At last night's debate the Democrats demonstrated that they were nasty, funny, and quite electable too.
» Back to full entry
» Back to full entry

» Jacques Berlinerblau: Finding, inspecting, analyzing and understanding The God Vote 2008.
» Katherine Marshall: Faith in ActionWhat Islam Really Says About Violence, Rights and Other Religions
Gomaa, Fadlallah, Mubarak, Khan, Siddiqi, Ellison, others | On Faith
Featured Comments
I have to agree with Dr.R.P. While all of the candidates are electable, I'm not sure we will have a big love session after the convention. Part of Obama's appeal comes from his role as the anti-Clinton candidate(more specifically, the anti-Hillary). The Clinton policy of mutually assured destruction campaigning has a lot of potential to backfire and create a massive population of disaffected and depressed voters. If Obama wins the nom, then it's almost certainly a landslide victory for Dems... if Hillary wins the nom, all bets are off. Large groups of Dems will not vote for her and huge groups of Repubs will come out to vote against her. Bad for everyone, in my opinion.
January 22, 2008 9:42 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on January 22, 2008 09:42
I am not so sure about the statement that Democrats will get behind the candidates that is nominated. I know many Obama supporters that hate Clinton about as much as the Republicans hated her husband in the 90's. I suppose some of them will drag themselves off to vote if she is nominated (and not a single one of them will be voting for the Republican nominee), but some of them will remain home. (and lets face it, Edwards is a fine candidate but doesn't really have a chance).
My only other comment is that I am one of those secularists who is very bothered by Obama's practice of what I like to call "Evangelitics".
January 22, 2008 8:47 AM | Report Offensive Comments
Posted on January 22, 2008 08:47