georgetownFaith_614x75.gif
Jacques Berlinerblau

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is associate Professor and Director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Many years ago he received a doctorate in ancient Near Eastern Languages and Literature from New York University. Soon after, for reasons that he himself has never fully understood, he completed another doctorate in theoretical sociology from the New School for Social Research. Feeling sufficiently credentialed to write about and research any topic under the sun, his areas of interest include the Bible, its composition, its interpretation, and in particular the way that it has been dragooned into modern political discourse. To this end his new book is called "Thumpin' It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today's Presidential Politics" (Westminster John Knox), described by First Things as "laugh-out-loud funny as well as astute." He also has published "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously" (Cambridge:2005). An earlier book, "Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals" (Rutgers: 1999) probed the manner in which institutions of higher education handle scholarly dissent. He has written extensively in scholarly journals on the subject of heretics, intellectuals, secularism, and Jewish civilization. This confluence of interests accounts, to a great degree, for his fascination with modern Jewish-American literature. A life-long New Yorker, he has recently moved to Washington D.C. with his family and is beguiled by the strange traffic lights that count down the seconds until they finally change colors. Close.

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is program director and associate professor of Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He is the author of the new book "Thumpin’ It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today’s Presidential Politics" and "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously." The God Vote is a critical look at the religious rhetoric, activity and theology behind the 2008 presidential campaign. Full bio »

The God Vote | Georgetown/On Faith Archives | On Faith Archives | Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs | Georgetown


Fashion and Faith and Values

There was little God Talk at last night’s GOP debate, but there were plenty of fashion statements to be made.

» Back to full entry

Featured Comments

The sartorial grading of the candidates is irrelevant to whom we should elect as president. The philosophy of the candidates along with the policies they are going to pursue are. Religion is relevant only insofar as the candidates religious beliefs will affect his or her policies. This would include atheists as well. Though God knows no candidate would have the guts to admit they were an atheist. For example President Bush has allowed certain religious beliefs affect his policy on stem cell research. That is something we should know about and ask the candidates about. Has anyone asked the candidates what specific policies they avow would be determined in whole or in part by their religious beliefs? If you have found such an insightful question asked by our major media representatives, let me know. To say we are a pluralist society does not imply all religious beliefs are consistent with our American values. For example any religious belief that would deny religious freedom to our citizens cannot be tolerated because it contradicts the Constitution of the United States that protects us from being persecuted by the State for what we believe. That includes the right to believe that there is no God or that religion is a remnant of a past tribal way of life. We can respect the religious beliefs of others as long as they are not destructive of the human values of -to quote Jefferson- "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness (well-being)." There are limits to the freedom of religion guaranteed by the constitution as there are limits to all our rights and freedoms. While there is no wall high enough to separate church and state as long as there are religious United States citizens, still the constitution forbids the Federal Government from favoring or persecuting any religious community or non-religious person as long as they live within the laws. So religious belief as such should not be a determining factor for who we elect under our constitution. If a candidate does not understand that, she or he cannot swear to protect and defend the constitution of the United States, and therefore, should not be elected President.

Post a Comment

Please return to the All Comments page to join the discussion. The best comments will be featured on this page.

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.
> > > > > > > > > >