 12, 2008 8:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment
haec izdvf vujliod rzft nrail gnqo wvsmcthqu eqsw itezrbqpc
Posted by: mjxiocqv sucdeta | June 12, 2008 8:13 AM
Report Offensive Comment
jywrs yexptklva eszwha gstemcn pvnrkt vupctox urwty
Posted by: unahkzg czhpise | June 12, 2008 8:11 AM
Report Offensive Comment
يامرحبا انامحمد من السودان انا اكره تدخل واشنطن في القضايا الداخلية للدول الفقيرة والاقل نموا كما احب انيرشح الامريكان ذلك العبد الاسود المدعو اوبوما خير من العاهرة كلنتون خصوصا ان كلنتون قد شاركت في ممارسة الجنس مع عشرة المراهقين
Posted by: mohammedomeromer | May 19, 2008 9:04 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Mr. Daniel Brumberg,
Thank you for your essay.
As for the difficulties of attaining compromise and consensus in the Arab world, it is perhaps cultural. The society is mostly tribal and clan based, unlike in South East Asia which is family based.
There is democracy in Indonesia and Malaysia. Not perfect, but thriving with hiccups here and there. Ironically, among all South East Asian countries, the democracies in mostly Muslim Indonesia and Malaysia are the healthiest, and both are more ethnically and religiously diverse than most Arab states.
Of course, there is also democracy in non-Arab but still mostly Muslim Turkey. All in a slighly longer way than intended to say that I differ slightly with your assertions that "many leaders in the Arab and wider Muslim world assert that domestic peace is far easier to achieve – or at least to enforce – under the umbrella of authoritarianism than under the uncertain canopy of democracy".
There are more non-Arab Muslims in the wider Muslim world than there are Arabs. It is also a mistake to define and measure all Muslims and Muslim countries by Arabs and Arab states.
And frankly, it would be better if the US cease interfering in the internal affairs of the Arab states, to shape its democratic institutions, or to reshape and remap Middle Eastern states to its own interests rather than the people there. It is just this simple and obvious.
There was internal violence and strife due to race, religion and politics in Indonesia and Malaysia following both countries' independence. There still minor ones are in pockets of Indonesia, including in Aceh and Papua. But was and is largely managed by both countries without direct foreign intervention.
If Indonesia and Malayia is as actively interfered in and or invaded by foreign forces as happened in the Middle East, I am sure the situation would be the same as in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Thank God we don't have as much oil as in the Middle East. Or Israel is carved out from one of our territories by the British or Dutch when they colonised our countries.
Thank you and best regards
"J"
Posted by: Jihadist | April 2, 2008 9:29 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Mr. Brumberg:
At last, someone who has a fairly comprehensive grasp of islamic diaspora politics. The solution to sectarianism lies mainly in the hearts and minds of muslims.
Until the last vestiges of their differences are talked out and seen not to threaten each and every sect, there probably wont be peace.
Therefore, the various efforts by western governments to bully, cajole, or pursuade the various muslim actors to take a more patient and forgiving approach to their differences is probably doomed to failure.
What a sad world it is when you cant get similarly held religious groups to even sit at the same table and begin the dialogue that may lead to understanding and peace.
Then, again, if you had the same history of internecine fighting for over thousands of years, you too may be wary of losing control, land and wealth to a neighboring islamist sect.
Perhaps, what is needed is a reformation like the one that took place in Europe in the 1600's. There, it was the differences among Christians and Protestants which led to Edict of Nantes allowing for more than one Christian perspective.
Then this led to local religious leaders to seek guidance and participation of local citizens. And this finally led to the establishment of Federalism form of government where local leaders cooperated with national leaders to administer their states.
Tony Gillotte
Posted by: Tony Gillotte | April 1, 2008 1:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment
Daniel:
Nice article, thanks for writing it. However, I'm not sure that the Washington Post is the correct forum for articles that educate and illuminate.
The Washington Post is the proper forum for articles the simplify, distort and obscure while pushing a partisan political agenda.
Nevertheless, thanks for swimming against the stream. I hadn' realized that there were any Washington think-thank/non-profits that employed actual scholars.
ZZim
Posted by: ZZim | April 1, 2008 1:02 PM
Report Offensive Comment
The comments to this entry are closed.
ztmwlfo