georgetownFaith_614x75.gif
Jacques Berlinerblau

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is associate Professor and Director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Many years ago he received a doctorate in ancient Near Eastern Languages and Literature from New York University. Soon after, for reasons that he himself has never fully understood, he completed another doctorate in theoretical sociology from the New School for Social Research. Feeling sufficiently credentialed to write about and research any topic under the sun, his areas of interest include the Bible, its composition, its interpretation, and in particular the way that it has been dragooned into modern political discourse. To this end his new book is called "Thumpin' It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today's Presidential Politics" (Westminster John Knox), described by First Things as "laugh-out-loud funny as well as astute." He also has published "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously" (Cambridge:2005). An earlier book, "Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals" (Rutgers: 1999) probed the manner in which institutions of higher education handle scholarly dissent. He has written extensively in scholarly journals on the subject of heretics, intellectuals, secularism, and Jewish civilization. This confluence of interests accounts, to a great degree, for his fascination with modern Jewish-American literature. A life-long New Yorker, he has recently moved to Washington D.C. with his family and is beguiled by the strange traffic lights that count down the seconds until they finally change colors. Close.

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is program director and associate professor of Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He is the author of the new book "Thumpin’ It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today’s Presidential Politics" and "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously." The God Vote is a critical look at the religious rhetoric, activity and theology behind the 2008 presidential campaign. Full bio »

The God Vote | Georgetown/On Faith Archives | On Faith Archives | Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs | Georgetown


Tired of Faith and Values Campaigning?

Is it just my imagination or are Faith and Values issues less central to the current campaign than many of us thought they would be? It seems like an eternity since the Republican Simi Valley debate of last May--the one where three anti-evolution candidates raised their hands to the skies like Cro-Magnon men rejoicing over newly discovered fire.

How things have changed. I first took note of this following the Republican debate of early October -- an event that was surprisingly light on God Talk. Religious themes were also few and far between at the MSNBC Democratic get-together on Halloween eve. And at last Thursday’s Las Vegas debate -- the one where John Edwards, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama all started Kung Fu Fighting -- faith-based chit-chat was kept to an absolute minimum.

What to make of this? The absence of such discussions might be a mere coincidence, reflecting the whims of the news divisions who choreographed the debates on those nights. Then again, maybe this is no coincidence at all. It could be that the networks (and their audiences) are growing tired or bored of political grandstanding in God’s name.

Let me spice up the broth by pointing out that while little is currently being said about religious concerns in nationally televised debates, the candidates are participating in events specifically devoted to religious concerns. There was, for example, last October’s so-called Values Voters Summit--the one where Rudy Giuliani politely double dared the Christian Right to abandon him. In June, CNN aired a Presidential Forum on Faith, Values and Poverty featuring leading Democrat contenders--the one sponsored by progressive Evangelicals who intend to make themselves heard in 2008.

It emerges from this that religiously based discussion in recent months has been de-centered and compartmentalized. It presently occupies its own discrete space within the palace of electoral politics. This might indicate that the issues situated at the intersection of religion and public life are so important that they require their own special forum to be properly engaged.

More cynically, one might surmise that faith-tinged politicking is now being strategically targeted to a significant niche market. Thus, God Talk has become a side show served up for the Values Voters. Remember them?

Whatever the motivations of the campaigns and news divisions might be, my guess is that Americans, religious, secular and secularly religious alike, are interested in one basic question. I look forward to an honest Faith and Values debate--one where each candidate offers clear answers regarding what is and is not the proper role of religion in public life.

Reader Response -- Latest Featured Comment

» Bruce O | Brambleton, When we look at the political posturing that goes on behind "values" issues (like children's health care), neither side looks v...
MORE FEATURED COMMENTS | ALL COMMENTS (41)

Post a comment

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.
> > > > > > > > > >