georgetownFaith_614x75.gif
Jacques Berlinerblau

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is associate Professor and Director of the Program for Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. Many years ago he received a doctorate in ancient Near Eastern Languages and Literature from New York University. Soon after, for reasons that he himself has never fully understood, he completed another doctorate in theoretical sociology from the New School for Social Research. Feeling sufficiently credentialed to write about and research any topic under the sun, his areas of interest include the Bible, its composition, its interpretation, and in particular the way that it has been dragooned into modern political discourse. To this end his new book is called "Thumpin' It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today's Presidential Politics" (Westminster John Knox), described by First Things as "laugh-out-loud funny as well as astute." He also has published "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously" (Cambridge:2005). An earlier book, "Heresy in the University: The Black Athena Controversy and the Responsibilities of American Intellectuals" (Rutgers: 1999) probed the manner in which institutions of higher education handle scholarly dissent. He has written extensively in scholarly journals on the subject of heretics, intellectuals, secularism, and Jewish civilization. This confluence of interests accounts, to a great degree, for his fascination with modern Jewish-American literature. A life-long New Yorker, he has recently moved to Washington D.C. with his family and is beguiled by the strange traffic lights that count down the seconds until they finally change colors. Close.

The God Vote

Jacques Berlinerblau

Jacques Berlinerblau is program director and associate professor of Jewish Civilization at the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service at Georgetown University. He is the author of the new book "Thumpin’ It: The Use and Abuse of the Bible in Today’s Presidential Politics" and "The Secular Bible: Why Nonbelievers Must Take Religion Seriously." The God Vote is a critical look at the religious rhetoric, activity and theology behind the 2008 presidential campaign. Full bio »

The God Vote | Georgetown/On Faith Archives | On Faith Archives | Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs | Georgetown


Rudy Double Dares Christian Right

It is difficult to draw conclusions about the extraordinarily unscientific straw poll conducted at this weekend’s so-called values voters summit. (In fact, the polling methods were so irregular that I wonder if an ombudsman at some major newspaper is questioning the propriety of publishing the numbers). In order to take the results seriously one must assume that the members of the group sponsoring the event, the Family Research Council, are representative of something, anything, beyond themselves.

Are they representative of Evangelical America? If so why did they shunt Giuliani into eighth place when all previous polling indicates that Evangelicals rank him at, or near, the top of the slate? Are they representative of America at large? If so how on earth did the iconoclastic congressman Ron Paul come in third?

But perhaps the most intriguing question concerns the degree to which these Conservative Christians represent the Republican Party and vice versa. For just a few weeks ago, James Dobson made it clear that frontrunner Rudy Giuliani does not represent the interests of pro-family groups. “Go right ahead!” he seemed to taunt, “nominate a candidate who does not share our values on abortion and gay marriage. Then try and beat Hillary without us.”

But by making no concessions in his speech at this weekend’s summit Giuliani made a statement of his own (albeit as politely and diplomatically as possible): he does not believe that this group’s views on these two issues represent those of the Party, or Evangelical America, or America for that matter. A spectacular game of chicken between Conservative Christian leaders and the rest of the GOP has now begun.

Doctor Dobson’s ultimatum identified the real stakes in the current race. Are Conservative Christians truly indispensable presidential kingmakers without whom the White House is unattainable in 2008? That was Dobson's surmise. Or, are their contributions to the Party, be they electoral, financial or organizational, preposterously overrated? Although he asked his audience to listen with "an open mind and an open heart," Giuliani must be closed off to any other possibility.

As they stand, the results of the straw poll would seem to suggest that the nomination of Mitt Romney (who took first place) and Mike Huckabee (who came in second on his home court) will keep these Conservative Christians from defecting. Senator John McCain, for his part, is in trouble. A few weeks ago, he did everything but speak in tongues in order to establish his Christian bona fides. The Family Research Council’s membership thanked him with a last place finish.

Giuliani fared just slightly better. The values voters are clearly not pleased by him. What remains to be seen is if the rest of the GOP shares their displeasure.

Reader Response -- Latest Featured Comment

» Mark | I am an evangelical. Whew, I've said it, and I'll admit it -- as unpopular as it is these day (especially in this particular web location)....
MORE FEATURED COMMENTS | ALL COMMENTS (60)

Post a comment

Top Local Global

On Faith is an interactive conversation on religion moderated by Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham and Sally Quinn of The Washington Post. It is produced jointly by Newsweek and washingtonpost.com, as is PostGlobal, a conversation on international affairs. Please send your comments, questions and suggestions for On Faith to David Waters, its producer.
> > > > > > > > > >